Little Moose Creek Mine, Kantishna Mining District, Denali Borough, Alaska, USAi
| Regional Level Types | |
|---|---|
| Little Moose Creek Mine | Mine |
| Kantishna Mining District | Mining District |
| Denali Borough | Borough |
| Alaska | State |
| USA | Country |
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
63° 44' 54'' North , 150° 26' 34'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Köppen climate type:
The mine is in Denali National Park and Preserve.
Location: The upper reaches of Little Moose Creek (Cobb, 1980 [OFR 80-363]) have been placer mined for about 7000 feet. The placer mine extends from the Mt. McKinley C-1 into the Mt. McKinley D-1 quadrangle (Hawley and Associates, 1978). For this record, the location is at the approximate midpoint of the mined section of the creek, near the center of the NW1/4 section 34, T. 13 S., R. 15 W., Fairbanks Meridian. The lowermost two miles of Little Moose Creek (on Mt. McKinley D-1 quadrangle) were staked and prospected for many years but had limited mining (Heiner and Porter, 1972: Kardex locations 66-1, -6, and -28).
Geology: Little Moose Creek mostly flows through Birch Creek Schist (Bundtzen, 1981). In the headwaters of Little Moose Creek, across the divide from an unnamed north fork tributary of the North Fork of Canyon Creek, a half-mile- wide band of siliceous and graphitic schist of the Keevy Peak Formation is downfaulted into the Birch Creek Schist (Hawley and Associates, 1978, fig. 4.1-A(2)). Below the outcrops of Keevy Peak Formation, ferricrete and limonitic spring deposits strongly discolor about 1500 feet of uppermost Little Moose Creek. A stream-sediment sample collected in Little Moose Creek about a mile below the limonite deposit and just above the placer mine contained 150 ppm copper, 65 ppm lead, and 1150 ppm zinc (Hawley and Associates, 1978, sample 62). A fault mapped immediately east of the placer mine places felsic schist of the Birch Creek against mainly calc-schist and quartzite-rich units. If this fault continues into the creek, it would be about at the head of the placer deposit. The placer deposits occur in a narrow canyon with steep to moderately steep walls. The gravel section mined in about 1916 was about 8 to 10 feet thick, too deep for open-cut mining in the narrow canyon. Placer gold recovered was about 600 fine, shot-like in appearance, and accompanied by small nuggets of native silver (Capps, 1919, p. 93). Scheelite is a common mineral in the placer concentrates (Joesting, 1942). Annual reports of the U. S. Geological Survey reported mining or active prospecting in many years between 1920 (Brooks, 1922) and 1933 (Smith, 1934). In 1922, Davis (1923) reported that miners cleaned 30,000 feet of bedrock at an average value of 22 cents per bedrock foot. Assuming that all of that value was due to gold (at $20.67 per ounce), the approximate production in 1922 was about 350 ounces of gold. The Little Moose Creek deposit is of interest geologically because of the low fineness (600) of the gold, and the occurrence of native silver in the placer.
Workings: Little Moose Creek creek was explored and mined at least from 1916 until 1941. The creek was extensively mined in 1922 (Davis, 1923). Antimony miner Earl Pilgrim mined the creek in 1941 (White, 1942). In 1955, claims on lower Little Moose Creek were active, and the creek was being prospected (Heiner and Porter, 1972). Early mining may have been from shallow drifts. The creek was probably mined on a small scale with tractors in the 1930s and in 1941.
Age: Holocene.
Production: Based on records cited by Davis (1923), about 350 ounces of gold were recovered from on Little Moose Creek in 1922. The approximate value of the production, computed at $20.67 per fine ounce of gold, was about $7,000. In general, annual production was less than this. Moffit (1933) reported that, in most years up to 1931, annual production amounted only to a few hundred dollars.
Commodities (Major) - Au; (Minor) - Ag, Cu, W, Zn
Development Status: Yes; small
Deposit Model: Au-PGE placer deposit (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 39a).
Select Mineral List Type
Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical ElementsCommodity List
This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.Mineral List
3 valid minerals.
Detailed Mineral List:
| ⓘ 'Limonite' |
| ⓘ Native Gold Formula: Au |
| ⓘ Native Silver Formula: Ag |
| ⓘ Scheelite Formula: Ca(WO4) |
Gallery:
List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification
| Group 1 - Elements | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ⓘ | Native Gold | 1.AA.05 | Au |
| ⓘ | Native Silver | 1.AA.05 | Ag |
| Group 7 - Sulphates, Chromates, Molybdates and Tungstates | |||
| ⓘ | Scheelite | 7.GA.05 | Ca(WO4) |
| Unclassified | |||
| ⓘ | 'Limonite' | - | |
List of minerals for each chemical element
| O | Oxygen | |
|---|---|---|
| O | ⓘ Scheelite | Ca(WO4) |
| Ca | Calcium | |
| Ca | ⓘ Scheelite | Ca(WO4) |
| Ag | Silver | |
| Ag | ⓘ Native Silver | Ag |
| W | Tungsten | |
| W | ⓘ Scheelite | Ca(WO4) |
| Au | Gold | |
| Au | ⓘ Native Gold | Au |
Other Databases
| Link to USGS - Alaska: | MM140 |
|---|
Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality
North AmericaContinent
North America PlateTectonic Plate
- North America PlatformPassive Margin
- Yukon-Tanana lower DomainDomain
This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.