Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Amesite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page kindly sponsored by Scott W. Bailey
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About AmesiteHide

08879150017271921037794.jpg
James T. Ames
Formula:
Mg2Al(AlSiO5)(OH)4
Colour:
Commonly pale grayish blue-green, also white, colourless, pale green, pink to lilac (chromian)
Lustre:
Resinous, Waxy, Greasy, Sub-Metallic
Hardness:
2½ - 3
Specific Gravity:
2.77 - 2.78
Crystal System:
Triclinic
Name:
Named in 1876 by Charles Upham Shepard in honor of James Tyler Ames [May 13, 1810 Lowell, Massachusetts, USA - February 16, 1883 Chicopee, Massachusetts, USA], who was part owner of the Chester Emery Mines. Ames came from a family of inventors and manufacturers. A close relative, John Ames, made many important mechanical developments in modern machine-made paper. James originally worked manufacturing cutlery and edge weapons in his father's [Nathan P. Ames, Sr.] factory. "In 1834, he removed to Chicopee Center, where the Ames Manufacturing Company was established, with Edmund Dwight, of Boston, president, James T. Ames, superintendent, and Nathan P. Ames [Jr.], agent. The company made contracts with the United States government for a lot of swords. Mr. [James T.] Ames had a rare genius for inventions ; in company with General James of Rhode Island, he invented a ball that was afterwards patented, and out of which grew the necessity of rifled cannon. During the War of the Rebellion he had large contracts with the government for the making of swords, cannon, and for military accoutrements, and also secured a contract for government mail bags. ... Mr. Ames was the first to introduce bronze statuary work in the United States. His first work was the construction of the Washington statue, in Union Square, New York. The bronze doors of the Senate extension of the National Capitol at Washington were made under his supervision, and "were masterly specimens of his genius, and famous as triumphs of art. ... In 1856, he went to England, where he obtained several important contracts, one of which was to furnish the Enfield Arms Works (controlled by the English government) with machinery for the manufacture of guns of the same pattern as that used at the Springfield Armory. He also obtained a contract for similar machinery for the Birmingham Small Arms Works. He visited France and interested Napoleon in the machinery used in the manufacture of arms. He met and became acquainted with the designer of the Crystal Palace; through his friendship he was enabled to meet nearly all the prominent mechanical engineers of Europe. He furnished Spain with machinery for the making of arms. He was one of the first to engage in silver plating in this country. He was much interested in mineralogy and had an unusual and rare collection of minerals. He was a skillful carver in wood, unique figures of which he often presented to his friends as keepsakes." (Chapin,C.W. 1893). See also Van Slyck (1879).

Because of C. U. Shepard's acceptance of the philosophy of external characters of minerals, his new minerals were consequently closely scrutinized by his brother-in-law, James D. Dana and other family members. Amesite was quickly relegated to varietal status under the chlorite Shepard had named corundophilite, also from the Chester Emery Mines.

Amesite was re-established as a species by Shannon (1920), although he continued to refer to amesite as a chlorite. Gruner (1944) demonstrated that amesite is a serpentine.
Several polytypes are known: 2H1, 2H2, 6R and others.

Chemically similar to sudoite and clinochlore.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
197
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:197:1

Similar NamesHide

AmausitA synonym of 'Oligoclase'
AmausiteA rock subtype
AmiciteA valid IMA mineral speciesK2Na2Al4Si4O16 · 5H2O
AmositeA variety of Grunerite◻{Fe22+}{Fe52+}(Si8O22)(OH)2
JamesiteA valid IMA mineral speciesPb2Zn(Fe2+,Zn)2Fe43+(AsO4)4(OH)10

IMA Classification of AmesiteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
First published:
1876

Classification of AmesiteHide

9.ED.15

9 : SILICATES (Germanates)
E : Phyllosilicates
D : Phyllosilicates with kaolinite layers composed of tetrahedral and octahedral nets
71.1.2c.1

71 : PHYLLOSILICATES Sheets of Six-Membered Rings
1 : Sheets of 6-membered rings with 1:1 layers
16.19.7

16 : Silicates Containing Aluminum and other Metals
19 : Aluminosilicates of Fe and Mg

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

Please only use the official IMA–CNMNC symbol. Older variants are listed for historical use only.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
AmeIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43
AmeWhitney & Evans (2010)Whitney, D.L. and Evans, B.W. (2010) Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. American Mineralogist, 95, 185–187 doi:10.2138/am.2010.3371
AmsThe Canadian Mineralogist (2019)The Canadian Mineralogist (2019) The Canadian Mineralogist list of symbols for rock- and ore-forming minerals (December 30, 2019). download
AmeWarr (2020)Warr, L.N. (2020) Recommended abbreviations for the names of clay minerals and associated phases. Clay Minerals, 55, 261–264 doi:10.1180/clm.2020.30

Physical Properties of AmesiteHide

Resinous, Waxy, Greasy, Sub-Metallic
Transparency:
Translucent
Comment:
Somewhat metallic on cleavage
Colour:
Commonly pale grayish blue-green, also white, colourless, pale green, pink to lilac (chromian)
Streak:
White with very pale green tint
Hardness:
2½ - 3 on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
on {001}
Density:
2.77 - 2.78 g/cm3 (Measured)    2.7 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of AmesiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 1.5962 - 1.5972 nβ = 1.5981 - 1.5991 nγ = 1.614 - 1.616
2V:
Measured: 18°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.018 - 0.019
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Moderate (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
r < v weak
Optical Extinction:
BXa perpendicular to (001)

Chemistry of AmesiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Mg2Al(AlSiO5)(OH)4
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O51.669 %
Al19.364 %
Mg17.443 %
Si10.078 %
H1.447 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
Al
Mg
Si
H

Crystallography of AmesiteHide

Polytype:
Formula:
Crystal System:
Class (H-M)
Space Group:
Space Group Setting:
Cell Parameters:
Ratio:
Unit Cell Volume (calc):
Z:
Comment:
Amesite-2H1Amesite-2H2Amesite-6R
(Mg2Al)(SiAl)O5(OH)4Mg2Al(AlSiO5)(OH)4Mg2Al(AlSiO5)(OH)4
Triclinic Triclinic Hexagonal 
1 - Pedial1 - Pedial6 - Pyramidal
P1 P63
   
a = 5.299(1) Å, b = 9.181(2) Å, c = 14.050(3) Å
α = 90.06(2)°, β = 90.30(2)°, γ = 90.00(1)°
a = 5.307(1) Å, b = 9.195(2) Å, c = 14.068(3) Å
α = 90.09(2)°, β = 90.25(2)°, γ = 89.96(2)°
a = 5.31(1) Å, c = 14.04(2) Å
a:b:c = 0.577 : 1 : 1.53a:b:c = 0.577 : 1 : 1.53a:c = 1 : 2.644
V 683.6 ųV 686.48 ų
(Calculated from Unit Cell)
V 342.84 ų
(Calculated from Unit Cell)
   
Refined as C1 (Zheng & Bailey 1997)Non-standard space group C1. Pseudo-hexagonal.However, sample was biaxial (pseudohexagonal drillings).

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0018811AmesiteZheng H, Bailey S W (1997) Refinement of an amesite-2H1 polytype from Postmasburg, South Africa Clays and Clay Minerals 45 301-3101997Postmasburg, South Africa0293
0001361AmesiteWiewiora A, Rausell Colom J A, Garcia Gonzalez T (1991) The crystal structure of amesite from Mount Sobotka: a nonstandard polytype American Mineralogist 76 647-6521991Mount Sobotka, lower Silesia, Poland0293
0000809AmesiteAnderson C S, Bailey S W (1981) A new cation ordering pattern in amesite-2H2 American Mineralogist 66 185-1951981Saranovskoye chromite deposit, North Urals Mountains, USSR0293
0018742AmesiteSteadman R, Nuttall P M (1962) The crystal structure of amesite Acta Crystallographica 15 510-5111962Saranovskaye, USSR0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
7.0 Å(100)
3.51 Å(100)
2.600 Å(40)
2.476 Å(80)
1.925 Å(70)
1.528 Å(60)
1.462 Å(35)
Comments:
Powder data for 2H2 polytype.

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 5: Initiation of plate tectonics<3.5-2.5
40 : Regional metamorphism (greenschist, amphibolite, granulite facies)
Geological Setting:
Low-grade metamorphism of Al-, Mg-rich rocks.

Type Occurrence of AmesiteHide

Synonyms of AmesiteHide

Other Language Names for AmesiteHide

Varieties of AmesiteHide

ChromoamesiteCr3+-bearing variety of amesite.
FerroamesiteAn iron-rich variety of amesite.

Relationship of Amesite to other SpeciesHide

Other Members of Serpentine Subgroup:
AntigoriteMg3(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon. m : Bm
Berthierine(Fe2+,Fe3+,Al)3(Si,Al)2O5(OH)4Mon. m : Bm
Brindleyite(Ni,Al)3(Si,Al)2O5(OH)4Mon.
CaryopiliteMn2+3Si2O5(OH)4Mon.
ChrysotileMg3(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon. m : Bb
CronstedtiteFe2+2Fe3+((Si,Fe3+)2O5)(OH)4Trig. 3m : P31m
Fraipontite(Zn,Al)3((Si,Al)2O5)(OH)4Mon.
GuidottiiteMn2Fe3+(Fe3+SiO5)(OH)4Hex. 6 : P63
KellyiteMn2+2Al(AlSiO5)(OH)4Hex. 6 : P63
LizarditeMg3(Si2O5)(OH)4Trig. 3m : P31m
NépouiteNi3Si2O5(OH)4Orth.
PecoraiteNi3(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon.

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
30 photos of Amesite associated with UvaroviteCa3Cr3+2(SiO4)3
17 photos of Amesite associated with CalciteCaCO3
11 photos of Amesite associated with ChromiteFe2+Cr3+2O4
8 photos of Amesite associated with DiasporeAlO(OH)
8 photos of Amesite associated with AnalcimeNa(AlSi2O6) · H2O
7 photos of Amesite associated with NatroliteNa2Al2Si3O10 · 2H2O
7 photos of Amesite associated with ClinochloreMg5Al(AlSi3O10)(OH)8
6 photos of Amesite associated with SanidineK(AlSi3O8)
6 photos of Amesite associated with 'Chromium-bearing Titanite'Ca(Ti,Cr)[SiO4](O,OH)
6 photos of Amesite associated with Shuiskite-(Cr)Ca2Cr3+Cr3+2[Si2O6OH][SiO4](OH)2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

9.ED.'Clinochrysotile'Mg3(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon. 2/m
9.ED.05DickiteAl2(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon. m : Bb
9.ED.05NacriteAl2(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon. m : Bb
9.ED.05KaoliniteAl2(Si2O5)(OH)4Tric. 1 : P1
9.ED.05Odinite(Fe,Mg,Al,Fe,Ti,Mn)2.4((Si,Al)2O5)(OH)4Mon. m : Bm
9.ED.10HalloysiteAl2Si2O5(OH)4 · n(H2O)Mon. m : Bb
9.ED.10HisingeriteFe3+2(Si2O5)(OH)4 · 2H2OMon.
9.ED.10'Hydrohalloysite'Al2Si2O5(OH)4 · 2H2OMon. m
9.ED.15AntigoriteMg3(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon. m : Bm
9.ED.15Brindleyite(Ni,Al)3(Si,Al)2O5(OH)4Mon.
9.ED.15Fraipontite(Zn,Al)3((Si,Al)2O5)(OH)4Mon.
9.ED.15NépouiteNi3Si2O5(OH)4Orth.
9.ED.15PecoraiteNi3(Si2O5)(OH)4Mon.
9.ED.15GuidottiiteMn2Fe3+(Fe3+SiO5)(OH)4Hex. 6 : P63
9.ED.15LizarditeMg3(Si2O5)(OH)4Trig. 3m : P31m
9.ED.15Berthierine(Fe2+,Fe3+,Al)3(Si,Al)2O5(OH)4Mon. m : Bm
9.ED.15KellyiteMn2+2Al(AlSiO5)(OH)4Hex. 6 : P63
9.ED.15CronstedtiteFe2+2Fe3+((Si,Fe3+)2O5)(OH)4Trig. 3m : P31m
9.ED.15CaryopiliteMn2+3Si2O5(OH)4Mon.
9.ED.15Greenalite(Fe2+,Fe3+)2-3Si2O5(OH)4Mon.
9.ED.15ManandoniteLi2Al4(Si2AlB)O10(OH)8Orth. 222 : C2221
9.ED.20ChrysocollaCu2-xAlx(H2-xSi2O5)(OH)4 · nH2O, x < 1Orth.
9.ED.20Neotocite(Mn,Fe)SiO3 · H2O (?)Amor.
9.ED.20Allophane(Al2O3)(SiO2)1.3-2 · 2.5-3H2OAmor.
9.ED.20ImogoliteAl2SiO3(OH)4
9.ED.25BismutoferriteFe3+2Bi(SiO4)2(OH)Mon. m : Bm
9.ED.25ChapmaniteFe3+2Sb3+(Si2O5)O3(OH)Mon. m : Bm
9.ED.30'Pianlinite'Al2Si2O6(OH)2Orth.

Fluorescence of AmesiteHide

Not fluorescent in UV

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
Amesite is not known to be dangerous, however do not confuse this with Amosite, or Brown Asbestos, which is dangerous. Please view the Amosite page for further information.

Internet Links for AmesiteHide

References for AmesiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for AmesiteHide

Showing 103 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Antarctica
 
  • East Antarctica
    • Queen Elizabeth Land
      • Pensacola Mountains
Hall et al. (1976)
Atlantic Ocean
 
  • Mid-Atlantic Ridge complex
Beard et al. (2009)
Beard et al. (2009)
Australia
 
  • New South Wales
    • Buccleuch Co.
      • Wee Jasper
McQueen et al. (1985)
  • Western Australia
    • Upper Gascoyne Shire
      • Mooloo Downs Station
The Clarke - Williams reference cited ... +1 other reference
Fetherston (2010)
Austria
 
  • Burgenland
    • Neusiedl am See District
      • Illmitz
Götzinger (2009)
  • Lower Austria
    • Horn District
      • Drosendorf-Zissersdorf
Kolitsch (2015)
    • Sankt Pölten-Land District
      • Karlstetten
        • Rosenthal
Kolitsch et al. (2023)
Bolivia
 
  • Cochabamba
    • Ayopaya Province
Petrov (n.d.) +1 other reference
Brazil
 
  • Pará
    • Curionópolis
Berni et al. (2014) +1 other reference
Canada
 
  • Manitoba
Bateman (1945)
  • Québec
    • Abitibi-Témiscamingue
      • Témiscamingue RCM
Mielke (n.d.)
    • Chaudière-Appalaches
      • Les Appalaches RCM
        • Saint-Joseph-de-Coleraine
        • Thetford Mines
          • Black Lake
    • Estrie
      • Memphrémagog RCM
        • Hatley
Stevenson (1934)
China
 
  • Guangdong
    • Shaoguan
      • Nanxiong Co.
        • Baishun Uranium ore field
[var: Ferroamesite] Zhanshi Zhang et al. (2007)
      • Shixing Co.
        • Baishun Uranium ore field
[var: Ferroamesite] Zhanshi Zhang et al. (2007)
  • Guangxi
    • Baise
      • Jingxi Co.
Wang et al. (2010)
  • Hubei
    • Shiyan
      • Zhushan Co.
Shihe Lei et al. (1998)
  • Liaoning
    • Huludao
      • Jianchang County
        • Bajiazi Zn-Pb-Ag deposit
Zhao et al. (2003)
      • Lianshan District
        • Yangjiazhangzi ore field
Wenwei Lin (1987)
Wenwei Lin (1987)
  • Yunnan
    • Honghe
      • Gejiu City
        • Gejiu Sn-polymetallic ore field
Chengdian Pen (1986)
Dominican Republic
 
  • María Trinidad Sánchez Province
    • Río San Juan
Krebs et al. (2008)
Finland
 
  • Southwest Finland
    • Kimitoön (Kemiönsaari)
Laitakari (1967)
  • Uusimaa
    • Myrskylä
Ilkka Mikkola collection
France
 
  • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
    • Puy-de-Dôme
      • Issoire
        • Saint-Babel
Barrier et al. (2009)
  • New Caledonia
    • Southern Province
      • Le Mont-Dore
Manceau et al. (1985)
      • Thio
Cluzel et al. (2024)
  • Occitanie
    • Pyrénées-Orientales
      • Céret
        • Prats-de-Mollo-la-Preste
Dubru. M (1986)
  • Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
    • Hautes-Alpes
      • Briançon
        • Cervières
Pusztaszeri (1969)
Germany
 
  • Saxony-Anhalt
    • Salzlandkreis
      • Bördeaue
        • Tarthun
Brockt et al. (2001)
Greece
 
  • Attica
    • East Attica
      • Lavreotiki
Schnorrer-Köhler et al. (1988)
Hungary
 
  • Veszprém County
    • Tapolca District
      • Uzsa
Szakáll & Gatter: Hun. Min. Spec.
      • Zalahaláp
Szakáll & Gatter: Hun. Min. Spec.
Indonesia
 
  • Papua Province
    • Mimika Regency
      • Gunung Bijih District
        • Ertsberg Complex
Bailey et al. (1995)
Iran
 
  • East Azerbaijan Province
    • Ajab Shir County
Abedini
  • West Azerbaijan Province
    • Mahabad County
Abedini et al. (2024)
Ireland
 
  • Connacht
    • Mayo County
Ryback et al. (1988)
Italy
 
  • Liguria
    • Genoa
      • Castiglione Chiavarese
Marchesini et al. (2025)
Sanità et al. (2024)
    • La Spezia Province
      • Carrodano
  • Piedmont
    • Metropolitan City of Turin
      • Lessolo
        • Calea
Campostrini (2001)
  • Sardinia
    • Nuoro Province
      • Orani
Conti-Vecchi et al. (1991)
Japan
 
  • Kagoshima Prefecture
    • Hishikari gold mine
Ibaraki et al. (1991)
  • Niigata Prefecture
    • Itoigawa City
      • Ōmi
Miyajima et al (1999)
Kazakhstan
 
  • Ulytau Region
    • Karazhal
      • Kara-Oba W deposit
Fleischer (1971) +2 other references
Madagascar
 
  • Vakinankaratra
    • Antsirabe II District
      • Ibity
        • Sahatany Valley
Lefevre et al. (1998)
Norway
 
  • Telemark
    • Porsgrunn
      • Auenlandet
        • Sagåsen
Larsen et al. (1987) +1 other reference
Knut Edvard Larsen collection (MM-3862)
      • Bjørkedalen
Andersen et al. (1996)
      • Slevolden
Larsen et al. (2010)
  • Vestfold
    • Larvik Commune
      • Sky
- (n.d.)
      • Tvedalen
Tom Engvoldsen collection
Knut Edvard Larsen collection (MM-4014)
Knut Edvard Larsen collection # MM-353 (find in 1979)
Poland
 
  • Lower Silesian Voivodeship
    • Świdnica County
      • Gmina Marcinowice
Archiwum Mineralogiczne v. 46
    • Wrocław County
      • Gmina Sobótka
        • Sobótka
Wiewióra et al. (1991)
Portugal
 
Figueiras +3 other references
  • Portalegre
    • Alter do Chão
Rocha et al. (2017)
  • Vila Real
    • Montalegre
      • Salto
Bobos et al. (2021)
Romania
 
  • Maramureș County
    • Groșii Țibleșului
Szakáll (2002)
Russia
 
  • Chelyabinsk Oblast
    • Miass
Sorokina et al. (2019)
  • Krasnoyarsk Krai
    • Taymyrskiy Autonomous Okrug
      • Taimyr Peninsula
        • Norilsk-Talnakh Mining Region
          • Talnakh Cu-Ni Deposit
Alferova (2007)
  • Murmansk Oblast
Pekov et al. (2004)
...
  • Nenets Autonomous Okrug
    • Yugorskii Peninsula
      • Pai-Khoi Range (Paikhoi; Pay Khoy)
        • Middle Silova-Yakha River
Koval’chuk et al. (2008)
  • Perm Krai
    • Gornozavodskii District
      • Sarany
[var: Chromoamesite] RRUFF ID: Specimen R070116
  • Primorsky Krai
    • Khorolsky District
      • Voznesenskii ore district
Krymsky et al. (2003, April)
[World of Stones 12:49]
  • Sverdlovsk Oblast
    • Asbest
Антонов (2003)
South Africa
 
  • Northern Cape
de Villiers (1943)
      • Western Belt
Cairncross et al. (1995) +1 other reference
        • Driehoekspan
Cairncross et al. (1995)
Cairncross et al. (1995)
Cairncross et al. (1995)
[Amesite-2H1] Zheng (1997)
Spain
 
  • Andalusia
    • Málaga
      • Cártama
Alejandro Sánchez Jiménez
Sweden
 
  • Örebro County
    • Hällefors
Sundius et al. (1967)
Turkey
 
  • Niğde Province
    • Ulukisla District
Sunkari et al. (2025)
UK
 
  • England
Ryback et al. (1988)
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Pinal County
      • Mammoth Mining District
        • Tiger
          • St. Anthony deposit
Anthony et al. (1995)
  • California
    • Inyo County
      • Inyo Mts (Inyo Range)
        • Talc City Hills
          • Talc City Mining District
            • Eagle Point
Norman (1951) +4 other references
    • Santa Clara County
      • Black Wonder Mining District
        • Mount Hamilton
    • Santa Cruz County
      • Santa Cruz
Cooper et al. (1986)
  • Colorado
    • Fremont County
      • Cotopaxi Mining District
        • Cotopaxi
          • Mine Gulch
Eckel et al. (1997)
  • Massachusetts
    • Hampden County
      • Blandford
"Western Massachusetts Mineral ...
      • Chester
Lincks (1978)
Alan R. Plante
Alan R. Plante
Alan R. Plante
Lincks (1978)
Alan R. Plante
  • New Hampshire
    • Cheshire County
      • Keene
    • Sullivan County
Meyers et al. (1956)
  • Tennessee
    • Polk County
Paris (2011)
    • Union County
Paris (2011)
Zambia
 
  • North-Western Province
    • Solwezi District
MacIntyre (2019)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 13:12:36 Page updated: August 25, 2026 07:45:36
Go to top of page