Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Sphalerite vs. Anorthite
Both zinc ore Sphalerite and calcium plagioclase feldspar Anorthite have perfect cleavage that will split cleanly if you hit them with a hammer, but only one can claim a larger split of your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Raygrantite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About RaygrantiteHide

09853680017271951795017.jpg
Ray Grant
Formula:
Pb10Zn(SO4)6(SiO4)2(OH)2
Colour:
Colourless
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
3
Specific Gravity:
6.374 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Triclinic
Member of:
Name:
Named after Dr. Raymond W. Grant (b. October 25, 1939) retired professor of geology (Lafayette College, University of Vermont, Mesa Community College). Founder and former curator of the Pinal Geology and Mineral Museum in Coolidge, Arizona. Past President of the Pinal Geology and Mineral Society; Life Member and Past President of the Mineralogical Society of Arizona; and Past Chairman of the Flagg Mineral Foundation. Lead author of the Mineralogy of Arizona (4th edition), mineralogist, and Arizona thumbnail collector currently (as of 2026) residing in Mesa, Arizona.
Isostructural with:
The S (or sulfate) analogue of hemihedrite, and S-Zn analogue of iranite.

The crystal structure consists of slabs || (120), which contain sulfate and silicate tetrahedra and ZnO4(OH)2 octahedra. Pb cations held those polyhedra together. There is a wide range of Pb–O bond distances.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
43868
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:43868:9

IMA Classification of RaygrantiteHide

Classification of RaygrantiteHide

7.FC.15

7 : SULFATES (selenates, tellurates, chromates, molybdates, wolframates)
F : Chromates
C : With PO4, AsO4, SiO4

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
RgrIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Pronunciation of RaygrantiteHide

Pronunciation:
PlayRecorded byCountry
Jolyon RalphUnited Kingdom

Physical Properties of RaygrantiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Colourless
Streak:
White
Hardness:
Comment:
Ca. 3
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Distinct/Good
on {120}
Parting:
Not observed
Density:
6.374 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of RaygrantiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 1.915(7) nβ = 1.981(7) nγ = 2.068(9)
2V:
Measured: 76° (2), Calculated: 85°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.153
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.

Chemistry of RaygrantiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Pb10Zn(SO4)6(SiO4)2(OH)2
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Pb70.670 %
O18.554 %
S6.562 %
Zn2.230 %
Si1.916 %
H0.069 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Pb
O
S
Zn
Si
H

Crystallography of RaygrantiteHide

Crystal System:
Triclinic
Class (H-M):
1 - Pinacoidal
Space Group:
P1
Cell Parameters:
a = 9.3175(4) Å, b = 11.1973(5) Å, c = 10.8318(5) Å
α = 120.374(2)°, β = 90.511(2)°, γ = 56.471(2)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.832 : 1 : 0.967
Unit Cell V:
753.13 ų
Twinning:
Fish-tail type, pervasive on (1 2 -1)

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event<2.4
47a : [Near-surface hydration of prior minerals]
47b : [Sulfates and sulfites]

Type Occurrence of RaygrantiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Bladed crystals with striations || c.
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Type material is deposited in the collections of the University of Arizona Mineral Museum, Tucson, Arizona, USA, catalogue number 19345, and the RRUFF Project, deposition number R120151 .
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Believed to be secondary in origin as a remnant of a galena-pyrite-chalcopyrite vein. The locality is basement-hosted narrow quartz pods and veins associated with late Cretaceous intrusives.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of RaygrantiteHide

Other Language Names for RaygrantiteHide

Relationship of Raygrantite to other SpeciesHide

Member of:
Other Members of Iranite Group:
HemihedritePb10Zn(CrO4)6(SiO4)2(OH)2Tric. 1 : P1
IranitePb10Cu(CrO4)6(SiO4)2(OH)2Tric. 1 : P1

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
1 photo of Raygrantite associated with AnglesitePbSO4

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

7.FC.05VauquelinitePb2Cu(CrO4)(PO4)(OH)Mon. 2/m
7.FC.10FornacitePb2Cu(CrO4)(AsO4)(OH)Mon. 2/m : P21/b
7.FC.10MolybdofornacitePb2Cu(MoO4,CrO4)(AsO4,PO4)(OH)Mon. 2/m : P21/b
7.FC.15HemihedritePb10Zn(CrO4)6(SiO4)2(OH)2Tric. 1 : P1
7.FC.15IranitePb10Cu(CrO4)6(SiO4)2(OH)2Tric. 1 : P1
7.FC.20EmbreyitePb5(CrO4)2(PO4)2 · H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.FC.20CassedanneitePb5(CrO4)2(VO4)2 · H2OMon. 2/m

Other InformationHide

Notes:
Insoluble in water, acetone or HCl acid.
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for RaygrantiteHide

References for RaygrantiteHide

Localities for RaygrantiteHide

Showing 1 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
USA (TL)
 
  • Arizona
    • Maricopa County
      • Osborn Mining District
        • Tonopah
          • Tiger Wash
Williams et al. (2013) +2 other references
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 3, 2026 04:59:46 Page updated: August 24, 2026 18:36:49
Go to top of page