Skip to content

x86: Implement vmul for byte - #6671

Merged
0xdaryl merged 2 commits into
eclipse-omr:masterfrom
BradleyWood:vmul
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

x86: Implement vmul for byte#6671
0xdaryl merged 2 commits into
eclipse-omr:masterfrom
BradleyWood:vmul

Conversation

@BradleyWood

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: BradleyWood <bradley.wood@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: BradleyWood <bradley.wood@ibm.com>
@BradleyWood

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Jenkins build all

@BradleyWood
BradleyWood marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2022 20:47
@BradleyWood

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gita-omr Would you mind reviewing?

@0xdaryl

0xdaryl commented Sep 29, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Jenkins build all

@0xdaryl 0xdaryl self-assigned this Sep 29, 2022
@0xdaryl

0xdaryl commented Sep 29, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Can you confirm you've tested this on hardware that can exploit the AVX2 and AVX-512 paths?

@0xdaryl

0xdaryl commented Sep 29, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Jenkins build win

Seems like an infra issue.

@BradleyWood

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Can you confirm you've tested this on hardware that can exploit the AVX2 and AVX-512 paths?

Yes, in intel emulator, but also through bumblebench perf runs on cascadelake.

@0xdaryl
0xdaryl merged commit 3d6f687 into eclipse-omr:master Sep 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants