Valpariso Mine, Paul Lake, Prince of Wales Island, Ketchikan Mining District, Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, Alaska, USAi
| Regional Level Types | |
|---|---|
| Valpariso Mine | Mine |
| Paul Lake | Lake |
| Prince of Wales Island | Island |
| Ketchikan Mining District | Mining District |
| Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area | Census Area |
| Alaska | State |
| USA | Country |
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
55° 8' 44'' North , 132° 4' 44'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Roppel (2005) includes an extensive bibliography of the history of the mine.
Location: The Valpariso Mine is near the north shore of Paul Lake, about 0.4 mile southwest of Dolomi Mountain. It is not at the mine symbol that is misplaced about a half mile to the west on the USGS 1:63,360-scale topographic map. Instead, it is about 0.3 mile south-southeast of the center of section 36, T. 77 S., R. 88 E. The Paul or Jessie prospect (CR200) to the east is an extension of the vein at the Valpariso Mine and descriptions of that prospect sometimes have been combined with that of the mine; they were often managed by the same company. The underground workings of the mine are shown on figure 30 of Maas and others (1995).
Geology: The Valpariso Mine was the most productive mine in the Dolomi area and has been described in many publications (for example: Brooks, 1902; Wright and Wright 1905, 1906, 1908; Smith, 1914; Smith, 1934a, Smith, 1934b, ; Galloway, 1952; Dyer, 1952, 1956; Herreid, 1967; Maas and others, 1991, 1995). By 1902, the mine had been developed by two shafts and three ore shipments of 31, 50, and 60 tons has been made to a smelter in California. Development and production took place intermittently from 1898 to 1920, and the deposit was mined by a lessor in 1927 and again in 1932. The surface mine plant and mill were extensively rebuilt in 1935 and again from 1946 to 1948 but no ore was produced before funds ran out. Roppel (2005) presents a detailed historical survey of the mine from its earliest days and the many legal, personality, water, and power problems, and management changes that repeatedly stymied mining. The workings consisted of two (four?) shafts, the deepest of which was 400 feet deep, and extensive workings on at least three levels. Smith (1934a, 1934b) and Dyer (1952, 1956) reported that the mine produced about 5,000 ounces of gold to 1933. U.S. Bureau of Mines records document the production of about 730 ounces of gold and 521 ounces of silver from 1914 to 1933 (Maas and others, 1991, 1995). Galloway (1952) estimated that the total production from the mine was about $100,000 (plus some production, probably small, from leasers), mostly from 1901 to 1908. In 1983 and 1984, Houston Oil and Mineral Exploration Corporation drilled 21 holes at the mine and at the Paul Lake (CR200), Amazon (CR209), and Boston (CR207) properties (Oliver and Adams, 1984). The host rocks at the Valpariso Mine are marble and schist of the Wales Group of Late Proterozoic and Cambrian age (Eberlein and others, 1983). The deposit consists of a vein up to 14 feet thick of quartz, quartz breccia, and quartz-marble breccia cemented by calcite; the vein is locally faulted and the marble is extensively silicified. The vein is conformable to the bedding of a thick marble layer. In an adit about 600 feet west of the mill, the marble is in contact with chlorite schist and quartzite or jasperoid. The vein strikes about N55W and dips 30-70N; it can be traced for as much as 6,000 feet to the east, to and beyond the Paul or Jessie prospect (CR200). The vein typically contains about 1 percent ore minerals, including free gold, tetrahedrite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena, and sphalerite. Some of the ore was very rich; some ore mined in early 1900's ran $200-$250 a ton in gold (at $20.67 an ounce) and silver (Brooks, 1902). Samples of veins and old dumps collected in 1934 ran $5.50 to $42.07 a ton in gold (at $35 per ounce) and silver (Smith, 1934). In 1934, after the last mining, Smith estimated that the deposit contained 22,500 tons of probable ore in place with an average grade of 0.28 ounce of gold per ton and minor silver. Maas and others (1991) collected 34 samples in the underground workings. Their gold values varied greatly; the best was 4.660 ounces of gold per ton across 1.2 feet, but most samples contained much less. The highest silver value was 6.18 ounces of silver per ton.
Workings: The workings consisted of two (four?) shafts, the deepest of which was 400 feet deep, and there were extensive workings on at least three levels. In 1983 and 1984, Houston Oil and Mineral Exploration Corporation drilled 21 holes at the mine and at the Paul Lake (CR200), Amazon (CR209), and Boston (CR207) properties (Oliver and Adams, 1984).
Age: The vein is younger than the Late Proterozoic or Cambrian host rocks.
Alteration: The vein is locally faulted and the marble is extensively silicified.
Production: Smith (1934) and Dyer (1952, 1956) reported that the mine produced about 5,000 ounces of gold to 1933. U.S. Bureau of Mines records document the production of about 730 ounces of gold and 521 ounces of silver from 1914 to 1933 (Maas and others, 1991, 1995). Galloway (1952) estimated that the total production from the mine was about $100,000 (plus some production, probably small, from leasers), mostly from 1901 to 1908.
Reserves: In 1934, after the last mining, Smith estimated that the deposit contained 22,500 tons of probable ore in place with an average grade of 0.28 ounce of gold per ton and minor silver.
Commodities (Major) - Ag, Au; (Minor) - Cu, Pb, Sb, Zn
Development Status: Yes; small
Deposit Model: Low-sulfide, brecciated gold-quartz vein (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 36a).
Select Mineral List Type
Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical ElementsCommodity List
This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.Mineral List
7 valid minerals.
Detailed Mineral List:
| ⓘ Calcite Formula: CaCO3 |
| ⓘ Chalcopyrite Formula: CuFeS2 |
| ⓘ Galena Formula: PbS |
| ⓘ Gold Formula: Au |
| ⓘ Pyrite Formula: FeS2 |
| ⓘ Quartz Formula: SiO2 |
| ⓘ Sphalerite Formula: ZnS |
| ⓘ 'Tetrahedrite Subgroup' Formula: Cu6(Cu4C2+2)Sb4S12S |
Gallery:
List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification
| Group 1 - Elements | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ⓘ | Gold | 1.AA.05 | Au |
| Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts | |||
| ⓘ | Sphalerite | 2.CB.05a | ZnS |
| ⓘ | Chalcopyrite | 2.CB.10a | CuFeS2 |
| ⓘ | Galena | 2.CD.10 | PbS |
| ⓘ | Pyrite | 2.EB.05a | FeS2 |
| ⓘ | 'Tetrahedrite Subgroup' | 2.GB.05 | Cu6(Cu4C2+2)Sb4S12S |
| Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides | |||
| ⓘ | Quartz | 4.DA.05 | SiO2 |
| Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates | |||
| ⓘ | Calcite | 5.AB.05 | CaCO3 |
List of minerals for each chemical element
| C | Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| C | ⓘ Calcite | CaCO3 |
| O | Oxygen | |
| O | ⓘ Calcite | CaCO3 |
| O | ⓘ Quartz | SiO2 |
| Si | Silicon | |
| Si | ⓘ Quartz | SiO2 |
| S | Sulfur | |
| S | ⓘ Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 |
| S | ⓘ Galena | PbS |
| S | ⓘ Pyrite | FeS2 |
| S | ⓘ Sphalerite | ZnS |
| S | ⓘ Tetrahedrite Subgroup | Cu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S |
| Ca | Calcium | |
| Ca | ⓘ Calcite | CaCO3 |
| Fe | Iron | |
| Fe | ⓘ Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 |
| Fe | ⓘ Pyrite | FeS2 |
| Cu | Copper | |
| Cu | ⓘ Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 |
| Cu | ⓘ Tetrahedrite Subgroup | Cu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S |
| Zn | Zinc | |
| Zn | ⓘ Sphalerite | ZnS |
| Sb | Antimony | |
| Sb | ⓘ Tetrahedrite Subgroup | Cu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S |
| Au | Gold | |
| Au | ⓘ Gold | Au |
| Pb | Lead | |
| Pb | ⓘ Galena | PbS |
Other Databases
| Link to USGS - Alaska: | CR197 |
|---|
Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality
North America PlateTectonic Plate
- Alexander DomainDomain
- Alexander TerraneVolcanic Arc
This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.