Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Markcooperite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About MarkcooperiteHide

05195890017271951053084.jpg
Mark Cooper
Formula:
Pb2(UO2)(TeO6)
Colour:
Orange
Lustre:
Adamantine
Hardness:
3
Specific Gravity:
8.496 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named in honor of Mr. Mark Cooper, Canadian mineralogist, University of Manitoba.
The unique feature of the mineral, not observed in any other species, is U-Te diadochy substitution.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
39671
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:39671:8

IMA Classification of MarkcooperiteHide

Approved
IMA Formula:
Pb2+2(U6+O2)Te6+O6
Approval year:
2009

Classification of MarkcooperiteHide

7.EB.25

7 : SULFATES (selenates, tellurates, chromates, molybdates, wolframates)
E : Uranyl sulfates
B : With medium-sized cations

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
McpIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of MarkcooperiteHide

Adamantine
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Orange
Streak:
Light orange
Hardness:
Hardness Data:
Estimated
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
perfect on {100}
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven
Density:
8.496 g/cm3 (Calculated)
Comment:
Calculation based on the empirical formula.

Optical Data of MarkcooperiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 2.11 nβ = 2.12 nγ = 2.29
2V:
Measured: 30° (5)
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.180
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
None observed
Pleochroism:
Weak
Comments:
Shades of orange, absorption X>Y=Z
Comments:
Orientation: X = c, Y = b, Z = a

Chemistry of MarkcooperiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Pb2(UO2)(TeO6)
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Pb45.638 %
U26.214 %
O14.096 %
Te14.053 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Pb
U
O
Te

Crystallography of MarkcooperiteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
P21/b
Cell Parameters:
a = 5.7217(16) Å, b = 7.7476(2) Å, c = 7.889(2) Å
β = 90.833(5)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.739 : 1 : 1.018
Unit Cell V:
349.7 ų
Z:
2

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0017720MarkcooperiteKampf A R, Mills S J, Housley R M, Marty J, Thorne B (2010) Lead-tellurium oxysalts from Otto Mountain near Baker, California: IV. Markcooperite, Pb(UO2)Te6+O6, the first natural uranyl tellurate American Mineralogist 95 1554-15592010Otto Mountain, Baker, California0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
3.501 Å(29)
3.235 Å(100)
2.985 Å(37)
2.873 Å(40)
2.774 Å(30)
2.220 Å(23)
1.990 Å(21)
1.715 Å(22)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):

Type Occurrence of MarkcooperiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Pseudotetragonal prisms to 0.2 mm with the forms {100} and {011}, and botryoidal intergrowths to 0.3 mm in diameter. No twinning was observed.
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, catalog numbers 62510, 62511, and 62512 (three co-type specimens).
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Fracture surfaces and small vugs in brecciated quartz veins.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of MarkcooperiteHide

Other Language Names for MarkcooperiteHide

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
19 photos of Markcooperite associated with HousleyitePb6CuTe6+4O18(OH)2
11 photos of Markcooperite associated with Eckhardite(Ca,Pb)Cu2+Te6+O5(H2O)
10 photos of Markcooperite associated with OttoitePb2TeO5
5 photos of Markcooperite associated with KhinitePb2+Cu2+3[Te6+O6](OH)2
4 photos of Markcooperite associated with QuartzSiO2
4 photos of Markcooperite associated with ChlorargyriteAgCl
3 photos of Markcooperite associated with ThorneitePb6(Te6+2O10)(CO3)Cl2(H2O)
2 photos of Markcooperite associated with Native GoldAu
2 photos of Markcooperite associated with TimroseitePb2Cu5(TeO6)2(OH)2
1 photo of Markcooperite associated with PyrolusiteMn4+O2

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

7.EB.BobcookiteNaAl(UO2)2(SO4)4 · 18H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EB.ZincorietvelditeZn(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)5Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EB.ChenowethiteMg(H2O)6[(UO2)2(SO4)2(OH)2] · 5H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmcm
7.EB.IShinarumpite[Co(H2O)6][(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)] · 4H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EB.Alwilkinsite-(Y)Y(UO2)3(SO4)2O(OH)3(H2O)7 · 7H2OOrth. 222 : P212121
7.EB.GurzhiiteAl(UO2)(SO4)2F · 10H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EB.05JohanniteCu(UO2)2(SO4)2(OH)2 · 8H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EB.05Meitnerite(NH4)(UO2)(SO4)(OH) · 2H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EB.10RietvelditeFe(UO2)(SO4)2(H2O)5Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EB.10DeliensiteFe[(UO2)2(SO4)2(OH)2](H2O)7Orth. mm2 : Pnn2
7.EB.15StrassmanniteAl(UO2)(SO4)2F · 16H2OMon. 2/m : B2/b
7.EB.15LeydetiteFe(UO2)(SO4)2 · 11H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
7.EB.15MagnesioleydetiteMg(UO2)(SO4)2 · 11H2OMon. 2/m : B2/b
7.EB.20Greenlizardite(NH4)Na(UO2)2(SO4)2(OH)2 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 26.2139% 6,553,475 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of MarkcooperiteHide

Not fluorescent.

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for MarkcooperiteHide

References for MarkcooperiteHide

Localities for MarkcooperiteHide

Showing 5 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
DR Congo
 
  • Lualaba
    • Mutshatsha
      • Kamoto
Analyzed by Joy Desor.
USA
 
  • California
    • San Bernardino County
      • Silver Lake Mining District
        • Soda Mountains
          • Baker
Kampf et al. (2010)
Kampf et al. (2010)
Kampf et al. (2010)
Marek Chorazewicz (2026)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 19:41:10 Page updated: August 21, 2026 20:56:19
Go to top of page