Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Margarosanite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About MargarosaniteHide

Formula:
Ca2PbSi3O9
Ca may be replaced by minor Mn(II).
Colour:
Colorless, white, grayish-white (due to included native lead)
Lustre:
Sub-Adamantine, Vitreous, Sub-Vitreous, Resinous, Pearly, Dull
Hardness:
2½ - 3
Specific Gravity:
4.33
Crystal System:
Triclinic
Name:
Named in 1916 by William Ebenezer Ford and Walter Minor Bradley from the Greek for "pearl" and "tablet," in allusion to the pearly luster and lamellar structure of the crystallized material. The original specimens were found in 1898, but the mineral remained unnamed for nearly 18 years.
Isostructural with:
The Pb analogue of walstromite. Chemically similar to ganomalite.

A rare lead silicate found in metamorphosed Pb-Zn-Mn deposits.

Crystal structure details (Callegari and Boiocchi, 2016):
- 2 layers parallel to (101)
- Si layer: isolated three-member rings of SiO4 tetrahedra
- Ca layer: dimeric CaO6 octahedra + CaO8 polyhedra forming chains
- Ca polyhedra interconnect forming a sheet
- chains, edge-sharing, of distorted [8]Pb polyhedra


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
2574
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:2574:0

IMA Classification of MargarosaniteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
IMA Formula:
Ca2Pb2+Si3O9
First published:
1916

Classification of MargarosaniteHide

9.CA.25

9 : SILICATES (Germanates)
C : Cyclosilicates
A : [Si3O9]6- 3-membered single rings (dreier-Einfachringe), without insular complex anions
59.1.2.2

59 : CYCLOSILICATES Three-Membered Rings
1 : Three-Membered Rings, anhydrous, no other anions
14.13.5

14 : Silicates not Containing Aluminum
13 : Silicates of Pb

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
MgaIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Pronunciation of MargarosaniteHide

Pronunciation:
PlayRecorded byCountry
Jolyon RalphUnited Kingdom

Physical Properties of MargarosaniteHide

Sub-Adamantine, Vitreous, Sub-Vitreous, Resinous, Pearly, Dull
Transparency:
Transparent, Translucent
Colour:
Colorless, white, grayish-white (due to included native lead)
Streak:
White
Hardness:
2½ - 3 on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
{010} perfect, {100} good, {001} fair
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven, Micaceous
Density:
4.33 g/cm3 (Measured)    4.31 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of MargarosaniteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.727 nβ = 1.771 nγ = 1.798
Birefringence:
0.071
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.071
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.

No measured or calculated 2V is on file for this mineral, so the value used here (74°) is estimated from its recorded refractive indices and optic sign, not from a direct 2V measurement.
Dispersion:
strong
Pleochroism:
Non-pleochroic

Chemistry of MargarosaniteHide

Mindat Formula:
Ca2PbSi3O9

Ca may be replaced by minor Mn(II).
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Pb40.186 %
O27.927 %
Si16.341 %
Ca15.546 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Pb
O
Si
Ca
Common Impurities:
Fe,Zn,Mg,Ba,H2O

Crystallography of MargarosaniteHide

Crystal System:
Triclinic
Class (H-M):
1 - Pinacoidal
Space Group:
P1
Setting:
P1
Cell Parameters:
a = 6.77 Å, b = 9.64 Å, c = 6.75 Å
α = 110.58°, β = 102°, γ = 88.5°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.702 : 1 : 0.7
Unit Cell V:
402.87 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
2
Morphology:
Crystals are extremely rare, but have a thin bladed appearance with acute crystal profile.
Comment:
Data from cr. structure refinement (Callegari & Boiocchi, 2016), approximated: a=6.74, b=9.53, c=6.70, α=110.19, β=103.05, γ=83.04

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0010672MargarosaniteFreed R L, Peacor D R (1969) Determination and refinement of the crystal structure of margarosanite, PbCa2Si3O9 Zeitschrift fur Kristallographie 128 213-2281969Parker Shaft, North Mine Hill, Franklin, New Jersey, USA0293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
8.967 Å(31)
6.588 Å(75)
6.122 Å(49)
5.193 Å(49)
5.097 Å(80)
5.023 Å(37)
4.483 Å(24)
4.444 Å(28)
4.384 Å(56)
4.121 Å(30)
4.050 Å(3)
4.009 Å(8)
3.903 Å(10)
3.791 Å(29)
3.627 Å(4)
3.499 Å(38)
3.373 Å(28)
3.294 Å(9)
3.273 Å(19)
3.221 Å(54)
3.176 Å(59)
3.127 Å(8)
3.088 Å(32)
3.045 Å(78)
3.034 Å(91)
2.989 Å(100)
Comments:
ICDD 27-79 many lines down to 2.025 (14)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
High-? alteration and/or metamorphism
32 : Ba/Mn/Pb/Zn deposits, including metamorphic deposits

Type Occurrence of MargarosaniteHide

Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 2.5943.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Altered areas of metamorphosed zinc-manganese-iron silicate-oxide orebodies
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Other Language Names for MargarosaniteHide

Relationship of Margarosanite to other SpeciesHide

Other Members of Margarosanite Group:
AnatolygurbanoviteSrCa2Si3O9Tric. 1 : P1
BreyiteCa3Si3O9Tric. 1 : P1
WalstromiteBaCa2(Si3O9)Tric. 1 : P1

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
77 photos of Margarosanite associated with WillemiteZn2SiO4
52 photos of Margarosanite associated with Axinite-(Mn)Ca2Mn2+Al2BSi4O15(OH)
32 photos of Margarosanite associated with AndraditeCa3Fe3+2(SiO4)3
32 photos of Margarosanite associated with CalciteCaCO3
19 photos of Margarosanite associated with WollastoniteCa3(Si3O9)
17 photos of Margarosanite associated with MicroclineK(AlSi3O8)
17 photos of Margarosanite associated with ClinohedriteCaZn(SiO4) · H2O
13 photos of Margarosanite associated with Minehillite(K,Na)2-3Ca28Zn4Al4Si40O112(OH)16
11 photos of Margarosanite associated with XonotliteCa6(Si6O17)(OH)2
11 photos of Margarosanite associated with PectoliteNaCa2Si3O8(OH)

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

9.CA.'UM1975-18-SiO:Mn'α-MnSiO3Tric.
9.CA.RaudseppiteBa2Ca7(Si3O9)2(CO3)2Cl2Tric. 1 : P1
9.CA.KopyloviteK2Ti(Si3O9)Hex. 6/m : P63/m
9.CA.05BaziriteBaZr(Si3O9)Hex. 6m2 : P6c2
9.CA.05BenitoiteBaTi(Si3O9)Hex. 6m2 : P62c
9.CA.05PabstiteBa(Sn,Ti)(Si3O9)Hex. 6m2 : P6c2
9.CA.10WadeiteK2Zr(Si3O9)Hex. 6/m : P63/m
9.CA.15CalciocatapleiiteCaZr(Si3O9) · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m)
9.CA.15CatapleiiteNa2Zr(Si3O9) · 2H2OMon.
9.CA.20PseudowollastoniteCaSiO3Mon. 2/m : B2/b
9.CA.25WalstromiteBaCa2(Si3O9)Tric. 1 : P1
9.CA.25AnatolygurbanoviteSrCa2Si3O9Tric. 1 : P1
9.CA.25BreyiteCa3Si3O9Tric. 1 : P1
9.CA.30Bobtraillite(Na,◻)12(◻,Na)12Sr12Zr14(Si3O9)10[Si2BO7(OH)2]6 · 12H2OTrig. 3m(32/m) : P31c
9.CA.35RogermitchelliteNa6Sr12Ba2Zr13Si39B4O123(OH)6 · 20H2OHex. 6mm : P63cm

Fluorescence of MargarosaniteHide

Bright blue-white, pink (often both colors are present)(MR UV, SW UV).

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Industrial Uses:
None.

Internet Links for MargarosaniteHide

References for MargarosaniteHide

Reference List:

Localities for MargarosaniteHide

Showing 10 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Sweden
 
  • Värmland County
    • Filipstad
      • Långban Ore District
Holtstam et al. (1999) +1 other reference
Flink (1917)
Adolfsson (1979)
Flink (1917) +1 other reference
      • Nordmark mining district
        • Jakobsberg ore field
Gatedal (2003) +3 other references
      • Persberg ore district
        • Pajsberg
Nysten (2003)
USA
 
  • New Jersey
    • Sussex County
      • Franklin
Palache (1935) +2 other references
King (n.d.)
King (n.d.) +1 other reference
Ford et al. (1916) +2 other references
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 08:45:24 Page updated: August 24, 2026 22:56:41
Go to top of page