Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Nizamoffite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About NizamoffiteHide

Formula:
Mn2+Zn2(PO4)2(H2O)4
Colour:
Colorless
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
Specific Gravity:
3.00
Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Member of:
Name:
In honor of James W. Nizamoff (b. 1971) in recognition of his research on pegmatite mineralogy in general, and especially on the phosphate mineralogy of the Palermo pegmatites at North Groton, New Hampshire. J. W. Nizamoff is one of the discoverers of the new mineral and provided the specimens used for its characterization.
Mn analogue of hopeite and sergeysmirnovite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
43593
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:43593:8

IMA Classification of NizamoffiteHide

Approved
IMA Formula:
Mn2+Zn2+2(PO4)2(H2O)4
Approval year:
2012
First published:
2013

Classification of NizamoffiteHide

8.CA.30

8 : PHOSPHATES, ARSENATES, VANADATES
C : Phosphates without additional anions, with H2O
A : With small and large/medium cations

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
NizIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of NizamoffiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Colorless
Streak:
White
Hardness:
3½ on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
Perfect on {010}, good on {100}, and fair on {001}.
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven
Density:
3.00(1) g/cm3 (Measured)    2.961 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of NizamoffiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.580 nβ = 1.590 nγ = 1.591
2V:
Measured: 28° (1), Calculated: 35°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.011
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Moderate (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
Strong, r < v.
Optical Extinction:
X = a; Y = c; Z = b.
Pleochroism:
Non-pleochroic

Chemistry of NizamoffiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Mn2+Zn2(PO4)2(H2O)4
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O42.884 %
Zn29.207 %
P13.837 %
Mn12.271 %
H1.801 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
Zn
P
Mn
H

Crystallography of NizamoffiteHide

Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Class (H-M):
mmm(2/m2/m2/m) - Dipyramidal
Space Group:
Pbcm
Cell Parameters:
a = 10.6530 Å, b = 18.4778 Å, c = 5.0583 Å
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.577 : 1 : 0.274
Unit Cell V:
995.70 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
4
Morphology:
Prismatic crystals, elongated and striated along [001]. Forms include {100}, {010}, {230}, {011}, {031}, and {111}.
Comment:
Space group Pnma

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0020015NizamoffiteKampf A R, Falster A U, Simmons W B, Whitmore R W (2013) Nizamoffite, Mn2+Zn2(PO4)2(H2O)4, the Mn analogue of hopeite from the Palermo No. 1 pegmatite, North Groton, New Hampshire American Mineralogist 98 1893-18982013the Palermo No. 1 pegmatite, North Groton, New Hampshire, USA0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
9.27 Å(71)
4.62 Å(37)
4.43 Å(24)
3.424 Å(52)
2.873 Å(100)
2.644 Å(36)
2.540 Å(33)
1.953 Å(36)
Comments:
From Type Description.

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 4b: Highly evolved igneous rocks>3.0
34 : Complex granite pegmatites

Type Occurrence of NizamoffiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Prisms up to 1 mm in length and 0.5 mm in diameter. The prisms are elongated and lightly striated parallel to [001].
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California, USA, catalogue numbers 64009 and 64010.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Pegmatite secondary alteration of primary triphylite and associated sphalerite.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of NizamoffiteHide

Other Language Names for NizamoffiteHide

Relationship of Nizamoffite to other SpeciesHide

Member of:
Other Members of Hopeite Group:
ArsenohopeiteZn3(AsO4)2 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
DavidlloyditeZn3(AsO4)2 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
HopeiteZnZn2(PO4)2 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
ParahopeiteZn3(PO4)2 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
SergeysmirnoviteMgZn2(PO4)2 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
1 photo of Nizamoffite associated with LaueiteMn2+Fe3+2(PO4)2(OH)2 · 8H2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

8.CA.ApexiteNaMg(PO4) · 9H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.BrandãoiteBeAl2(PO4)2(OH)2(H2O)5Tric. 1 : P1
8.CA.DavidlloyditeZn3(AsO4)2 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.05ParafransoletiteCa3Be2(PO4)2(PO3OH)2 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.05FransoletiteCa3Be2(PO4)2(PO3OH)2 · 4H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
8.CA.10EhrleiteCa4Be3Zn2(PO4)6 · 9H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.15FaheyiteBe2Mn2+Fe3+2(PO4)4 · 6H2OTrig. 32 : P3121
8.CA.20MccrillisiteNaCs(Be,Li)Zr2(PO4)4 · 1-2H2OTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I41/amd
8.CA.20GainesiteNa(Na,K)(Be,Li)Zr2(PO4)4 · 1.5-2H2OTet. 4mm : I41md
8.CA.20SelwyniteNaK(Be,Al)Zr2(PO4)4 · 2H2OTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I41/amd
8.CA.25PahasapaiteLi8(Ca,Li,K)10.5Be24(PO4)24 · 38H2OIso. 23 : I23
8.CA.30ArsenohopeiteZn3(AsO4)2 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
8.CA.30HopeiteZnZn2(PO4)2 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
8.CA.35WarikahniteZn3(AsO4)2 · 2H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.40PhosphophylliteZn2Fe 2+(PO4)2 · 4H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
8.CA.42SteinmetziteZn2Fe3+(PO4)2(OH) · 3H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.45ParascholziteCaZn2(PO4)2 · 2H2OMon.
8.CA.45ScholziteCaZn2(PO4)2 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcm
8.CA.50KeyiteCu2+3Zn4Cd2(AsO4)6 · 2H2OMon. 2/m
8.CA.55PushcharovskiteK0.6Cu18[AsO2(OH)2]4[AsO3OH]10(AsO4)(OH)9.6 · 18.6H2OTric.
8.CA.60ProsperiteCa2Zn4(AsO4)4 · H2OMon.
8.CA.65GengenbachiteKFe3+3(PO3OH)4[PO2(OH)2]2 · 6H2OTrig. 3m : P31c
8.CA.70ParahopeiteZn3(PO4)2 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.70ReaphookhilliteMgZn2(PO4)2 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.CA.75StergiouiteCaZn2(AsO4)2 · 4H2OMon. m : Pb
8.CA.80LimousiniteBaCa[Be4P4O16] · 6H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
8.CA.85MinjiangiteBaBe2(PO4)2Hex. 6/mmm(6/m2/m2/m) : P6/mmm
8.CA.85Wilancookite(Ba5Li2◻)Ba6Be24P24O96 · 26H2OIso. 23 : I23

Fluorescence of NizamoffiteHide

Other InformationHide

Notes:
Dissolves readily in cold, dilute HCl.
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for NizamoffiteHide

References for NizamoffiteHide

Localities for NizamoffiteHide

Showing 3 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Germany
 
  • Bavaria
    • Upper Palatinate
      • Neustadt an der Waldnaab District
        • Waidhaus
          • Hagendorf
Keck et al. (2022)
USA (TL)
 
  • New Hampshire
    • Grafton County
      • Groton
Kampf et al. (2013)
  • North Carolina
    • Cleveland County
      • Kings Mountain
Jason Smith collection
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 20:42:30 Page updated: August 25, 2026 03:53:19
Go to top of page