Add missing default cases to switch statements - #7123
Merged
Conversation
Add missing default cases to switch statements which were causing "enumeration values not handled in switch" warnings Signed-off-by: Dylan Tuttle <jdylantuttle@gmail.com>
Contributor
|
Jenkins build aarch64,amac |
Contributor
|
See Issue #6516 for the socket test failures in porttest on x86-64 macOS. |
knn-k
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add missing default cases to switch statements which were causing "enumeration values not handled in switch" warnings on
aarch64_macOpenJ9 builds. These additions (along with a few corresponding additions in OpenJ9) fix the warnings without changing the behaviour of the code. This, of course, assumes that there are no switch cases that should be handled but aren't.This PR contributes to (but does not close) openj9 issue #14859.