Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Steklite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About StekliteHide

Formula:
KAl(SO4)2
Colour:
colorless
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
Specific Gravity:
2.792 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Trigonal
Name:
From the Russian word стекло (steklo) for glass as an allusion to the visual appearance of aggregates of the mineral formed around vents of a burning coal heap (coal mine N 47 near Kopeisk, South Urals, Russia).
K-analogue of godovikovite.

Found on a burnt coal dump, so first considered to be anthropogenic and not to be a true mineral.

Steklite is a natural analog of the synthetic KAl(SO4)2 studied by Manoli et al (1970).



Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
40128
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:40128:7

Similar NamesHide

StealiteA synonym of 'Chiastolite'
SteeliteA synonym of Mordenite
StelliteA synonym of Pectolite

IMA Classification of StekliteHide

Classification of StekliteHide

7.AC.20

7 : SULFATES (selenates, tellurates, chromates, molybdates, wolframates)
A : Sulfates (selenates, etc.) without additional anions, without H2O
C : With medium-sized and large cations

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
SekIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of StekliteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Colorless
Comment:
aggregates are white to grayish white
Streak:
White
Hardness:
2½ on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
parallel to {001}
Fracture:
Micaceous
Comment:
Fracture is lamellar while very thin flakes are flexible.
Density:
2.792 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of StekliteHide

Type:
Uniaxial (-)
RI values:
nω = 1.546(2) nε = 1.533(3)
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.013
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars.

Surface Relief:
Moderate
Pleochroism:
Non-pleochroic

Chemistry of StekliteHide

Mindat Formula:
KAl(SO4)2
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O49.571 %
S24.837 %
K15.142 %
Al10.450 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Crystallography of StekliteHide

Crystal System:
Trigonal
Class (H-M):
32 - Trapezohedral
Space Group:
P321
Cell Parameters:
a = 4.7281(3) Å, c = 7.9936(5) Å
Ratio:
a:c = 1 : 1.691
Unit Cell V:
154.76 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
1

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0018101StekliteVegard L, Maurstad A (1928) Die Kristallstruktur der wasserfreien Alaune R'R'''(SO4)2 _cod_database_code 1011235 Skrifter utgitt av det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo 1928 1-2419280293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
8.02 Å(34)
4.085 Å(11)
3.649 Å(100)
2.861 Å(51)
2.660 Å(19)
2.364 Å(25)
2.267 Å(14)
1.822 Å(12)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event<2.4
45a : [Sulfates, arsenates, selenates, antimonates]
45b : [Other oxidized fumarolic minerals]
Stage 10b: Anthropogenic minerals<10 Ka
54 : Coal and other mine fire minerals (see also #51 and #56)

Type Occurrence of StekliteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Hexagonal plates and more frequently multi!angular irregular lamellae. The both are commonly 5–10 µm and occasionally up to 30 µm in thickness; 0.2 mm and rarely up to 1 mm across
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, registration number 4109/1
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Burnt coal dump

Fumarole
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of StekliteHide

Other Language Names for StekliteHide

Dutch:Stekliet
German:Steklit

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
1 photo of Steklite associated with EuchlorineKNaCu3(SO4)3O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

7.AC.Aluminopyracmonite(NH4)3Al(SO4)3Trig. 3 : R3
7.AC.AmgaiteTl+32Te6+O6Trig. 32 : P321
7.AC.05VanthoffiteNa6Mg(SO4)4Mon. 2/m : P21/b
7.AC.08Pyracmonite(NH4)3Fe(SO4)3Trig. 3m : R3c
7.AC.10LangbeiniteK2Mg2(SO4)3Iso. 23 : P213
7.AC.10Efremovite(NH4)2Mg2(SO4)3Iso. 23 : P213
7.AC.10Ferroefremovite(NH4)2Fe2+2(SO4)3Iso. 23 : P213
7.AC.10ManganolangbeiniteK2Mn2(SO4)3Iso. 23 : P213
7.AC.15YavapaiiteKFe(SO4)2Mon. 2/m : B2/m
7.AC.15EldfelliteNaFe3+(SO4)2Mon. 2/m : B2/m
7.AC.20Sabieite(NH4)Fe3+(SO4)2Trig. 32 : P321
7.AC.20Godovikovite(NH4)Al(SO4)2Trig. 32 : P321
7.AC.35AphthitaliteK3Na(SO4)2Trig. 3m(32/m) : P3m1
7.AC.35BelomarinaiteKNa(SO4)Trig. 3m : P31m
7.AC.35Natroaphthitalite KNa3(SO4)2Trig. 3m(32/m) : P3m1
7.AC.35Möhnite(NH4)K2Na(SO4)2Trig. 3m : P3m1
7.AC.40ItelmeniteNa4Mg3Cu3(SO4)8Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbca
7.AC.45SaranchinaiteNa2Cu(SO4)2Mon. 2 : P21
7.AC.50MajzlaniteK2Na(ZnNa)Ca(SO4)4Mon. 2/m : B2/b
7.AC.60Philoxenite(K,Na,Pb)4(Na,Ca)2(Mg,Cu)3(Fe3+0.5Al0.5)(SO4)8Tric. 1 : P1
7.AC.75PetroviteNa12Cu2(SO4)8Mon. 2/m : P21/b

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 15.1423% 4,694 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of StekliteHide

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for StekliteHide

References for StekliteHide

Localities for StekliteHide

Showing 10 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Cape Verde
 
  • Sotavento Islands
    • Fogo Island
Silva et al. (2019)
Czech Republic
 
  • Moravian-Silesian Region
    • Ostrava-City District
      • Ostrava
        • Heřmanice
Matýsek et al. (2022)
Italy
 
  • Campania
Pellino et al. (2025)
Poland
 
  • Silesian Voivodeship
    • Wodzisław County
      • Radlin
Kruszewski (2012)
      • Rydułtowy
        • ROW Ruch Rydułtowy Mine
Kruszewski et al. (2020)
Russia
 
  • Chelyabinsk Oblast
Cesnokov et al. (1998)
    • Kopeysk
      • Coal Mine No. 47
Pekov (1998)
  • Kamchatka Krai
    • Milkovsky District
      • Tolbachik Volcanic field
        • Great Fissure eruption (Main Fracture)
          • Northern Breakthrough (North Breach)
            • Second scoria cone
Pekov et al. (2018)
Williams et al. (2011) +2 other references
USA
 
  • Pennsylvania
    • Schuylkill County
Lapham et al. (1980)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 08:19:07 Page updated: June 15, 2026 20:19:49
Go to top of page