Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Formula:
KCa4(Si8O20)(OH,F) · 8H2O
Colour:
Colorless to white; may be pink, light green, or light yellow.
Lustre:
Vitreous, Pearly
Hardness:
4 - 5
Specific Gravity:
2.37
Crystal System:
Tetragonal
Name:
Apophyllite was named in 1806 by Rene Just Haüy from the Greek for "away from" (ἀπό, apo) and "leaf" (φύλλον, phyllos), in allusion to the way it exfoliates upon heating. Chemical variants were recognized by Pete J. Dunn, Roland C. Rouse, and Julie A. Norberg in 1978.
Mineral name changed from apophyllite-(KOH) to hydroxyapophyllite-(K) (Hatert et al., 2013).
Fluorapophyllite-(K)-Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) Series. The Ca analogue of hydroxymcglassonite-(K).


Mineral name changed from apophyllite-(KOH) to hydroxyapophyllite-(K) (Hatert et al., 2013).


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
1989
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:1989:3

Similar NamesHide

Hydroxyapophyllite-(NH4)A valid IMA mineral species - pending publication(NH4)Ca4(Si8O20)(OH)(H2O)8

IMA Classification of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Classification of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

9.EA.15

9 : SILICATES (Germanates)
E : Phyllosilicates
A : Single nets of tetrahedra with 4-, 5-, (6-), and 8-membered rings
17.1.6

17 : Silicates Containing other Anions
1 : Silicates with fluoride (not containing Al)

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

Please only use the official IMA–CNMNC symbol. Older variants are listed for historical use only.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
Hapo-KIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43
HapkThe Canadian Mineralogist (2019)The Canadian Mineralogist (2019) The Canadian Mineralogist list of symbols for rock- and ore-forming minerals (December 30, 2019). download

Physical Properties of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Vitreous, Pearly
Transparency:
Transparent, Translucent, Opaque
Comment:
Vitreous on {100} and pearly on {001}
Colour:
Colorless to white; may be pink, light green, or light yellow.
Streak:
White
Hardness:
4 - 5 on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
{001}
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven
Density:
2.37 g/cm3 (Measured)    2.36 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Type:
Uniaxial (+)
RI values:
nω = 1.536 - 1.542 nε = 1.537 - 1.543
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.001
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
None to Very Low
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized uniaxial interference figure - the conoscopic (convergent-light, Bertrand-lens-in) view, for a grain cut with the optic axis centred and vertical. The coloured rings are isochromatics, computed with the same physics as the Michel-Lévy bar above; the dark cross is the isogyre.

For a genuinely uniaxial mineral viewed this way, that cross stays perfectly stationary if you rotate the stage - unlike a biaxial mineral, where it splits apart on rotation. That invariance is itself the standard diagnostic test for telling uniaxial and biaxial minerals apart at the microscope.

Chemistry of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Mindat Formula:
KCa4(Si8O20)(OH,F) · 8H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O51.257 %
Si24.821 %
Ca17.710 %
K4.319 %
H1.893 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
Si
Ca
K
H
Common Impurities:
Al,Na

Chemical AnalysisHide

Oxide wt%:
 1
SiO252.99 %
Al2O30.19 %
CaO25.42 %
MgO0.01 %
FeO0.03 %
Na2O0.20 %
K2O4.89 %
Rb2O0.02 %
F0.01 %
H2O+16.87 %
Total:100.63 %
Empirical formulas:
Sample IDEmpirical Formula
1(K0.94Na0.06)Ca4.10(Si7.98Al0.02)O20(OH)1.18

Crystallography of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Crystal System:
Tetragonal
Class (H-M):
4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) - Ditetragonal Dipyramidal
Cell Parameters:
a = 8.978(3) Å, c = 15.83(1) Å
Ratio:
a:c = 1 : 1.763
Unit Cell V:
1,275.97 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
2
Comment:
Space Group: P4/mnc

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0000617Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Rouse R C, Peacor D R, Dunn P J (1978) Hydroxyapophyllite, a new mineral, and a redefinition of the apophyllite group II. Crystal structure American Mineralogist 63 196-2021978Kimberley, South Africa0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Loading XRD data...
Data Set:
Data courtesy of RRUFF project at University of Arizona, used with permission.
Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
3.965 Å(100)
2.990 Å(67)
1.588 Å(26)
4.554 Å(23)
2.494 Å(22)
7.90 Å(13)
7.82 Å(13)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 4a: Earth’s earliest continental crust>4.4-3.0
19 : Granitic intrusive rocks
Near-surface Processes
23 : Subaerial aqueous alteration by non-redox-sensitive fluids (see also #47)
Stage 4b: Highly evolved igneous rocks>3.0
35 : Ultra-alkali and agpaitic igneous rocks
Stage 5: Initiation of plate tectonics<3.5-2.5
40 : Regional metamorphism (greenschist, amphibolite, granulite facies)

Type Occurrence of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Place of Conservation of Type Material:
The Natural History Museum, London, England, 1977,58; Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 14099; Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada; Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA, 115268.

Synonyms of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Other Language Names for Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Relationship of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) to other SpeciesHide

Other Members of Apophyllite Group:
Fluorapophyllite-(Cs)CsCa4(Si8O20)F · 8H2OTet.
Fluorapophyllite-(K)KCa4(Si8O20)(F,OH) · 8H2OTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/mnc
Fluorapophyllite-(Na)NaCa4(Si8O20)F · 8H2OOrth.
Fluorapophyllite-(NH4)NH4Ca4(Si8O20)F · 8H2OTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/mnc
Hydroxyapophyllite-(NH4)(NH4)Ca4(Si8O20)(OH)(H2O)8Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m)
Hydroxymcglassonite-(K)KSr4Si8O20(OH) · 8H2OTet.
Forms a series with:

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
200 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with PrehniteCa2Al2Si3O10(OH)2
94 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with CalciteCaCO3
84 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with GyroliteNaCa16Si23AlO60(OH)8 · 14H2O
83 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with KinoiteCa2Cu2(H2O)2[Si3O10]
52 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with OkeniteCa10Si18O46 · 18H2O
44 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with NatroliteNa2Al2Si3O10 · 2H2O
37 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with QuartzSiO2
34 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with BultfonteiniteCa2(HSiO4)F · H2O
30 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with InesiteCa2(Mn,Fe)7Si10O28(OH)2 · 5H2O
26 photos of Hydroxyapophyllite-(K) associated with LaumontiteCaAl2Si4O12 · 4H2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

9.EA.Hydroxymcglassonite-(K)KSr4Si8O20(OH) · 8H2OTet.
9.EA.Miyawakiite-(Y)◻Y4Fe2(Si8O20)(CO3)4(H2O)3Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : I4/mcm
9.EA.Bussyite-(Y)(Y,REE,Ca)3(Na,Ca)6MnSi9Be5(O,OH,F)34Mon. 2 : B2
9.EA.Hydroxyapophyllite-(NH4)(NH4)Ca4(Si8O20)(OH)(H2O)8Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m)
9.EA.Fluorapophyllite-(NH4)NH4Ca4(Si8O20)F · 8H2OTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/mnc
9.EA.05GillespiteBaFe2+Si4O10Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/ncc
9.EA.05CuprorivaiteCaCuSi4O10Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/ncc
9.EA.05WesselsiteSrCuSi4O10Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/ncc
9.EA.05EffenbergeriteBaCuSi4O10Tet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/ncc
9.EA.07Fluorapophyllite-(Cs)CsCa4(Si8O20)F · 8H2OTet.
9.EA.10EkaniteCa2ThSi8O20Tet. 422 : I422
9.EA.15Fluorapophyllite-(Na)NaCa4(Si8O20)F · 8H2OOrth.
9.EA.15Fluorapophyllite-(K)KCa4(Si8O20)(F,OH) · 8H2OTet. 4/mmm(4/m2/m2/m) : P4/mnc
9.EA.20MagadiiteNa2Si14O29 · 11H2OOrth. mm2 : Fdd2
9.EA.25DalyiteK2ZrSi6O15Tric. 1 : P1
9.EA.25DavaniteK2TiSi6O15Tric.
9.EA.30Sazhinite-(La)Na3La[Si6O15] · 2H2OOrth. mm2 : Pmm2
9.EA.30Sazhinite-(Ce)Na3CeSi6O15 · 2H2OOrth. mm2 : Pmm2
9.EA.35ArmstrongiteCaZr[Si6O15] · 3H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
9.EA.40OkeniteCa10Si18O46 · 18H2OTric. 1 : P1
9.EA.45Perettiite-(Y)Y2Mn4FeSi2B8O24Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmna
9.EA.45NekoiteCa3Si6O15 · 7H2OTric. 1 : P1
9.EA.45Badakhshanite-(Y)Y2Mn4Al(Si2B7BeO24)Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
9.EA.47ShlykoviteKCa[Si4O9(OH)] · 3H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
9.EA.50DiegogattaiteNa2CaCu2Si8O20 · H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
9.EA.50CavansiteCa(VO)Si4O10 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m)
9.EA.52YangitePbMnSi3O8 · H2OTric. 1 : P1
9.EA.55PentagoniteCa(VO)Si4O10 · 4H2OOrth. mm2
9.EA.60PenkvilksiteNa4Ti2Si8O22 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcn
9.EA.60TumchaiteNa2Zr(Si4O11) · 2H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
9.EA.65NabesiteNa2BeSi4O10 · 4H2OOrth. 222 : P212121
9.EA.70Ajoite(K,Na)Cu7AlSi9O24(OH)6 · 3H2OTric.
9.EA.75ZeravshaniteNa2Cs4Zr3[Si18O45]*2H2OMon. 2/m : B2/b
9.EA.80Bussyite-(Ce)(Ce,REE)3(Na,H2O)6MnSi9Be5(O,OH)30F4Mon. 2/m : B2/b
9.EA.85PlumbophyllitePb2Si4O10 · H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcn

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 4.3192% 1,339 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

References for Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Localities for Hydroxyapophyllite-(K)Hide

Showing 106 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Australia
 
  • New South Wales
    • Buckland Co.
      • Ardglen
Hodge-Smith (1924) +2 other references
  • Tasmania
    • Burnie city
      • Ridgley
Sutherland et al. (2004)
    • Circular Head municipality
      • Cape Grim district
Tschernich (1992) +1 other reference
  • Western Australia
    • Leonora Shire
      • Leinster
Grguric et al. (2005)
Austria
 
  • Styria
    • Bruck-Mürzzuschlag District
      • Breitenau am Hochlantsch
        • Eibegggraben
Postl (2008)
      • Pernegg an der Mur
        • Kirchdorf
Taucher et al. (2013)
    • Südoststeiermark District
      • Feldbach
        • Mühldorf bei Feldbach
Postl et al. (1996)
Canada
 
  • Northwest Territories
Anton R. Chakhmouradian and Roger H. Mitchell (2001)
  • Québec
    • Montérégie
      • La Vallée-du-Richelieu RCM
        • Mont Saint-Hilaire
Grice (1989) +1 other reference
Chile
 
  • Atacama
    • Inca de Oro mining district
Maurizio Dini & Robert Jenkins ... +1 other reference
  • Tarapacá
    • Tamarugal Province
      • Huara
Personally collected by Günter Frenz
China
 
  • Inner Mongolia
    • Chifeng City (Ulanhad League; Chifeng Prefecture)
      • Hexigten Banner (Keshiketeng Co.)
Möhn et al. (05/2021)
  • Yunnan
    • Honghe
      • Gejiu City
        • Gejiu Sn-polymetallic ore field
          • Malage ore field
Xu Jinsha et al. (2019)
Czech Republic
 
  • Karlovy Vary Region
    • Karlovy Vary District
Hloušek et al. (2002)
  • Ústí nad Labem Region
    • Děčín District
      • Těchlovice
Dolníček et al. (2021)
Finland
 
  • Kymenlaakso
    • Iitti
Arhe
  • South Karelia
    • Lappeenranta
Hytönen (1999)
    • Luumäki
Ilkka Mikkola collection
  • Southwest Finland
    • Laitila
Joel Dyer collection
France
 
  • Réunion
    • Salazie
André MELLE collection - Nicolas ...
Germany
 
  • Bavaria
    • Upper Franconia
      • Wunsiedel im Fichtelgebirge
        • Selb
          • Längenau
Keck (2008)
  • Hesse
    • Giessen Region
      • Lahn-Dill-Kreis
        • Greifenstein
          • Allendorf
Hanneberg et al. (2009) +1 other reference
  • Rhineland-Palatinate
    • Mayen-Koblenz
      • Vordereifel
        • Ettringen
          • Caspar quarry
in the collection of Christof Schäfer
    • Vulkaneifel
      • Gerolstein
        • Gerolstein
          • Roth
Blaß et al. (2012)
      • Kelberg
        • Höchstberg
Blass (2010)
Hungary
 
  • Fejér County
    • Székesfehérvár District
      • Kőszárhegy
Szakáll: Minerals of Szár Hill
  • Veszprém County
    • Sümeg District
      • Bazsi
        • Prága Hill
Szakáll & Gatter +1 other reference
    • Tapolca District
      • Uzsa
Szakáll & Gatter
India
 
  • Maharashtra
    • Konkan Division
      • Salsette Island
        • Mumbai Suburban District
          • Malad
Personal experience-Rock Currier +1 other reference
    • Nashik Division
Pavel M. Kartashov analytical data
    • Pune Division
      • Pune District
Rock Currier
Rock Currier photo
Israel
 
  • Southern District
    • Beersheba Subdistrict
      • Tamar Regional Council
        • Hatrurim Basin
          • Gurim anticline
Sokol et al. (2014, November)
Italy
 
  • Lazio
    • Rieti Province
      • Rieti
        • Santa Rufina
XRD analysis at Bari University
  • Liguria
    • La Spezia Province
      • Borghetto di Vara
XRD analysis
  • Lombardy
    • Sondrio Province
      • Chiesa in Valmalenco
Marchesini et al. (2025)
  • Piedmont
    • Metropolitan City of Turin
      • Traversella
Delpiano et al. (2012)
  • Sicily
    • Metropolitan City of Catania
Gemellaro (1856)
  • Tuscany
    • Livorno Province
      • Rio
        • Rio Marina
Garavelli C.L. & Vurro F. (1984)
  • Umbria
    • Perugia Province
      • Spoleto
Stoppa et al. (2010) +2 other references
    • Terni Province
      • San Venanzo
Carlo Cassinelli infrared spectrum (unpublished data)
  • Veneto
    • Padova Province
      • Galzignano Terme
Fabio Tosato et al. (2024)
    • Vicenza Province
      • Altissimo
        • Tesoro Mountain
Boscardin et al. (2011)
      • Gambellara
        • S. Marco hill
Boscardin et al. (2011)
      • Lugo di Vicenza
Boscardin et al. (2010)
      • Montecchio Maggiore
        • San Pietro
Boscardin et al. (2011)
      • San Vito di Leguzzano
Boscardin et al. (2000)
Boscardin et al. (2000) +2 other references
Boscardin et al. (2011)
Japan
 
  • Okayama Prefecture
    • Takahashi City
      • Bitchū
        • Fuka
  • Tokyo Metropolis
    • Ogasawara Subprefecture
      • Ogasawara Islands
        • Chichijima Group
          • Ani Island (Anijima)
Momma et al. (2015)
Kenya
 
  • Trans-Nzoia County
    • Mount Elgon
Forti et al. (2003)
Paolo Forti - Genetic processes of cave ...
Mexico
 
  • Chihuahua
    • Aquiles Serdán Municipality
      • Santa Eulalia Mining District
        • West Camp
          • Francisco Portillo
Panczner (1987)
Panczner (1987)
  • Guanajuato
    • Guanajuato Municipality
      • Guanajuato
Panczner (1987)
      • La Luz
Panczner (1987)
Panczner (1987)
  • Hidalgo
    • Pachuca Municipality
      • Pachuca de Soto (Pachuca)
Panczner (1987)
  • Zacatecas
    • Melchor Ocampo Municipality
      • Mineral de Noche Buena
Panczner (1987)
Namibia
 
  • Khomas Region
    • Windhoek Rural
      • Aris
...
Norway
 
  • Nordland
    • Fauske
      • Sulitjelma
        • Sulitjelma Copper Mines
Larsen (1980)
    • Rana
      • Mofjellet
Larsen (1980) +1 other reference
Portugal
 
  • Madeira
    • Madeira Island
      • Machico
        • Porto da Cruz
Alves (n.d.)
Romania
 
  • Hunedoara County
www.minerals-of-the carpathians.eu (2009)
  • Maramureș County
Hîrtopanu P. et al. (2022)
Russia
 
  • Aldan Shield
    • Chara and Tokko Rivers Confluence
      • Murunskii Massif
Dokuchits et al. (2022)
  • Chelyabinsk Oblast
    • Verkhny Ufaley
      • Ufaley District (Ufalei District)
Talovina et al. (2003)
  • Krasnoyarsk Krai
    • Taymyrskiy Autonomous Okrug
      • Taimyr Peninsula
        • Norilsk-Talnakh Mining Region
          • Talnakh Cu-Ni Deposit
            • Oktyabrsky Mine
Spiridonov et al. (2016)
  • Murmansk Oblast
...
  • Sverdlovsk Oblast
    • Asbest
Igor Savin data +1 other reference
South Africa
 
  • Mpumalanga
    • Nkangala District Municipality
      • Emakhazeni Local Municipality
        • Belfast
Cairncross et al. (1995) +1 other reference
  • Northern Cape
    • Frances Baard District Municipality
      • Sol Plaatje Local Municipality
Rouse et al. (1978)
    • John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality
      • Joe Morolong Local Municipality
        • N'Chwaning Mines
Pohl et al. (1991)
Cairncross et al. (1995)
Cairncross et al. (1993)
Spain
 
  • Asturias
    • Belmonte de Miranda
Calvo Rebollar (2018)
Cepedal et al. (2021)
  • Castile-La Mancha
    • Ciudad Real
      • Ciudad Real
Calvo et al. (2013)
UK
 
  • England
    • County Durham
      • Stanhope
  • Scotland
    • Highland
      • Eilean á Chèo
        • Isle of Skye
          • Duirinish
Green et al. (1996)
Ukraine
 
  • Crimea
    • Bakhchysarai
      • Trudolyubovka
Karpenko V. (New Data on Minerals) +1 other reference
    • Feodosia area
Tischenko A. data
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Gila County
      • Banner Mining District
        • Christmas
RRUFF Project Specimen ID: R050169
    • Maricopa County
Anthony et al. (1995)
  • California
    • Tulare County
      • Dumtah
Dunning et al. (2003)
    • Ventura County
      • Thousand Oaks
www.mindat.org (2012)
  • Georgia
    • Fulton County
      • Red Oak
Confirmed by XRD by Travis Olds
  • Nevada
Barrick Gold Corporation
  • New Jersey
    • Passaic County
      • Little Falls Township
Rouse et al. (1978)
Betts (n.d.)
      • Prospect Park
Wilson et al. (1978)
    • Sussex County
      • Franklin
Dunn (1995)
  • New York
    • Lewis County
      • Diana Township
Chamberlain et al. (1999)
  • North Carolina
    • Ashe County
      • Ore Knob
Joseph A. Mandarino and Malcolm E. Back +1 other reference
    • Catawba County
      • Hickory
Keith Wood
    • Cleveland County
      • Kings Mountain
Wilson et al. (1978) +1 other reference
  • Pennsylvania
    • Lebanon County
      • Cornwall Borough (Cornwall)
Kearns et al. (2008)
  • Virginia
    • Fairfax County
      • Culpeper Basin
        • Centreville
Meier et al. (K, Na)
    • Loudoun County
      • Chantilly
Meier et al. (K, Na)
      • Conklin
Meier et al. (K, Na)
      • Leesburg
Joseph Freillich specimen
Meier et al. (K, Na)
Meier et al. (K, Na)
Meier et al. (K, Na)
Meier et al. (K, Na)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 06:27:36 Page updated: August 26, 2026 16:08:35
Go to top of page