Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Erythrite vs. Skutterudite
Pretty pink and poisonous Erythrite is against its shiny silver and structurally-useful Skutterudite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Schoepite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About SchoepiteHide

01495120017271925303567.jpg
Alfred Schoep
Formula:
(UO2)8O2(OH)12 · 12H2O
Colour:
Amber-yellow, lemon-yellow, or sulphur-yellow
Lustre:
Adamantine, Sub-Adamantine, Vitreous
Hardness:
Specific Gravity:
4.8
Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Member of:
Name:
Named by Thomas Leonard Walker in 1923 in honour of Alfred Schoep (6 June 1881, Ghent, Belgium - 1 June 1966, Ghent, Belgium), Professor of Mineralogy, University of Ghent, Belgium.
May originate as a dehydration product of ianthinite, and may itself dehydrate to metaschoepite and, subsequently, to paulscherrerite.

Most stable uranyl-bearing phase at moderate H2O2 activity. At high concentrations of H2O2, the stability path is as follows: studtite, schoepite, metaschoepite, becquerelite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
3574
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:3574:9

Similar NamesHide

IMA Classification of SchoepiteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
IMA Formula:
(U6+O2)4O(OH)6(H2O)6

Classification of SchoepiteHide

4.GA.05

4 : OXIDES (Hydroxides, V[5,6] vanadates, arsenites, antimonites, bismuthites, sulfites, selenites, tellurites, iodates)
G : Uranyl Hydroxides
A : Without additional cations
5.2.1.3

5 : OXIDES CONTAINING URANIUM OR THORIUM
2 : AXO3·xH2O
7.16.2

7 : Oxides and Hydroxides
16 : Oxides of U

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
ShoIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of SchoepiteHide

Adamantine, Sub-Adamantine, Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Amber-yellow, lemon-yellow, or sulphur-yellow
Streak:
Yellow
Hardness:
2½ on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
{001} perfect; {010} poor
Density:
4.8 g/cm3 (Measured)    4.918 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of SchoepiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.69 - 1.700 nβ = 1.714 - 1.720 nγ = 1.735
2V:
Measured: 89°
Birefringence:
0.04
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.035 - 0.045
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
weak to moderate
Optical Extinction:
Parallel
Pleochroism:
Visible
Comments:
X = c = Colourless
Y = b = Lemon-yellow
Z = a = Lemon-yellow

Chemistry of SchoepiteHide

Mindat Formula:
(UO2)8O2(OH)12 · 12H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
U72.890 %
O25.722 %
H1.389 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Crystallography of SchoepiteHide

Crystal System:
Orthorhombic
Class (H-M):
mmm(2/m2/m2/m) - Dipyramidal
Space Group:
Pbca
Setting:
Pbca
Cell Parameters:
a = 16.7810(5) Å, b = 14.7044(4) Å, c = 14.2985(5) Å
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.141 : 1 : 0.972
Unit Cell V:
3528.22 ų
Z:
8
Morphology:
Usually tabular {001}; also equant or short prismatic [001].
Comment:
The space-group Pbca confirmed by the new structure determination and refinement; the formula is [(UO2)4O(OH)6](H2O)6 for Z = 8 (Plášil 2018)

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0005517SchoepiteFinch R J, Cooper M A, Hawthorne F C, Ewing R C (1996) The crystal structure of schoepite, [(UO2)8O2(OH)12](H2O)12 The Canadian Mineralogist 34 1071-108819960293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
7.28 Å(100)
5.08 Å(70)
3.66 Å(10)
3.51 Å(10)
3.44 Å(20)
3.22 Å(10)
2.89 Å(10)
2.54 Å(19)
Comments:
ICDD 13-407

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Near-surface Processes
27 : Radioactive decay; auto-oxidation
Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event<2.4
47a : [Near-surface hydration of prior minerals]
47f : [Uranyl (U⁶⁺) minerals]

Type Occurrence of SchoepiteHide

Geological Setting of Type Material:
Oxidized zone of a copper-uranium deposit

Synonyms of SchoepiteHide

Other Language Names for SchoepiteHide

Relationship of Schoepite to other SpeciesHide

Member of:
Other Members of Schoepite Group:
Metaschoepite(UO2)8O2(OH)12 · 10H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcn
PaulscherreriteUO2(OH)2Mon.

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
88 photos of Schoepite associated with Rutherfordine(UO2)CO3
52 photos of Schoepite associated with MalachiteCu2(CO3)(OH)2
47 photos of Schoepite associated with CuprosklodowskiteCu(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 6H2O
41 photos of Schoepite associated with UraniniteUO2
31 photos of Schoepite associated with IanthiniteU4+(UO2)5O7 · 10H2O
31 photos of Schoepite associated with DigeniteCu9S5
21 photos of Schoepite associated with CuritePb3(H2O)2[(UO2)4O4(OH)3]2
18 photos of Schoepite associated with UranophaneCa(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 5H2O
15 photos of Schoepite associated with ZirconZr(SiO4)
15 photos of Schoepite associated with MetatorberniteCu(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 8H2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

4.GA.05ParaschoepiteUO3 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbca
4.GA.05Metaschoepite(UO2)8O2(OH)12 · 10H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcn
4.GA.10IanthiniteU4+(UO2)5O7 · 10H2OOrth. mm2 : Amm2
4.GA.15MetastudtiteUO4 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
4.GA.15Studtite[(UO2)(O2)(H2O)2] · H2OMon. 2/m : B2/b
4.GA.20PaulscherreriteUO2(OH)2Mon.

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 72.8895% 18,222,375 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Fluorescence of SchoepiteHide

Pale green SW and LW

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for SchoepiteHide

References for SchoepiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for SchoepiteHide

Showing 120 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Argentina
 
  • Córdoba Province
    • Punilla Department
      • San Roque District
        • Tanti
          • Cerro Blanco pegmatite district
Mr. Nelson Valenzuela.
Australia
 
  • Northern Territory
    • Coomalie Shire
      • Rum Jungle
D.A.Berkman (1968)
  • South Australia
    • Pastoral Unincorporated Area
      • Arkaroola (Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary; Arkaroola Station)
        • Mount Painter area
Brugger et al. (2003)
  • Tasmania
    • Northern Midlands municipality
      • Rossarden mining district
Bottrill (2021) +1 other reference
Brazil
 
  • Bahia
Pires et al. (2014)
Canada
 
  • Northwest Territories
    • North Slave Region
Cowan (1962)
  • Nova Scotia
    • Cumberland Co.
Chatterjee (1977)
  • Ontario
    • Haliburton County
      • Highlands East Township
        • Cardiff Township
Reiner Mielke and Travis Olds
China
 
  • Guangdong
    • Shaoguan
      • Wengyuan Co.
Long Lu et al. (2006)
Czech Republic
 
  • Central Bohemian Region
    • Příbram District
      • Háje
Plášil
- (Pavel Škácha coll.)
      • Příbram
        • Bytíz
Plášil et al. (2026)
  • Karlovy Vary Region
    • Karlovy Vary District
Hloušek et al. (2002)
        • Svornost Mine
Plášil et al. (2014)
  • Ústí nad Labem Region
    • Chomutov District
Hyrsl et al. (2009)
DR Congo (TL)
 
  • Haut-Katanga
    • Kambove Territory
      • Shinkolobwe
Christ (1965) +2 other references
  • Lualaba
    • Mutshatsha
      • Kamoto
      • Kolwezi
Deliens (1996) +1 other reference
      • Sicomines copper-cobalt project
Lavinsky (n.d.)
Egypt
 
  • Red Sea Governorate
El-Naby (2009)
Hussein et al. (1988)
France
 
  • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
    • Loire
      • Roanne
        • Saint-Priest-la-Prugne
- (1998)
J.-J. Périchaud: "Où trouver les minéraux d'Auvergne" et al. (Clermont-Ferrand)
    • Puy-de-Dôme
      • Thiers
        • Lachaux
- (1998)
  • Nouvelle-Aquitaine
    • Corrèze
      • Ussel
        • Davignac
Queneau (n.d.)
    • Deux-Sèvres
      • Bressuire
        • Mauléon
          • La Chapelle-Largeau
Lièvre et al. (2002)
        • Saint-Amand-sur-Sèvre
Lièvre et al. (2002)
    • Haute-Vienne
      • Bellac
        • Compreignac
- (1998)
- (1998)
  • Occitanie
    • Hérault
      • Lodève
        • Le Bosc
- (1998)
        • Le Puech
Bariand et al. (1993) +1 other reference
        • Lodève
Henriot et al. (1998)
- (1998)
Gabon
 
  • Haut-Ogooué Province
    • Léboumbi-Leyou Department
Janusz Janeczek (1999)
Germany
 
  • Baden-Württemberg
    • Freiburg Region
      • Ortenaukreis
        • Oberwolfach
Walenta (1992)
      • Waldshut
        • St Blasien
          • Menzenschwand
Walenta (1989) +1 other reference
    • Karlsruhe Region
      • Baden-Baden
        • Müllenbach U deposit
Walenta (1992)
  • Bavaria
    • Upper Palatinate
      • Schwandorf District
        • Schwarzach bei Nabburg
          • Wölsendorf
Dill et al. (2010)
  • Rhineland-Palatinate
    • Birkenfeld
      • Birkenfeld
        • Ellweiler
Aufschluss 69/ (7+8) +1 other reference
  • Saxony
    • Erzgebirgskreis
Lapis 30 (7/8)
Hungary
 
  • Baranya County
    • Pécs District
Szakáll et al. (1996)
      • Kővágótöttös
Szakáll et al. (1996)
Italy
 
  • Lombardy
    • Bergamo Province
      • Valgoglio
Daniele Ravagnani - I giacimenti ...
    • Sondrio Province
      • Novate Mezzola
        • Codera Valley
De Michele V. (1979)
  • Piedmont
    • Cuneo Province
      • Roburent
        • San Giacomo
          • I Cardin
Piccoli et al. (2007)
    • Verbano-Cusio-Ossola Province
      • Montescheno
Piccoli et al. (2007)
  • Sardinia
    • Metropolitan City of Cagliari
      • Capoterra
luigi chiapino
  • Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
    • Trento Province
      • Bocenago
        • Monte Toff
Ravagnani (1974)
      • Borgo Chiese
        • Condino
Campostrini et al. (2006)
      • Valdaone
        • Daone
          • Daone Valley
            • Limes
Campostrini et al. (2005)
Japan
 
  • Okayama Prefecture
Akira Kato (1973)
Mexico
 
  • Chihuahua
    • Aldama Municipality
      • Peña Blanca District
        • Sierra Peña Blanca
Murphy (2006)
www.swri.org (2001) +1 other reference
Namibia
 
  • Hardap Region
    • Daweb
Bowell et al. (2017)
New Zealand
 
  • West Coast Region
    • Buller District
      • Westport
Christie et al. (2000)
Norway
 
  • Agder
    • Evje og Hornnes
Neumann (1985)
Neumann (1985)
Pakistan
 
  • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province
    • Lakki Marwat District
Alia et al. (2018)
Poland
 
  • Lower Silesian Voivodeship
    • Karkonosze County
      • Kowary
        • Podgórze
Syczewski et al. (2023)
Russia
 
  • Stavropol Krai
    • Pyatigorsk
Pavel M. Kartashov (n.d.)
  • Zabaykalsky Krai
    • Krasnokamensky District
      • Krasnokamensk
Pavel M. Kartashov (n.d.)
Spain
 
  • Catalonia
    • Lleida
      • Pallars Jussà
        • La Vall Fosca
          • La Torre de Cabdella
            • Castell-estaó
Joan Abella i Creus specimens
  • Extremadura
    • Badajoz
      • La Haba
www.foro-minerales.com (n.d.)
www.foro-minerales.com (n.d.)
      • Quintana de la Serena
www.foro-minerales.com (n.d.)
Switzerland
 
  • Grisons
    • Maloja Region
      • Bregaglia
        • Upper Val Bregaglia
          • Albigna Valley
Stalder et al. (1998)
  • Valais
    • Saint-Maurice
      • Salvan
        • Les Marécottes
          • La Creusaz
Meisser (2012)
Tajikistan
 
  • Sughd
    • Khodzhent (Leninabad)
Pekov (1998)
UK
 
  • Scotland
    • Dumfries and Galloway
Braithwaite et al. (1990)
Knight (1978) +2 other references
      • Needle's Eye
R. S. W. Braithwaite and J. R. Knight (1990) +1 other reference
Ukraine
 
  • Kyiv Oblast
    • Ivankiv Raion
Burakov et al. () +1 other reference
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Apache County
      • Cane Valley Mining District
        • Yazzie Mesa
          • Monument No. 2 channel
Frondel (1956) +2 other references
    • Coconino County
      • Cameron Mining District
Bollin et al. (1958)
Austin (1964) +1 other reference
    • Yavapai County
      • Bradshaw Mountains (Bradshaw Range)
        • Castle Creek Mining District
Granger (1962) +1 other reference
  • Colorado
    • Fremont County
Eckel et al. (1997)
      • Texas Creek Area
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Gunnison County
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Moffat County
      • Maybell Mining District
        • Maybell Mines
Eckel et al. (1997)
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Park County
      • Lake George (Badger Flats) Area
Eckel et al. (1997)
    • Saguache County
Gross (1965) +2 other references
    • San Miguel County
Travis Olds collection
Eckel et al. (1997)
  • Maine
    • Androscoggin County
      • Poland
King et al. (1994)
    • Oxford County
      • Albany
King (2009)
King (2009)
      • Buckfield
Fred Davis discovery specimen and ...
      • Greenwood
        • Uncle Tom Mountain
Falster et al. (2019)
      • Newry
King et al. (1994)
King et al. (6)
King et al. (6)
      • Peru
King (2000) +1 other reference
    • Sagadahoc County
      • Topsham
        • Highland Green
King et al. (1994) +1 other reference
  • New Hampshire
    • Grafton County
      • Grafton
Frondel (1956)
      • Groton
Whitmore et al. (2004)
    • Sullivan County
      • Acworth
        • South Acworth
Januzzi et al. (1976)
  • New Mexico
    • Cibola County
Northrop et al. (1996)
NMBMMR Memoir 15 Geology and Technology ...
Caldwell (2018)
  • North Carolina
Foord et al. (1997)
      • Spruce Pine
Curt segeler
  • Texas
    • Karnes County
Smith (1991)
MINERALS OF THE KARNES URANIUM ...
  • Utah
    • Emery County
      • San Rafael Swell Mining District
        • Green Vein Mesa
Bullock (1981)
Page et al. (1956) +3 other references
    • San Juan County
      • Deer Flat Mining District
Bullock (1981)
      • Red Canyon Mining District
Bullock (1981)
Bullock (1981)
USGS TEI #514 +2 other references
Min News 16:1 p1
    • Wayne County
      • Fremont Mining District
Bullock (1981)
  • Wyoming
    • Converse County
      • Highland Flats-Box Creek Mining District
Sumaila (2017)
    • Fremont County
USGS MRDS Database
Am Min 51:1567-1578
Uzbekistan
 
  • Namangan Region
    • Pop District
Frost et al. (2009)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 2, 2026 05:39:53 Page updated: August 19, 2026 22:15:29
Go to top of page