Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Banjo Mine (Hardrock and Tugboat Annie claims), Kantishna Mining District, Denali Borough, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Banjo Mine (Hardrock and Tugboat Annie claims)Mine
Kantishna Mining DistrictMining District
Denali BoroughBorough
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
63° 33' 7'' North , 150° 53' 23'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Mindat Locality ID:
196365
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:196365:9
GUID (UUID V4):
0


The Banjo mine was the largest gold lode producer in the Kantishna Hills lode area (MM091). The claims at the mine, which is in Denali National Park and Preserve, were never patented.
Location: The Banjo mine (Cobb, 1980 [OFR 80-363]), on the unpatented Hardrock and Tugboat Annie claims, is on the ridge at the head of Lucky Gulch, a minor south-flowing tributary of Eureka Creek. The Banjo vein cropped out at an elevation of about 3200 feet. The main mine workings are about 0.28 mile south-southwest of the center of section 5, T. 16 S., R. 17 W., Fairbanks Meridian. The location is accurate within about 300 feet. The Banjo mine site is included in number 13 of Cobb (1972 [MF 366]), numbers 31 and 32 of Bundtzen, Smith and Tosdal (1976), location J of Hawley and Associates (1978), and occurrence 50 of Thornsberry, McKee, and Salisbury (1984). The mine is called the Red Top mine on the 1954 (revised 1978) edition of the Mt. McKinley C-2 quadrangle topographic map; it should be called the Banjo mine of the Red Top Mining Co.
Geology: The country rocks at the Banjo mine are graphitic schist, quartz-mica schist, and metafelsite of the lower Paleozoic Spruce Creek sequence (Bundtzen, 1981; Thornsberry, McKee, and Salisbury, 1984, v. 2, occurrence 50). The Banjo deposit is a 3- to 10-foot-thick quartz-carbonate-sulfide vein that on average strikes N 60 E and dips about 65 SE. It was developed for about 300 feet on the Banjo mine level, approximately at an elevation of 3140 feet, and was stoped from that level to the surface. On the Banjo level, the vein is cut off to the east by a low-angle fault that strikes NNW and dips SW. The fault projects toward the Jupiter-Mars (MM102) adit,and could be the same fault that cuts off that vein. A mill level driven at an elevation of about 3010 feet appears to intersect the Banjo vein (called the Pas vein on that level), but it contains less gold and more base metals. The mill level apparently also intersects the NNW-striking fault that cuts off the productive vein on the Banjo level (Hawley and Associates, 1978; fig. 4.1-A(1)-4; Bundtzen, 1981, plate 3). The intermediate Quigley level apparently was not driven far enough to intersect either the Banjo vein or the fault (Wells, 1933, p. 370-371). The productive part of the Banjo vein consists of quartz and carbonate that contains free gold, galena, arsenopyrite, pyrite, sphalerite, and tetrahedrite. The gold is in the quartz and in (or with) the sulfide minerals. Locally, the vein also contains scheelite, malachite, limonite, and scorodite. The gold-silver ratio in the vein appears to be about 1:1. The average grade of about 13,650 tons of ore was 0.52 ounce of silver per ton and 0.46 ounce of gold per ton. The concentrates contained 13.8 to 19.7 percent lead and about 0.9 to 1.6 percent zinc, and about 20 tons of lead-zinc concentrates were produced from the ore that was mined. The ore also averaged about 0.5 percent scheelite (Bundtzen, 1981).
Workings: The deposit was discovered by tracing rich, gold-bearing quartz float on the east flank of Lucky Gulch. It was probably first developed by the so-called Upper Eureka tunnel (Capps, 1919, p. 101-102). Joe Quigley subsequently drove an adit below the area of float, but encountered only graphitic schist (Wells, 1933, p. 370-371). This level (Quigley) appears to lie between the Banjo level and lower mill level. The principal Banjo ore body was discovered sometime before1938, and mined from 1939 through 1941. During that time it yielded more than 13,650 tons of ore that contained about 6,260 ounces of gold and 7,114 ounces of silver. A small amount of ore was probably mined in 1942.
Age: The deposit is assumed to be Eocene (see record MM091).
Alteration: Local oxidation of iron, copper, and arsenic minerals.
Production: The mine was the largest lode gold producer in the Kantishna district; it produced about 6,260 ounces of gold from 1939 through 1941.
Reserves: There is a small resource, established by drilling and underground workings during the mine operation. This resource is in caved underground workings and aggregates1595 tons of ore averaging 0.49 ounce of gold per ton (Bundtzen, 1981, pl. 3). Additional ore could occur between the Banjo and Mill levels west of the fault that cuts off the ore.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Au; (Minor) - Cu, Pb, W, Zn
Development Status: Yes
Deposit Model: Low-sulfide Au-quartz-(carbonate) vein, possibly grading with depth into a poly

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


10 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 1 - Elements
Native Gold1.AA.05Au
Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Arsenopyrite2.EB.20FeAsS
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
Malachite5.BA.10Cu2(CO3)(OH)2
Group 7 - Sulphates, Chromates, Molybdates and Tungstates
Scheelite7.GA.05Ca(WO4)
Group 8 - Phosphates, Arsenates and Vanadates
Scorodite8.CD.10Fe3+AsO4 · 2H2O

List of minerals for each chemical element

HHydrogen
H MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
H ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
CCarbon
C MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
OOxygen
O MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
O QuartzSiO2
O ScheeliteCa(WO4)
O ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
SiSilicon
Si QuartzSiO2
SSulfur
S ArsenopyriteFeAsS
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S GalenaPbS
S PyriteFeS2
S SphaleriteZnS
CaCalcium
Ca ScheeliteCa(WO4)
FeIron
Fe ArsenopyriteFeAsS
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe PyriteFeS2
Fe ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
CuCopper
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Cu MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS
AsArsenic
As ArsenopyriteFeAsS
As ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
WTungsten
W ScheeliteCa(WO4)
AuGold
Au Native GoldAu
PbLead
Pb GalenaPbS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:MM097

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality


This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 15:02:55 Page updated: August 16, 2025 23:08:14
Go to top of page