Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Frenchie; BP Adit Prospect, Petersburg Mining District, Wrangell City and Bourough, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Frenchie; BP Adit ProspectProspect
Petersburg Mining DistrictMining District
Wrangell City and BouroughBorough
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
56° 25' 7'' North , 132° 57' 18'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Petersburg2,948 (2017)43.8km
Coffman Cove180 (2017)45.7km
Mindat Locality ID:
197567
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:197567:6
GUID (UUID V4):
0


Location: The Frenchie prospect is at an elevation of less than 100 feet on the south bank of an unnamed creek about one-half mile south of the head of St. John Harbor. It is near the center of the SE1/4, section 8, T. 63 S., R. 80 E. The location is accurate.
Geology: The Frenchie deposit was first described as a gold prospect by Buddington in 1923. In 1978, BP Alaska Exploration staked 34 claims on the prospect, mapped and sampled it, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, did stream sediment and soil geochemistry in the area, and recognized it as a volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit (Brewer, 1979). In 1979, geologists from the U.S. Geological Survey examined the thick layer of pyrite that is the most prominent outcrop of the prospect (Berg and Grybeck, 1980) and recognized as one of the deposits along the Duncan Canal-Zarembo belt of Upper Triassic volcanogenic, massive sulfide deposits. Three holes were drilled in 1984 and five more were drilled in 1966 by Westmin Resources (Rockingham, 1996). As of 2007, the property is again active (Mark Robinson, oral communication, 2007). Buddington (1923) describes a 100-foot adit in the pyrite bed and a shaft that was sunk about 100 feet north of the adit. (The shaft could not be located by Still and others, 2002). The main massive sulfide layer is up to 6 feet thick and and crops out for at least 600 feet along the creek bank (Brewer, 1979; Berg and Grybeck, 1980; Still and others, 2002). This layer consists of 50-75 percent massive sulfides in a siliceous matrix. The sulfides are chiefly pyrite, accompanied by minor sphalerite, chalcopyrite, and galena that form lenses, bands, and knots in the massive pyrite. The hanging wall of the deposit consists of a thin layer of black phyllite above the massive sulfide layer, about 18 inches of siliceous argillite and chert with up to 10 percent pyrite and sphalerite above that, and then about 13 feet of pyritized argillite and schist to the top of the outcrop in the cliff beside the creek. The footwall consist of siliceous, quartz-muscovite phyllite. All are intruded by Tertiary(?) andesite dikes. The massive sulfide layer is cut by several faults but none dislocates the layer significantly. The deposit disappears under surficial material to the west and it truncated by a fault to the east. Karl and others (1999) map the rocks in the area as part of the Upper Triassic Hyd Group that is the host of many of the massive sulfide deposits to the north along the Duncan Canal-Zarembo mineral belt. Thirteen samples were collected by Brewer (1979) across the main massive sulfide layer; they averaged 0.047 ounce of gold per ton, 0.42 ounce of silver per ton, 0.55 percent copper, 0.08 percent lead, and 1.48 percent zinc, and 5 to 20 percent barite. Still and others (2002) also sampled the deposit. Eight chip samples across the main layer of massive sulfides contained 0.019 ounce of gold per ton, 0.32 ounce of silver per ton, 0.25 percent copper, 0.16 percent lead, 2.4 percent zinc, and 0.08 percent arsenic.
Workings: The Frenchie prospect was first described as a gold prospect by Buddington in 1923. In 1978, BP Alaska Exploration staked 34 claims on the prospect, mapped and sampled it, conducted airborne and ground geophysical surveys, carried out stream sediment and soil geochemistry surveys in the area, and recognized it as a volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit (Brewer, 1979). Examined by the U.S. Geological Survey in 1979 (Berg and Grybeck, 1980). Three holes were drilled in 1984 and five more were drilled by Westmin Resources in 1996 (Rockingham, 1996). In 2007, the property is again active (Mark Robinson, oral communication, 2007). Buddington (1923) describes a 100-foot adit into the main massive sulfide layer and a shaft that was sunk about 100 feet north of the adit. (The shaft could not be located by Still and others, 2002).
Age: Late Triassic as part of the Duncan-Zarembo Island mineral belt defined by Berg and Grybeck (1980) and Berg (1981).

Commodities (Major) - Au, Cu, Pb, Zn; (Minor) - Ba
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Kuroko volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit (Singer and Cox, 1986; model 28a ),

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


3 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2

List of minerals for each chemical element

SSulfur
S GalenaPbS
S PyriteFeS2
S SphaleriteZnS
FeIron
Fe PyriteFeS2
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS
PbLead
Pb GalenaPbS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:PE058

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North America
North America PlateTectonic Plate
USA

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Berg, H.C., 1981, Upper Triassic volcanogenic massive sulfide metallogenic province identified in southeastern Alaska, in Albert, N.R.D., and Hudson, Travis, eds., The United States Geological Survey in Alaska--Accomplishments during 1979: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 823-B, p. B104-B108. Berg, H.C., and Grybeck, Donald, 1980, Upper Triassic volcanogenic Zn-Pb-Ag (-Cu-Au) mineral deposits near Petersburg, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 80-527, 11 p., 1 sheet. Brew, D.A., 1997, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Petersburg B-3 quadrangle, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-156-E, 23 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:63,360. Brewer, N.H., 1979, Frenchie project, Zarembo Island, Alaska: Unpublished BP Alaska Exploration summary report, 49 p. (On file at the Bureau of Land Management, Mineral Information Center, Juneau, Alaska.) Buddington, A.F., 1923, Mineral deposits of the Wrangell district: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 739-B, p. 51-75. Grybeck, D.J., Berg, H.C., and Karl, S.M., 1984, Map and description of the mineral deposits in the Petersburg and eastern Port Alexander quadrangles: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 84-837, 86 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Karl, S.W., Haeussler, P.J., and McCafferty, A.E., 1999, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Duncan Canal-Zarembo Island area, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-0168, 30 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:150,000. Rockingham, C.J., 1996, Report on the 1996 field work, Frenchy claims, Zarembo Islands, southeast Alaska: Unpublished report by Westmin Resources Limited, 8 p. (Report on file at the Bureau of Land Management, Minerals Information Center, Juneau, Alaska.) Still, J.C., Bittenbender, P.E., Bean, K.W., and Gensler, E.G., 2002, Mineral assessment of the Stikine area, central Southeast Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Land Management Technical Report 51, 560 p.
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 00:13:58 Page updated: August 10, 2025 09:28:09
Go to top of page