Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Parsonsite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About ParsonsiteHide

08337440017271925847754.jpg
Arthur Leonard Parsons
Formula:
Pb2(UO2)(PO4)2
Water content appears to be variable.
Both 0-0.5H2O and ~2H2O per formula unit were measured.
Colour:
Light citron-yellow, honey-brown, green-brown, pale rose (rare); pale yellow in transmitted light.
Lustre:
Sub-Adamantine, Greasy
Hardness:
2½ - 3
Specific Gravity:
5.72 - 5.75
Crystal System:
Triclinic
Name:
In honor of Arthur Leonard Parsons (1873-1957), Professor and Head of Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Toronto (1936-1943), Assistant Director (1920-1939) and Director (1939-1957) of the Royal Ontario Museum.
Hallimondite-Parsonsite Series.
The phosphate analogue of Hallimondite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
3126
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:3126:0

IMA Classification of ParsonsiteHide

Classification of ParsonsiteHide

8.EA.10

8 : PHOSPHATES, ARSENATES, VANADATES
E : Uranyl phosphates and arsenates
A : UO2:RO4 = 1:2
40.2a.31.1

40 : HYDRATED NORMAL PHOSPHATES,ARSENATES AND VANADATES
2a : AB2(XO4)2·xH2O, containing (UO2)2+
19.11.36

19 : Phosphates
11 : Phosphates of U

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
PsoIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Pronunciation of ParsonsiteHide

Pronunciation:
PlayRecorded byCountry
Jolyon RalphUnited Kingdom

Physical Properties of ParsonsiteHide

Sub-Adamantine, Greasy
Transparency:
Transparent, Translucent
Colour:
Light citron-yellow, honey-brown, green-brown, pale rose (rare); pale yellow in transmitted light.
Hardness:
2½ - 3 on Mohs scale
Cleavage:
None Observed
Fracture:
Conchoidal
Density:
5.72 - 5.75 g/cm3 (Measured)    6.21 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of ParsonsiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.85 nγ = 1.86
2V:
Measured: 11° to 26°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.010
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
relatively strong
Pleochroism:
Non-pleochroic

Chemistry of ParsonsiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Pb2(UO2)(PO4)2

Water content appears to be variable.
Both 0-0.5H2O and ~2H2O per formula unit were measured.
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Pb47.394 %
U27.223 %
O18.298 %
P7.085 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Pb
U
O
P

Crystallography of ParsonsiteHide

Crystal System:
Triclinic
Class (H-M):
1 - Pinacoidal
Space Group:
P1
Cell Parameters:
a = 6.842(4) Å, b = 10.383(6) Å, c = 6.670(40) Å
α = 101.26(7)°, β = 98.17(7)°, γ = 86.38(7)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.659 : 1 : 0.642
Unit Cell V:
459.8 ų
Z:
2
Morphology:
Crystals lath-like, elongated [001] and flattened {010}, exhibiting {001}, {101}, and {100}. Radial-fibrous spherulites; commonly as crusts and powdery aggregates.
Comment:
Non-standard setting; reduced cell: 6.670, 6.842, 10.383 Å, 86.38, 78.74, 81.83°. Cell parameters from Burns (2000)

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0003721ParsonsiteLocock A J, Burns P C, Flynn T M (2005) The role of water in the structures of synthetic hallimondite, Pb2[(UO2)(AsO4)2](H2O)n and synthetic parsonsite, Pb2[(UO2)(PO4)2](H2O)n, 0 < n < 0.5 American Mineralogist 90 240-24620050293
0002459ParsonsiteBurns P C (2000) A new uranyl phosphate chain in the structure of parsonsite American Mineralogist 85 801-80520000293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
4.25 Å(100)
3.28 Å(80)
2.13 Å(60)
1.661 Å(60)
1.852 Å(50)
3.97 Å(40)
3.44 Å(40)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):

Type Occurrence of ParsonsiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Minute tabular crystals.
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
National School of Mines, Paris, France #123.89.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Oxidized zone of a hydrothermal uranium deposit.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of ParsonsiteHide

Other Language Names for ParsonsiteHide

Relationship of Parsonsite to other SpeciesHide

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
46 photos of Parsonsite associated with TorberniteCu(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 12H2O
21 photos of Parsonsite associated with MetatorberniteCu(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 8H2O
16 photos of Parsonsite associated with PyromorphitePb5(PO4)3Cl
12 photos of Parsonsite associated with QuartzSiO2
11 photos of Parsonsite associated with PlumbogummitePbAl3(PO4)(PO3OH)(OH)6
9 photos of Parsonsite associated with OpalSiO2 · nH2O
7 photos of Parsonsite associated with 'Chalcedony'SiO2
5 photos of Parsonsite associated with 'Mimetite-Pyromorphite Series'
5 photos of Parsonsite associated with AutuniteCa(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 10-12H2O
5 photos of Parsonsite associated with MimetitePb5(AsO4)3Cl

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

8.EA.05Phosphowalpurgite(BiO)4(UO2)(PO4)2 · 2H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.EA.05Walpurgite(BiO)4(UO2)(AsO4)2 · 2H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.EA.05Orthowalpurgite(BiO)4(UO2)(AsO4)2 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcm
8.EA.10HallimonditePb2(UO2)(AsO4)2 · nH2OTric. 1 : P1
8.EA.15UlrichiteCaCu(UO2)(PO4)2 · 4H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
8.EA.20LakebogaiteCaNaFe3+2H(UO2)2(PO4)4(OH)2 · 8H2OMon. m : Bb

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 27.2229% 6,805,725 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of ParsonsiteHide

Not fluorescent.

Other InformationHide

Notes:
Radioactive. Soluble in acids.
In a closed tube yields H2O and becomes yellowish.
On charcoal fuses to a black globule.
Health Risks:
Radioactive. Don't store in occupied areas. Avoid inhaling dust. Wash hands after handling.

Internet Links for ParsonsiteHide

References for ParsonsiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for ParsonsiteHide

Showing 75 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Australia
 
  • Northern Territory
    • West Arnhem Region
      • Kakadu
of Raman Spectroscopy 37 (9) +2 other references
Henry et al. (1999)
Austria
 
  • Salzburg
    • St. Johann im Pongau District
      • Bad Gastein
        • Naßfeld valley
          • Kreuzkogel massif
            • Radhausberg
Auer (2005)
Brazil
 
  • Minas Gerais
    • Malacacheta
Stephan Wolfsried collection
Canada
 
  • Ontario
    • Algoma District
      • Peever Township
Traill (1983)
China
 
  • Guangxi
    • Guilin
      • Ziyuan Co.
        • Miaoershan Uranium ore field (Ziyuan Uranium ore field)
Carnegie Museum of Natural History ...
Czech Republic
 
  • Hradec Králové Region
    • Trutnov District
      • Špindlerův Mlýn
        • Medvědín
Journal of Geosciences 54:15-56 +2 other references
  • Karlovy Vary Region
    • Karlovy Vary District
      • Jáchymov
Plášil et al. (2009)
Hloušek et al. (2002)
  • Olomouc Region
    • Jeseník District
      • Javorník
        • Horní Hoštice
Pauliš et al. (2004)
        • Zálesí
Sejkora (1994)
DR Congo (TL)
 
  • Haut-Katanga
    • Kambove Territory
      • Shinkolobwe
Schoep (1923) +4 other references
France
 
  • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
    • Allier
      • Vichy
        • Échassières
Mario Mebus collection (SXRD-analysed by Uwe Kolitsch)
          • Montmins mining district
Cuchet et al. (2000)
    • Haute-Loire
      • Brioude
Belot (1978)
J.-J. Périchaud: "Les Minéraux ...
    • Loire
      • Roanne
        • Saint-Priest-la-Prugne
- (1998)
- (1998)
J.-J. Périchaud: "Où trouver les minéraux d'Auvergne" et al. (Clermont-Ferrand) +1 other reference
    • Puy-de-Dôme
      • Ambert
        • Baffie
J. Chervet
      • Thiers
Poughon et al. (1955)
- (1998)
J. Chervet +1 other reference
P.-C. Guiollard (2002)
J. Chervet
J. Chervet
Queneau (n.d.)
        • Ris
J. Chervet
J. Geffroy
J. Chervet +1 other reference
  • Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
    • Nièvre
      • Château-Chinon
        • Dommartin
- (1998)
    • Saône-et-Loire
      • Charolles
        • Grury
OLLIC Pascal Collection +2 other references
OLLIC Pascal Collection +1 other reference
        • Issy-l'Evêque
OLLIC Pascal Collection +1 other reference
        • Neuvy-Grandchamp
- (1998)
        • Suin
Joachim Esche collection +1 other reference
  • Brittany
    • Côtes-d'Armor
      • Saint-Brieuc
        • Trédaniel
- (1998)
    • Finistère
      • Brest
        • Guilers
- (1998)
    • Morbihan
      • Pontivy
        • Guern
Lukas (1978) +2 other references
  • Grand Est
    • Haut-Rhin
      • Colmar-Ribeauvillé
        • Sainte-Marie-aux-Mines
N. Meisser 2024
  • Nouvelle-Aquitaine
    • Creuse
      • Aubusson
        • Soumans
          • Montebras
Yannick Vessely collection
    • Dordogne
      • Nontron
        • Saint-Pierre-de-Côle
- (1998)
    • Haute-Vienne
      • Bellac
        • Bessines-sur-Gartempe
- (1998)
        • Compreignac
- (1998)
  • Occitanie
    • Lozère
      • Mende
        • Grandrieu
- (1998)
        • Saint-Jean-la-Fouillouse
- (1998)
Germany
 
  • Baden-Württemberg
    • Freiburg Region
      • Ortenaukreis
        • Seelbach
          • Seelbach
            • Weiler
Scharrer et al. (2020)
  • Bavaria
    • Upper Palatinate
      • Cham District
        • Zandt
Weiß (1990)
      • Schwandorf District
        • Schwarzach bei Nabburg
          • Wölsendorf
Weiß (1990)
Dill et al. (2010)
  • Saxony
    • Erzgebirgskreis
      • Eibenstock
Schnorrer (1995) +1 other reference
      • Schneeberg
        • Neustädtel
    • Vogtlandkreis
Gröbner et al. (2007) +1 other reference
  • Thuringia
    • Saale-Orla District
      • Wurzbach
        • Weitisberga
Wittern (2001)
Italy
 
  • Piedmont
    • Verbano-Cusio-Ossola Province
      • Montescheno
Biffi et al. (1999) +1 other reference
  • Sardinia
    • Metropolitan City of Cagliari
      • Assemini
Stara (1990)
Garavelli et al. (1959) +2 other references
      • Capoterra
Ref: Daniele Ravagnani - I giacimenti ... +1 other reference
Poland
 
  • Lower Silesian Voivodeship
    • Karkonosze County
      • Gmina Janowice Wielkie
Siuda R. et al. (2010)
Portugal
 
  • Guarda
    • Gouveia
      • Vila Cortês da Serra
    • Trancoso
      • Torre de Terrenho, Terrenho e Sebadelhe da Serra
Alves (n.d.) +1 other reference
  • Viseu
    • Mangualde
      • Tavares (Chãs; Várzea e Travanca)
        • Tragos
van den Berg (1992) +1 other reference
    • Nelas
      • Vilar Seco
Favreau (n.d.)
    • Sátão
      • Ferreira de Aves
        • Aldeia Nova
Rui Nunes 2011
Spain
 
  • Andalusia
    • Almería
      • Níjar
        • Pozo de Los Frailes
Collection Andres Marin - analysed by Christian Rewitzer (REM 5956)
UK
 
  • England
    • Cornwall
      • St Stephen-in-Brannel
an abandoned uranium mine +1 other reference
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Cochise County
Anthony et al. (1995)
  • Colorado
    • Fremont County
      • Eight Mile Park Pegmatite Mining District
Eckel et al. (1997)
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Gunnison County
      • Tomichi Mining District (White Pine Mining District)
Eckel et al. (1997)
Eckel et al. (1997)
  • Connecticut
    • Middlesex County
      • Portland
        • Collins Hill
          • Strickland pegmatite
Schooner (circa 1985)
  • New Hampshire
    • Grafton County
      • Grafton
Palache et al. (1951) +1 other reference
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 13:53:18 Page updated: August 21, 2026 20:15:16
Go to top of page