Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

North Marsha Peak Prospect, Petersburg Mining District, Wrangell City and Bourough, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
North Marsha Peak ProspectProspect
Petersburg Mining DistrictMining District
Wrangell City and BouroughBorough
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
56° 29' 36'' North , 132° 2' 38'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Wrangell2,382 (2018)20.6km
Mindat Locality ID:
199163
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:199163:8
GUID (UUID V4):
0


No claims were active as of 2002 according to Still and others.
Location: The North Marsha Peak prospect is about 0.5 mile north of Marsha Peak and about 0.4 mile east of the center of section 18, T. 62 S., R. 86 E. The location is accurate. A map of the prospect is Figure 30 of Still and others (2002).
Geology: The rocks in the prospect area are part of a belt of Mesozoic or Paleozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks that have been metamorphosed to Tertiary or Cretaceous schist and gneiss. The belt is about 1 1/2 mile wide and strikes northwest (Brew, 1997; George and Wyckoff, 1973). The metamorphic rocks are bounded on the east by a thick, regionally extensive, 60 to 70 Ma tonalite sill and on the west by a 90 Ma granodiorite pluton (Brew, 1997 Still and others, 2002). On the north side of Groundhog Basin, about 2 miles northwest of this prospect, the metamorphic rocks are intruded by a 16.3 Ma biotite 'tin' granite pluton about 1,000 by 2,0000 feet in size. The granite is probably the source of the numerous rhyolite dikes and sills that extend from it and the mineralization in the area (Newberry and Brew, 1989). The mineralization at this prospect was described by Gault and others (1953) but little was done on it by industry until the property was optioned by the Bunker Mill Mining Company in 1965. From 1968 to 1970, Humble Oil and Refining Company optioned the property and drilled two holes on it through the Nelson Glacier. El Paso Natural Gas Company optioned the property from 1971 to 1973, collected numerous surface samples, and drilled three holes on it, 116 to 230 feet long (George and Wyckoff, 1973). Still and others (2002) re-examined the property during a mineral assessment of the area by the BLM. The mineralization here is generally similar to that in Groundhog Basin (PR040) several miles to the north and probably shares the same origin. Here the mineralization is associated with two sheared zones that parallel the foliation of the gneiss and the rhyolite sills in the gneiss; the fault zones strike north and are about 750 feet apart. As reported by Still and others (2002) the western shear zone is 4 to 12 feet thick and about 1,100 feet long. Samples averaged 1.5 ounces of silver per ton, 0.3 percent copper, 0.22 percent lead, and 0.58 percent zinc. The eastern shear zone is about 4 feet thick and can be traced for about 600 feet to where it disappears under the Nelson Glacier. Select samples of thin veinlets along the shear zone contained up to 20.7 ounces of silver per ton, 70 percent lead, and 22 percent zinc. One hole by El Paso Natural Gas Company in the western zone was probably drilled parallel to the mineralized shear zone; it averaged 1.1 percent zinc and 0.25 percent lead over its entire 116 foot length. Another drill hole in the eastern shear zone had a 13-foot interval that averaged 0.87 ounce of silver per ton, 0.08 percent copper, 0.6 percent lead, and 4.3 percent zinc.
Workings: The mineralization at this prospect was described by Gault and others (1953) but little was done on it by industry until the property was optioned by the Bunker Mill Mining Company in 1965. From 1968 to 1970, Humble Oil and Refining Company optioned the property and drilled two holes on it through the Nelson Glacier. El Paso Natural Gas Company optioned the property from 1971 to 1973, collected numerous surface samples, and drilled three holes on it, 116 to 230 feet long (George and Wyckoff, 1973). Still and others (2002) re-examined the property during a mineral assessment of the area by the BLM.
Age: Probably 16.3 Ma based on a genetic tie to a nearby, zinnwaldite 'tin' granite (Newberry and Brew, 1989).
Alteration: None specifically noted.
Reserves: None.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Pb, Sn, Zn
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Banded Ag-Cu-Sn-Pb-Zn tabular replacement bodies, veins, and stringers.

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


5 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2

List of minerals for each chemical element

OOxygen
O QuartzSiO2
SiSilicon
Si QuartzSiO2
SSulfur
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S GalenaPbS
S PyriteFeS2
S SphaleriteZnS
FeIron
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe PyriteFeS2
CuCopper
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS
PbLead
Pb GalenaPbS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:PE110

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North AmericaContinent
North America PlateTectonic Plate
USA

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 08:53:14 Page updated: August 18, 2025 19:32:22
Go to top of page