Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Bayleyite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About BayleyiteHide

06980180017271921653240.jpg
William Shirley Bayley
Formula:
Mg2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 18H2O
Colour:
Yellow, whitish yellow
Lustre:
Vitreous, Dull
Hardness:
2 - 2½
Specific Gravity:
2.05
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named after William Shirley Bayley (1861-1943), American mineralogist and geologist. It was first observed and collected by the American geologist Charles Alfred Anderson from the oxidation zone of the Hillside Mine, Arizona, USA and first described as a new mineral by Axelrod et al. (1951).
After collecting, bayleyite, when stored in a drier atmosphere, becomes dull and disintegrates to a yellow powder.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
582
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:582:5

IMA Classification of BayleyiteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
IMA Formula:
Mg2(U6+O2)(CO3)3·18H2O
First published:
1951

Classification of BayleyiteHide

5.ED.05

5 : CARBONATES (NITRATES)
E : Uranyl Carbonates
D : UO2:CO3 = 1:3
15.3.3.1

15 : HYDRATED NORMAL CARBONATES
3 : AmBn(XO3)p·xH2O, with (m+n):p = 1:1
11.11.5

11 : Carbonates
11 : Carbonates of Cr and U

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
ByyIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of BayleyiteHide

Vitreous, Dull
Transparency:
Translucent
Comment:
Vitreous, becoming dull as it dehydrates
Colour:
Yellow, whitish yellow
Hardness:
2 - 2½ on Mohs scale
Fracture:
Conchoidal
Density:
2.05 g/cm3 (Measured)    2.06 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of BayleyiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.453 - 1.455 nβ = 1.49 - 1.492 nγ = 1.498 - 1.502
2V:
Measured: 30°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.045 - 0.047
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Moderate (negative)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
r > v distinct
Pleochroism:
Visible
Comments:
X = Pinkish
Y = Light yellow
Z = Light yellow

Chemistry of BayleyiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Mg2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 18H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O56.381 %
U28.924 %
Mg5.907 %
H4.409 %
C4.379 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Crystallography of BayleyiteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
P21/b
Setting:
P21/a
Cell Parameters:
a = 26.65(5) Å, b = 15.31(5) Å, c = 6.53(2) Å
β = 93.07°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.741 : 1 : 0.427
Unit Cell V:
2,660.49 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
4
Morphology:
Crystals minute, short-prismatic; also acicular; in divergent groups (artificial material).

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0015706BayleyiteMayer H, Mereiter K (1986) Synthetic bayleyite, Mg2[UO2(CO3)3]*18H2O: Thermochemistry, crystallography and crystal structure Tschermaks Mineralogische und Petrographische Mitteilungen 35 133-1461986synthetic0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
7.66 Å(100)
13.1 Å(90)
3.83 Å(60)
2.69 Å(50)
2.21 Å(50)
6.53 Å(40)
5.85 Å(40b)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):

Type Occurrence of BayleyiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
As crust on gypsum and mica schist
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA, 106101–106104.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Post-mining efforescent coatings on mine walls.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Other Language Names for BayleyiteHide

Dutch:Bayleyiet
German:Bayleyit
Spanish:Bayleyita

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
9 photos of Bayleyite associated with AndersoniteNa2Ca(UO2)(CO3)3 · 5.33H2O
8 photos of Bayleyite associated with GypsumCaSO4 · 2H2O
7 photos of Bayleyite associated with SchröckingeriteNaCa3(UO2)(CO3)3(SO4)F · 10H2O
7 photos of Bayleyite associated with LiebigiteCa2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 11H2O
4 photos of Bayleyite associated with CarnotiteK2(UO2)2(VO4)2 · 3H2O
4 photos of Bayleyite associated with ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
2 photos of Bayleyite associated with 'Sandstone'
2 photos of Bayleyite associated with QuartzSiO2
1 photo of Bayleyite associated with AutuniteCa(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 10-12H2O
1 photo of Bayleyite associated with MarécottiteMg3(UO2)8(SO4)4O6(OH)2 · 28H2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

5.ED.SzilagyiiteNaCa3(UO2)(CO3)3(SeO3)F(H2O)6Trig. 3m : R3c
5.ED.Pendevilleite-(Y)Mg2Y3Al(UO2)2(CO3)7(OH)6(H2O)16Tric. 1 : P1
5.ED.ParamarkeyiteCa2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 5H2OMon. 2/m
5.ED.10SwartziteMgCa(UO2)(CO3)3 · 12H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
5.ED.15AlbrechtschraufiteCa4Mg(UO2)2(CO3)6F2 · 17-18H2OTric. 1 : P1
5.ED.20LiebigiteCa2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 11H2OOrth. mm2
5.ED.25RabbittiteCa3Mg3(UO2)2(CO3)6(OH)4 · 18H2OMon.
5.ED.30AndersoniteNa2Ca(UO2)(CO3)3 · 5.33H2OTrig. 3 : R3
5.ED.35GrimseliteK3Na(UO2)(CO3)3 · H2OHex. 6m2 : P62c
5.ED.40WidenmannitePb2(OH)2[(UO2)(CO3)2]Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmmn
5.ED.45ZnucaliteZn10Ca0.83(UO2)0.83(CO3)4(OH)15.31(H2O)5.48Mon. 2/m : P21/m
5.ED.50AgricolaiteK4(UO2)(CO3)3Mon. 2/m : B2/b
5.ED.50ČejkaiteNa4(UO2)(CO3)3Mon. m : Bb
5.ED.55LínekiteK2Ca3[(UO2)(CO3)3]2 · 8H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnnm
5.ED.55BrauneriteK2Ca(UO2)(CO3)3 · 6H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
5.ED.60LeószilárditeNa6Mg(UO2)2(CO3)6 · 6H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
5.ED.65PseudomarkeyiteCa8(UO2)4(CO3)12 · 21H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
5.ED.65NatromarkeyiteNa2Ca8(UO2)4(CO3)13 · 27H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmmn
5.ED.65MarkeyiteCa9(UO2)4(CO3)13 · 28H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmmn
5.ED.70PaddlewheeliteMgCa5Cu2(UO2)4(CO3)12(H2O)33Mon. m : Pb

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 28.9242% 7,231,050 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of BayleyiteHide

Weakly fluorescent yellow-green to pale greenish in LW and SW UV.

Other InformationHide

Notes:
Soluble in water. Radiactive.
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for BayleyiteHide

References for BayleyiteHide

Localities for BayleyiteHide

Showing 44 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Argentina
 
  • Mendoza Province
    • Malargüe Department
      • Pampa Amarilla mining district
Linares +1 other reference
Canada
 
  • Saskatchewan
    • Athabasca Basin
Mineralogical Society of America - ...
Czech Republic
 
  • Karlovy Vary Region
Pavel Škácha
    • Karlovy Vary District
      • Jáchymov
Škácha et al. (2014)
  • Vysočina Region
    • Žďár nad Sázavou District
      • Rožná
        • Rožná deposit
Pauliš P. et al. (Kutna Hora, issue 2)
France
 
  • Occitanie
    • Hérault
      • Lodève
        • Le Bosc
- (1998)
        • Lodève
- (1998)
Germany
 
  • Thuringia
    • Greiz District
      • Ronneburg
Witzke et al. (1998)
Witzke et al. (1998)
Greece
 
  • Attica
    • East Attica
      • Lavreotiki
        • Plaka
          • Paliokamariza Mines (Paleokamariza Mines)
Rieck et al. (2018)
Middle East
 
Mineralogical Society of America - ...
Morocco
 
  • Marrakesh-Safi Region
    • Al Haouz Province
      • Amizmiz Cercle
        • Guedmioua Caïdat
          • Azgour
Maya Gold and Silver
Spain
 
  • Catalonia
    • Lleida
      • Pallars Jussà
        • La Vall Fosca
          • La Torre de Cabdella
            • Castell-estaó
mineralsabella.blogspot.de (n.d.)
Switzerland
 
  • Bern
    • Interlaken-Oberhasli
      • Guttannen
        • Gerstenegg
Luetcke (n.d.)
Stalder et al. (1998)
Turkey
 
  • Çanakkale Province
Top et al. (2018)
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Cochise County
Anthony et al. (1995)
Anthony et al. (1995)
    • Yavapai County
      • Eureka Mining District
        • Bagdad
          • Bozarth Mesa
Palache et al. (1951) +6 other references
  • Colorado
    • Clear Creek County
      • Idaho Springs Mining District (Virginia Mining District)
Eckel et al. (1997)
Eckel et al. (1997)
      • Lawson Mining District
Sims (1963) +1 other reference
    • Garfield County
      • East Rifle Creek area
Eckel et al. (1997)
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Jefferson County
      • Ralston Buttes Mining District
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Montrose County
      • Paradox Valley
Eckel et al. (1997)
Eckel et al. (1997)
  • New Mexico
    • Cibola County
      • Grants
Northrop et al. (1996)
Northrop et al. (1996)
    • McKinley County
Northrop et al. (1996)
      • Poison Canyon area
New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral ...
NMBMMR Memoir 15 Geology and Technology ...
NMBMMR Memoir 15 Geology and Technology ...
    • Sandoval County
      • Dennison Bunn subdistrict
NMBMMR Memoir 38 Geology and Technology ... +1 other reference
  • Oklahoma
    • Comanche County
Rocks & Min. vol. 72 (1997)
  • Utah
    • Emery County
      • San Rafael Swell Mining District
Bullock (1981)
    • Grand County
    • San Juan County
Finnell et al. (1963)
Page et al. (1956) +4 other references
      • Elk Ridge Mining District
Bullock (1981)
      • Lisbon Valley Mining District
Bullock (1981)
      • Red Canyon Mining District
Travis Olds collection +1 other reference
      • White Canyon Mining District
        • Fry Mesa
Plášil et al. (2013)
  • Wyoming
    • Johnson County
Mineralogical Society of America - ...
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 14:04:15 Page updated: August 20, 2026 00:26:41
Go to top of page