Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Summit Prospect, Chandalar Mining District, Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Summit ProspectProspect
Chandalar Mining DistrictMining District
Yukon-Koyukuk Census AreaCensus Area
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
67° 32' 19'' North , 148° 11' 6'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Köppen climate type:
Mindat Locality ID:
200216
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:200216:6
GUID (UUID V4):
0


See also: Mikado (CH045), Little Squaw(CH040), Star(CH042).
Location: The Summit lode is at an elevation of about 4,800 feet, approximately 1/2 mile south of Little Squaw Peak, between Little Squaw Peak and peak 5072 (St. Marys Peak as labeled on fig. 2 in Chipp, 1970) in SW1/4 sec. 3, T. 31 N., R. 3 W., of the Fairbanks Meridian. The location is accurate.
Geology: Maddren (1913) reported a 54-foot-deep shaft and a 72-foot drift along the vein. Prospect pits have been dug along the Summit fault/vein system as far east as the pass between Big Creek and McClellan Creek and west along the spur going into Big Squaw Creek. Heiner and Wolff (1968) report that there was some development work in the 1950s and a small mill was established for the ore in the headwaters of Big Creek. It may not have milled any ore. In 2004, Little Squaw Gold Mining Company controlled 8,550 acres of patented and unpatented mining claims in the Chandalar district which includes the Summit prospect. This company contracted a district-scale analysis of the placer and lode gold potential of the district by Pacific Rim Geological Consulting, Inc. This study was completed in April, 2004 (Barker and Bundtzen, 2004). The Summit lode is one of the four principal auriferous quartz vein systems in the Chandalar area. The Summit vein system, like the others in the area, is localized along steeply-dipping, northwest-trending normal faults in Devonian quartz-muscovite schist, phyllite, and quartzite, intruded by Devonian mafic sills and dikes (Chipp, 1970). In general, the veins in the Chandalar area are less than 10 feet thick and are discontinuous, pinching out within a few hundred feet or less. The veins are composed principally of white crystalline to microcrystalline quartz, and their sulfide content is generally less than 5 percent. The principal sulfides (in relative order of abundance) are arsenopyrite, galena, sphalerite, and pyrite. Scorodite and limonite occur commonly as oxidation products. The quartz veins exhibit evidence of shearing, indicating that the veins were emplaced before or during fault movement. Major structural features in the area include large-scale northeast-trending anticlines and synclines, northeast-trending thrusts, and the northwest-trending, high-angle cross faults. The Summit lode follows the Summit fault, strikes N80W, and dips 75 to 80 degrees south. Early workings on the property exposed a vein 1.5 to 2 feet wide. A sample from these workings was reported to have assayed $54 of gold per ton (Maddren,1913). Dump samples of vein material collected by Chipp (1970) contained abundant arsenopyrite and scorodite in sheared and brecciated quartz; assays of these samples returned values of 0.5 to 6.6 parts per million gold. Ashworth (1983) described two generations of quartz at the Summit lode. The older generation is coarsely crystalline, massive, white quartz. It is in the hanging wall and is as much as 4 feet wide. It contains less than 5 percent sulfides and little gold. The younger generation pinches and swells; it adjoins the older veins, but typically follows in the footwall. It is generally finer grained and contains bands accentuated by smeared graphite and arsenopyrite. Scorodite is common, and free gold occurs as blebs and occasional wires. The genesis of the gold deposits in the Chandalar district is still in question. Various authors have hypothesized genetic links to a variety of felsic and mafic igneous rocks from which the gold was remobilized during metamorphism (Mertie, 1925; Boadway, 1933; Chipp, 1970; Dillon, 1982).
Workings: Maddren (1913) reported a 54-foot-deep shaft and a 72-foot drift along the vein. Prospect pits have been dug along the Summit fault/vein system as far east as the pass between Big Creek and McClellan Creek and west along the spur going into Big Squaw Creek. Heiner and Wolff (1968) report that there was some development work in the 1950s and a small mill was established for the ore in the headwaters of Big Creek. It may not have milled any ore. In 2004, Little Squaw Gold Mining Company controlled 8,550 acres of patented and unpatented mining claims in the Chandalar district which includes the Summit prospect. This company contracted a district-scale analysis of the placer and lode gold potential of the district by Pacific Rim Geological Consulting, Inc. This study was completed in April, 2004 (Barker and Bundtzen, 2004).
Age: Middle Cretaceous(?) based on arguments by Dillon (1982) that the age of emplacement of the gold-bearing quartz veins of the Koyukuk and Chandalar districts was between the Neocomian metamorphism of the Devonian host rocks and their erosional unroofing and cooling in Albian time.
Alteration: Oxidation of vein material produces scorodite and limonite.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Au; (Minor) - Cu, Pb, Sb
Development Status: Undetermined
Deposit Model: Low-sulfide Au-quartz veins (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 36a)

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


4 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 1 - Elements
Native Gold1.AA.05Au
Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Arsenopyrite2.EB.20FeAsS
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 8 - Phosphates, Arsenates and Vanadates
Scorodite8.CD.10Fe3+AsO4 · 2H2O

List of minerals for each chemical element

HHydrogen
H ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
OOxygen
O QuartzSiO2
O ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
SiSilicon
Si QuartzSiO2
SSulfur
S ArsenopyriteFeAsS
FeIron
Fe ArsenopyriteFeAsS
Fe ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
AsArsenic
As ArsenopyriteFeAsS
As ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
AuGold
Au Native GoldAu

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:CH041

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North AmericaContinent
North America PlateTectonic Plate

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Anderson, E., 1944, Petrographic descriptions of rocks collected during 1944 field investigation in north-west Alaska, and lists of ore and rock samples and placer concentrates collected in northwestern and interior Alaska during 1945 field season: Alaska Territorial Department of Mines Miscellaneous Report 195-28, 76 p. Ashworth, K.K., 1983, Genesis of gold deposits at the Little Squaw mines, Chandalar mining district, Alaska: Bellingham, Western Washington University, M.Sc. thesis, 98 p. Barker, J. C., and Bundtzen, T. K., 2004, Gold deposits of the Chandalar mining district, northern Alaska: An information review and recommendations: Independent technical report for Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, 165 p. (Available at www.littlesquawgold.com; as of November 2005). Boadway, E.A., 1932, Report on Sulzer properties, Chandalar, Alaska: Alaska Territorial Department of Mines Miscellaneous Report 31-6, 23 p., 4 sheets. Boadway, E.A., 1933, Report on Mikado and Little Squaw veins, Chandalar, Alaska: Alaska Territorial Department of Mines Miscellaneous Report 31-7, 37 p. Bundtzen, T.K., Eakins, G.R., and Conwell, C.N., 1982, Review of Alaska mineral resources 1981: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Annual Report 1981, 48 p. Chipp, E.R., 1970, Geology and geochemistry of the Chandalar area, Brooks Range, Alaska: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Geologic Report 42, 39 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:3,000. Cobb, E.H., 1972, Metallic mineral resources map of the Chandalar quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-457, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Cobb, E.H., 1976, Summary of references to mineral occurrences (other than mineral fuels and construction materials) in the Chandalar and Wiseman quadrangles, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 76-340, 205 p. Cobb, E.H., and Cruz, E.L., 1983, Summaries of data and lists of references to metallic and selected nonmetallic mineral deposits
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 10:11:54 Page updated: August 11, 2025 21:06:05
Go to top of page