Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Sphalerite vs. Anorthite
Both zinc ore Sphalerite and calcium plagioclase feldspar Anorthite have perfect cleavage that will split cleanly if you hit them with a hammer, but only one can claim a larger split of your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Calcite from
Goesdorf antimony mine, Goesdorf, Canton Wiltz, Luxembourg


Locality type:Mine
Classification
Species:Calcite
Formula:CaCO3
Confirmation
Validity:Believed Valid
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Calcite data
Locality Data:Click here to view Goesdorf antimony mine, Goesdorf, Canton Wiltz, Luxembourg
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:484654
Long-form Identifier:1:3:484654:3
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Calcite
14.7km (9.1 miles) ⓘPb occurrence, Hosingen, Parc Hosingen, Canton Clervaux, Luxembourg
14.9km (9.3 miles) ⓘFléssen, Stolzembourg, Putscheid, Canton Vianden, Luxembourg
15.8km (9.8 miles) ⓘStolzembourg Copper Mine, Stolzembourg, Putscheid, Canton Vianden, Luxembourg
18.2km (11.3 miles) ⓘObermartelingen slate mine, Obermartelingen, Martelange, Rambrouch, Canton Redange, Luxembourg
18.3km (11.4 miles) ⓘSlate mine, Martelange, Luxembourg, Wallonia, Belgium
18.6km (11.5 miles) ⓘSur les Roches quarry, Bastogne, Luxembourg, Wallonia, Belgium
18.6km (11.6 miles) ⓘLa Wiltz brook quarries, Mardasson, Bastogne, Luxembourg, Wallonia, Belgium
20.8km (12.9 miles) ⓘBrouch Steekaul, Reckange, Mersch, Canton Mersch, Luxembourg
27.6km (17.1 miles) ⓘEischen quarry, Eischen, Habscht, Canton Capellen, Luxembourg
31.2km (19.4 miles) ⓘBambësch quarry, Bourglinster, Junglinster, Canton Grevenmacher, Luxembourg
References
Philippo, S., Hanson, A. (2007) La minéralisation en antimoine de Goesdorf. Ferrantia 49, 111-146.
Filella, M., Philippo, S., Belzile, N., Chen, Y., Quentel, F. (2009) Natural attenuation processes applying to antimony: a study in the abandoned antimony mine in Goesdorf, Luxembourg. Science of the Total Environment, 407(24), 6205-6216.
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 3, 2026 05:24:16
Go to top of page