Katophorite Root Name Group
A group of related mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
About Katophorite Root Name Group
Formula:
A(CaNa)(C2+4C3+)(AlSi7O22)W2
The katophorite minerals are sodium-calcium amphiboles defined with A(Na+K+2Ca)> 0.5 apfu and 0.5 apfu < C(Al+Fe3++2Ti) < 1.5 apfu.
The individual minerals are defined by the dominant elements in the A, C and the W positions. The most common dominant elements in the various positions are:
A position: Na or K dominant
C2+ position: Mg or Fe2+ dominant
C3+ position: Al or Fe3+ dominant
W position: (OH) or F dominant
The individual minerals are defined by the dominant elements in the A, C and the W positions. The most common dominant elements in the various positions are:
A position: Na or K dominant
C2+ position: Mg or Fe2+ dominant
C3+ position: Al or Fe3+ dominant
W position: (OH) or F dominant
This page provides mineralogical data about Katophorite Root Name Group.
Unique Identifiers
Mindat ID:
39388
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:39388:1
Chemistry of Katophorite Root Name Group
Mindat Formula:
A(CaNa)(C2+4C3+)(AlSi7O22)W2
The katophorite minerals are sodium-calcium amphiboles defined with A(Na+K+2Ca)> 0.5 apfu and 0.5 apfu < C(Al+Fe3++2Ti) < 1.5 apfu.
The individual minerals are defined by the dominant elements in the A, C and the W positions. The most common dominant elements in the various positions are:
A position: Na or K dominant
C2+ position: Mg or Fe2+ dominant
C3+ position: Al or Fe3+ dominant
W position: (OH) or F dominant
The katophorite minerals are sodium-calcium amphiboles defined with A(Na+K+2Ca)> 0.5 apfu and 0.5 apfu < C(Al+Fe3++2Ti) < 1.5 apfu.
The individual minerals are defined by the dominant elements in the A, C and the W positions. The most common dominant elements in the various positions are:
A position: Na or K dominant
C2+ position: Mg or Fe2+ dominant
C3+ position: Al or Fe3+ dominant
W position: (OH) or F dominant
Chemical Analysis
Oxide wt%:
Showing 12 of 25 analyses on this page.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 45.72 % | 39.09 % | 43.12 % | 49,1 % | 45.88 % | 48.8 % | 48.2 % | 47.15 % | 46.06 % | 46.26 % | 49.42 % | 51.26 % |
| TiO2 | 1.69 % | 1.9 % | 0.47 % | 0,17 % | 0.24 % | 0.2 % | 0.35 % | 0.30 % | 0.54 % | 1.57 % | 3.84 % | 0.40 % |
| ZrO2 | 0.03 % | 0.03 % | ||||||||||
| Al2O3 | 2.79 % | 9.31 % | 15.28 % | 8,22 % | 11.73 % | 10.18 % | 10.25 % | 12.55 % | 13.43 % | 2.99 % | 1.64 % | 1.96 % |
| Ga2O3 | 0.01 % | |||||||||||
| V2O3 | 0.01 % | 0.01 % | ||||||||||
| Cr2O3 | 0.01 % | 0,04 % | 0.01 % | 0.01 % | 0.05 % | |||||||
| Fe2O3* | 4.15 % | 2.38 % | ||||||||||
| FeO* | 27.17 % | 24.91 % | ||||||||||
| MnO* | 2.39 % | 2.14 % | ||||||||||
| ZnO | 0.14 % | 0.11 % | 0.37 % | |||||||||
| MgO | 1.91 % | 3.67 % | 7.22 % | 11,77 % | 9.67 % | 11.28 % | 12.45 % | 12.12 % | 13.7 % | 4.28 % | 2.42 % | 11.50 % |
| CaO | 5.67 % | 8.83 % | 6.5 % | 8,06 % | 9.98 % | 8.72 % | 7.66 % | 7.72 % | 9.63 % | 7.15 % | 3.55 % | 4.75 % |
| SrO | 0.02 % | 0.01 % | ||||||||||
| BaO | 0.02 % | 0.01 % | ||||||||||
| Na2O | 5.15 % | 3.76 % | 5.98 % | 3.9 % | 3.29 % | 4.8 % | 4.42 % | 4.61 % | 3.56 % | 4.55 % | 6.68 % | 6.67 % |
| K2O | 1.18 % | 1.46 % | 0.74 % | 0.2 % | 0.24 % | 0.31 % | 0.7 % | 0.77 % | 0.25 % | 1.24 % | 1.48 % | 0.92 % |
| F | 1.37 % | 1.86 % | 1.87 % | 2.89 % | ||||||||
| Cl | 0.06 % | 0.02 % | 0.06 % | |||||||||
| H2O (by stoichiometry) | 0.80 % | 0.62 % | ||||||||||
| -O=F+Cl | -0.59 % | -0.80 % | ||||||||||
| Fe2O3 | 2.64 % | 6.79 % | ||||||||||
| FeO | 27.11 % | 15.01 % | 15,68 % | 16.94 % | 13.58 % | 13.10 % | 12.69 % | 10.69 % | 27.02 % | 8.64 % | ||
| MnO | 1.27 % | 0.59 % | 0,04 % | 0.07 % | 0.04 % | 0.05 % | 0.05 % | 0.08 % | 1.27 % | 4.30 % | ||
| NiO | 0,01 % | |||||||||||
| H2O | 2.01 % | |||||||||||
| FeO2 | ||||||||||||
| Li2O | 0.09 % | |||||||||||
| O=F | -1.22 % | |||||||||||
| Total: | 99.7 % | 96.4 % | 99.56 % | 95.1 % | 98.05 % | 97.91 % | 97.18 % | 97.96 % | 97.96 % | 99.39 % | 99.24 % | 99.32 % |
Empirical formulas:
| Sample ID | Empirical Formula |
|---|---|
| 1 | (Na0.75K0.24)(Ca0.98Na0.87Mn2+0.15)(Fe2+3.68Mg0.46Fe3+0.45Ti0.21Mn2+0.18Zn0.02)[Si7.41Al0.53Fe3+0.06O22]([OH]0.87F0.70O0.41Cl0.02) |
| 13 | (Na0.593K0.034)Σ0.627(Ca1.203Na0.613Fe0.162Mn0.023)Σ2.001(Fe2+1.938Mg1.901Al0.773Fe3+0.322Ti0.056Ni0.011)Σ5.001(Si6.892Al1.108)Σ8O22((OH)1.888O0.112)Σ2 |
| 14 | (Na0,798K0,07)?0,868 (Na1,489Ca0,466Fe0,045)?2 (Feii2,02Mg1,652Al1,205FeIII0,08Ti0,044)?5,001 (Si7,25Al0,75)?8 O22 ((OH)1,999O0,001)?2 |
| 4 | (Na0.51K0.037)Σ0.547 (Ca1.265Na0.598Fe0.131Mn0.005)Σ1.999 (Mg2.571Fe2+1.552Al0.614Fe3+0.238Ti0.019Cr0.005Ni0.001)Σ5 (Si7.195Al0.805)Σ8 O22 ((OH)1.962O0.038)Σ2 |
| 15 | (Na0.49 K0.08 )Σ0.57 (Na0.58Ca1.42)Σ2.00 ( Mg2.56Fe1.28Ti0.06Al1.19)Σ5.09(Al1.19Si6.48)Σ8.00O22OH2 |
| 9 | (Na0.47 K0.05 )Σ0.53 (Na0.52Ca1.48)Σ2.00 ( Mg2.94Fe1.29Ti0.06Al0.90)Σ5.19(Al1.38Si6.62)Σ8.00O22OH2 |
| 16 | (Na0.83K0.17)(Ca1.25Na0.67Mn2+0.08)(Fe2+2.31Mg1.69Fe3+0.59Ti0.22Mn2+0.14Al0.04Zn0.01)[Si7.03Al0.97O22](F0.96[OH]0.58O0.45Cl0.02) |
| 10 | (Na0.74K0.25)(Ca1.23Na0.67Mn2+0.11)(Fe2+3.33Mg1.02Fe3+0.25Ti0.19Mn2+0.18Zn0.01)[Si7.40Al0.56Fe3+0.03O22](F0.94[OH]0.67O0.38Cl0.01) |
| 17 | (K0.663Na0.353)1.016 (Na1.408Ca0.592)2 (Mg2.433FeII1.963FeIII0.253Ti0.289MnII0.055Li0.036)5.043 (Si7.846Al0.154)8 O22 ((OH)1.182F0.508O0.310)2 |
| 18 | A(Na0.437K0.154)B0.591( (Na0.879Ca1.049Mn0.072) C2.00( (Mg2.938Li0.065Fe2+0.796Mn2+0.405Fe3+0.752Ti0.045) 5.000 T( (Si7.657Al0.323) 7.980OW22( (F1.352(OH) 0.648) 2.00-d-d- |
| 12 | A(Na0.749K0.175)0.924 B( (Na1.175Ca0.757Mn0.068) 2.00 C(Mg2.551Li0.054Fe2+1.071Mn2+0.474Zn0.041Fe3+0.760Ti0.045) 5.001 T( (Si7.628Al0.344) 7.972O22 W( (F1.360(OH) 0.640 2.00-d-d- |
Sample references:
| ID | Locality | Reference | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Água de Pau Volcano, São Miguel, Azores, Portugal | Slightly brighter BSE-Z outermost rim of weakly zoned amphibole. The main portion of the crystals grade to ferro-ferri-fluoro-katophorite (compare with pts. 76 and 90). EPMA data normalized to ∑cations = 16. *valences of Fe and Mn calculated by normalization-imposed charge balance. X-site oxygen calculated from 2*Ti, with OH calculated from stoichiometry. | |
| 2 | Marinkas Kwela, Karasburg West, ǁKaras Region, Namibia | Sample from a foyaite | |
| 3 | Sierra de las Minas, Motagua Valley, Guatemala | Sample from retrograded eclogite | |
| 4 | Engebøfjellet Eclogite Deposit, Naustdal, Sunnfjord, Vestland, Norway | Matrix amphibole in eclogite. Formula normalized by use of Locock, A. J. (2014). An Excel spreadsheet to classify chemical analyses of amphiboles following the IMA 2012 recommendations. Computers & Geosciences, 62, 1-11. | |
| 5 | Akeyazhi River valley, Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture, Xinjiang, China | Sample from eclogite | |
| 6 | Roadcut Rv 5, Kvineset, Førde, Sunnfjord, Vestland, Norway | Rim of amphibole in eclogite matrix formed under eclogite facies conditions EPMA analysis | |
| 7 | " " | Analysis of core of matrix amphibole formed under eclogite facies conditions. EPMA analysis | |
| 8 | " " | Analysis of rim of eclogite matrix amphibole formed under eclogite facies conditions. EPMA analysis | |
| 9 | Hohl-Felsen eclogite, Wernersdorf, Wies, Deutschlandsberg District, Styria, Austria | EMPA analysis (University of Vienna) of an amphibole from eclogite facies vein in eclogite | |
| 10 | Água de Pau Volcano, São Miguel, Azores, Portugal | Slightly brighter BSE-Z main body of weakly zoned amphibole. Outermost rim grades to F-enriched ferro-ferri-katophorite (compare with pts. 90 and 91). EPMA data normalized to ∑cations = 16. *valences of Fe and Mn calculated by normalization-imposed charge balance. X-site oxygen calculated from 2*Ti, with OH calculated from stoichiometry. | |
| 11 | Pantelleria Island, Trapani Province, Sicily, Italy | Sample collected from an alkaline trachyte and analyzed using a combines WDS-EDS technique using a CAMENCA SX-50 electron microprobe. Data reduction was made using ZAF4/FLS software. | |
| 12 | Virgin Canyon pluton, Questa, Taos County, New Mexico, USA | A single crystal about 0.2x2mm was analyzed with EMPA, XRD and site scattering techniques. Li is ordered at M3, which is compensated by Fe3+ in the M2 site. | |
| 13 | Engebøfjellet Eclogite Deposit, Naustdal, Sunnfjord, Vestland, Norway | Amphibole found as inclusion in garnet. Formula normalized by use of Locock, A. J. (2014). An Excel spreadsheet to classify chemical analyses of amphiboles following the IMA 2012 recommendations. Computers & Geosciences, 62, 1-11. | |
| 14 | Isasca, Cuneo Province, Piedmont, Italy | Tropper et al. (2000) prints the analyses given as ferro-nybøite by : T. Hirajima and R. Compagnoni : "Petrology of a jadeite-quartz-almandine-phengite fels with retrograde ferro-nyböite from the Dora-Maira Massif, Western Alps", Eur. Journ. Mineral., 1993, 5, pp 943-955 The analyses normalizes to ferro-katophorite, see https://www.mindat.org/locentry-769804.html | |
| 15 | Hohl-Felsen eclogite, Wernersdorf, Wies, Deutschlandsberg District, Styria, Austria | EMPA analysis (University of Vienna) of an amphibole from eclogite matrix | |
| 16 | Água de Pau Volcano, São Miguel, Azores, Portugal | Slightly darker BSE-Z central "core" of weakly zoned amphibole (compare with pts. 76 and 91). EPMA data normalized to ∑cations = 16. *valences of Fe and Mn calculated by normalization-imposed charge balance. X-site oxygen calculated from 2*Ti, with OH calculated from stoichiometry. | |
| 17 | Coyote Peak, Humboldt County, California, USA | Analyzed by single crystal X-ray and electron- and ion-microprobe techniques. The sample is also analyzed for Li and H. | |
| 18 | Amalia tuff, Questa, Taos County, New Mexico, USA | A single crystal about 0.2x2mm was analyzed with EMPA, XRD and site scattering techniques. Li is ordered at M3, which is compensated by Fe3+ in the M2 site. |
Crystal Structure
Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
CIF File Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
Data courtesy of the American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database. Click on an AMCSD ID to view structure
| ID | Species | Reference | Link | Year | Locality | Pressure (GPa) | Temp (K) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0020689 | Katophorite | Oberti R, Boiocchi M, Hawthorne F C, Ball N A, Harlow G E (2015) Katophorite from the Jade Mine Tract, Myanmar: mineral description of a rare (grandfathered) endmember of the amphibole supergroup Mineralogical Magazine 79 355-363 | 2015 | near Hpakan, Jade Mine Tract, Kachin State, Myanmar | 0 | 293 | |
| 0006114 | Ferri-fluoro-katophorite | Hawthorne F C, Oberti R, Martin R F (2006) Short-range order in amphiboles from the Bear Lake diggings, Ontario The Canadian Mineralogist 44 1171-1179 | ![]() | 2006 | Bear Lake diggings, Bancroft area of Ontario, Canada | 0 | 293 |
| 0006116 | Ferri-fluoro-katophorite | Hawthorne F C, Oberti R, Martin R F (2006) Short-range order in amphiboles from the Bear Lake diggings, Ontario The Canadian Mineralogist 44 1171-1179 | ![]() | 2006 | Bear Lake diggings, Bancroft area of Ontario, Canada | 0 | 293 |
| 0006115 | Katophorite | Hawthorne F C, Oberti R, Martin R F (2006) Short-range order in amphiboles from the Bear Lake diggings, Ontario The Canadian Mineralogist 44 1171-1179 | ![]() | 2006 | Bear Lake diggings, Bancroft area of Ontario, Canada | 0 | 293 |
| 0012382 | Ferri-katophorite | Pushcharovsky D Y, Lebedeva Y S, Pekov I V, Ferraris G, Novakova A A, Ivaldi G (2003) Crystal structure of magnesioferrikatophorite Crystallography Reports 48 16-23 | 2003 | Turiy Cape, Kola Peninsula, Russia | 0 | 293 | |
| 0005493 | Katophorite | Hawthorne F C, Oberti R, Sardone N (1996) Sodium at the A site in clinoamphiboles: the effects of composition on patterns of order The Canadian Mineralogist 34 577-593 | ![]() | 1996 | 0 | 293 | |
| 0005492 | Katophorite | Hawthorne F C, Oberti R, Sardone N (1996) Sodium at the A site in clinoamphiboles: the effects of composition on patterns of order The Canadian Mineralogist 34 577-593 | ![]() | 1996 | 0 | 293 |
CIF Raw Data - click here to close
Relationship of Katophorite Root Name Group to other Species
Member of:
Other Members of Sodium-Calcium Amphibole Subgroup:
| Barroisite Root Name Group | ◻(CaNa)(C2+3C3+2)(AlSi7O22)W2 | |
| Richterite Root Name Group | A(CaNa)C5(Si8O22)W2 | Mon. |
| Taramite Root Name Group | A(CaNa)(C2+3C3+2)(Al2Si6O22)W2 | |
| Winchite Root Name Group | ◻(CaNa)(C2+4C3+)(Si8O22)W2 | Mon. |
Katophorite Root Name Group Members:
| Ferri-fluoro-katophorite | Na(CaNa)(Mg4Fe3+)(AlSi7O22)F2 | Mon. 2/m : B2/m |
| Ferri-katophorite | Na(CaNa)(Mg4Fe3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH)2 | Mon. 2/m : B2/m |
| 'Ferro-ferri-fluoro-katophorite' | Na(CaNa)(Fe2+4Fe3+)(AlSi7O22)F2 | Mon. |
| Ferro-ferri-katophorite | Na(NaCa)(Fe2+4Fe3+)(Si7Al)O22(OH)2 | Mon. 2/m : B2/m |
| Ferro-katophorite | Na(CaNa)(Fe2+4Al)(AlSi7O22)(OH)2 | Mon. 2/m : B2/m |
| 'Fluoro-katophorite' | Na(CaNa)(Mg4Al)(AlSi7O22)F2 | Mon. |
| Katophorite | Na(CaNa){Mg4Al)(AlSi7O22)(OH)2 | Mon. 2/m : B2/m |
| 'Potassic-ferri-katophorite' | K(CaNa)(Mg4Fe3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH)2 | |
| 'Potassic-ferro-ferri-katophorite' | K(CaNa)(Fe2+4Fe3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH)2 | |
| 'Potassic-fluoro-katophorite' | K(CaNa)(Mg4Al)(AlSi7O22)F2 |
Click on any node to view relationships. Formula-derived relationship network for the group members above. Use Find related species to add formula-neighbour species outside the current group view. Solid links show inferred chemical differences; dashed violet links show same-formula crystallographic differences. Hydration states are not treated as relationship changes. These relationships do not imply any real-world substitution reactions between these species.
Other Information
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Katophorite Root Name Group in petrology
An essential component of rock names highlighted in red, an accessory component in rock names highlighted in green.
Internet Links for Katophorite Root Name Group
mindat.org URL:
https://www.mindat.org/min-39388.html
Please feel free to link to this page.
Please feel free to link to this page.
Search Engines:
Mineral Dealers:
References for Katophorite Root Name Group
Localities for Katophorite Root Name Group
Showing 241 localities.
Locality List
- This locality has map coordinates listed.
- This locality has estimated coordinates.
ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence.
? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.




symbol to view information about a locality.
The
Kovdor Phlogopite mine, Kovdor Massif, Kovdorsky District, Murmansk Oblast, Russia