Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Quartz vs. Asagiite
It's a classic vs a newbie as the most common named mineral in the crust Quartz is up against an exceedingly-rare sea foam-green mineral discovered just a few years ago Asagiite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Dolomite from
ZK801 borehole, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, China


Locality type:Borehole
Classification
Species:Dolomite
Formula:CaMg(CO3)2
Confirmation
Validity:Believed Valid
Data
Mineral Data:Click here to view Dolomite data
Locality Data:Click here to view ZK801 borehole, Jiujiang, Jiangxi, China
Data Identifiers
Mindat Occurrence Record ID:1905248
Long-form Identifier:1:3:1905248:5
GUID (UUID V4):0
Nearest other occurrences of Dolomite
58.1km (36.1 miles) ⓘJinjiawu Au deposit, Poyang Co., Shangrao, Jiangxi, China
72.5km (45.1 miles) ⓘHuangmei Fe deposit, Huangmei Co., Huanggang, Hubei, China
82.2km (51.1 miles) ⓘAnqing copper mine, Yueshan ore field, Huaining County, Anqing, Anhui, China
83.1km (51.6 miles) ⓘSusong P deposit, Susong County, Anqing, Anhui, China
83.8km (52.1 miles) ⓘTongshan Mine (West Tongshan Mine), Guichi District, Chizhou, Anhui, China
84.9km (52.8 miles) ⓘZhuchong Fe-Cu Deposit, Yueshan ore field, Huaining County, Anqing, Anhui, China
87.4km (54.3 miles) ⓘLongmenshan Mine, Yueshan ore field, Huaining County, Anqing, Anhui, China
88.5km (55.0 miles) ⓘTielukan deposit, Jiurui Mining District, Yangxin Co., Huangshi, Hubei, China
88.9km (55.3 miles) ⓘChengmenshan mine, Jiurui Mining District, Yangxin Co., Huangshi, Hubei, China
90.4km (56.2 miles) ⓘTongniujing Cu-Mo-Au deposit (Tongliujing Cu-Mo-Au deposit), Yueshan ore field, Huaining County, Anqing, Anhui, China
References
Yang, Lifei; Qiao, Miqi; Liu, Zherong; Ouyang, Yongpeng; Ouyang, Xuecai; Li, Zenghua; Deng, Youguo; Han, Shanchu; Xu, Yicong; Zhao, Li (2026) Paleoceanographic environment synergistic controls on V-U enrichment in Early Cambrian marine shales from the Yangtze Block. Ore Geology Reviews, 192. 107219 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2026.107219
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 6, 2026 00:35:33
Go to top of page