Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Sun; Picnic Creek; Hot Prospects, Shungnak Mining District, Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Sun; Picnic Creek; Hot ProspectsGroup of Prospects
Shungnak Mining DistrictMining District
Northwest Arctic BoroughBorough
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
67° 4' 13'' North , 155° 2' 34'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Group of Prospects
Köppen climate type:
Mindat Locality ID:
200220
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:200220:3
GUID (UUID V4):
0


Location: This site represents several prospects in an approximately 12-square-mile area northeast of Beaver Creek. The coordinates are for the center of the area in the SE1/4 of sec. 1, T. 19 N., R. 17 E., of the Kateel River Meridian. The location is accurate to within 2000 ft. The site corresponds to localities 68 and 69 of Grybeck and Nelson (1981).
Geology: The Sun deposit consists of stratiform, banded, massive to semi-massive sulfides in a series of elongate, southwest-plunging, lenticular bodies along three distinct mineral horizons. An upper horizon is silver, lead, and zinc rich, a middle horizon is copper rich, and a lower horizon is copper and zinc rich. According to Zdepski (1980), the Sun prospect is in a 5,000-foot-thick sequence of Devonian felsic to andesitic volcanic, volcaniclastic and intercalated pelitic sedimentary rocks separated into upper and lower units by calcareous metabasite beds of variable thickness. The upper unit of metarhyolite and related rocks contains all of the identified massive sulfides; the lower unit is dominantly pelitic schist and metarhyolite. As described by Andover Ventures (2008, Sun), the Sun deposit was found in the mid-1970's by Sunshine Mining Company and has been variously studied by Anaconda Minerals, Noranda Mining, and Teck Cominco. The Sun deposit consists of 13 SUN claims and 12 HOT claims and has been extensively drilled. As of June 2007, Andover has staked 68, 160-acre claims adjacent to the Sun deposit and drilled 20 holes in 2007 (Andover Ventures, 2007, Andover-Sun; 2008, Sun). The results for 13 of the holes have been released. Some notable intercepts include: 10.94 meters of 2.34 percent copper, 0.77 percent lead, 5.98 percent zinc, 68.1 grams of silver per ton, and 0.266 gram of gram of gold per ton; 5.08 meters with 4.34 percent copper, 0.58 percent lead, 2.76 percent zinc, 99.1 grams of silver per ton, and 0.199 gram of gold per ton; 37.01 meters of 1.17 percent copper, 1.85 percent lead, 7.26 percent zinc, 44.0 grams of silver per ton and 0.179 gram of gold per ton; and 11.0 meters of 1.07 percent copper, 5.38 percent lead, 16.54 percent zinc, 88.6 grams of silver per ton, and 0.210 gram of gold per ton. Andover Ventures (2008, Sun) cites a 1976 Anaconda report that the main Sun deposit contains 12,500,000 tons of inferred resources with a grade of 1.8 percent copper, 5.3 percent zinc, 2.6 ounces per ton of silver, and 1.8 percent lead. Andover also cites a 1977, Anaconda preliminary feasibility study that gives the 'inferred resources' amenable to open-pit mining at SUN as: 1) 2,399,000 tons with a grade of 1.93 percent copper, 4.51 percent zinc, 2.39 ounces of silver per ton, and 1.20 percent lead, and 2) 17,891,000 tons of material with a grade of 1.91 percent copper, 4.46 percent zinc, 2.37 ounces of silver per ton, and 1.18 percent lead.
Workings: Andover Ventures (2008, Sun) cites a 1976 Anaconda report that the main Sun deposit contains 12,500,000 tons of inferred resources with a grade of 1.8 percent copper, 5.3 percent zinc, 2.6 ounces per ton of silver, and 1.8 percent lead. Andover also cites a 1977, Anaconda preliminary feasibility study that gives the 'inferred resources' amenable to open-pit mining at SUN as: 1) 2,399,000 tons with a grade of 1.93 percent copper, 4.51 percent zinc, 2.39 ounces of silver per ton, and 1.20 percent lead, and 2) 17,891,000 tons of material with a grade of 1.91 percent copper, 4.46 percent zinc, 2.37 ounces of silver per ton, and 1.18 percent lead.
Age: Devonian, based on radiometric and fossil determinations.
Reserves: Andover Ventures (2008) cites a 1976 Anaconda report that the main Sun deposit contains 12,500,000 tons of ore with a grade of 1.8 percent copper, 5.3 percent zinc, 2.6 ounces per ton of silver, and 1.8 percent lead in 'inferred resources'. Andover also cites a 1977, Anaconda preliminary feasibility study that gives the 'inferred resources' at SUN as: 1) 2,399,000 tons of material with a grade of 1.93 percent copper, 4.51 percent zinc, 2.39 ounces of silver per ton, and 1.20 percent lead that can be mined from an open pit, and 2) 17,891,000 tons of material with a grade of 1.91 percent copper, 4.46 percent zinc, 2.37 ounces of silver per ton, and 1.18 percent lead.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Au, Cu, Pb, Zn
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Kuroko massive sulfide (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 28a).

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


15 valid minerals.

Detailed Mineral List:

Actinolite
Formula: ◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Arsenopyrite
Formula: FeAsS
Baryte
Formula: BaSO4
Bornite
Formula: Cu5FeS4
Calcite
Formula: CaCO3
Calcite var. Iron-bearing Calcite
Formula: (Ca,Fe)CO3
Chalcopyrite
Formula: CuFeS2
Cymrite
Formula: BaAl2Si2(O,OH)8 · H2O
Dolomite
Formula: CaMg(CO3)2
Dolomite var. Iron-bearing Dolomite
Formula: Ca(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2
Enargite
Formula: Cu3AsS4
Galena
Formula: PbS
Muscovite
Formula: KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Quartz
Formula: SiO2
Sphalerite
Formula: ZnS
Stilpnomelane
Formula: (K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
Tremolite
Formula: ◻Ca2Mg5(Si8O22)(OH)2

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Bornite2.BA.15Cu5FeS4
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Arsenopyrite2.EB.20FeAsS
Enargite2.KA.05Cu3AsS4
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
Calcite5.AB.05CaCO3
var. Iron-bearing Calcite5.AB.05(Ca,Fe)CO3
Dolomite5.AB.10CaMg(CO3)2
var. Iron-bearing Dolomite5.AB.10Ca(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2
Group 7 - Sulphates, Chromates, Molybdates and Tungstates
Baryte7.AD.35BaSO4
Group 9 - Silicates
Actinolite9.DE.10◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Tremolite9.DE.10◻Ca2Mg5(Si8O22)(OH)2
Muscovite9.EC.15KAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Cymrite9.EG.05BaAl2Si2(O,OH)8 · H2O
Stilpnomelane9.EG.40(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O

List of minerals for each chemical element

HHydrogen
H Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
H CymriteBaAl2Si2(O,OH)8 · H2O
H MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
H Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
H Tremolite◻Ca2Mg5(Si8O22)(OH)2
CCarbon
C CalciteCaCO3
C DolomiteCaMg(CO3)2
C Calcite var. Iron-bearing Calcite(Ca,Fe)CO3
C Dolomite var. Iron-bearing DolomiteCa(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2
OOxygen
O Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
O BaryteBaSO4
O CalciteCaCO3
O CymriteBaAl2Si2(O,OH)8 · H2O
O DolomiteCaMg(CO3)2
O MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
O QuartzSiO2
O Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
O Tremolite◻Ca2Mg5(Si8O22)(OH)2
O Calcite var. Iron-bearing Calcite(Ca,Fe)CO3
O Dolomite var. Iron-bearing DolomiteCa(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2
NaSodium
Na Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
MgMagnesium
Mg Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Mg DolomiteCaMg(CO3)2
Mg Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
Mg Tremolite◻Ca2Mg5(Si8O22)(OH)2
Mg Dolomite var. Iron-bearing DolomiteCa(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2
AlAluminium
Al CymriteBaAl2Si2(O,OH)8 · H2O
Al MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Al Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
SiSilicon
Si Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Si CymriteBaAl2Si2(O,OH)8 · H2O
Si MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
Si QuartzSiO2
Si Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
Si Tremolite◻Ca2Mg5(Si8O22)(OH)2
SSulfur
S ArsenopyriteFeAsS
S BaryteBaSO4
S BorniteCu5FeS4
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S EnargiteCu3AsS4
S GalenaPbS
S SphaleriteZnS
KPotassium
K MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2
K Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
CaCalcium
Ca Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Ca CalciteCaCO3
Ca DolomiteCaMg(CO3)2
Ca Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
Ca Tremolite◻Ca2Mg5(Si8O22)(OH)2
Ca Calcite var. Iron-bearing Calcite(Ca,Fe)CO3
Ca Dolomite var. Iron-bearing DolomiteCa(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2
FeIron
Fe Actinolite◻Ca2(Mg4.5-2.5Fe0.5-2.5)Si8O22(OH)2
Fe ArsenopyriteFeAsS
Fe BorniteCu5FeS4
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe Stilpnomelane(K,Ca,Na)(Fe,Mg,Al)8(Si,Al)12(O,OH)36 · nH2O
Fe Calcite var. Iron-bearing Calcite(Ca,Fe)CO3
Fe Dolomite var. Iron-bearing DolomiteCa(Mg,Fe)(CO3)2
CuCopper
Cu BorniteCu5FeS4
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Cu EnargiteCu3AsS4
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS
AsArsenic
As ArsenopyriteFeAsS
As EnargiteCu3AsS4
BaBarium
Ba BaryteBaSO4
Ba CymriteBaAl2Si2(O,OH)8 · H2O
PbLead
Pb GalenaPbS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:SP039

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North AmericaContinent
North America PlateTectonic Plate

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Andover Ventures, Inc., 2007, Andover - Sun Property, 2007 Surveyed drill holes: http://www.andoverventures.com/_resources/sun_Dec_2007.pdf (October, 11, 2007). Andover Ventures 2008, http://www.andoverventures.com/projects/sun/ (as of March 4, 2008). Garland, R.E., Eakins, G.R., Trible, T.C., and McClintock, W.W., 1975, Geochemical analysis of rock and stream-sediment samples from Survey Pass A-4, A-5, A-6, B-4, B-5, and B-6 quadrangles: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Open-File Report AOF-67, 4 p., 4 sheets, scale 1:63,360. Grybeck, D.J., and Nelson, S.W., 1981, Mineral deposit map of the Survey Pass quadrangle, Brooks Range, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1176-F, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Marrs, C.D., 1978, Geology of the Sun massive sulfide deposit, Ambler district, Alaska [abs.]: Northwest Mining Association, 84th Annual Convention, Spokane, Washington, Nov. 29-Dec. 2, 1978. Sicherman, H.A., Russell, R.H., and Fikkan, P.R., 1976, The geology and mineralization of the Ambler district, Alaska: Spokane, Wash., Bear Creek Mining Company, 22 p. Smith, T.E., Profett, J.M., and Heatwole, D.A., 1979, Ambler schist belt of northwest Alaska--Host terrane for volcanogenic base metal massive sulfide deposits of mid-Paleozoic age [abs.]: Geoscience Forum, 7th, Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, December 1979, Abstracts, p. 6. Smith, T.E., Profett, J.M., Heatwole, D.A., and Seklemian, R.W., 1977, Geologic setting of base metal massive sulfide deposits, Ambler district, northwest Alaska [abs.]: Alaska Geological Society Symposium, 6th, Anchorage, April 1977, Abstracts with Program, p. 41-42. Zdepski, J.M., 1980, Stratigraphy, mineralogy and zonal relations of the Sun massive-sulfide deposit, Ambler district, northwest Alaska: Fairbanks, University of Alaska, M.Sc. thesis, 93 p.
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 03:00:47 Page updated: August 23, 2025 01:19:47
Go to top of page