Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Monazite-(Ce) vs. Andalusite
It's a showdown with rare earth elemental ore Monazite-(Ce) and index mineral Andalusite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

UM2002-12-OS:CuFe

Valid as an unnamed mineral
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
~(Cu,Fe)SO ?
recasting the below wt.% data with any factors based on (K+Cu+Fe), (Cu+Fe), (S+O), or (K+Cu+Fe+S+O) and assuming various valencies of Cu and Fe does not give any result with neutral charge; as such, the above formula proposal may be wrong (possibly the sulfide bears water, or the below EPMA data concerns a mixture) (Ł.K.)
Possibly a Cu-Fe oxysulfide. Co-described with UM1990-101-S:CuFeK.

In form of millimetre-sized, platy aggregates cutting chalcopyrite and concentrated in its interstices.

EPMA results [wt.%], example analysis, with range of 10 analyses in parentheses, O by difference:

K 0.07 (0.07–0.39)
Fe 21.02 (13.99–23.86)
Cu 40.53 (33.78–41.34)
S 27.11 (25.50–33.74)

total 88.73 (78.10–92.55)


Hide all sections | Show all sections

Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
54317
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:54317:6

Similar NamesHide

UM1970-24-S:CuFe(Fe,Cu)S
UM1970-25-S:CuFeHA synonym of Ferrovalleriite2(Fe,Cu)S · 1.5Fe(OH)2
UM1974-16-Se:CoFe(Co,Fe)S2
UM1979-02-AsO:CuFeCu-Fe-Ca-As-Sb-O
UM1981-12-S:CoFe~(Co,Fe)4S3
UM1983-12-S:CuFeCu2FeS3
UM1986-42-S:CuFeCu2Fe3S5
UM1987-10-S:AgFeAg2Fe15S20
UM1988-17-S:CuFeCu7Fe8S16
UM1988-18-S:CuFeCu5Fe9S14
UM1994-22-S:CuFeCuFe3S4
UM2003-19-S:CuFe(Cu0.96K0.04)(Fe0.6Cu0.4)(S1.98O0.02)

IMA Classification of UM2002-12-OS:CuFeHide

IMA status notes:
Unnamed (probably valid)

Optical Data of UM2002-12-OS:CuFeHide

Anisotropism:
intense
Bireflectance:
intense
Reflectivity:
WavelengthR1 (%)R2 (%)
470nm18.0% 19.9%
546nm26.2% 31.4%
589nm28.7% 34.3%
650nm31.2% 36.1%


Graph shows reflectance levels at different wavelengths (in nm). Peak reflectance is 36.1%.
R1 shown in black, R2 shown in red
Colour in reflected light:
bronze-yellow to gray
Comments:
yellow-orange to blue and dark blue rotation tints

Chemistry of UM2002-12-OS:CuFeHide

Mindat Formula:
~(Cu,Fe)SO ?

recasting the below wt.% data with any factors based on (K+Cu+Fe), (Cu+Fe), (S+O), or (K+Cu+Fe+S+O) and assuming various valencies of Cu and Fe does not give any result with neutral charge; as such, the above formula proposal may be wrong (possibly the sulfide bears water, or the below EPMA data concerns a mixture) (Ł.K.)
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Cu56.936 %
S28.729 %
O14.335 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for UM2002-12-OS:CuFeHide

References for UM2002-12-OS:CuFeHide

Localities for UM2002-12-OS:CuFeHide

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Russia
 
  • Murmansk Oblast
    • Khibiny Massif
      • Koashva Mt
Lisitsyn et al. (2002) +1 other reference
Quick NavTopUnique IdentifiersSimilar NamesIMA Classification Optical Data Chemistry Other InformationInternet Links References Localities Locality List
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 7, 2026 05:43:20 Page updated: January 1, 2026 23:13:13
Go to top of page