Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Dahl Prospect, Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Dahl ProspectProspect
Yukon-Koyukuk Census AreaCensus Area
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
62° 19' 37'' North , 153° 48' 36'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Köppen climate type:
Mindat Locality ID:
197130
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:197130:2
GUID (UUID V4):
0


The Dahl prospect is not typical of other deposits in the Farewell Mineral Belt. The mineralized zone appears to be controlled by a regional structure that extends toward the Crash (MG049) and Little Bird (MG047) prospects.
Location: The Dahl prospect is located in a steep north-trending gulch 4.0 kilometers due west of the outlet of Smith Lake and one kilometer south of the confluence of the headward tributaries of Sheep Creek at an elevation of 3,600 feet (1,097 m) near the boundary between sections 19 and 24, T. 26 N., R. 24 W., of the Seward Meridian. The reporter visited the site in 1981 and in 1997. Note that the Dahl prospect is not accurately located in Bundtzen and others (1997; prospect # 14).
Geology: The Dahl prospect consists of several impressive zones of massive chalcopyrite-pyrite-sphalerite mineralization that replaces Lower Paleozoic carbonaceous shale, and in contact zones between a north-trending quartz-feldspar porphyry sill (?) and shale. The massive sulfide mineralization at the Dahl prospect is exposed for over 90 meters along a narrow north-south ravine between two unnamed tributaries of upper Sheep Creek. The quartz-feldspar porphyry sill is parallel to the contact between the Lower Ordovician to Lower Silurian Post River Formation and mid-Silurian Terra Cotta Mountains Sandstone; both are units of the Dillinger subterrane (Bundtzen, Harris, and Gilbert, 1997). The massive sulfide horizon consists primarily of mobilized massive pyrrhotite with variable amounts of chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and traces of tetrahedrite over widths of 2.0 to 4.5 meters within a 4.0 meter to 7.0 meter wide zone of siliceous foliated breccia. This breccia is localized in the faulted contact between the Ordovician-Lower Silurian Post River Formation and the mid to Upper Silurian Terra Cotta Sandstone. Chalcopyrite occurs as fine grained masses up to 15 centimeters thick. Subordinate sphalerite, pyrrhotite, and pyrite occurs with the chalcopyrite and in separate masses up to 5 centimeters thick. Minor quartz gangue occurs in the sulfide zones, which range from 1 to 5 meters thick. Ore genesis for the Dahl prospect is controversial. The Anaconda Minerals Company, which explored the deposit in 1982 with a diamond drill, regarded the Dahl prospect as a shale hosted, sedimentary exhalitive, massive sulfide deposit hosted in lower Silurian tuffaceous(?) shale (Reed, 1982; Brewer and others, 1992). They based this interpretation on : (1) the stratigraphic section of the Dillinger subterrane is very similar to that in the Selwyn basin in Yukon Territory, Canada, which hosts significant 'sedex' mineralization of the same age; (2) the wallrocks at the Dahl prospect contain framboidal pyrite with high lead, zinc and copper backgrounds; (3) pyrite has been altered to pyrrhotite and 'buckshot' textures similar to that observed at Faro orebody, in Yukon; and (4) the whitish (?) layer interlayered with the sulfides was believed to be a syngenetic, submarine tuff. Sulfide-rich shale sections in drill core that were examined by the reporter in 1983 contained the graptolite Mongraptus spiralus which confirms that the host rock for mineralization is Lower Silurian in age. However, Smith and Albanese (1985) observed crosscutting relationships of sulfides and host sediments and sulfide replacements in the younger (?) quartz-feldspar porphyry sill (?). The quartz-feldspar porphyry was also observed to cut bedding in host sediments. Del S34 values from pyrrhotite average -0.2, which suggests derivation from plutonic sources (T.K. Bundtzen, written communication, 1989). Hence, Smith and Albanese (1985) and Bundtzen, Harris, and Gilbert (1997) classified the Dahl prospect as an epigenetic, sulfide replacement deposit. Two drill holes tested the Dahl prospect. Drill hole DP-W01 intersected 5.5 meters of massive sulfide mineralization that averaged 0.9 percent copper, 1.0 percent lead, 6.0 percent zinc, and 177.3 grams/tonne silver. Diamond drill hole DP-D01 intersected a true width of 3.5 meters in semi-massive sulfides that averaged 4.0 percent copper, 0.3 percent lead, 1.0 percent zinc, and 370.1 grams/tonne silver (Brewer and others, 1992). Bundtzen, Kline, and Clough (1982), Smith and Albanese (1985) and Bundtzen, Harris, and Gilbert (1997) reported that mineralized chip-channel surface samples contained up to 5.40 percent copper, 3.48 percent zinc, and 165.0 grams/tonne silver. No estimates of size and grade have been made or are available (Reed, 1982; Brewer and others, 1992).
Workings: The Dahl prospect was discovered by Anaconda Minerals Company in 1980 or 1981 and drilled from a precipitous platform in the steep 'discovery' gulch during the 1982 season. Drill hole DP-W01 intersected a true width of 5.5 meters of massive sulfide averaging 1.0 percent lead, 0.9 percent copper, 6.0 percent zinc, and 177.3 grams/tonne silver. Diamond drill hole DP-D01 intersected semi-massive sulfides with a true width of 3.5 meters that averaged 4.0 percent copper, 0.3 percent lead, 1.0 percent zinc, and 370.1 grams/tonne silver (Brewer and others, 1992). Bundtzen, Kline, and Clough (1982), Smith and Albanese (1985) and Bundtzen, Harris, and Gilbert (1997) reported that mineralized chip-channel surface samples contained up to 5.40 percent copper, 3.48 percent zinc, and 165.0 grams/tonne silver. A downhole mise-a-la-masse survey showed that the DP-D01 intercept is electrically continuous with the surface outcrops, confirming a downdip dimension of at least 150 meters. Additional surface conductivity surveys also suggest that the massive sulfide horizon extends to the north for an additional 150 meters.
Age: Unknown; believed to be either Tertiary, based on presumed age of the associated quartz-feldsar porphyry sill or Silurian based on fossil control (Bundtzen, Harris, and Gilbert, 1997).
Reserves: Although the deposit was drilled, no reserves were calculated or are available.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Cu, Zn; (Minor) - Pb
Development Status: No
Deposit Model: Either polymetallic replacement (?) or sedimentary exhalitive lead-zinc (Cox an

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


5 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Pyrrhotite2.CC.10Fe1-xS
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2

List of minerals for each chemical element

OOxygen
O QuartzSiO2
SiSilicon
Si QuartzSiO2
SSulfur
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S PyriteFeS2
S PyrrhotiteFe1-xS
S SphaleriteZnS
FeIron
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe PyriteFeS2
Fe PyrrhotiteFe1-xS
CuCopper
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:MG053

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North AmericaContinent
North America PlateTectonic Plate
USA

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 00:56:39 Page updated: August 11, 2025 00:38:41
Go to top of page