Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Crookesite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About CrookesiteHide

06136750017271922387482.jpg
William Crookes
Formula:
Cu7(Tl, Ag)Se4
Formely considered (Cu,Tl,Ag)2Se.
Colour:
Lead Grey
Lustre:
Metallic
Hardness:
2½ - 3
Specific Gravity:
6.90
Crystal System:
Tetragonal
Name:
Named in honor of Sir William Crookes (17 June 1832, London, England - 4 April 1919, London, England), chemist and physicist. He worked on spectroscopy, and used that technology to discover thallium in 1861.
This page provides mineralogical data about Crookesite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
1159
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:1159:0

Similar NamesHide

CrocoisiteA synonym of Crocoite

IMA Classification of CrookesiteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
IMA Formula:
Cu1+7Tl1+Se2-4
First published:
1867

Classification of CrookesiteHide

2.BD.50

2 : SULFIDES and SULFOSALTS (sulfides, selenides, tellurides; arsenides, antimonides, bismuthides; sulfarsenites, sulfantimonites, sulfbismuthites, etc.)
B : Metal Sulfides, M: S > 1: 1 (mainly 2: 1)
D : With Hg, Tl
2.4.12.1

2 : SULFIDES
4 : AmBnXp, with (m+n):p = 2:1
3.5.12

3 : Sulphides, Selenides, Tellurides, Arsenides and Bismuthides (except the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and Au, which are included in Section 1)
5 : Sulphides etc. of Hg and Tl

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

Please only use the official IMA–CNMNC symbol. Older variants are listed for historical use only.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
CrkIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43
CrkThe Canadian Mineralogist (2019)The Canadian Mineralogist (2019) The Canadian Mineralogist list of symbols for rock- and ore-forming minerals (December 30, 2019). download

Physical Properties of CrookesiteHide

Metallic
Transparency:
Opaque
Colour:
Lead Grey
Hardness:
2½ - 3 on Mohs scale
Hardness:
VHN100=92 - 123 kg/mm2 - Vickers
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Distinct/Good
Two at right angles
Density:
6.90 g/cm3 (Measured)    7.443 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of CrookesiteHide

Anisotropism:
Weak but distinct in brownish tones
Reflectivity:
WavelengthR1 (%)R2 (%)
400nm33.6%35.9%
420nm33.3%35.8%
440nm32.7%35.8%
460nm32.4%35.7%
480nm32.5%35.6%
500nm32.8%35.3%
520nm33.1%35.1%
540nm33.1%34.8%
560nm33.0%34.7%
580nm32.7%34.6%
600nm32.6%34.7%
620nm32.4%35.0%
640nm32.2%35.2%
660nm31.9%35.2%
680nm31.6%35.3%
700nm31.2%35.3%


Graph shows reflectance levels at different wavelengths (in nm). Peak reflectance is 35.9%.
R1 shown in black, R2 shown in red

Chemistry of CrookesiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Cu7(Tl, Ag)Se4

Formely considered (Cu,Tl,Ag)2Se.
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Cu46.093 %
Se32.728 %
Tl21.179 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Common Impurities:
Fe

Crystallography of CrookesiteHide

Crystal System:
Tetragonal
Cell Parameters:
a = 10.435 Å, c = 3.954 Å
Ratio:
a:c = 1 : 0.379
Unit Cell V:
430.55 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
2
Morphology:
Disseminated specks and in veinlets.
Comment:
Point Group: 4/m, 4, or 4 ; Space Group: I4/m, I4, or I4.

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0013693CrookesiteEriksson L, Werner P E, Berger R, Meerschaut A (1991) Structure refinement of TlCu7Se4 from X-ray powder profile data Journal of Solid State Chemistry 90 61-681991Skrikerum mine, Sweden0293
0013692CrookesiteEriksson L, Werner P E, Berger R, Meerschaut A (1991) Structure refinement of TlCu7Se4 from X-ray powder profile data Journal of Solid State Chemistry 90 61-681991synthetic0293
0013691CrookesiteEriksson L, Werner P E, Berger R, Meerschaut A (1991) Structure refinement of TlCu7Se4 from X-ray powder profile data Journal of Solid State Chemistry 90 61-681991synthetic0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
3.29 Å(100)
2.59 Å(100)
3.00 Å(80)
2.11 Å(50)
1.833 Å(40)
1.779 Å(40)
2.32 Å(30)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):

Type Occurrence of CrookesiteHide

Other Language Names for CrookesiteHide

German:Crookesit
Simplified Chinese:硒铊银铜矿
Spanish:Crookesita
Traditional Chinese:硒鉈銅銀礦

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
41 photos of Crookesite associated with CalciteCaCO3
21 photos of Crookesite associated with 'Thucholite'
20 photos of Crookesite associated with EucairiteAgCuSe
17 photos of Crookesite associated with KlockmanniteCuSe
13 photos of Crookesite associated with ClausthalitePbSe
9 photos of Crookesite associated with Bukovite(Cu3Fe)Σ4Tl2Se4
9 photos of Crookesite associated with UmangiteCu3Se2
5 photos of Crookesite associated with AcanthiteAg2S
5 photos of Crookesite associated with SideriteFeCO3
4 photos of Crookesite associated with BerzelianiteCu2-xSe (x ≈ 0.12)

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

2.BD.VrančiceiteCu10Hg3S8Tric. 1 : P1
2.BD.'UM2004-33-S:AgCuHgSe'(Ag,Cu)8Hg3(S,Se)7
2.BD.05ImiteriteAg2HgS2Mon. 2/m : P21/b
2.BD.10GortdrumiteCu24Fe2Hg9S23Tric. 1 : P1
2.BD.15Danielsite(Cu,Ag)14HgS8Orth.
2.BD.15BalkaniteCu9Ag5HgS8Mon. 2/m : P2/m
2.BD.20DonharrisiteNi3HgS3Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.BD.25CarliniteTl2STrig. 3 : R3
2.BD.30Bukovite(Cu3Fe)Σ4Tl2Se4Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I4/mmm
2.BD.30ThalcusiteTl2Cu3FeS4Tet.
2.BD.30MurunskiteK2(Cu,Fe)4S4Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I4/mmm
2.BD.35Rohaite(Tl,Pb,K)2Cu8.7Sb2S4Orth.
2.BD.40ChalcothalliteTl2(Cu,Fe)6SbS4Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I4/mmm
2.BD.45SabatieriteTlCu6Se4Orth.
2.BD.55BrodtkorbiteCu2HgSe2Mon. 2/m : P21/m

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for CrookesiteHide

References for CrookesiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for CrookesiteHide

Showing 20 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Argentina
 
  • La Rioja Province
    • General Lamadrid Department
      • Villa Castelli
        • Sierra de Cacho
Paar et al. (2002) +2 other references
Armenia
 
  • Gegharkunik Province
Khachaturyan (1957)
Canada
 
  • Saskatchewan
Mineralogical Society of America - ... +1 other reference
China
 
  • Anhui
    • Huaibei
      • Suixi Co.
        • Sanpu ore field
Chen et al. (2007)
Zhao et al. (1999)
Czech Republic
 
  • Central Bohemian Region
Škácha et al. (2017)
      • Háje
        • Uranium Mine No. 16
Sejkora et al. (2024)
  • Plzeň Region
    • Klatovy District
      • Nalžovské Hory
        • Ústaleč
Sejkora et al. (2024)
  • Vysočina Region
    • Žďár nad Sázavou District
      • Nové Město na Moravě
Kvaček (1979) +1 other reference
      • Rožná
        • Rožná deposit
American Mineralogist 73:933 +2 other references
Kvaček (1979)
France
 
  • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
    • Puy-de-Dôme
      • Issoire
        • Le Vernet-Chaméane
Agrinier et al. (1967)
Germany
 
  • Lower Saxony
    • Göttingen District
      • Osterode am Harz
        • Lerbach
Weiß (1990)
      • Walkenried
        • Zorge
Weiß (1990)
  • Saxony
    • Erzgebirgskreis
      • Aue-Bad Schlema
Forster et al. (2004)
Sweden (TL)
 
  • Östergötland County
    • Valdemarsvik
Earley (1950) +2 other references
Switzerland
 
  • Aargau
    • Laufenburg
      • Kaisten
Stalder et al. (1998)
    • Rheinfelden
Stalder et al. (1998)
UK
 
  • England
    • Devon
      • East Devon
        • Budleigh Salterton
Rumsey et al. (2015)
USA
 
  • Colorado
    • Summit County
      • Montezuma Area
        • Snake River
personal correspondence with Doug Scott
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 10:01:14 Page updated: August 21, 2026 05:44:31
Go to top of page