Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Arsenuranylite vs. Talc
It's a pair of soft and lovely minerals as Stichtite and Talc compete for your votes.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Kemuk Prospect, Bristol Bay Region Mining District, Dillingham Census Area, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Kemuk ProspectProspect
Bristol Bay Region Mining DistrictMining District
Dillingham Census AreaCensus Area
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
59° 43' 11'' North , 157° 40' 12'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Köppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Koliganek209 (2015)21.6km
New Stuyahok526 (2017)35.9km
Ekwok118 (2017)42.6km
Mindat Locality ID:
198334
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:198334:3
GUID (UUID V4):
0


Location: The Kemuk prospect is in the north-central Dillingham C-5 quadrangle 12 miles east-northeast of the summit of Kemuk Mountain. The map site is at the south end of the boundary between sections 19 and 20, T 5 S, R 49 W, of the Seward Meridian. This is an area of extensive surficial deposits with few conspicuous topographic features. Napotoli Creek is 1.9 miles directly north and Klutuk Creek is 8 miles directly south of the prospect. The location is accurate to within 1 mile.
Geology: The Kemuk prospect was first discovered as a result of an aeromagnetic survey flown for Humble Oil and Refining Company in 1959 (Berg and Cobb, 1967, p. 11). The map site is at the approximate center of a 4 square mile aeromagnetic anomaly. Buried below 90 to 140 feet of unconsolidated Quaternary deposits is a large, composite ultramafic and mafic pluton. The pluton is known from the results of 16 diamond drill holes, some drilled to almost 2,000 feet. It is a composite, tabular, southeast-dipping body (Nokleberg and others, 1987) of abundant clinopyroxenite, some olivine-bearing rocks, and some hornblende-bearing rocks (T. Hinderman, personal commun., 2000). Country rocks encountered in some drill holes are hornfels and quartzite. The metalliferous mineral is titaniferous magnetite that probably occurs as segregations and disseminations in clinopyroxenite. This prospect is believed to contain 2.4 billion long tons averaging 15 to 17 percent total Fe (Nokleberg and others, 1987). The average grade is 10.5 to 12 percent magnetic Fe and 15 to 17 percent total Fe. A beneficiation test indicates the feasibility of producing a concentrate containing 65 percent Fe, 2 to 3 percent SiO2, 0.005 to 0.016 percent P2O5, and 2 to 3 percent TiO2. The platinum-group metal (PGM) potential of this prospect is now being evaluated (T. Hinderman, personal commun., 2000).
Workings: The Kemuk prospect was first discovered as a result of an aeromagnetic survey flown for Humble Oil and Refining Company in 1959 (Berg and Cobb, 1967, p. 11). It was subsequently explored by this company with 16 diamond core drill holes to maximum depth of about 2,000 feet.
Age: Not known; the age of the country rocks is uncertain. From regional trends, they could be clastic sedimentary rocks of either Jurassic or Cretaceous age (Decker and others, 1994). The quartz-rich character of the country rocks suggests that they could be older than Cretaceous (Mertie, 1938). The composite ultramafic pluton at Red Mountain in the Hagemeister Island quadrangle to the west is Jurassic in age.
Reserves: This prospect is believed to contain 2.4 billion long tons averaging 15 to 17 percent total Fe (Nokleberg and others, 1987). The average grade is 10.5 to 12 percent magnetic Fe and 15 to 17 percent total Fe. A beneficiation test indicates the feasibility of producing a concentrate containing 65 percent Fe, 2 to 3 percent SiO2, 0.005 to 0.016 percent P2O5, and 2 to 3 percent TiO2.

Commodities (Major) - Fe; (Minor) - Ti, PGM (?)
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Titaniferous magnetite in clinopyroxenite; Alaska PGE ? (Cox and Singer, 1986;

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


1 valid mineral.

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
Magnetite4.BB.05Fe2+Fe3+2O4
var. Titanium-bearing Magnetite4.BB.05Fe2+(Fe3+,Ti)2O4

List of minerals for each chemical element

OOxygen
O MagnetiteFe2+Fe23+O4
O Magnetite var. Titanium-bearing MagnetiteFe2+(Fe3+,Ti)2O4
TiTitanium
Ti Magnetite var. Titanium-bearing MagnetiteFe2+(Fe3+,Ti)2O4
FeIron
Fe MagnetiteFe2+Fe23+O4
Fe Magnetite var. Titanium-bearing MagnetiteFe2+(Fe3+,Ti)2O4

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:DI003

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality


This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 8, 2026 06:50:23 Page updated: August 17, 2025 20:59:52
Go to top of page