Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Cupropavonite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About CupropavoniteHide

03096270017271922416053.jpg
Martin Alfred Peacock
Formula:
Cu0.9Ag0.5Pb0.6Bi2.5S5
Also given as AgCu2PbBi5S10.
Colour:
Lead-grey to tin-white
Hardness:
2
Specific Gravity:
7.04 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named in 1979 by Sven Karup-Møller and Emil Makoviky for the dominant copper content and relationship to pavonite (named for Martin Alfred Peacock; pavo = peacock in Latin).
Typically forms fine lamellar intergrowths with pavonite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
1187
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:1187:3

IMA Classification of CupropavoniteHide

Classification of CupropavoniteHide

2.JA.05a

2 : SULFIDES and SULFOSALTS (sulfides, selenides, tellurides; arsenides, antimonides, bismuthides; sulfarsenites, sulfantimonites, sulfbismuthites, etc.)
J : Sulfosalts of PbS archetype
A : Galena derivatives with little or no Pb
3.8.10.6

3 : SULFOSALTS
8 : 1 < ø < 2
5.7.44

5 : Sulphosalts - Sulpharsenites and Sulphobismuthites (those containing Sn, Ge,or V are in Section 6)
7 : Sulpharsenites etc. of Pb and other metals

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
CpavIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of CupropavoniteHide

Transparency:
Opaque
Colour:
Lead-grey to tin-white
Hardness:
Density:
7.04 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of CupropavoniteHide

Anisotropism:
Distinct
Reflectivity:
WavelengthR1 (%)R2 (%)
400nm45.1%48.2%
440nm45.0%49.4%
480nm44.4%50.2%
520nm43.4%49.1%
560nm42.5%47.5%
600nm42.1%46.4%
640nm41.9%46.2%
680nm41.6%46.0%
700nm41.2%45.6%


Graph shows reflectance levels at different wavelengths (in nm). Peak reflectance is 50.2%.
R1 shown in black, R2 shown in red
Colour in reflected light:
White
Pleochroism:
Weak
Comments:
Weak in air, weak to distinct in oil

Chemistry of CupropavoniteHide

Mindat Formula:
Cu0.9Ag0.5Pb0.6Bi2.5S5

Also given as AgCu2PbBi5S10.
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Bi56.898 %
S17.460 %
Pb13.539 %
Cu6.229 %
Ag5.874 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Bi
S
Pb
Cu
Ag
Common Impurities:
Sb

Crystallography of CupropavoniteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
B2/m
Setting:
C2/m
Cell Parameters:
a = 13.45 Å, b = 4.02 Å, c = 33.06 Å
β = 93.5°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 3.346 : 1 : 8.224
Unit Cell V:
1,784.19 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
4
Morphology:
Fine lamellar intergrowths with pavonite.

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
2.892 Å(very strong)
2.257 Å(very strong)
2.193 Å(very strong)
2.118 Å(very strong)
2.019 Å(very strong)
2.007 Å(very strong)
1.8011 Å(very strong)
Comments:
Alaska mine, Colorado, USA. Data from the type description.

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
High-? alteration and/or metamorphism
33 : Minerals deposited by hydrothermal metal-rich fluids (see also [#12])
Geological Setting:
Mesothermal base and precious metal deposits.

Type Occurrence of CupropavoniteHide

Place of Conservation of Type Material:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 1124.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Exsolved in pavonite and associated with interstitial gustavite.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of CupropavoniteHide

Other Language Names for CupropavoniteHide

Relationship of Cupropavonite to other SpeciesHide

Other Members of Pavonite Homologous Series:
BenjaminiteAg3Bi7S12Mon. 2/m : B2/m
CupromakopavoniteAg3Cu8Pb4Bi19S38Mon. 2/m : B2/m
CupromakovickyiteCu4AgPb2Bi9S18Mon. 2/m : B2/m
DantopaiteAg5Bi13S22Mon. 2/m : B2/m
GraţianiteMnBi2S4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
GrumipluciteHgBi2S4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
Kudriavite(Cd,Pb)Bi2S4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
LuboržákiteMn2AsSbS5Mon. 2/m : B2/m
MakovickyiteCu1.12Ag0.81Pb0.27Bi5.35S9Mon. 2/m
MummeiteCu0.58Ag3.11Pb1.10Bi6.65S13Mon.
PavoniteAgBi3S5Mon. 2/m : B2/m
SunshuiteFeBi2S4Mon. 2/m : B2/m

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
3 photos of Cupropavonite associated with PyriteFeS2
3 photos of Cupropavonite associated with QuartzSiO2
3 photos of Cupropavonite associated with 'UM1988-05-S:AgBiCuHgPb'(Hg,Ag,Cu,Pb)5Pb5Bi11S27
3 photos of Cupropavonite associated with BenjaminiteAg3Bi7S12
2 photos of Cupropavonite associated with PavoniteAgBi3S5
2 photos of Cupropavonite associated with DantopaiteAg5Bi13S22

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

2.JA.FerdowsiiteAg8(Sb5As3)S16Mon. 2/m : P21/b
2.JA.LuboržákiteMn2AsSbS5Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.SangenaroiteAg8(Sb8-xAsx)SΣ16 Mon. 2/m
2.JA.05aPavoniteAgBi3S5Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05bGrumipluciteHgBi2S4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05cKudriavite(Cd,Pb)Bi2S4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05dCupromakovickyiteCu4AgPb2Bi9S18Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05eBenjaminiteAg3Bi7S12Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05iLivingstoniteHgSb4S6(S2)Mon. 2/m : B2/b
2.JA.05hMozgovaitePbBi4S7Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m)
2.JA.05DantopaiteAg5Bi13S22Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05SelenodantopaiteAg5Bi13Se22Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05gBorodaeviteAg5(Bi,Pb,Fe)8(Sb,Bi)2S17Mon.
2.JA.05aCupromakopavoniteAg3Cu8Pb4Bi19S38Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.05dMakovickyiteCu1.12Ag0.81Pb0.27Bi5.35S9Mon. 2/m
2.JA.05fMummeiteCu0.58Ag3.11Pb1.10Bi6.65S13Mon.
2.JA.10bKupčíkiteCu3.4Fe0.6Bi5S10Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.10dPizgrischite(Cu,Fe)Cu14PbBi17S35Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.10cHodrušiteCu8Bi12S22Mon. 2/m
2.JA.10aCuprobismutiteCu8AgBi13S24Mon. 2/m : B2/m
2.JA.10ePadĕraiteCu7[(Cu,Ag)0.33Pb1.33Bi11.33]S22Mon. 2/m : P21/m
2.JA.15SchapbachiteAg0.4Pb0.2Bi0.4SIso. m3m(4/m32/m) : Fm3m
2.JA.15CuboargyriteAgSbS2Iso. m3m(4/m32/m)
2.JA.20MatilditeAgBiS2Trig. 32 : P3121
2.JA.20VolynskiteAgBiTe2Trig. 3m(32/m) : P3m1
2.JA.20BohdanowicziteAgBiSe2Trig. 3m(32/m) : P3m1

Other InformationHide

Notes:
Etch tests are negative with solutions of KOH, HgCl2, KCN, FeCl3, and HCl (1:1).
HNO3 (1:1) produces a yellow-brown film.
Concentrated HNO3 etches cupropavonite more strongly than pavonite.
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for CupropavoniteHide

References for CupropavoniteHide

Localities for CupropavoniteHide

Showing 30 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Austria
 
  • Carinthia
    • Spittal an der Drau District
      • Großkirchheim
        • Zirknitz
          • Kleine Zirknitz valley
            • Kluidscharte
Paar et al. (1982) +1 other reference
Brazil
 
  • Mato Grosso
    • Nova Santa Helena
Silva (2017)
Germany
 
  • Baden-Württemberg
    • Freiburg Region
      • Ortenaukreis
        • Oberwolfach
Kolitsch et al. (2019)
Iran
 
  • Zanjan Province
    • Tarom County
Mousavi Motlagh et al. (2024)
Italy
 
  • Sardinia
    • South Sardinia Province
      • Nuxis
Deidda et al. (2022)
Deidda et al. (2023)
Gian Claudio Lecca et al. (2024)
      • Villaputzu
Venerandi Pirri (2002)
Japan
 
  • Hokkaidō Prefecture
    • Ishikari Subprefecture
      • Sapporo City
島倉広至 et al. (2015)
Peru
 
  • Huancavelica
    • Angaraes Province
      • Ccochaccasa District
        • Julcani mining district
Duval et al. (1986)
Romania
 
  • Bihor County
    • Nucet
Cook et al. (2002)
Shimizu et al. (1998)
Shimizu et al. (1998)
Shimizu et al. (1998)
  • Caraş-Severin County
Cook et al. (2002)
Cook et al. (2002)
Cook et al. (2002)
Russia
 
  • Chelyabinsk Oblast
    • Kaslinsky District
Rogov et al. (2023)
Rogov et al. (2023)
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Cochise County
Graeme (1993)
Graeme (1993) +1 other reference
  • California
    • Inyo County
      • Darwin Hills
        • Darwin Mining District
          • Darwin
Mineral News: 16 (9) +2 other references
  • Colorado
    • Clear Creek County
      • Alice Mining District (Yankee Mining District; Lincoln Mining District)
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Park County
      • Montezuma Mining District
        • Hall Valley (Hall's Valley)
Nuffield (1980) +1 other reference
    • San Juan County
      • Poughkeepsie Gulch
Eckel et al. (1997)
  • Nevada
    • Lincoln County
Castor et al. (2004)
      • Delamar Mining District
Castor et al. (2004)
Rocks & Minerals. Nov. 1999.
Uzbekistan
 
  • Tashkent Region
    • Ohangaron District
Kovalenker (2003)
Kovalenker et al. (1997)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 03:16:31 Page updated: August 30, 2026 01:02:55
Go to top of page