Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Sphalerite vs. Anorthite
Both zinc ore Sphalerite and calcium plagioclase feldspar Anorthite have perfect cleavage that will split cleanly if you hit them with a hammer, but only one can claim a larger split of your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Niobokupletskite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About NiobokupletskiteHide

Formula:
K2NaMn2+7(NbTi)[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4O
Colour:
Light yellow-brown, silvery brown.
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
3 - 4
Specific Gravity:
3.46 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Triclinic
Name:
Named for its Nb content and its relation to kupletskite.

Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
7098
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:7098:6

IMA Classification of NiobokupletskiteHide

Approved
IMA Formula:
K2NaMn2+7(Nb5+,Ti4+)2(Si4O12)2O2(OH)4(O,F)
Approval year:
1999
First published:
2000

Classification of NiobokupletskiteHide

9.DC.05

9 : SILICATES (Germanates)
D : Inosilicates
C : Inosilicates with branched 2-periodic single chains; Si2O6 + 2SiO3 Si4O12

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

Please only use the official IMA–CNMNC symbol. Older variants are listed for historical use only.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
NbkIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43
NbkWarr (2020)Warr, L.N. (2020) Recommended abbreviations for the names of clay minerals and associated phases. Clay Minerals, 55, 261–264 doi:10.1180/clm.2020.30

Physical Properties of NiobokupletskiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Light yellow-brown, silvery brown.
Hardness:
3 - 4 on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
Perfect {001}
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven, Splintery
Density:
3.46 g/cm3 (Calculated)
Comment:
Experimentally sinks in methylene iodide that has a density of 3.325 g/cm3.

Optical Data of NiobokupletskiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 1.718(1) nβ = 1.733(1) nγ = 1.750
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.032
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.

No measured or calculated 2V is on file for this mineral, so the value used here (87°) is estimated from its recorded refractive indices and optic sign, not from a direct 2V measurement.
Dispersion:
r > v strong
Optical Extinction:
Z = c; X and Y in the (001) plane.
Pleochroism:
Visible
Comments:
X ≈ Y = light orange-yellow; Z = red-brown.
Comments:
γ calculated.

Chemistry of NiobokupletskiteHide

Mindat Formula:
K2NaMn2+7(NbTi)[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O36.706 %
Mn28.461 %
Si16.628 %
Nb6.876 %
K5.787 %
Ti3.543 %
Na1.701 %
H0.298 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
Mn
Si
Nb
K
Ti
Na
H

Crystallography of NiobokupletskiteHide

Crystal System:
Triclinic
Class (H-M):
1 - Pinacoidal
Space Group:
P1
Setting:
P1
Cell Parameters:
a = 5.4303 Å, b = 11.924 Å, c = 11.747 Å
α = 112.927°, β = 94.750°, γ = 103.175°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.455 : 1 : 0.985
Unit Cell V:
669.5 ų
Morphology:
Three types described from type description:
Type-I = anhedral to subhedral, platy to tabular, light beige to yellow epitaxic overgrowths on primary, dark brown kupletskite.
Type-II = as a dense, fibrous, light yellow-brown overgrowth on coarse-grained primary kupletskite.
Type-III = as an overgrowth on primary kupletskite as very fine-grained bronze to silvery brown acicular crystals in sheaf-like aggregates, originally described as “witch’s broom astrophyllite”.

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0005821NiobokupletskitePiilonen P C, McDonald A M, Lalonde A E (2003) Insights into astrophyllite-group minerals II: Crystal chemistry The Canadian Mineralogist 41 27-542003nepheline syenite pegmatite at Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada0293
0005648NiobokupletskitePiilonen P C, Lalonde A E, McDonald A M, Gault R A (2000) Niobokupletskite, a new astrophyllite-group mineral from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada: Description and crystal structure The Canadian Mineralogist 38 627-6392000Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

Epitaxial Relationships of NiobokupletskiteHide

Epitaxial Minerals:
'Kupletskite'K2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4F

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
10.707 Å(100)
4.405 Å(20)
3.536 Å(50)
3.294 Å(20)
2.793 Å(40)
2.677 Å(30)
2.587 Å(40)
Comments:
Poudrette quarry, Mont Saint-Hilaire, Québec, Canada. The data are from the type description.

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 4b: Highly evolved igneous rocks>3.0
35 : Ultra-alkali and agpaitic igneous rocks

Type Occurrence of NiobokupletskiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Anhedral to subhedral, platy to tabular, light beige to yellow epitaxic overgrowths on primary, dark brown kupletskite.
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, number CMNMC 82924 (holotype).
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Nepheline syenite pegmatites. Late stage mineral.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of NiobokupletskiteHide

Other Language Names for NiobokupletskiteHide

Relationship of Niobokupletskite to other SpeciesHide

Other Members of Kupletskite Group:
HeyerdahliteNa2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4F(H2O)2Tric. 1 : P1
KupletskiteK2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric. 1 : P1
Kupletskite-(Cs)Cs2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric. 1 : P1
LaveroviteK2NaMn2+7Zr2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric. 1 : P1

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
13 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with FranconiteNa(Nb2O5)(OH) · 3H2O
13 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with AegirineNaFe3+Si2O6
9 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with AlbiteNa(AlSi3O8)
6 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with KupletskiteK2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4F
3 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with NephelineNa3K(Al4Si4O16)
2 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with Adamsite-(Y)NaY[CO3]2 · 6H2O
2 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with Astrophyllite SupergroupA2pBrC7D2(T4O12)2Xod2XoA4XpdnWa2
2 photos of Niobokupletskite associated with Wurtzite(Zn,Fe)S
1 photo of Niobokupletskite associated with Thomasclarkite-(Y)(Na,Ce)(Y,REE)(HCO3)(OH)3 · 4H2O
1 photo of Niobokupletskite associated with CatapleiiteNa2Zr(Si3O9) · 2H2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

9.DC.BulgakiteLi2CaFe2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4O(H2O)2Tric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05DevitoiteBa4Ba2Fe2+7Fe3+2[Si4O12]2[PO4]2[CO3]O2(OH)42Tric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05ZircophylliteK2NaFe2+7Zr2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric.
9.DC.05NalivkiniteLi2NaFe2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4F(H2O)2Tric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05Sveinbergeite(H2O)2[Ca(H2O)](Fe2+6Fe3+)Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4[(OH)(H2O)]Tric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05NiobophylliteK2NaFe2+7(NbTi)[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4OTric.
9.DC.05HeyerdahliteNa2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4F(H2O)2Tric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05Tarbagataite(K◻)CaFe2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4(OH)Tric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05AstrophylliteK2NaFe2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05'Hydroastrophyllite'[H3O]+2CaFe2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4OTric.
9.DC.05LobanoviteK2Na(Fe2+4Mg2Na)Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
9.DC.05Kupletskite-(Cs)Cs2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05KupletskiteK2NaMn2+7Ti2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric. 1 : P1
9.DC.05LaveroviteK2NaMn2+7Zr2[Si4O12]2O2(OH)4FTric. 1 : P1

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 5.7871% 1,794 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for NiobokupletskiteHide

References for NiobokupletskiteHide

Localities for NiobokupletskiteHide

Showing 2 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Canada (TL)
 
  • Québec
    • Montérégie
      • La Vallée-du-Richelieu RCM
        • Mont Saint-Hilaire
Piilonen et al. (2000) +1 other reference
India
 
  • West Bengal
    • Purulia District
Chakrabarty et al. (2018)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 3, 2026 02:11:18 Page updated: August 25, 2026 19:22:42
Go to top of page