Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Cuprite vs. Orpiment
It's a fiery match of vibrant red Cuprite and just as saturated orange Orpiment battle for your votes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Mahoney; Ash; Asche Mine, Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Mahoney; Ash; Asche MineMine
Ketchikan Gateway BoroughBorough
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
55° 25' 40'' North , 131° 30' 28'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Ketchikan8,197 (2017)13.0km
Saxman417 (2017)13.4km
Metlakatla1,405 (2017)33.5km
Mindat Locality ID:
198709
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:198709:9
GUID (UUID V4):
0


Early reports refer to this property as the Asche, or Ash, claim (Brooks, 1902, p. 63-64; Cobb and Elliott, 1980, p. 71).
Location: The Mahoney mine is less than 100 feet above sea level on the west shore of George Inlet. It is on the north side of the mouth of the creek draining Mahoney Lake. The site is in section 25, T. 74 S., R. 91 E., of the Copper River Meridian. It corresponds to loc. 76 in Elliott and others (1978), and to loc. 293 in Maas and others (1995). The location is accurate within a few hundred feet. Also see Additional comments.
Geology: The country rocks in this part of Revillagigedo Island are marine, pelitic phyllite and schist that are intruded by Cretaceous stocks, sills, and dikes of feldspar-porphyritic granodiorite, and by a stock and probably related plugs of Tertiary gabbro (Berg and others, 1988). The strata and some of the granodiorite were regionally metamorphosed to greenschist grade in Late Cretaceous time. These regionally metamorphosed rocks subsequently were locally contact metamorphosed to hornblende hornfels near the contacts of Cretaceous granodiorite plutons that were emplaced after the regional metamorphism, and then more widely remetamorposed to hornblende hornfels near the contacts of the Tertiary gabbro. The premetamorphic age range of the pelitic strata is uncertain. Berg and others (1988) assign them a Mesozoic or (Late) Paleozoic age; Brew and Ford (1998) and Crawford and others (2000) assign them to the Gravina belt, of Late Jurassic or Cretaceous age. The Mahoney deposit consists of a pod or lens 6 inches to 3 feet thick and 350 feet long of massive sphalerite and galena, accompanied by interstitial quartz and calcite. The orebody formed by fracture filling in, and by minor replacement of, dark gray, graphitic, slaty to phyllitic metapelite (Robinson and Twenhofel, 1953; Cobb and Elliott, 1980, p. 71). The metapelite locally is intruded by feldspar-porphyritic dikes or sills. Maas and others (1995, p. 203-204) note that the deposit has a shallow dip and is slightly discordant to the gently-dipping foliation of the phyllite hostrock. The orebody thickens from west to east and its dip steepens from 17 to 54 degrees. They believe that the deposit was emplaced along a fault, or, more likely, that there has been fault movement along the boundary of the soft sulfides and the relatively hard phyllite. Where the massive sulfides are not present, the fault zone is filled with quartz and crushed phyllite. The Mahoney deposit was discovered in the early 1900s and originally referred to as the Asche claim (Brooks, 1902, p. 63). The mine was developed mainly in the 1940s and included more than 600 feet of underground workings, along with several surface pits and trenches (Maas and others, 1995, p. 202). From 1947 to 1949, total recovery from about 400-500 tons of ore was 33.1 metric tons (mt) of Zn, 18.1 mt of Pb, 1.27 mt of Cu, 11.6 kg of Ag, and 0.25 kg of Au (Maas and others, 1995, p, 202). Resources are estimated at 2,500 tons of material averaging 6-7% Pb and about 28% Zn (Robinson and Twenhofel, 1953; Cobb and Elliott, 1980, p. 71). Maas and others (1995, p. 210) collected one-foot-wide samples across the deposit for the first 118 feet of the main adit. These samples averaged 3.2% Pb, 7.6% Zn, and 25.5 ppm Ag. The weighted average of assays of 1.4-foot-long samples along 60 feet of the richest ore was 20.1% Zn, 8.0% Pb, 61 ppm Ag, and 0.69 ppm Au (Maas and others, p. 204). Some samples also contained up to 1200 ppm Cd. Maas and others' sampling showed a direct correlation between high lead and silver values.
Workings: The Mahoney deposit was discovered in the early 1900s and originally referred to as the Asche claim (Brooks, 1902, p. 63). The mine was developed mainly in the 1940s and included more than 600 feet of underground workings, along with several surface pits and trenches (Maas and others, 1995, p. 202). From 1947-49, total recovery from about 400-500 tons of ore was 33.1 metric tons (mt) of Zn, 18.1 mt of Pb, 1.27 mt of Cu, 11.6 kg of Ag, and 0.25 kg of Au (Maas and others, 1995, p, 202). Maas and others (1995, p. 210) collected one-foot-wide samples across the deposit for the first 118 feet of the main adit. These samples averaged 3.2% Pb, 7.6% Zn, 25.5 ppm Ag. The weighted average of assays of 1.4-foot-long samples along 60 feet of the richest ore was 20.1% Zn, 8.0% Pb, 61 ppm Ag, and 0.69 ppm Au (Maas and others, p. 204). Some samples also contained up to 1200 ppm Cd. Maas and others' sampling showed a direct correlation between high lead and silver values.
Production: From 1947 to 1949, total recovery from about 400-500 tons of ore was 33.1 metric tons (mt) of Zn, 18.1 mt of Pb, 1.27 mt of Cu, 11.6 kg of Ag, and 0.25 kg of Au (Maas and others, 1995, p, 202). Resources are estimated at 2,500 tons of material averaging 6-7% Pb and about 28% Zn (Cobb and Elliott, 1980, p. 71).
Reserves: Resources are estimated at 2,500 tons of material averaging 6-7% Pb and about 28% Zn (Robinson and Twenhofel, 1953; Cobb and Elliott, 1980, p. 71).

Commodities (Major) - Pb, Zn; (Minor) - Ag, Au, Cd, Cu
Development Status: Yes; small
Deposit Model: Stratiform, massive-sulfide replacement body

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


4 valid minerals.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
Galena2.CD.10PbS
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
Calcite5.AB.05CaCO3

List of minerals for each chemical element

CCarbon
C CalciteCaCO3
OOxygen
O CalciteCaCO3
O QuartzSiO2
SiSilicon
Si QuartzSiO2
SSulfur
S GalenaPbS
S SphaleriteZnS
CaCalcium
Ca CalciteCaCO3
ZnZinc
Zn SphaleriteZnS
PbLead
Pb GalenaPbS

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:KC079

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North AmericaContinent
North America PlateTectonic Plate
USA

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Berg, H.C., Elliott, R.L., and Koch, R.D., 1988, Geologic map of the Ketchikan and Prince Rupert quadrangles, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Investigations Series Map I-1807, 27 p., scale 1:250,000. Brew, D.A., and Ford, A.B., 1998, The Coast Mountains structural zones in southeastern Alaska--descriptions, relations, and lithotectonic significance, in Gray, J.E., and Riehle, J.R., eds., The U.S. Geological Survey in Alaska--Geological studies in Alaska by the U.S. Geological Survey in 1996: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1595, p. 183-192. Brooks, A.H., 1902, Preliminary report on the Ketchikan mining district, Alaska, with an introductory sketch of the geology of southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1, 120 p. Cobb, E.H., and Elliott, R.L., 1980, Summaries of data on and lists of references to metallic and selected nonmetallic mineral deposits in the Ketchikan and Prince Rupert quadrangles, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 80-1053, 157 p. Crawford, M.L., Crawford, W.A., and Gehrels, G.E., 2000, Terrane assembly and structural relationships in the eastern Prince Rupert quadrangle, British Columbia, in H.H. Stowell and W.C.McClelland, eds., Tectonics of the Coast Mountains, southeastern Alaska and British Columbia: Geological Society of America Special Paper 343, p. 1-21. Elliott, R.L., Berg, H.C., and Karl, S.M., 1978, map and table describing metalliferous and selected non-metalliferous mineral deposits, Ketchikan and Prince Rupert quadrangles, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-73-B, 17 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Maas, K.M., Bittenbender, P E., and Still, J.C., 1995, Mineral investigations in the Ketchikan mining district, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 11-95, 606 p. Robinson, G.D., and Twenhofel, W.S., 1953, Some lead-zinc and zinc-copper deposits of the Ketchikan and Wales districts, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 998-C, p
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2026 14:11:14 Page updated: July 30, 2025 11:44:33
Go to top of page