Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Quartz vs. Asagiite
It's a classic vs a newbie as the most common named mineral in the crust Quartz is up against an exceedingly-rare sea foam-green mineral discovered just a few years ago Asagiite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Nome Beach and Abrasion Deposits Mine, Nome Mining District, Nome Census Area, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Nome Beach and Abrasion Deposits MineMine
Nome Mining DistrictMining District
Nome Census AreaCensus Area
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
64° 31' 33'' North , 165° 23' 13'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Nome3,806 (2018)2.9km
Mindat Locality ID:
199145
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:199145:4
GUID (UUID V4):
0


Location: Four main gold-bearing beaches, Present Beach (NM255), Second Beach (NM256), Third Beach (NM258), and locally preserved Fourth Beach (NM259), constitute true strandline gold placer deposits of the Nome coastal plain; they are developed between Cape Nome and Cape Rodney. Present Beach is essentially continuous throughout this distance, the Second beach is almost continuous, and Third Beach is discontinuous. Discontinuous deposits such as Intermediate (NM287), Monroeville (NM-257) Submarine Beach (NM285), and Center Creek (NM286), occur in the same general area, but fthey ormed on submarine abrasion platforms offshore of the strandline deposits. The map location is the approximate center of the area of all onshore marine and beach deposits. It is in the NW1/4 section 24, T. 11 S., R. 34 W., Kateel River Meridian. The deposits described in this record are essentially the same as the Nome Beaches of Cobb (1978 [OFR 78-93, p. 119-124]). Cobb's Nome Beaches category includes locality numbers 129, 135, 137-139, and 141-143 of Cobb (1972 [MF 463]). Note that location 138 has been described previously (NM251).
Geology: Three main strandline beach deposits exist at Nome, Present (also First or Modern), Second, and Third. With reference to modern sea level, these beaches formed, respectively, at current sea level, 38 feet and about 70 feet in elevation There is some evidence of a fourth beach at an elevation of 120 feet, and there appear to be other fossil beachlines under the sea. The other so-called beaches (Monroeville, Intermediate, Submarine, and Center Creek) appear to have developed offshore on the seaward abrasion platforms of the beaches. The following general descriptions are largely based on Metcalfe and Tuck (1942). Present Beach extends from Cape Nome to Cape Rodney. It was auriferous throughout, but it was richest near Nome. It formed by reworking marine sedimentary deposits that range from about 10 feet to more than 100 feet in thickness. Gold was characteristically very fine grained and commonly had to be saved by amalgamation. It occurred mainly in lens-like concentrations. Garnet was abundant, black sand less so. Second Beach is nearly continuous, but interrupted by stream erosion at Penny River, Snake River, Nome River, and Hastings Creek. It has an average elevation of about 38 feet and occurred from a few hundred feet to 3,000 feet inland of Present Beach. Second Beach also formed mainly by reworking marine sediment. At Nome and near Snake and Penny Rivers, Second Beach appears to have formed on sand spits. West of Hastings Creek and at other places, this beach formed as the sea was encroaching on headlands composed of marine sediments. Most of the gold in Second Beach deposits, except near Otter Creek, was fine grained. The highly productive Third Beach is discontinuous and is complex in origin. To the east of Nome near Hastings Creek, it apparently formed in an environment of lagoons and barrier bars and is not well developed or very productive. Near Irene and Cunningham Creeks and from Macdonald to near Little Creeks, it formed as a narrow strandline deposit against gravel headlands. It has been removed by erosion on Snake River, but it exists near Sunset Creek in the Nome C-2 quadrangle; it is productive only in a small area. Third Beach is present, but has not been productive,west of Sunset Creek. Some other beach-like deposits, specifically the Intermediate, Monroeville, Submarine, and Center Creek deposits, appear to have formed in an offshore abrading environment as the sea advanced onto the shoreline. Sulfides, principally pyrite and arsenopyrite, are much more abundant in platform than in the strandline deposits. The lens-shaped beach deposits of gold in garnet or black sand characteristic of the strandline beaches are not well developed in the abrading marine environment. In general, gold in the marine abrasion platforms is coarser than in the strandline deposits. Several of the deposits have complex origins. The richest part of Submarine Beach could have formed near the mouth of ancestral Anvil Creek (Metcalfe and Tuck, 1942).
Workings: Gold was discovered on Present Beach in 1899 and immediately gave rise to extensive production. Second Beach was discovered in 1902 and Third Beach was discoved in 1904. In 1906, Nome had its most productive year when more than 295,000 ounces of gold were produced (Bundtzen and others, 1994). The Intermediate Beach was discovered in 1906 and Submarine Beach in 1907. By 1908, the richest parts of the beaches were worked out, but major production continued in the abrasion areas seaward from the true beaches. In general, production from the submerged deposits was by drift-mining and by large-scale hydraulic operations, until the development of cold-water thawing in the 1920's. The first two large dredges and thaw-fields were installed in 1923 (Brooks, 1925, p. 49). Extensive development by dredging did not take place until about 1930 as defects were worked out of the thawing process. The great dredging era was from about 1927 (Smith, 1930 [B 810]) until World War II (Smith, 1942). Dredges were reactivated after World War II and operated until about 1965. Two dredges operated after 1975 in the Dry Creek and Submarine Beach areas (Kastelic, 1975). From 1996 until 1998 all operations were truck-shovel open pits, with summertime washing.
Age: Late Pliocene and Pleistocene.
Production: Most of the production of the Nome district (NM250) has come from the strandline deposits and their related offshore abrasion deposits.
Reserves: Resources locally remain in the remnants of the beach and abrasion deposits that have not been previously mined.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Au; (Minor) - W
Development Status: Yes; large
Deposit Model: Lensoid deposits of fine gold associated with black and ruby sands in the true b

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


7 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 1 - Elements
Native Gold1.AA.05Au
Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Arsenopyrite2.EB.20FeAsS
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Magnetite4.BB.05Fe2+Fe3+2O4
Hematite4.CB.05Fe2O3
Ilmenite4.CB.05Fe2+TiO3
Group 7 - Sulphates, Chromates, Molybdates and Tungstates
Scheelite7.GA.05Ca(WO4)
Unclassified
'Garnet Group'-X3Z2(SiO4)3

List of minerals for each chemical element

OOxygen
O HematiteFe2O3
O IlmeniteFe2+TiO3
O MagnetiteFe2+Fe23+O4
O ScheeliteCa(WO4)
O Garnet GroupX3Z2(SiO4)3
SiSilicon
Si Garnet GroupX3Z2(SiO4)3
SSulfur
S ArsenopyriteFeAsS
S PyriteFeS2
CaCalcium
Ca ScheeliteCa(WO4)
TiTitanium
Ti IlmeniteFe2+TiO3
FeIron
Fe ArsenopyriteFeAsS
Fe HematiteFe2O3
Fe IlmeniteFe2+TiO3
Fe MagnetiteFe2+Fe23+O4
Fe PyriteFeS2
AsArsenic
As ArsenopyriteFeAsS
WTungsten
W ScheeliteCa(WO4)
AuGold
Au Native GoldAu

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:NM252

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North AmericaContinent
North America PlateTectonic Plate

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 6, 2026 14:00:53 Page updated: August 15, 2025 23:43:58
Go to top of page