Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Bournonite vs. Vesuvianite
Cogwheels of bournonite are up against colourful vesuvianite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

MacArthur Mine, Yerington Mining District, Singatse Range, Lyon County, Nevada, USAi
Regional Level Types
MacArthur MineMine
Yerington Mining DistrictMining District
Singatse RangeMountain Range
Lyon CountyCounty
NevadaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
39° 2' 50'' North , 119° 14' 26'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Yerington3,064 (2017)9.6km
Smith1,033 (2006)28.5km
Smith Valley1,603 (2011)30.6km
Fish Springs648 (2017)36.9km
Dayton8,964 (2011)37.0km
Nearest Clubs:
Local clubs are the best way to get access to collecting localities
ClubLocationDistance
Great Basin Gem & Mineral ClubCarson City, Nevada48km
High Desert RockersCarson City, Nevada48km
Mindat Locality ID:
21099
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:21099:2
GUID (UUID V4):
0


A Cu occurrence/mine located in secs. 8, 9, 16, 17, 20, 21 & 25, T14N, R24E, MDM, , on private and Bureau of Land Management administered land. Owned-Operated by Quaterra Resources Inc. (2006); owned by Arimetco International, Inc. (50%), Tucson, Arizona (1992); owned by Holcorp Mines Ltd. (50%) (1992); owned by Anaconda Co. (100%) (1975).

Mineralization is a Cu deposit (Mineral occurrence model information: Model code: 53; USGS model code: 17; Deposit model name: Porphyry Cu; Mark3 model number: 4), hosted in Jurassic-Triassic quartz monzonite and granodiorite.

The MacArthur mine occurs in a quartz monzonite intrusive of Jurassic age that has been intruded by a series of northwesterly-trending steeply dipping quartz monzonite porphyry, rhyolite and andesite dikes. The copper mineralization is zoned, with a chalcopyrite-rich (low iron to copper ratio) eastern area grading into a pyrite halo (high iron to copper ratio) to the north and west. Oxide mineralization overlies the chalcopyrite-rich area and consists of copper oxides and silicates (malachite, chrysocolla), copper wad and iron oxides


Local alteration includes green-stained outcrops of copper-rich rock in the mine area. Associated rocks include granite porphyry, quartz monzonite porphyry, argillite, gypsum, ignimbrite, rhyolite, sandstone, volcaniclastic rocks, andesite, granite, hornfels, quartz monzonite and skarn. Local rocks include granitic rocks.

Workings include surface and underground openings.

Small-scale high-grade copper production began in 1943. The major period of porphyry copper exploration in the Yerington area began in the 1950s. The area was again extensively explored in the 1960s and in the 1970s Anaconda mined the main Yerington deposit. Copper mining in the historically active Yerington district in Lyon county ceased in the late 1970s. In 1992 Arimetco International Inc. of Tucson, AZ. acquired a 50% interest (Holcorp Mines Ltd. owned 50%) in the Yerington property and began mining. Arimetco mined, stacked and leached ore at a rate of almost 2 million tons annually. In 1994 Arimetco International produced 10 million pounds of copper from the Yerington mine, equal to 1993 production. This figure was expected to increase when production from the nearby MacArthur property began. Permits for development of the MacArthur copper deposit were finally received by Arimetco International and development of the deposit started. MacArthur crops out at the surface and contains estimated proven and probable oxide copper reserves of 97 million tons containing 0.21% Cu. Yerington mine had an open-pit oxide reserve of about 15 million tons averaging 0.32% copper at that time. In 1994, Arimetco entered into an agreement with Billiton Metals Inc. for Billiton to finance an expansion of the Yerington-MacArthur solvent extraction-electrowinning plant for cathode copper from 50,000 pounds per day to 80,000 pounds per day. Arimetco planned to complete the expansion by the end of 1994. Copper production increased by 30% from 1994 to 1995 as Arimetco, Inc. opened its new MacArthur Mine near its Yerington facility. 1995 copper production by Arimetco International Inc. from the Yerington and MacArthur Mines in Lyon County totaled almost 13 million pounds, up from 10 million pounds in 1994. In 1995, Arimetco International Inc. began operations at its MacArthur deposit from a 12-million-ton starter pit with an average grade of 0.33% copper. Ore was being trucked to leach facilities at Arimetco's nearby Yerington Mine. At the Yerington Mine, Arimetco planned to begin a 2-year project for dewatering the pit, preparatory to mining sulfide ore left by Anaconda, and permitting was underway for a 20,000 ton-per-day mining, crushing, and concentrating operation. Arimetco reported that the Yerington pit contained provable and developed sulfide ore of 50 million tons grading 0.49% copper with a 0.70:1 tripping ratio. Meanwhile, Arimetco was processing 18.5 million tons of low-grade oxide dump material by heap-leaching, yielding about 5,000 pounds of copper per day. In 1996, Copper production by Arimetco International Inc. from the Yerington and MacArthur Mines in Lyon County totaled 15 million pounds. In 1997 low copper prices caused Arimetco, Inc. to curtail mining at its MacArthur project after producing slightly over 10.5 million pounds from the combined Yerington operations in 1997. Quaterra Resources Inc acquired the MacArthur property and in 2006 planned to drill it and develop it. Quaterra began a first phase program consisting of data review and compilation in late 2006. During the first half of 2007 Quaterra plansa limited confirmation drilling program to validate the historic resource, calculate an oxide resource and complete a technical report. Drilling will also be initiated to determine the size and grade of the porphyry system beyond the pit boundaries.


Production data: As of 1976, 6.5 million tons of oxide ore.

In 1994, MacArthur was reported to contain an estimated proven and probable oxide copper reserve of 97 million tons containing 0.21% Cu. In 1995, MacArthur was reported to contain an estimated 51 million tons of oxide copper ore with an average grade of 0.26% copper. In 2006, the MacArthur oxide deposit was reported to contain a remaining resource of 29 million tons grading 0.28% copper, including 13 million tons of +0.40% copper.

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


18 valid minerals.

Rock Types Recorded

Note: data is currently VERY limited. Please bear with us while we work towards adding this information!

Select Rock List Type

Alphabetical List Tree Diagram

Detailed Mineral List:

Actinolite
Formula: ◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Anapaite
Formula: Ca2Fe2+(PO4)2 · 4H2O
Azurite
Formula: Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2
'Biotite'
Formula: K(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
Cacoxenite
Formula: Fe3+24AlO6(PO4)17(OH)12 · 75H2O
Chalcocite
Formula: Cu2S
Chalcopyrite
Formula: CuFeS2
Chrysocolla
Formula: Cu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1
Fluorapatite
Formula: Ca5(PO4)3F
Goethite
Formula: Fe3+O(OH)
Gypsum
Formula: CaSO4 · 2H2O
Jarosite
Formula: KFe3+3(SO4)2(OH)6
Libethenite
Formula: Cu2(PO4)(OH)
'Limonite'
Malachite
Formula: Cu2(CO3)(OH)2
Neotocite
Formula: (Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)
Pseudomalachite
Formula: Cu5(PO4)2(OH)4
Pyrite
Formula: FeS2
Tenorite
Formula: CuO
Turquoise
Formula: CuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 · 4H2O

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Chalcocite2.BA.05Cu2S
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Goethite4.00.Fe3+O(OH)
Tenorite4.AB.10CuO
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
Azurite5.BA.05Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Malachite5.BA.10Cu2(CO3)(OH)2
Group 7 - Sulphates, Chromates, Molybdates and Tungstates
Jarosite7.BC.10KFe3+3(SO4)2(OH)6
Gypsum7.CD.40CaSO4 · 2H2O
Group 8 - Phosphates, Arsenates and Vanadates
Libethenite8.BB.30Cu2(PO4)(OH)
Pseudomalachite8.BD.05Cu5(PO4)2(OH)4
Fluorapatite8.BN.05Ca5(PO4)3F
Anapaite8.CH.10Ca2Fe2+(PO4)2 · 4H2O
Cacoxenite8.DC.40Fe3+24AlO6(PO4)17(OH)12 · 75H2O
Turquoise8.DD.15CuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 · 4H2O
Group 9 - Silicates
Actinolite9.DE.10◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Chrysocolla9.ED.20Cu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1
Neotocite9.ED.20(Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)
Unclassified
'Biotite'-K(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
'Limonite'-

List of minerals for each chemical element

HHydrogen
H Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
H AnapaiteCa2Fe2+(PO4)2 · 4H2O
H AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
H BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
H CacoxeniteFe243+AlO6(PO4)17(OH)12 · 75H2O
H ChrysocollaCu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1
H GoethiteFe3+O(OH)
H GypsumCaSO4 · 2H2O
H JarositeKFe33+(SO4)2(OH)6
H LibetheniteCu2(PO4)(OH)
H MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
H Neotocite(Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)
H PseudomalachiteCu5(PO4)2(OH)4
H TurquoiseCuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 · 4H2O
CCarbon
C AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
C MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
OOxygen
O Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
O AnapaiteCa2Fe2+(PO4)2 · 4H2O
O AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
O BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
O CacoxeniteFe243+AlO6(PO4)17(OH)12 · 75H2O
O ChrysocollaCu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1
O FluorapatiteCa5(PO4)3F
O GoethiteFe3+O(OH)
O GypsumCaSO4 · 2H2O
O JarositeKFe33+(SO4)2(OH)6
O LibetheniteCu2(PO4)(OH)
O MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
O Neotocite(Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)
O PseudomalachiteCu5(PO4)2(OH)4
O TenoriteCuO
O TurquoiseCuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 · 4H2O
FFluorine
F BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
F FluorapatiteCa5(PO4)3F
MgMagnesium
Mg Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Mg BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
AlAluminium
Al BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
Al CacoxeniteFe243+AlO6(PO4)17(OH)12 · 75H2O
Al ChrysocollaCu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1
Al TurquoiseCuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 · 4H2O
SiSilicon
Si Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Si BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
Si ChrysocollaCu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1
Si Neotocite(Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)
PPhosphorus
P AnapaiteCa2Fe2+(PO4)2 · 4H2O
P CacoxeniteFe243+AlO6(PO4)17(OH)12 · 75H2O
P FluorapatiteCa5(PO4)3F
P LibetheniteCu2(PO4)(OH)
P PseudomalachiteCu5(PO4)2(OH)4
P TurquoiseCuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 · 4H2O
SSulfur
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S ChalcociteCu2S
S GypsumCaSO4 · 2H2O
S JarositeKFe33+(SO4)2(OH)6
S PyriteFeS2
KPotassium
K BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
K JarositeKFe33+(SO4)2(OH)6
CaCalcium
Ca Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Ca AnapaiteCa2Fe2+(PO4)2 · 4H2O
Ca FluorapatiteCa5(PO4)3F
Ca GypsumCaSO4 · 2H2O
TiTitanium
Ti BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
MnManganese
Mn Neotocite(Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)
FeIron
Fe Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Fe AnapaiteCa2Fe2+(PO4)2 · 4H2O
Fe BiotiteK(Fe2+/Mg)2(Al/Fe3+/Mg/Ti)([Si/Al/Fe]2Si2O10)(OH/F)2
Fe CacoxeniteFe243+AlO6(PO4)17(OH)12 · 75H2O
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe GoethiteFe3+O(OH)
Fe JarositeKFe33+(SO4)2(OH)6
Fe Neotocite(Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)
Fe PyriteFeS2
CuCopper
Cu AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Cu ChalcociteCu2S
Cu ChrysocollaCu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1
Cu LibetheniteCu2(PO4)(OH)
Cu MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
Cu PseudomalachiteCu5(PO4)2(OH)4
Cu TenoriteCuO
Cu TurquoiseCuAl6(PO4)4(OH)8 · 4H2O

Other Databases

Link to USGS MRDS:10310387

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality


This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2026 09:01:29 Page updated: December 19, 2025 22:24:01
Go to top of page