Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Arsenuranylite vs. Talc
It's a pair of soft and lovely minerals as Stichtite and Talc compete for your votes.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Lady of the Lake; Lucky Boy; North Vein; Complex; Frisco; Idaho; Minnetonka; Oregon; Portland; Seattle Prospect, Dora Lake, Prince of Wales Island, Ketchikan Mining District, Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Lady of the Lake; Lucky Boy; North Vein; Complex; Frisco; Idaho; Minnetonka; Oregon; Portland; Seattle ProspectProspect
Dora LakeLake
Prince of Wales IslandIsland
Ketchikan Mining DistrictMining District
Prince of Wales-Hyder Census AreaCensus Area
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
55° 9' 27'' North , 132° 14' 9'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Hollis112 (2011)51.1km
Mindat Locality ID:
198429
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:198429:6
GUID (UUID V4):
0


Location: The workings at the Lady of the Lake prospect extend from the shore of upper Dora Lake to an elevation of about 330 feet. They are about 0.3 mile northeast of the southern tip of the lake and about 0.5 mile south of the center of section 25, T. 77 S, R. 87 E. Several authors combine their descriptions of this prospect with the Lucky Boy propect (CR174), about 0.4 mile to the southwest. For example, Roppel (1991), who focuses on the personalities and early history of the properties, describes both prospects under the name 'Complex' (which was the name of a short-lived post office and one of the many names for the claim groups that covered both prospects). Robinson and Twenhofel (1953) call the prospect at this site the 'Lucky Boy North deposit,' and the Lucky Boy prospect, the 'Lucky Boy South deposit.' Maas and others (1991) follow Robinson and Twenhofel's nomenclature, whereas Maas and others (1995) call this site the Lady of the Lake prospect and the one to the south the Lucky Boy prospect, as does ARDF. Robinson and Twenhofel (1953) provide a detailed map of the prospect.
Geology: The Lady of the Lake prospect was discovered prior to 1902 (Brooks, 1902). It has been described several times in the older literature, sometimes in combination with the Lucky Boy prospect (CR174), sometimes as a distinct prospect, and sometimes as being on various claim blocks (Wright and Wright, 1906, 1908; Smith, 1914; Chapin, 1916; Buddington and Chapin, 1929; Roehm 1939 [PE 119-16]; Townsend, 1945; Twenhofel, 1953). Robinson and Twenhofel (1953) provide a detailed map and description of the prospect (under the name 'Lucky Boy North deposit'). The deposit consists of three breccia veins in black, calcareous argillite, schist, and marble. The breccias are composed of rock fragments cemented by quartz and calcite that are 'slightly mineralized' with sphalerite, galena, pyrite, and chalcopyrite. Until recently, the host rocks were considered to be part of the Wales Group of Late Proterozoic and Cambrian age (Eberlein and others, 1983; Brew, 1996). More recent mapping, however, indicates that they are previously unrecognized Silurian and Ordovician metamorphic rocks that are less deformed than those of the Wales Group (S.M. Karl, oral communication, 2003). The lowest vein at the Lady of the Lake prospect strikes N10W and dips 70W; it is exposed for about 160 feet along the shore of Dora Lake and it about 18 inches thick. A sample across it contained 3.80 percent zinc and 0.36 percent lead. Two veins are at an elevation of about 330 feet. One of them is 7 feet thick and is exposed for about 150 feet; it strikes N35W and dips 70SW. The other is exposed for about 85 feet and is about 5 feet thick in a 65-foot adit that cuts it in the subsurface; it strikes north and dips 80W. A select sample from the dump of one of the upper veins contained 5.23 percent zinc, 2.05 percent lead, and minor silver and gold. Maas and others (1991) collected a representative 15-foot sample across one of the quartz- and calcite-cemented breccias. It contained 2.065 parts per million (ppm) gold, 4,316 ppm lead, and 1.35 percent zinc. Selected samples contained up to 0.331 ounce of gold per ton, 12.8 ppm silver, 0.97 percent lead, and 2.44 percent zinc. The workings consist of several trenches and a 65-foot adit on the upper workings. There is no record of production. Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation sampled and possibly drilled the Lady of the Lake prospect in the late 1970's and 1980's, during their exploration of other deposits in the area. Robinson and Twenhofel (1953) estimate that the deposit contains about 7,000 tons of material with about 0.33 percent zinc, 1 percent lead, and minor silver and gold.
Workings: The workings consist of several trenches and a 65-foot adit on the upper veins. Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation sampled and possibly drilled the Lady of the Lake prospect in the late 1970's and 1980's, during their exploration of other deposits in the area.
Age: Only that it is younger than the Silurian or Ordovician host rocks.
Production: There is no record of production.
Reserves: Robinson and Twenhofel (1953) estimated that the deposit contains about 7,000 tons of material with about 0.33 percent zinc, 1 percent lead, and minor silver and gold.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Au, Cu, Pb, Zn
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Polymetallic mineralized breccia along a shear zone.

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


6 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
Calcite5.AB.05CaCO3

List of minerals for each chemical element

CCarbon
C CalciteCaCO3
OOxygen
O CalciteCaCO3
O QuartzSiO2
SiSilicon
Si QuartzSiO2
SSulfur
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S GalenaPbS
S PyriteFeS2
S SphaleriteZnS
CaCalcium
Ca CalciteCaCO3
FeIron
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe PyriteFeS2
CuCopper
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS
PbLead
Pb GalenaPbS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:CR173

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality


This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Brew, D.A., 1996, Geologic map of the Craig, Dixon Entrance, and parts of the Ketchikan and Prince Rupert quadrangles, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2319, 53 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Brooks, A.H., 1902, Preliminary report on the Ketchikan mining district, Alaska, with an introductory sketch of the geology of southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1, 120 p. Buddington, A.F., and Chapin, Theodore, 1929, Geology and mineral deposits of southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 800, 398 p. Chapin, Theodore, 1916, Mining developments in southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 642-B, p. 73-104. Eberlein, G.D., Churkin, Michael, Jr., Carter, Claire, Berg, H.C., and Ovenshine, A. T., 1983, Geology of the Craig quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 83-91, 52 p. Hedderly-Smith, D.A., 1991, Report of the 1990 field season-Sealaska Mineral Reconnaissance Project: Sealaska Corporation: Sealaska Corporation, 2 vols., 180 p., 13 plates. (Unpublished report held by the Sealaska Corporation, Juneau, Alaska.) Hedderly-Smith, D.A., 1992, Report of the 1991 field season - Sealaska Mineral Reconnaissance Project: Sealaska Corporation, 2 vols., 225 p. 23 plates. (Unpublished report held by the Sealaska Corporation, Juneau, Alaska.) Hedderly-Smith, D.A., 1993, Report of the 1992 field season-Sealaska minerals reconnaissance project: Sealaska Corporation, 60 p. (Unpublished report held by the Sealaska Corporation, Juneau, Alaska.) Hedderly-Smith, D.A., 1999, Inventory of metallic mineral prospects, showings and anomalies on Sealaska lands, 1988 through 1998: Sealaska Corporation, Juneau, Alaska, 217 p. (internal report held by Sealaska Corporation, Juneau, Alaska). Maas, K.M., Bittenbender, P E., and Still, J.C., 1995, Mineral investigations in the Ketchikan mining district, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 11-95, 606 p.
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 8, 2026 02:54:01 Page updated: August 22, 2025 06:55:10
Go to top of page