Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Sphalerite vs. Anorthite
Both zinc ore Sphalerite and calcium plagioclase feldspar Anorthite have perfect cleavage that will split cleanly if you hit them with a hammer, but only one can claim a larger split of your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Rambler-Cariboo Group mine, McGuigan Creek, Sandon, Slocan Mining Division, British Columbia, Canadai
Regional Level Types
Rambler-Cariboo Group mineMine
McGuigan Creek- not defined -
Sandon- not defined -
Slocan Mining DivisionDivision
British ColumbiaProvince
CanadaCountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearchMineralogy
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
50° 0' 36'' North , 117° 11' 47'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Mindat Locality ID:
18880
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:18880:6
GUID (UUID V4):
0


Situated in Rambler Creek Basin, Southern tributary to McGuigan Creek.
Polymetallic Ag-Pb-Zn-(Au-Cd-Cu-Sb) veins.
Host rocks : quartzite and argillites with interbedded slates and limestones (Triassic Slocan Group) with aplitic dikes and sills.
What has been variously called the Rambler mine or the Rambler-Cariboo Group mine is located near the headwaters McGuigan Creek, about 4.6 kilometres north-east of the famous mining town of Sandon, and 58 kilometres north of Nelson, British Columbia, in the Slocan Mining Division.
There is an extensive description of the mine on the British Columbia “Minfile” site, current to 1995. Much of this is concerned with the history of the mine; parts that detail the geological setting are quoted below:
“The Rambler occurrence is hosted by calcareous, massive quartzite, argillite, with interbedded fissile slate and limestone of the Triassic Slocan Group. The average strike of these strata is 115 degrees dipping 57 degrees southwest. Folding and faulting are prominent along northwest axes. Axial planes of most of the folds and major faults dip steeply southwest. Other small-scale anticline-syncline pairs are of short amplitude with east striking axial planes and dipping southward. The plunge of these folds is 15 degrees west. These strata are intruded by an elliptical-shaped quartz diorite stock, the Best-Antelope porphyry, and numerous quartz porphyry dikes. The quartz diorite stock occurs almost in the centre of the mine workings and is the principal ore host. ”
“The lode system of the former Rambler mine has a strike of 040 degrees and a dip of 50 to 80 degrees to the southeast. A series of crosscutting fissure-veins, known as the Rambler veins, strike about 080 degrees. The Rambler veins are best developed in more competent rocks. Three main ore shoots were discovered, the Main, North and South. They occur over a horizontal distance of about 610 metres. The North shoot lies entirely within the Rambler claim. The North shoot extends from near the north end of the No. 4 level to somewhere below the No. 9 level with a maximum stoped length of 61 metres above the No. 8 level. The Main shoot straddles the boundary between the Rambler and Cariboo claims. It extended from the No. 3 level to the No. 8 level with a maximum length of about 46 metres. The South shoot lies some distance south of the Rambler claim. It was best developed between the No. 9 and 10 levels but continued to above the No. 7 and below the No. 12 levels. Its maximum length was about 49 metres. The shoots were up to 5 metres in width, consisting of up to 2.0 metres of massive, commonly sheared galena in a gangue of drusy quartz. Some of the lower levels contained considerable sphalerite but no general increase of sphalerite with depth is recorded. Other associated mineralization included pyrite, chalcocite, native silver, pyrargyrite, tetrahedrite, jamesonite, owyheeite and a little chalcopyrite.”
Giles Peatfield comments:
For more on this deposit, refer to: McDougall (1931); Cairnes (1934, 1935); and Ambrose (1946).
“Minfile” reports that “The former Rambler mine produced continuously for 34 years from 1895 to 1935, then intermittently to 1951. During its mine life a total of 189,421 tonnes of ore was mined from which 108,959,934 grams [3,503,143 ounces] silver, 839 grams [27 ounces] gold, 327 kilograms copper, 10,527,871 kilograms lead and 2,654,696 kilograms zinc were recovered.” Also reported were 2,950 kilograms of cadmium. What is important to understand is that these figures are at best estimates. In later years, there were shipments of tailings, dump material, mill concentrates to a smelter, and other complexities. There was a very small amount of production from the Best mine (Minfile # 082KSW156) which is part of the mineralized system but a separate legal entity. Note also that before 1913, zinc was a deleterious element that was discarded – some may have been recovered from dumps and tailings, but probably not all. Rambler was a major silver producer, with by-product metals, especially lead and zinc, but precise production figures would be impossible to assemble.

Comments on the Minerals Reported:
The minerals listed were reported by various workers, in some cases with little supporting data. I have added comments for all but the commonest minerals reported:
Azurite: Reported only by Ambrose (1946), who, reporting on a small adit above the Number 3 portal, wrote that “Numerous fragments of quartz carrying grey copper [tetrahedrite] and stained with azurite were seen on the dump.”
Calcite: The only worker to specifically mention calcite was McDougall (1931), but it is probably common and simply ignored.
Chalcocite?: This was reported only by “Minfile”, with no reference, and I would regard it as tentative for the locality.
Chalcopyrite: Small amounts reported by McDougall (1931), and by Ambrose (1946) as “copper pyrites”.
Jamesonite: This was reported by Cairnes (1934) from the adjacent Best claim, and by Cairnes (1935) from a small adit, probably the same as reported by Ambrose (above for azurite), where it was found that “. . . the vein consists of drusy quartz, which averages a foot in width, and is in part well mineralized with grey copper and jamesonite.” Interestingly, this occurrence is not reported by Traill (1970, 1983).
Owyheeite: Material from this occurrence was X-rayed and owyheeite confirmed (Berry and Thompson, 1962). The Pacific Museum of Earth at the University of British Columbia has a polished section (catalogue #1959), of a specimen provided by the British Columbia Ministry of Mines, which may be part of the collection X-rayed, probably by Dr. R. M. Thompson. See also Traill (1970; 1983).
Pyrargyrite?: McDougall (1931) reported “ruby silver”, but gave no details. His mention was repeated by Ambrose (1946). I have assumed for the purposes of this report that the mineral is actually pyrargyrite, as did “Minfile”, but this has not been confirmed, and it is considered tentative.
Silver: McDougall (1931) reported native silver, but gave no details. His mention was repeated by Ambrose (1946).
Stibnite?: Cairnes (1935) mentioned a locality where “Antimony, probably in the form of stibnite, has been reported . . . but was not seen.” I regard this as tentative at best.
Tetrahedrite subgroup: Early workers, in the fashion of the times, reported this mineral consistently as “grey copper”. There is no information regarding the silver content of the mineral, but given the locally high silver grades it is possible that freibergite may be present.

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Mineral List


13 valid minerals.

Detailed Mineral List:

Azurite
Formula: Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Calcite
Formula: CaCO3
Chalcocite
Formula: Cu2S
Chalcopyrite
Formula: CuFeS2
Galena
Formula: PbS
Jamesonite
Formula: Pb4FeSb6S14
Native Silver
Formula: Ag
Owyheeite
Formula: Ag3Pb10Sb11S28
Pyrargyrite
Formula: Ag3SbS3
Pyrite
Formula: FeS2
Quartz
Formula: SiO2
Sphalerite
Formula: ZnS
Stibnite ?
Formula: Sb2S3
'Tetrahedrite Subgroup'
Formula: Cu6(Cu4C2+2)Sb4S12S

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 1 - Elements
Native Silver1.AA.05Ag
Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Chalcocite2.BA.05Cu2S
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Stibnite ?2.DB.05Sb2S3
Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
Pyrargyrite2.GA.05Ag3SbS3
'Tetrahedrite Subgroup'2.GB.05Cu6(Cu4C2+2)Sb4S12S
Jamesonite2.HB.15Pb4FeSb6S14
Owyheeite2.HC.35Ag3Pb10Sb11S28
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
Calcite5.AB.05CaCO3
Azurite5.BA.05Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2

List of minerals for each chemical element

HHydrogen
H AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
CCarbon
C AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
C CalciteCaCO3
OOxygen
O AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
O CalciteCaCO3
O QuartzSiO2
SiSilicon
Si QuartzSiO2
SSulfur
S ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
S ChalcociteCu2S
S GalenaPbS
S JamesonitePb4FeSb6S14
S OwyheeiteAg3Pb10Sb11S28
S PyrargyriteAg3SbS3
S PyriteFeS2
S SphaleriteZnS
S StibniteSb2S3
S Tetrahedrite SubgroupCu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S
CaCalcium
Ca CalciteCaCO3
FeIron
Fe ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Fe JamesonitePb4FeSb6S14
Fe PyriteFeS2
CuCopper
Cu AzuriteCu3(CO3)2(OH)2
Cu ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
Cu ChalcociteCu2S
Cu Tetrahedrite SubgroupCu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS
AgSilver
Ag OwyheeiteAg3Pb10Sb11S28
Ag PyrargyriteAg3SbS3
Ag Native SilverAg
SbAntimony
Sb JamesonitePb4FeSb6S14
Sb OwyheeiteAg3Pb10Sb11S28
Sb PyrargyriteAg3SbS3
Sb StibniteSb2S3
Sb Tetrahedrite SubgroupCu6(Cu4C22+)Sb4S12S
PbLead
Pb GalenaPbS
Pb JamesonitePb4FeSb6S14
Pb OwyheeiteAg3Pb10Sb11S28

Other Databases

Link to British Columbia Minfile:082KSW018

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North AmericaContinent
North America Plate

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 3, 2026 07:40:45 Page updated: July 24, 2026 16:29:44
Go to top of page