Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Sphalerite vs. Anorthite
Both zinc ore Sphalerite and calcium plagioclase feldspar Anorthite have perfect cleavage that will split cleanly if you hit them with a hammer, but only one can claim a larger split of your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Copper King Mine, Pima Mining District, Sierrita Mountains, Pima County, Arizona, USAi
Regional Level Types
Copper King MineMine
Pima Mining DistrictMining District
Sierrita MountainsMountain Range
Pima CountyCounty
ArizonaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
31° 53' 54'' North , 111° 3' 34'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Green Valley21,391 (2011)7.9km
Sahuarita25,707 (2017)11.8km
East Sahuarita1,622 (2006)13.3km
Arivaca Junction1,090 (2011)19.0km
Amado295 (2011)21.2km
Nearest Clubs:
Local clubs are the best way to get access to collecting localities
ClubLocationDistance
Old Pueblo Lapidary ClubTucson, Arizona38km
Tucson Gem and Mineral SocietyTucson, Arizona38km
Mindat Locality ID:
36240
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:36240:8
GUID (UUID V4):
0


A former small underground Zn-Pb-Ag-Cu-Au mine located in the NW ¼ sec. 6, T.18S., R.13E., at the town of Twin Buttes and about 500 feet ESE of the old Twin Buttes railway depot on private land. Produced 1910-1942. Owned at times, or in part, by Baxter; the Twin Buttes Mining & Smelting Co.; Midland Copper Co.; and, William Foy.

The surface, from south to north, consists of cherty Naco limestone; a belt of relatively pure crystalline marble of Escabrosa aspect, 200 feet wide; a belt of bluish limestone 50 feet wide; siliceous beds, 25 feet; and cherty Naco limestone. These beds strike NW and dip from 80ºNE. to vertically. An irregular body of gray porphyry, 100 feet long by 15-25 feet wide, cuts across the SW contact of the marble.

Mineralization is irregular, lensing copper and zinc carbonate ores as replacements along fissure veins in partly garnetized Paleozoic limestone. The ore averaged about 5 feet in width along the Copper King fissure. Several mineralized NE fissures, dipping from 65º SE to vertically are visible in the hanging wall of the orebody. Commercial mineralization was apparently limited to the marble.

The Copper King fissure trends west to northwesterly and dips about 75ºS. It is traceable for a length of some 350 feet, becoming tight and indistinct on the ends. On the east, near the bluish limestone, it apparently forks and is marked by a mass of garnet. Overall, the ore body is 106.68 meters long, 1.52 meters wide and 68.58 meters deep, striking WNW and dipping 75SW.

Workings include an inclined shaft that reached a vertical depth of 335 feet (102.11 meters deep). Possibly some 100 tons of 12% Cu with 2 oz. Ag/t ore were produced in the early 1900's as well as a body of oxidized ore in the footwall that yielded 2,183 tons of 27-34% Zn in 1912. Worked for several years prior to 1914. Production was valued at $150,000 and consisted mainly of carbonate ore that averaged about 8 Cu and 2 oz. Ag/T.

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Mineral List


Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Unclassified
'Garnet Group'-X3Z2(SiO4)3

List of minerals for each chemical element

OOxygen
O Garnet GroupX3Z2(SiO4)3
SiSilicon
Si Garnet GroupX3Z2(SiO4)3

Other Databases

Link to USGS MRDS:10026756

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality


This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 3, 2026 11:19:27 Page updated: July 23, 2025 16:06:49
Go to top of page