Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Thomsenolite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About ThomsenoliteHide

07084000017271927142956.png
Hans Peter Jørgen Julius Thomsen
Formula:
NaCa[AlF6] · H2O
Colour:
Colourless, white, pale lilac; brownish or reddish tinted due to staining; colourless in transmitted light.
Lustre:
Vitreous, Pearly
Hardness:
3 - 3½
Specific Gravity:
2.981
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named after Hans Peter Jørgen Julius Thomsen (16 February 1826, Copenhagen, Denmark - 13 February 1909, Copenhagen, Denmark), Professor of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen (Denmark), and founder of the Greenland cryolite industry.
Dimorph of:
This page provides mineralogical data about Thomsenolite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
3940
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:3940:2

IMA Classification of ThomsenoliteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
IMA Formula:
NaCaAlF6·H2O
First published:
1866

Classification of ThomsenoliteHide

3.CB.40

3 : HALIDES
C : Complex halides
B : Neso-aluminofluorides
11.6.6.1

11 : HALIDE COMPLEXES
6 : Aluminofluorides - Isolated Octahedra
8.6.17

8 : Halides - Fluorides, Chlorides, Bromides and Iodides; also Fluoborates and Fluosilicates
6 : Halides of Al

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
TseIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of ThomsenoliteHide

Vitreous, Pearly
Transparency:
Transparent, Translucent
Comment:
Pearly on cleavages
Colour:
Colourless, white, pale lilac; brownish or reddish tinted due to staining; colourless in transmitted light.
Streak:
White
Hardness:
3 - 3½ on Mohs scale
Hardness:
VHN25=220 - 320 kg/mm2 - Vickers
Comment:
Typically given as Mohs 2. Modern measurement and discussion by Pauly (1985).
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
On {001}; {110} distinct.
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven
Density:
2.981 g/cm3 (Measured)    2.986(3) g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of ThomsenoliteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.4072 nβ = 1.4136 nγ = 1.415
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.008
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (negative)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.

No measured or calculated 2V is on file for this mineral, so the value used here (50°) is estimated from its recorded refractive indices and optic sign, not from a direct 2V measurement.
Dispersion:
r > v
Optical Extinction:
X ∧ c = –52°; Z = b.

Chemistry of ThomsenoliteHide

Mindat Formula:
NaCa[AlF6] · H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
F51.334 %
Ca18.049 %
Al12.151 %
Na10.353 %
O7.205 %
H0.908 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
F
Ca
Al
Na
O
H

Crystallography of ThomsenoliteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
P21/b
Cell Parameters:
a = 5.563(2) Å, b = 5.541(2) Å, c = 16.115(1) Å
β = 96.35(3)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.004 : 1 : 2.908
Unit Cell V:
493.69 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Morphology:
Crystals commonly prismatic [001]; cubic in aspect with equal development of {001} and {110}. Grouped in parallel aggregates. Also tabular {001}. {110} and terminal prisms strongly striated parallel to the intersection with {001}. {h0l} often curved. Opaline or chalcedony-like crusts and stalactitic masses.
Twinning:
None observed.

Crystallographic forms of ThomsenoliteHide

Crystal Atlas:
Image Loading
Click on an icon to view
View 3D crystal model
Thomsenolite no.1 - {110} - Goldschmidt (1913-1926)
View 3D crystal model
Thomsenolite no.7 - {110} - Goldschmidt (1913-1926)
3d models and HTML5 code kindly provided by www.smorf.nl.

Toggle
Edge Lines | Miller Indices | Axes

Transparency
Opaque | Translucent | Transparent

View
Along a-axis | Along b-axis | Along c-axis | Start rotation | Stop rotation

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0009312ThomsenoliteCocco G, Castiglione P C, Vagliasindi G (1967) The crystal structure of thomsenolite Acta Crystallographica 23 162-1661967Ivigtut, Greenland0293
0012167ThomsenoliteAdhikesavalu D, Cameron T S, Knop O (1985) Thomsenolite, NaCaAlF6*H2O: hydrogen bonding and comparison with pachnolite Canadian Journal of Chemistry 63 3322-332719850293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

Epitaxial Relationships of ThomsenoliteHide

Epitaxial Minerals:
'Pachnolite'NaCa[AlF6] · H2O
Epitaxy Comments:
Oriented growths of thomsenolite on pachnolite, with thomsenolite (001) and (110) quasi-parallel to pachnolite (110) and (001). Also with thomsenolite (110) and (110) quasi-parallel to pachnolite (110) and (001).

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Loading XRD data...
Data Set:
Data courtesy of RRUFF project at University of Arizona, used with permission.
Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
4.02 Å(100)
1.963 Å(90)
1.996 Å(80)
2.92 Å(50)
1.761 Å(30)
2.16 Å(20)
1.640 Å(20)
Comments:
Ivigtut, Greenland.

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Near-surface Processes
22 : Hydration and low-? subsurface aqueous alteration (see also #23)
Stage 10b: Anthropogenic minerals<10 Ka
56 : Slag and smelter minerals (see also #51 and #55)
Geological Setting:
Granitic pegmatites

Type Occurrence of ThomsenoliteHide

Synonyms of ThomsenoliteHide

Other Language Names for ThomsenoliteHide

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
85 photos of Thomsenolite associated with Hydrokenoralstonite Na0.5(Al,Mg)2(F,OH)6 · H2O
78 photos of Thomsenolite associated with CryoliteNa2NaAlF6
53 photos of Thomsenolite associated with PachnoliteNaCa[AlF6] · H2O
34 photos of Thomsenolite associated with ProsopiteCaAl2F4[(OH)4-xFx]
30 photos of Thomsenolite associated with SideriteFeCO3
19 photos of Thomsenolite associated with QuartzSiO2
11 photos of Thomsenolite associated with 'Limonite'
9 photos of Thomsenolite associated with 'Hagemannite'
9 photos of Thomsenolite associated with Gagarinite-(Y)NaCaYF6
9 photos of Thomsenolite associated with TridymiteSiO2

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

3.CB.05CryolithioniteNa3Al2(LiF4)3Iso. m3m(4/m32/m) : Ia3d
3.CB.15ElpasoliteK2NaAlF6Iso. m3(2/m3) : Pa3
3.CB.15SimmonsiteNa2LiAlF6Mon.
3.CB.15CryoliteNa2NaAlF6Mon. 2/m
3.CB.20ColquiriiteCaLi[AlF6]Trig.
3.CB.25LeonardseniteMgAlF5 · 2H2O Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Imma
3.CB.25WeberiteNa2Mg[AlF6]FOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Immm
3.CB.30KarasugiteSrCa[Al(F,OH)7]Mon. 2/m : P21/b
3.CB.35UsoviteBa2CaMgAl2F14Mon. 2/m : B2/b
3.CB.40PachnoliteNaCa[AlF6] · H2OMon. 2/m
3.CB.45CarlhintzeiteCa2[AlF6]F · H2OTric.
3.CB.50YaroslaviteCa3Al2F10(OH)2 · H2OOrth.
3.CB.55SbacchiiteCa2AlF7Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
3.CB.60VerneiteNa2Ca3Al2F14Iso. 23 : I213

Other InformationHide

Thermal Behaviour:
Heated in a closed tube it yields water with an acid reaction that etches the glass. At a higher temperature it melts to a clear glass, fusing even more easily than cryolite.
Notes:
Readily soluble in H2SO4.
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for ThomsenoliteHide

References for ThomsenoliteHide

Reference List:

Localities for ThomsenoliteHide

Showing 31 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Brazil
 
  • Amazonas
    • Presidente Figueiredo
7. symposium on volcanism and ... +2 other references
Bastos Neto et al. (2026)
Canada
 
  • Québec
    • Montérégie
      • Lajemmerais RCM
        • Varennes & St-Amable
Horváth et al. (1998)
Horváth et al. (1998)
Finland
 
  • Satakunta
    • Harjavalta
Marttila
Greece
 
  • Attica
    • East Attica
      • Lavreotiki
Schnorrer-Köhler et al. (1988)
        • Velatouri
Gelaude et al. (1996)
Greenland (TL)
 
  • Sermersooq
    • Arsuk Fjord
      • Ivigtut stock
Palache et al. (1951) +2 other references
Iceland
 
  • Southern Region
    • Vestmannaeyjar
      • Vestmannaeyjar archipelago (Westman islands)
        • Heimaey Island
Mitolo et al. (2008)
Japan
 
  • Shiga Prefecture
    • Otsu City
Kotora Jimboh (1899)
Kazakhstan
 
  • Abai Region
    • Tarbagatai Range
      • Akzhaylyautas Mts (Akzhailyautas Mts; Akjaylautas Mts; Akzhalautas Mts)
Pavel M. Kartashov (n.d.) +1 other reference
Nigeria
 
  • Plateau
Am Min 51:299-323
Bailey (1980)
Norway
 
  • Akershus
    • Lunner
Sæbø (1966) +1 other reference
Russia
 
  • Buryatia
    • Mama River Basin
      • Maigunda River
Bailey (1980)
  • Chelyabinsk Oblast
    • Ilmen Mountains
Bailey (1980) +1 other reference
Raade et al. (1980)
  • Tuva
    • Kaa-Khemsky District
Bailey (1980)
Pavel M. Kartashov (n.d.) +1 other reference
  • Zabaykalsky Krai
    • Kalarsky District
P.M. Karashov data +2 other references
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
 
Bailey (1980)
Ukraine
 
  • Zhytomyr Oblast
    • Korosten Raion
Yurk Yu.Yu. et al. (1973) +1 other reference
USA
 
  • Colorado
    • El Paso County
      • Cheyenne Mining District (St. Peters Dome Mining District)
Palache et al. (1951) +1 other reference
Gross et al. (1966) +1 other reference
Pavel M. Kartashov analytical data
Eckel et al. (1997)
Gross et al. (1966) +1 other reference
  • Nevada
    • Mineral County
      • Fitting Mining District
        • Gillis Range
Mandarino (2000)
  • Texas
    • Hudspeth County
      • Sierra Blanca Peaks
O'Neill (2014)
  • Utah
    • Juab County
      • Honeycomb Hills Mining District
Henderson (1981)
  • Virginia
    • Amelia County
      • Winterham
Kearns (1995) +1 other reference
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 11:08:38 Page updated: August 30, 2026 07:46:52
Go to top of page