Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Kivuite

A discredited species name
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
Th(UO2)4(PO3OH)2(OH)8 · 7H2O
Name:
named for the Kivu region
Originally reported from Kobokobo pegmatite, Lusungu River District, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo (Zaïre)in L. Van Wambeke: "Contribution a l'etude de la mineralisation radioactive de la pegmatite de Kobokobo et description d'une nouvelle espece minerale radioactive de la serie phosphuranylite-renardite: la kivuite." Bull. soc. belge geol., paleontol., et hydrol, 67, 383-403 (1958) (publ. 1959).
Michael Fleischer commented in the American Mineralogist, v. 44 (1959, September-October), p. 1326-1327: "Discussion. The analysis is unsatisfactory, because one cannot tell how the impurities were deducted. Needs confirmation and tests for homogeneity, in view of the behavior with nitric acid."
L. Van Wambeke (1971) later informally discredited kivuite in "The Problem of Cation Deficiencies in Some Phosphates Due to Alteration Processes", American Mineralogist, vol. 56, p. 1380: "Eylettersite is not only the first radioactive mineral in the crandallite series, but also the first hydrated Th phosphate found in nature, the mineral kivuite being often a mixture of thorian crandallite or eylettersite with phosphuranylite."



Hide all sections | Show all sections

Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
2221
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:2221:3

Similar NamesHide

CavoiteA valid IMA mineral speciesCaV34+O7
CoviteA rock subtype
GaviteA variety of TalcMg4Si5O12(OH)4 ?
Keiviite-(Y)A valid IMA mineral speciesY2Si2O7
Keiviite-(Y)-Keiviite-(Yb) SeriesA solid-solution series between two end-member minerals
Keiviite-(Yb)A valid IMA mineral speciesYb2Si2O7
KieviteA synonym of Cummingtonite
KiviteA rock subtype

IMA Classification of KivuiteHide

Discredited

Classification of KivuiteHide

8.EC.10

8 : PHOSPHATES, ARSENATES, VANADATES
E : Uranyl phosphates and arsenates
C : UO2:RO4 = 3:2
42.4.9.3

42 : HYDRATED PHOSPHATES, ETC.CONTAINING HYDROXYL OR HALOGEN
4 : (AB)5(XO4)2Zq·xH2O
19.11.35

19 : Phosphates
11 : Phosphates of U

Optical Data of KivuiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.618 nβ = 1.654 nγ = 1.655
2V:
Calculated: 18°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.037
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars.

Surface Relief:
Moderate
Dispersion:
noticable

Chemistry of KivuiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Th(UO2)4(PO3OH)2(OH)8 · 7H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
U53.905 %
O28.081 %
Th13.137 %
P3.507 %
H1.370 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Common Impurities:
Ca,Pb

Other Language Names for KivuiteHide

German:Kivuit
Spanish:Kivuita

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

8.EC.05UpaliteAl(UO2)3(PO4)2O(OH) · 7H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
8.EC.05Françoisite-(Nd)(Nd,Ce,Sm)(UO2)3(PO4)2O(OH) · 6H2OMon. 2/m
8.EC.05Françoisite-(Ce)(Ce,Nd,Ca)(UO2)3(PO4)2O(OH) · 6H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
8.EC.05PhuralumiteAl2[(UO2)3(PO4)2O(OH)](OH)3(H2O)9Mon. 2/m
8.EC.10YingjiangiteK2Ca(UO2)7(PO4)4(OH)6 · 6H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmcm
8.EC.10RenarditePb(UO2)4(PO4)2(OH)4 · H2OOrth.
8.EC.10PhosphuranyliteKCa(H3O)3(UO2)7(PO4)4O4 · 8H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmcm
8.EC.10ArsenuranyliteCa(UO2)4(AsO4)2(OH)4 · 6H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m)
8.EC.10DewindtiteH2Pb3(UO2)6O4(PO4)4 · 12H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmma
8.EC.15DumontitePb2(UO2)3O2(PO4)2 · 5H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
8.EC.15HügelitePb2(UO2)3(AsO4)2O2 · 5H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
8.EC.20VanmeersscheiteU6+(UO2)3(PO4)2(OH)6 · 4H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m)
8.EC.20ArsenovanmeersscheiteU6+(UO2)3(AsO4)2(OH)6 · 4H2OOrth. mm2 : Pmn21
8.EC.20MetavanmeersscheiteU6+(UO2)3(PO4)2(OH)6 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Fddd
8.EC.25AlthupiteAlTh(UO2)7(PO4)4(OH)5O2 · 15H2OTric. 1 : P1
8.EC.30MunditeAl(UO2)3(PO4)2(OH)3 · 5.5H2OOrth.
8.EC.35PhurcaliteCa2(UO2)3(PO4)2O2 · 7H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbca
8.EC.40BergeniteCa2Ba4(UO2)9(PO4)6O6 · 16H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b

RadioactivityHide

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for KivuiteHide

References for KivuiteHide

Localities for KivuiteHide

Showing 4 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
China
 
  • Yunnan
    • Baoshan
      • Tengchong County
Anthony
    • Dehong
      • Yingjiang County
        • Tongbiguan
Anthony
DR Congo
 
  • South Kivu
    • Mwenga Territory
- (1962)
USA
 
  • New Hampshire
    • Grafton County
      • Grafton
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 22:33:23 Page updated: August 3, 2026 17:18:47
Go to top of page