Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Línekite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About LínekiteHide

06561880017272472246065.jpg
Allan Línek
Formula:
K2Ca3[(UO2)(CO3)3]2 · 8H2O
The water content in línekite is somewhat variable and varies between 7 to 8 H2O pfu. The content obtained from crystal-structure studies is everytime underestimated in the case of línekite (see Plášil et al. 2017).
Colour:
Pale olive to khaki green
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
2 - 3
Specific Gravity:
2.922 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Name:
Línekite is named after Dr. Allan Línek (1925–1984), a Czech physicist and crystallographer of the Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, for his significant contribution to structure science.
Known synthetically. Chemically close to braunerite.
Línekite forms from uranium-rich aqueous solutions and its origin is associated with post-mining processes.


Name EncodingHide

ASCII-7:
Linekite

Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
43587
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:43587:7

Similar NamesHide

LengaiteA synonym of 'Natrocarbonatite'
LineiteA synonym of Linnaeite
Lun'okiteA valid IMA mineral species(Mn,Ca)(Mg,Fe,Mn)Al(PO4)2OH · 4H2O

IMA Classification of LínekiteHide

Classification of LínekiteHide

5.ED.55

5 : CARBONATES (NITRATES)
E : Uranyl Carbonates
D : UO2:CO3 = 1:3

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
LnkIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of LínekiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Pale olive to khaki green
Streak:
Greenish white to yellowish white
Hardness:
2 - 3 on Mohs scale
Comment:
Estimated
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
Perfect on {100} and very good cleavage on {010}.
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven
Density:
2.922 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of LínekiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 1.546(2) nβ = 1.550 nγ = 1.562(2)
2V:
Calculated: 60°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.016
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Low (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.

Chemistry of LínekiteHide

Mindat Formula:
K2Ca3[(UO2)(CO3)3]2 · 8H2O

The water content in línekite is somewhat variable and varies between 7 to 8 H2O pfu. The content obtained from crystal-structure studies is everytime underestimated in the case of línekite (see Plášil et al. 2017).
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O38.625 %
U38.310 %
Ca9.676 %
K6.293 %
C5.799 %
H1.298 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
O
U
Ca
K
C
H

Crystallography of LínekiteHide

Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Class (H-M):
mmm(2/m2/m2/m) - Dipyramidal
Space Group:
Pnnm
Cell Parameters:
a = 17.0069 Å, b = 18.0273 Å, c = 18.3374 Å
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.943 : 1 : 1.017
Unit Cell V:
5,622.04 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Morphology:
Tabular, mostly isometric crystals, up to ca. 0.5 mm across: typically in multiple intergrowths.

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):

Type Occurrence of LínekiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Tabular, mostly isometric crystals, up to ca. 0.5 mm across, typically in multiple intergrowths.
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology of the National Museum in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, catalogue number P1P 2/2012
Empirical Formula of Type Material:
(K1.73Na0.021.75(Ca2.97Cu0.022.99[(UO2)(CO3)3]2.02(H2O)8.00
Chemical Analysis of Type Material:
Na2O0.06 %
K2O6.89 %
CaO14.11 %
CuO0.12 %
UO348.76 %
CO2 (calc.)22.51 %
H2O (calc.)12.20 %
Total:104.65 %
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Geschieber vein, Svornost mine, Ja´chymov ore district, Western Bohemia, Czech Republic (50º22’21.5’’N 12º54’42.0’’E)
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of LínekiteHide

Other Language Names for LínekiteHide

Dutch:Línekiet
German:Línekit

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
11 photos of Línekite associated with BrauneriteK2Ca(UO2)(CO3)3 · 6H2O
5 photos of Línekite associated with GypsumCaSO4 · 2H2O
2 photos of Línekite associated with ČejkaiteNa4(UO2)(CO3)3
2 photos of Línekite associated with SchröckingeriteNaCa3(UO2)(CO3)3(SO4)F · 10H2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

5.ED.SzilagyiiteNaCa3(UO2)(CO3)3(SeO3)F(H2O)6Trig. 3m : R3c
5.ED.Pendevilleite-(Y)Mg2Y3Al(UO2)2(CO3)7(OH)6(H2O)16Tric. 1 : P1
5.ED.ParamarkeyiteCa2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 5H2OMon. 2/m
5.ED.05BayleyiteMg2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 18H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
5.ED.10SwartziteMgCa(UO2)(CO3)3 · 12H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
5.ED.15AlbrechtschraufiteCa4Mg(UO2)2(CO3)6F2 · 17-18H2OTric. 1 : P1
5.ED.20LiebigiteCa2(UO2)(CO3)3 · 11H2OOrth. mm2
5.ED.25RabbittiteCa3Mg3(UO2)2(CO3)6(OH)4 · 18H2OMon.
5.ED.30AndersoniteNa2Ca(UO2)(CO3)3 · 5.33H2OTrig. 3 : R3
5.ED.35GrimseliteK3Na(UO2)(CO3)3 · H2OHex. 6m2 : P62c
5.ED.40WidenmannitePb2(OH)2[(UO2)(CO3)2]Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmmn
5.ED.45ZnucaliteZn10Ca0.83(UO2)0.83(CO3)4(OH)15.31(H2O)5.48Mon. 2/m : P21/m
5.ED.50AgricolaiteK4(UO2)(CO3)3Mon. 2/m : B2/b
5.ED.50ČejkaiteNa4(UO2)(CO3)3Mon. m : Bb
5.ED.55BrauneriteK2Ca(UO2)(CO3)3 · 6H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
5.ED.60LeószilárditeNa6Mg(UO2)2(CO3)6 · 6H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
5.ED.65PseudomarkeyiteCa8(UO2)4(CO3)12 · 21H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
5.ED.65NatromarkeyiteNa2Ca8(UO2)4(CO3)13 · 27H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmmn
5.ED.65MarkeyiteCa9(UO2)4(CO3)13 · 28H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmmn
5.ED.70PaddlewheeliteMgCa5Cu2(UO2)4(CO3)12(H2O)33Mon. m : Pb

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 38.3095% 9,577,375 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 6.2927% 1,951 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of LínekiteHide

Intense greenish yellow luminescence under both short- (254 nm) and long-wave (366 nm) UV radiation

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for LínekiteHide

References for LínekiteHide

Localities for LínekiteHide

Showing 1 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Czech Republic (TL)
 
  • Karlovy Vary Region
    • Karlovy Vary District
      • Jáchymov
        • Svornost Mine
Williams et al. (2013) +1 other reference
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 05:11:09 Page updated: August 25, 2026 05:12:33
Go to top of page