Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Magnesiozippeite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About MagnesiozippeiteHide

Formula:
Mg(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2O
Colour:
Intense yellow, orange, red brownish yellow.
Hardness:
2
Specific Gravity:
4.756 (Calculated)
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Member of:
Name:
For its relation to zippeite and dominance of magnesium. Originally called magnesium-zippeite, the name was changed in 2008 by the IMA (Burke 2008).
See also marécottite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
2474
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:2474:3

Classification of MagnesiozippeiteHide

01991140017683580375858.jpg
The zippeite-type sheet

The uranyl sulfate sheet topology found in the members of the zippeite group.

IMA Classification of MagnesiozippeiteHide

Approved
IMA status notes:
Redefined by the IMA
IMA Formula:
Mg(U6+O2)2(S6+O4)O2·3.5H2O
Approval year:
2000
First published:
1976
Approval history:
Redefined IMA00-G: Neotype approved; redefined as monoclinic (Grice and Ferraris 2003).
7.EC.05

7 : SULFATES (selenates, tellurates, chromates, molybdates, wolframates)
E : Uranyl sulfates
C : With medium-sized and large cations
31.10.4.3

31 : HYDRATED SULFATES CONTAINING HYDROXYL OR HALOGEN
10 : Miscellaneous
25.8.13

25 : Sulphates
8 : Sulphates of Sb, V, Cr and U

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
MzipIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of MagnesiozippeiteHide

Transparency:
Translucent
Colour:
Intense yellow, orange, red brownish yellow.
Hardness:
Density:
4.756 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of MagnesiozippeiteHide

Type:
Biaxial
RI values:
nα = 1.7 nβ = 1.74 nγ = 1.79
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.090
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Dispersion:
r > v strong
Pleochroism:
Visible
Comments:
X = pale yellow; Y = yellow; Z = dark yellow.

Chemistry of MagnesiozippeiteHide

Mindat Formula:
Mg(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
U63.014 %
O28.590 %
S4.244 %
Mg3.217 %
H0.934 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
U
O
S
Mg
H

Crystallography of MagnesiozippeiteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
B2/m
Setting:
C2/m
Cell Parameters:
a = 8.6514(4) Å, b = 14.1938(7) Å, c = 17.7211(9) Å
β = 104.131(1)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.61 : 1 : 1.249
Unit Cell V:
2,110.24 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Morphology:
Earthy, granular/crystalline.
Comment:
Data for synthetic sample. Natural crystals gave a cell with a halved volume and interlayer complex, which is distinctive from synthetics - there is an additional Mg-octahedron resulting in a infinite chain of polyhedra, instead of isolated dimers of Mg-octahedra in synthetic material (Plášil et al., 2013): a = 8.7005(5), b = 14.2541(6), c = 8.8433(5)Å, β = 104.408(5)°, V = 1062.24(9) Å3.

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0005851MagnesiozippeiteBurns P C, Deely K M, Hayden L A (2003) The crystal chemistry of the zippeite group The Canadian Mineralogist 41 687-70620030293
0005854MagnesiozippeiteBurns P C, Deely K M, Hayden L A (2003) The crystal chemistry of the zippeite group The Canadian Mineralogist 41 687-70620030293
0005854MagnesiozippeiteBurns P C, Deely K M, Hayden L A (2003) The crystal chemistry of the zippeite group The Canadian Mineralogist 41 687-70620030293
0005851MagnesiozippeiteBurns P C, Deely K M, Hayden L A (2003) The crystal chemistry of the zippeite group The Canadian Mineralogist 41 687-70620030293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
7.112 Å(100)
3.559 Å(58)
3.104 Å(40)
3.449 Å(38)
2.653 Å(22)
1.9518 Å(22)
2.4774 Å(21)
Comments:
Jáchymov, Czech Republic

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event<2.4
47b : [Sulfates and sulfites]
47f : [Uranyl (U⁶⁺) minerals]
Stage 10b: Anthropogenic minerals<10 Ka
55 : Anthropogenic mine minerals

Type Occurrence of MagnesiozippeiteHide

Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Musée Géologique Cantonal, Lausanne, Switzerland, MGL 54060 (neotype).
Harvard University, Boston, USA, 2000-G (holotype).

Synonyms of MagnesiozippeiteHide

Other Language Names for MagnesiozippeiteHide

Relationship of Magnesiozippeite to other SpeciesHide

Member of:
Other Members of Zippeite Group:
Ammoniozippeite(NH4)2[(UO2)2(SO4)O2] · H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmca
CobaltzippeiteCo(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
NatrozippeiteNa5(UO2)8(SO4)4O5(OH)3 · 12H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
NickelzippeiteNi2(UO2)6(SO4)3(OH)10 · 16H2OMon.
PlavnoiteK0.8Mn0.6[(UO2)2O2(SO4)] · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
PseudojohanniteCu3(UO2)4(SO4)2O4(OH)2 · 12H2OTric. 1 : P1
Sejkoraite-(Y)Y2(UO2)8(SO4)4O6(OH)2 · 26H2OTric. 1 : P1
ZinczippeiteZn(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
ZippeiteK3(UO2)4(SO4)2O3(OH) · 3H2OMon. 2 : B2

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
5 photos of Magnesiozippeite associated with JohanniteCu(UO2)2(SO4)2(OH)2 · 8H2O
4 photos of Magnesiozippeite associated with GypsumCaSO4 · 2H2O
3 photos of Magnesiozippeite associated with MarécottiteMg3(UO2)8(SO4)4O6(OH)2 · 28H2O
2 photos of Magnesiozippeite associated with LeesiteK(H2O)2[(UO2)4O2(OH)5] · 3H2O
1 photo of Magnesiozippeite associated with Blatonite(UO2)CO3 · H2O

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

7.EC.Nitscheite(NH4)2[(UO2)2(SO4)3(H2O)2] · 3H2OMon. 2/m
7.EC.Beshtauite(NH4)2(UO2)(SO4)2 · 2H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.Oldsite-(K)K2Fe2+[(UO2)(SO4)2]2(H2O)8Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EC.AdolfpateraiteK(UO2)(SO4)(OH)(H2O)Mon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.Libbyite(NH4)2(Na2◻)[(UO2)2(SO4)3(H2O)]2 · 7H2OTet. 422 : P41212
7.EC.SeaborgiteLiK2Na6(UO2)(SO4)5(SO3OH)(H2O)Tric. 1 : P1
7.EC.05ZinczippeiteZn(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.05ZippeiteK3(UO2)4(SO4)2O3(OH) · 3H2OMon. 2 : B2
7.EC.05CobaltzippeiteCo(UO2)2(SO4)O2 · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.05NickelzippeiteNi2(UO2)6(SO4)3(OH)10 · 16H2OMon.
7.EC.05Redcanyonite(NH4)2Mn[(UO2)4O4(SO4)2](H2O)4Mon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.05NatrozippeiteNa5(UO2)8(SO4)4O5(OH)3 · 12H2OMon. 2/m : P21/m
7.EC.05Ammoniozippeite(NH4)2[(UO2)2(SO4)O2] · H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmca
7.EC.05PlavnoiteK0.8Mn0.6[(UO2)2O2(SO4)] · 3.5H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
7.EC.10RabejaciteCa(UO2)4(SO4)2(OH)6 · 6H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.10Svornostite-(NH4)(NH4)2Mg(UO2)2(SO4)4(H2O)8Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EC.10Svornostite-(K)K2Mg[(UO2)(SO4)2]2(H2O)8Orth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EC.15Sejkoraite-(Y)Y2(UO2)8(SO4)4O6(OH)2 · 26H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.15MarécottiteMg3(UO2)8(SO4)4O6(OH)2 · 28H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.15HubbarditeMg(H2O)6[(UO2)2O(OH)(SO4)]2 · 8H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Fddd
7.EC.20PseudojohanniteCu3(UO2)4(SO4)2O4(OH)2 · 12H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.40BluelizarditeNa7(UO2)(SO4)4Cl(H2O)2Mon. 2/m : B2/b
7.EC.45MeisseriteNa5(UO2)(SO4)3(SO3OH)(H2O)Tric. 1 : P1
7.EC.45FermiiteNa4(UO2)(SO4)3 · 3H2OOrth. mm2 : Pmn21
7.EC.45OppenheimeriteNa2(UO2)(SO4)2 · 3H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.50FeynmaniteNa(UO2)(SO4)(OH) · 3.5H2OMon.
7.EC.50PlášiliteNa(UO2)(SO4)(OH) · 2H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.55GeschieberiteK2(UO2)(SO4)2 · 2H2OOrth. mm2 : Pna21
7.EC.60OttohahniteNa6(UO2)2(SO4)5(H2O)7 · 1.5H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.65PéligotiteNa6(UO2)(SO4)4 · 4H2OTric. 1 : P1
7.EC.70KlaprothiteNa6(UO2)(SO4)4 · 4H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.75Lussierite Na10[(UO2)(SO4)4](SO4)2 · 3(H2O)Mon. m : Bb
7.EC.80NavrotskyiteK2Na10(UO2)3(SO4)9 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcm
7.EC.85Pseudomeisserite-(NH4)(NH4)2Na4[(UO2)2(SO4)5] · 4H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
7.EC.90WetherilliteNa2Mg(UO2)2(SO4)4 · 18H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 63.0143% 15,753,575 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for MagnesiozippeiteHide

References for MagnesiozippeiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for MagnesiozippeiteHide

Showing 21 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Canada
 
  • Northwest Territories
    • North Slave Region
      • Great Bear Lake
McCollam (2002)
Czech Republic
 
  • Karlovy Vary Region
    • Karlovy Vary District
Hloušek et al. (2002)
Thorne (n.d.)
Desor (04/2022)
      • Ostrov
        • Hanušov
          • Plavno mine
Plášil et al. (2015)
  • Plzeň Region
    • Plzeň-South District
      • Kasejovice
McCollam (2002)
France
 
  • Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
    • Saône-et-Loire
      • Charolles
        • Neuvy-Grandchamp
Vajdak (2006)
Germany
 
  • Saxony
    • Erzgebirgskreis
      • Annaberg-Buchholz
        • Kleinrückerswalde
Desor (06/2020)
    • Sächsische Schweiz-Osterzgebirge
      • Glashütte
        • Bärenhecke
Witzke (2024)
  • Thuringia
    • Greiz District
      • Kauern
Hans-Jürgen Haas collection
      • Ronneburg
Witzke et al. (1998)
Hungary
 
  • Baranya County
    • Pécs District
      • Kővágótöttös
Szakáll-Fehér 2014.
Morocco
 
  • Drâa-Tafilalet Region
    • Zagora Province
      • Agdz Cercle
        • Bou Skour mining district
Favreau (n.d.) +1 other reference
Russia
 
  • Zabaykalsky Krai
    • Nerchinsky District
      • Adun-Cholon Range
Eremin et al. (2023)
Switzerland
 
  • Valais
    • Saint-Maurice
      • Salvan
        • Les Marécottes
          • La Creusaz
Meisser (2012)
USA
 
  • Nevada
    • Lander County
      • Reese River Mining District
McCollam (2002) +1 other reference
  • Utah
    • Emery County
      • San Rafael Swell Mining District
Frondel et al. (1976) +3 other references
    • Grand County
      • Thompsons Mining District
        • Yellow Cat Mesa
          • Parco Mines
McCollam (2002)
    • San Juan County
      • White Canyon Mining District
        • Fry Mesa
Plášil et al. (2013)
McCollam (2002)
Patrick Haynes. XRD and EDS by Michel ...
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 23:10:09 Page updated: August 21, 2026 21:15:37
Go to top of page