Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Tinnunculite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About TinnunculiteHide

07692890017272472633094.jpg
Common Kestrel - falco tinnunculus
Formula:
C5H4N4O3 · 2H2O
structural formula: NHC(O)NHC2C(O)NHC(O)NH·2H2O
Colour:
Colorless, white, yellowish, reddish or раlе lilас
Lustre:
Vitreous
Specific Gravity:
1.68 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named after the Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). An original description was of material formed as a product of hot gases from a burning coal dump reacting with excrement from Falco tinnunculus. It was rejected by the IMA for being of anthropogenic origin (the burning coal dump), however natural material was later found and the name was kept.
A naturally occurring dihydrate of uricite (uric acid) to which it is visually very similar.
Well-known though rare component of urinary and other stones (a biomineral).

Not to be confused with Tinnunculite (of Chesnokov & Shcherbakova).

Chemically (C-H-N-O) but not structurally similar to other organic minerals: guanine, uricite; also acetamide, kladnoite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
47018
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:47018:0

Similar NamesHide

IMA Classification of TinnunculiteHide

Classification of TinnunculiteHide

10.CA.65

10 : ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
C : Miscellaneous Organic Minerals
A : Miscellaneous Organic Minerals

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
TnnIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of TinnunculiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent, Translucent
Colour:
Colorless, white, yellowish, reddish or раlе lilас
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Distinct/Good
Distinct (010).
Density:
1.68 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of TinnunculiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.503(3) nβ = 1.712(3) nγ = 1.74(1)
2V:
Measured: 40° (10)
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.237
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.

Chemistry of TinnunculiteHide

Mindat Formula:
C5H4N4O3 · 2H2O

structural formula: NHC(O)NHC2C(O)NHC(O)NH·2H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O39.187 %
C29.418 %
N27.445 %
H3.950 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
C
N
H

Crystallography of TinnunculiteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
P21/b
Setting:
P21/c
Cell Parameters:
a = 7.261(9) Å, b = 6.365(7) Å, c = 17.48(3) Å
β = 91.0(1)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.141 : 1 : 2.746
Unit Cell V:
820 ų
Z:
4

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 10a: Neoproterozoic oxygenation/terrestrial biosphere<0.6
50 : Coal and/or oil shale minerals<0.36
52 : Guano- and urine-derived minerals<0.4
Stage 10b: Anthropogenic minerals<10 Ka
54 : Coal and other mine fire minerals (see also #51 and #56)

Type Occurrence of TinnunculiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Prismatic or tabular crystals, uр to 0.2 mm in length, clusters, and crystalline ог micro-globular crusts.
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Type material is deposited in the collections of the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, registration number 4695/1.

Synonyms of TinnunculiteHide

Other Language Names for TinnunculiteHide

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

10.CA.AllantoinC4H6N4O3Mon. 2/m : P21/b
10.CA.PabellóndepicaiteCu2+2(N3C2H2)2(NH3)2(NO3)Cl · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnna
10.CA.BojariteCu3(N3C2H2)3(OH)Cl2 · 6H2OIso. m3m(4/m32/m)
10.CA.NatrosulfatoureaNa2(SO4)[CO(NH2)2]Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcn
10.CA.'Tholins'(C,H,N)
10.CA.FuchuniteBa(C2H3O3)2(C2H4O3)2Mon. 2/m : P21/b
10.CA.05RefikiteC20H32O2Orth. 222 : P21212
10.CA.10FlagstaffiteC10H22O3Orth. mm2 : Fdd2
10.CA.15HoeliteC14H8O2Mon. 2/m : P21/b
10.CA.20AbelsoniteNi(C31H32N4)Tric. 1 : P1
10.CA.25KladnoiteC6H4(CO)2NHMon. 2/m
10.CA.30'Tinnunculite (of Chesnokov & Shcherbakova)'C10H12N8O8Orth.
10.CA.30GuanineC5H5N5OMon. 2/m : P21/b
10.CA.35UreaCO(NH2)2Tet. 42m : P421m
10.CA.40UriciteC5H4N4O3Mon. 2/m : P21/b
10.CA.45ChanabayaiteCuCl(N3C2H2)(NH3) · 0.25H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Imma
10.CA.50TriazoliteNaCu2(N3C2H2)2(NH3)2Cl3 · 4H2OOrth. 222 : P212121
10.CA.55ErnstburkeiteMg(CH3SO3)2 · 12H2O Trig. 3 : R3
10.CA.60JoanneumiteCu(C3N3O3H2)2(NH3)2Tric. 1 : P1
10.CA.70'Dopplerite'Amor.

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for TinnunculiteHide

References for TinnunculiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for TinnunculiteHide

Showing 20 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Austria
 
  • Salzburg
    • St. Johann im Pongau District
      • Bad Gastein
        • Naßfeld valley
          • Sportgastein
Kolitsch et al. (2011)
    • Zell am See District
      • Rauris
        • Alteck - Hoher Sonnblick area
          • Kolm-Saigurn
Kolitsch et al. (2012)
  • Styria
    • Südoststeiermark District
      • Bad Gleichenberg
        • Wilhelmsdorf
Postl et al. (2019)
      • Feldbach
        • Mühldorf bei Feldbach
Postl et al. (2019)
      • Klöch
Postl (2019)
Canada
 
  • Québec
    • Montérégie
      • Lajemmerais RCM
        • Varennes & St-Amable
          • Saint-Amable sill
Modris Baum collection - Joy Desor ...
Germany
 
  • Hesse
    • Giessen Region
      • Limburg-Weilburg
        • Selters
          • Eisenbach
XRD by Gerhard Möhn
        • Weinbach
XRD by Gerhard Möhn and Joy Desor
  • Rhineland-Palatinate
    • Cochem-Zell
      • Zell
        • Altlay
XRD by Gerhard Möhn
    • Rhein-Lahn-Kreis
      • Lahnstein
        • Friedrichssegen
XRD by Gerhard Möhn and Joy Desor
Hungary
 
  • Vas County
    • Szombathely District
      • Felsõcsatár
Csanad Loranth
Italy
 
  • Emilia-Romagna
    • Modena Province
      • Serramazzoni
Artioli et al. (1993)
  • Piedmont
    • Cuneo Province
      • Bagnolo Piemonte
Ciriotti et al. (2021)
Ciriotti et al. (2021)
      • Canosio
        • Vallone della Valletta
Cámara et al. (2017)
    • Verbano-Cusio-Ossola Province
      • Baceno
        • Devero Alp
Guastoni et al. (2020)
      • Varzo
Cuchet et al. (2016)
Norway
 
  • Buskerud
    • Modum
      • Åmot
Kolitsch et al. (2011)
Russia (TL)
 
  • Murmansk Oblast
Pekov et al. (2016) +2 other references
Switzerland
 
  • Valais
    • Brig
Cuchet et al. (2020)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 15:38:41 Page updated: August 24, 2026 03:27:02
Go to top of page