Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here – discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header (dark green when in dark mode) appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

M. John Harrison in 2017
M. John Harrison

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide that a recent death is important enough to warrant a blurb instead.

All articles featured in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting items marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, post the item and change the header to (Posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).
  • When consensus to post will not be reached, close the discussion section and change the header to (Closed). If the article's quality remains poor, leave a brief note explaining why to encourage and assist others in fixing it.

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Mention problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible or help is needed.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please explain yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is or is not related to a particular country. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with its significance. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Structure

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. Eight days of current nominations are maintained – older days are archived. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


November 13

[edit]

November 12

[edit]

Nvidia CEO Huang steps down

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: Jensen Huang (talk · history · tag) and Jensen Huang spying scandal (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Following allegations of being targeted by Chinese spies in an extramarital affair, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang resigns. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Following allegations of being targeted by Chinese spies in an extramarital affair, Nvidia President and CEO Jensen Huang resigns and is replaced by CFO Colette Kress.
Alternative blurb 2: ​ Following allegations of being targeted by Chinese spies and of having extramarital affairs, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang resigns.
News source(s): CNBC
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Normally we dont touch on business head changes, but the security and economic impact of the last week involving Huang makes this more unusual to post at this point. There might be further legal action but thats speculative. Masem (t) 14:11, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support for major society and exonomy news. By the way, I'd like to make a nomination of this! LOL--Sinsyuan✍️PJTW 14:17, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support Major scandal over the last few days with the head of the ?2nd? biggest market cap. I know we shouldn't make predictions but I believe this will have more fallout. Otto (talk) 14:22, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    At the very least, Nvidia stock has fallen sharply overnight. NYSE opens in 7 minutes... I'm ready for a disaster. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 14:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Support since NVIDIA is one of the biggest companies currently. Prettty dang hard to not see this not having any major impact. Justcgi (talk) 15:00, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Oppose The spying allegations seem to be unproven and unreliable. My impression is that it was the second affair with one of his reports that was the tipping point and that's routine impropriety. And AI-related stock prices were already on the slide. Synthesising all this into a single event seems too speculative and gossipy. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:17, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment I think the blurb is misleading. As the Guardian said, "The emergence of the second affair, this one rumoured to be with an employee, appears to have been the last straw for the board." Also, why do we have an article called Jensen Huang spying scandal? That sounds like he was spying, so could definitely be somewhat better titled. Black Kite (talk) 15:32, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    Theres a rename going on for that page. Masem (t) 15:45, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    Yes, to Jensen Huang spying allegations which is probably worse! Black Kite (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Strong support While extramarital affairs and resignations are de rigeur amongst billionaire CEOs, this item is highly notable because it took place amidst alleged espionage activity against Huang being conducted by the People's Republic of China. Reliable sources have been reporting on this story for multiple days now, especially given NVidia's pre-eminence in the GPU industry, NVidia's longstanding relationship with the Taiwanese semiconductor industry and the ongoing implications for Huang himself now being investigated by the FBI and other US intelligence agencies. This is no ordinary affair. Oppius Brutus (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Tremendous news with potentially far-reaching implications. NVIDIA's market cap is the size of the Russian economy. Inherent interest in a story involving corporate espionage, state espionage between China and the US, on of the latter country's most important strategic assets, the most important corporate factor in the world-historical AI boom, and sex. LocoTacoFever (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support This is one of those unusual cases that readily merit a blue-box entry. This is one of the most controversial massive companies to come around, (and the highest-capitalized company in history) and this incident is extremely unusual. I honestly cannot think of any precedent for an incident like this. The closest I could think of are strictly hypothetical: such as if there had been a scandal that forced Bill Gates out of Microsoft during US v. Microsoft. Needless to say, this easily ticks all the boxes Wikipidians have come to expect: it's been front-page news across the world for many days now, it's very explicitly an international story, (geopolitical, no less) and has very wide-reaching implications for an already hotly-discussed field. Nottheking (talk) 16:31, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
It's easy to find precedents for this such as OpenAI ousted its own founder or Tim Cook stepping down from Apple. There have been many nominations about these big tech companies and few have been posted. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:31, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Even though the extramarital allegation is not yet proven, the political, technological, and economic impact fallout of this is very much noticable around the world, so it definitely deserve a blurb. NotKringe (talk) 17:17, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
So the extramarital affair is not proven, but we're going to post it as fact on the Main Page? Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Well, other has pointed out that we should use the word "allegations" given that right now it's currently just allegations, but it's because of it that caused the story to unravel this way. NotKringe (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support I think the notability is pretty obvious (founder and CEO of the 2nd most valuable company leading a technological overhaul stepping down after a spy scandal, straight out of a Hollywood blockbuster). That this is synthesis or BLPVIO, as Andrew claims above, is baseless Huang has admitted to it himself even if we take the spying as allegations for now. Gotitbro (talk) 17:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose as written. Support if we can find a blurb that doesn't write accusations of spying in Wikivoice. The fact that he's stepped down and admitted one affair is enough. Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
That's why I said "allegations of", does not state that is actually what happened but its the fact that those are looming over his decision. He definitely did not step down just bevause of one affair, as if that were the case, that wouldn't be ITN. Masem (t) 19:30, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
No, I agree; the point being that unless things have changed since I last looked, only one extramarital affair is confirmed. Black Kite (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
I added alt2 that moves the affairs under the "allegations" to keep any inference of these being established fact out of wikivoice.Masem (t) 19:44, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • And now news of a third possible affair, so my adjustment for alt2 i think covers all this. We probably need to double check articles for BLP issues before posting. Masem (t) 20:14, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Strongly support. I like the framing of the blurb. TheChestertonian (talk) 20:41, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support, but would rewrite to clarify what's alleged and what's known, since Jensen Huang has admitted he had an affair with Alice Huang. Alternative headline: Nvidia President and CEO Jensen Huang resigns after admitting to an extramarital affair with an alleged Chinese spy. (Although given reliable sources like the NYT are reporting it to be known as a fact, I'm not sure we should use "alleged" there either.) – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Except the resignation also came after the second alleged affair (the internal to Nvidia one) was reported, abd Huang hasn't given any specific reason. Nearly all sources talk about bpth, and we dont have enough space to make that much clarity in the blurb to establish what parts were established. Masem (t) 22:26, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support The change of Nvidia's CEO, especially after scandal, clearly meets the notability criteria due to its significance and sustained coverage by international media. The quality of the article appears to be fine. I will note, the number of affairs are beginning to get out of hand, for there are currently at least three affairs. CastleFort1 (talk) 23:02, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Indonesian VP resigns

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Gibran Rakabuming Raka (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Indonesian Vice President Gibran Rakabuming Raka (pictured) resigns amid a diploma controversy. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Amidst a diploma controversy, Gibran Rakabuming Raka (pictured) resigns as vice president of Indonesia.
News source(s): Bloomberg Reuters
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Have been a long drama, but he just submitted the resignation to parliament. Being aware that vice presidents are not ITN/R, this is the second time Indonesia's VP has resigned, the last being in 1956 (a couple other cases of VP becoming President). Juxlos (talk) 06:23, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Question have we ever posted a blurb involving high-profile political resignation that's not of head of state/government? I could see that the blurb is still plausible should the story being about how far-reaching of an impact the diploma controversy is. NotKringe (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support This is a rare and notable event, and the target article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 23:20, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Ongoing) Salvadoran military intervention in Haiti

[edit]
Article: Salvadoran military intervention in Haiti (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Military actions that are being conducted regularly reach the mainstream news in many places. Abcmaxx (talk) 00:38, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Oppose Fails the "near daily updates" part of ongoing. Just because its continuing to happen doesn't mean it is suitable for ongoing, there has to be near-daily news coverage and appropriate timely updates to the article for that. Masem (t) 02:17, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    It may fail your own personal criteria, but WP:ONGOING says nothing about "near daily updates" or "near daily news coverage". The only objective dates or frequency discussed in ONGOING is:

    Articles whose most recent update is older than the oldest blurb currently on ITN are usually not being updated frequently enough for ongoing status.

    At this moment, the oldest blurb is dated November 3, and the article has at least two sourced paragraphs which post-date that. Left guide (talk) 02:49, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    "the article needs to be regularly updated with new, pertinent information." Given the time scale ITN works on, near-daily is a reasonable expectation for "regularly updated". The point of ongoing when it was created was to avoid posting multiple blurbs (that would otherwise appear as blurbs) about the same ongoing event, diluting out other coverage, like what the Olympics or World Cup would often bring. There's nothing about the situation in Haiti that would even bring frequent "new" blurbs to ITN, so it makes no sense for ongoing. Masem (t) 03:44, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose Not even near-daily updates. ~2026-57945-69 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose Latest update that is actually of anything happening is from the 8th of November, prior to that the 5th and so on. While yes, that may be newer than some of the things on the page. It's not enough actual information for an ongoing nom.PliskorCor (talk) 08:21, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
I added the information from 11 November to the article though? Abcmaxx (talk) 18:14, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Which was just the Haitian prime minister saying something. It is certainly the sort of thing to include on a page like that. I just don't see it as enough to warrant an ongoing nom.PliskorCor (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
no it wasn't, it was the helicopter bombing of the headquarters of one of the biggest gangs, which incedentally was also nominated at ITN. Abcmaxx (talk) 23:50, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
That is listed as occurring on the 8th of November in the article.PliskorCor (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support The article is receiving frequent enough updates for Ongoing. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2026 (UTC)reply

November 11

[edit]

Scuttling of SS United States

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: SS United States (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ American ocean liner SS United States (pictured) is scuttled in the Atlantic Ocean to create the largest artificial reef. (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Notable for being one of the last trans-Atlantic ships, one of the U.S. National Register of Historic Places and now additionally as the largest artificial reef. Article updated. Brandmeister talk 12:59, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Oppose I don’t see it as ITN-worthy or ITN-interesting. Not all world’s largest stories are equally relevant. To me, it’s trivial. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Marsha Linehan

[edit]
Article: Marsha M. Linehan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: American psychologist, therapist, and creator of DBT. I will find a better source soon as it seems it just happened. Julesucks (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Alexander Darchiev

[edit]
Article: Alexander Darchiev (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Russian ambassador to US ~2026-59829-37 (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Tom O'Brien (jockey)

[edit]
Article: Tom O'Brien (jockey) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Should be mostly ready. Jiewei Xiong (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

2026 attack of 400 Mawozo headquarters

[edit]
Article: 400 Mawozo (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Salvadoran troops allegedly destroy the headquarters of 400 Mawozo, the biggest gang in Haiti. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Salvadoran military intervention in Haiti intensifies following strikes on the alleged headquarters of the gang 400 Mawozo.
News source(s): BBC, AP
Credits:
Article needs updating

 IAmNotCreativeEnough (talk) 18:19, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

As well it is alleged does WP:CRYSTAL apply here ~2026-59829-37 (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply
I think the main article should be Salvadoran military intervention in Haiti and, as the operation began over a month ago, the discussion should probably be moved to an ongoing item as have at least a periodic update. _-_Alsor (talk) 19:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Yes, I support ongoing or blurb like: "The Salvadoran military intervention in Haiti intensifies following strikes on the alleged headquarters of the gang 400 Mawozo." ArionStar (talk) 03:07, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose for same reasons as I opposed Abcmaxx’s “ongoing” proposal. ~2026-57945-69 (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
You opposed that for not having near-daily updates, which is important for an ongoing proposal, but I'm not sure how it helps here. GenevieveDEon (talk) 07:06, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

November 10

[edit]

RD: Richard Posner

[edit]
Article: Richard Posner (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: One of the foremost U.S. appellate judges and legal educators. BD2412 T 00:45, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

  • There is some quite unencyclopaedic prose in the Legal and philosophical positions section (eg. The animal rights subsection includes "He recognizes the philosophical force of arguments for strong animal rights, but maintains that human intuition about the paramount value of human life makes it impossible to accommodate an ethic of strong animal rights. Posner, a self-avowed moral anti-realist, does not present his critique of strong animal rights as a deductive proof. Instead, he highlights the practical importance of intuition and emotion over abstract argument." and goes on from there), and a lot of quotes which seem to pull directly from Posner's blog and other primary sources. Sourcing is mostly there, possibly okay for an RD. CMD (talk) 03:10, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Danny Kelly (journalist)

[edit]
Article: Danny Kelly (journalist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, The Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Some cn tags, not ready yet. Jiewei Xiong (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Stacy Keach

[edit]
Article: Stacy Keach (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

 Happily888 (talk) 06:20, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted) Booker Prize

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: The End of Everything (Harrison novel) (talk · history · tag) and M. John Harrison (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A post-apocalyptic novel by M. John Harrison, The End of Everything, wins the Booker Prize (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The End of Everything by M. John Harrison wins the Booker Prize
Alternative blurb 2: ​ In literature, The End of Everything by M. John Harrison wins the Booker Prize Credits:

Article updated
One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Interesting to see a SF genre author winning this literary prize for the first time. Harrison is also the oldest winner of the prize and so is doing well in his 80s. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:12, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support Book article seems reasonably fleshed out with a plot summary, and reception etc. Harrison's article seems well written and the Booker Prize article has been updated with this years winner.PliskorCor (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support alt blurb - sourcing looks good, but from what I remember of similar awards genres don't tend to be put into the blurbs Vessel (talk) 18:18, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Comment I would say that being the first Science fiction author to win it is notable and has been a large part of the news coverage of it. But it does seem to have been removed from the blurb anyway. Would agree that Genre ussually isn't notable, but in this case it probably was.PliskorCor (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support. Just about passes muster. Original blurb, but perhaps putting the title first? (And Alt-2 added, as an alternative to re-wording a blurb that editors have already voted on, which can get messy.) Moscow Mule (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support notability, oppose quality, The End of Everything meets quality standards but the author's article seems to have large sections unsourced and is overall quite strangely organised. Preference for ALT2. ClarkBurbank 20:06, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
The author's article is not bold in any of the proposed blurbs. In any case, it has over 50 citations and zero cleanup tags. The content is mostly lists and summaries of his works which verify themselves. I just spot-checked some early details and they were correct. This is not a show-stopper for the main article. Andrew🐉(talk) 00:01, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Comment Just out of curiosity, on what Criteria does Wikipedia accept blurbs about winning awards? I personally would support this, but I am hesistant due to how I'm new to ITN nominations and am not sure how ITN values events like this. Zuniwang (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
In general, they're fine to nominate provided they meet the significance criteria. The Booker, as it happens, is one of the world's leading literature awards, and is listed as a recurring item whose significance is generally agreed to be sufficient already, so this discussion should concentrate on the quality of the target article(s) and the phrasing of the blurb. GenevieveDEon (talk) 07:08, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Will just add onto what the other editor said, you can nominate any award or event. Other users will then decide if the event or award is notable enough, as well as if the article is of high enough quality. Some awards such as the Booker Prize are already assumed to be notable enough, so you just focus on the quality of the article. But generally if an award is highest honour in a wide field, it is a good candidate. For example the Booker is considered the highest honour in at least English literature annually. So is notable, however the Hugo Award which is for Science Fiction literature likely wouldn't be, however a national literature award likely wouldn't be because its only the highest honour in one country. Same with Football, the World Cup is notable enough, the Cup winner in Australia isn't and so on.PliskorCor (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
No, the Hugo Award for Best Novel is ITN/R too. See Recurring items: Literature for the actual guideline. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:05, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Ah my mistake then. Seems like a weird thing to be ITN/R, but fair enough.PliskorCor (talk) 08:10, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Dai Henwood

[edit]
Article: Dai Henwood (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: New Zealand comedian dies after long cancer battle.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  00:30, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply

November 9

[edit]

2026 Aliağa factory explosion

[edit]
Article: 2026 Aliağa factory explosion (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ An explosion at a steel plant in Aliağa, Turkey, kills 17 workers. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ An explosion at the HABAŞ steel plant in Aliağa, Turkey, kills 17 workers and injures 13 others.
Alternative blurb 2: ​ An explosion at a steel plant in Aliağa, Turkey, kills 17 workers and prompts protests over workplace safety. Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Deadliest industrial accident in Turkey in recent years. Four prosecutors assigned, five suspects detained, and the plant has a documented safety record (serious incidents in May 2024 and September 2025). Article is new and fully cited; the toll is the 17 confirmed by the health minister on the evening of 9 November. HoraceEdits2919 (talk) 00:25, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Support as nominator. HoraceEdits2919 (talk) 00:25, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Weak support on notability, weak oppose on quality Industrial accidents like this are sadly rather common in Turkiye. Just four years ago, 41 people were killed in a coal mine explosion, and Category:Industrial fires and explosions in Turkey paints a similarly bleak picture. However, on the whole this is still a large disaster and has caused protests about industrial safety in the country. On quality, I have a few qualms. There seems to be a minor issue of CLOP/small copyvio (Earwig) and it reads sort of strangely for a Wikipedia article. There appears to be an overabundance of quotations, many are not needed, and we do not need so many first-hand accounts of the explosion in that section. What is verified, include without qualifiers, and what is not, is unsuitable for the article. On this topic, Anadolu Ajansi should also probably be avoided, and the 3 current instances should be swapped out. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 00:44, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Ready) RD: Tommy Walsh (builder)

[edit]
Article: Tommy Walsh (builder) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Telegraph
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: One of the members of Ground Force; article needs a little work first. SchroCat (talk) 15:45, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support RD, overall well-sourced and meets quality standards. ClarkBurbank 15:07, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted) Novaya Gazeta closes

[edit]
Article: Novaya Gazeta (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Novaya Gazeta, one of Russia's oldest and most prominent independent newspapers, closes under pressure from the Russian authorities. (Post)
News source(s): AP, NYT
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Consensus at the previous discussion was to post when it actually happened. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 14:37, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Comment The newspaper ceased its operations in Russia, but Novaya Gazeta Europe is still active. Practically, the outcome of all this is that they moved their staff and operations out of Russia, not that they no longer exist. This is apparent neither in the blurb nor in the article. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:58, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    They're independent of each other. From the Columbia Journalism Review here: Some of this group [journalists who fled previously] have come together to create Novaya Gazeta Europe, which is based in Latvia and independent of the Russian publication. Muratov remains in Moscow, living a circumscribed and increasingly precarious existence. I didn't find anything which suggests that staff/operations moved either. InfernoHues (talk) 08:07, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    If they're independent, why is Novaya Gazeta Europe a sub-section then, not a stand-alone article, and why does the infobox mentions its launch date in 2022? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    NGE would not be a notable topic on its own at this point for a standalone, but it makes obvious sense that discussion of it in the same article as NG is completely fair. That distinction should be made much more clear and the infobox disassembled (adding a second for NGE) to make it clear. Masem (t) 12:36, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
At this point, the article is a complete mess. The last paragraph of the introduction says that it suspended publication within Russia in March 2022, so this seems like a more appropriate event to post instead of its formal closure. Furthermore, the same paragraph introduces Novaya Gazeta Europe as a sister publication, not an independent one as mentioned in the source presented above, and this had to be clarified in the article before supporting the nomination. It looks like people care about what's written in the nominated article only when someone raises concerns about its substance. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:38, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
In 2022, Novaya Gazeta stopped paper/print publication. The online activities run until 9 November 2026. Grimes2 13:52, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Tony Butala

[edit]
Article: Tony Butala (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Seehafer, WKBN WFMJ
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: The article seems appropriately sourced with no major issues, so thought I would nominate it. –First Rate Town ☃️ (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Badrul Kamal

[edit]
Article: Badrul Kamal (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Indonesian mayor. Juxlos (talk) 03:37, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support, article is of sufficient quality for RD. ClarkBurbank 17:08, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

November 8

[edit]

(Posted) RD: Solange Alexandre

[edit]
Article: Solange Alexandre (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: World War II French Resistance fighter. Thriley (talk) 16:31, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support. Article is of sufficient quality. RIP ClarkBurbank 17:07, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted) 2026 NASCAR Cup Series

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2026 NASCAR Cup Series (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In stock car racing, Kyle Larson (pictured) wins the NASCAR Cup Series. (Post)
News source(s): USA Today
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: The article is in very good shape. Congrats to Kyle! User:Brycenrichter (talk). 21:15, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Posted with the image suggested by ClarkBurbank. Left guide (talk) 04:37, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted) RD: Peter Jaroš

[edit]
Article: Peter Jaroš (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Noviny.sk
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Slovak novelist. ~2026-59559-38 (talk) 16:19, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Darren Beckford

[edit]
Article: Darren Beckford (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): HeraldScotland
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: English professional footballer. ~2026-59559-38 (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply

2026 El Ayyat train collision

[edit]
Article: 2026 El Ayyat train collision (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 7 people are killed in a train collision near Cairo in Egypt. (Post)
News source(s): BBC and AP
Credits:

Nominator's comments: To me it seems to be pretty relevant in the news; it's on the Front Page of multiple media websites, showing it is pretty significant. Similar incidents have been posted in the past such as here Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/January 2019 ((Posted) Great Belt Bridge rail accident). Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 18:31, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Wait. The article is a stub so far, but there isn't exactly much information released so far as rescue operations are still ongoing. It has been covered internationally so far, and it seems like there is more fatalities/injuries than reported as of now, but there isn't enough information and the article isn't sufficient enough yet. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Yep, I’d agree Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 20:21, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Leaning oppose Unless casualties are more significant or there is more of a story here, this is a semi-regular occurance in Egypt. From the New York Times: The crash between two passenger trains was the latest in a long history of deadly rail accidents in the country. Curbon7 (talk) 22:19, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose - These are not rare in Egypt. Militant.Insurgency (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose - the article is like... three sentences long OrdinariusFingius (talk) 21:50, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose both on notability and quality. Per the ones above, such accidents aren't very rare in the country, and the article is stub-length TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 06:26, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply

November 7

[edit]

RD: Richard Lloyd

[edit]
Article: Richard Lloyd (guitarist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Guitarist and founder member of Television. Article is woefully undersourced but posting it up here anyway. Black Kite (talk) 22:47, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Oppose It’s always best to post here once the articles meet the required standard. That isn’t the case here; article is orange-tagged. _-_Alsor (talk) 22:50, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply
No, that's not how it works, really. I have previously brought bios of people that I'm interested in which were in a poor state up to scratch when I've seen them here before, so when I see one like this I often post them in case someone with the relevant skills decides to do the same. Black Kite (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Thank you for nominating and inviting others to improve the article so it can be posted. Thriley (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
It's hella narcissistic to expect that improvements to the encyclopedia should revolve around the expectations of certain active editors rather than the expectations of readers. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:10, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply
If talking about ITNRCRIT makes me a narcissist… well, then, I suppose I must be one. Article is orange-tagged and needs improving. _-_Alsor (talk) 23:32, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose I was the editor who orange tagged the article because I also thought about bringing it to ITN, but I reconsidered upon seeing the state of the article. Multiple sections about Lloyd's career are completely unsourced. I'd support an RD listing if the article's quality improves. Doc Strange (talk) 00:07, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Ready) 2026 New Zealand general election

[edit]
Articles: 2026 New Zealand general election (talk · history · tag) and Results of the 2026 New Zealand general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The National Party wins a plurality of seats in the New Zealand general election but fails to win a majority. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The National Party wins a plurality of seats in the New Zealand general election, with the overall result too close to call before final results are released.
Alternative blurb 2: ​ The National Party wins a plurality of seats in the New Zealand general election, with an as yet unclear overall outcome.
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

One or both nominated events are listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Abcmaxx (talk) 22:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply

  • Support. Well sourced, well written and lengthy article. National election so should meet notability. Don't see any reason not to post. Perhaps blurb could sound a bit more neutral, but I'm unfamiliar with the standard. Maybe "The National Party wins the most seats in the New Zealand general election, 24 seats short of a majority." ? ClarkBurbank 01:12, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Lean support Article quality appears to be fine and dandy. While special votes haven't been counted yet, it is guaranteed that the National Party won the most seats in that election. I don't think there should be any accompanying image until a government is created.
Some aside comments: The election is interesting, as more right-bloc voters chose National in electoral and their own party in the party-list vote. Special votes in New Zealand, including from overseas, have been stated to be more left-leaning. CastleFort1 (talk) 01:21, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Comment. We seem to have been using the term plurality for "most seats but not a majority". A blurb with that would be "The National Party wins a plurality of seats in the New Zealand general election." LightNightLights (talk • contribs) 04:18, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • Wait There is no clear result as it stands, so while it is fair to say that National has won the most seats and failed to win a majority. There are still 400,000 overseas votes to count, and given reporting on the matter, they are likely to sway towards the opposition, rather than National. Current figures have the National led coalition on 67 seats, while Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori, as well as Opportunity if they choose that coalition would be on 64. With 66 needed. However, at the previous election, overseas votes removed two National seats and gave Maori and the Greens 2 and 1 more respectively, which would flip the result. I feel that waiting and reposting when the results are more clearly known is a more prudent choice. But if there is no consensus for that then the current blurb is acceptable and I would *Support it, with a preference to wait.PliskorCor (talk) 07:17, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
The result is clear though, these votes will only matter in regards to coalition-building. If new information comes to light regarding coalitions or government formation then we can always change and update the blurb. Abcmaxx (talk) 19:04, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
My argument would be that if I was reading it, I would want to know either who won or at the very least that neither coalition without Opportunity etc has the numbers yet. I feel the current blurb doesn't really say enough, although it's also only something that I could write an altblurb for, when those extra votes are counted and the seat totals are known with more certainty.PliskorCor (talk) 22:39, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
If I may contribute as a local: those 400,000 votes yet to be counted are special votes, but most of those votes were cast in New Zealand. And yes, the specials always favour the left. Given that the result for the government coalition is tight, nobody knows what the final votes will tell us. The two things that are noteworthy about this election are that there are a record 11 overhang seats, and for the first time since we introduced mixed-member proportional representation in 1996, a (completely) new party has managed to make it into parliament. Those elements could be blurbed now. I suspect come 27 November when the final results come out, we will have a couple of months ahead of us before a new government is formed, because the new party will likely be the kingmaker, and they will negotiate with both the incumbents and the opposition. Schwede66 19:08, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Is this allowed to be resubmitted on the 27th when the official results are out and paint the clear picture?  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  07:45, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose wait We waited with the Israeli elections (which had global eyes on it) until it went stale and we never posted it. We should post this now regardless and amend if anything changes. We do this for non-electoral events unsure why we should wait. Many democracies have lengthy coalition building as part of government creation, this can take months. Abcmaxx (talk) 09:05, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Also the US mid-terms were posted and they're still counting two of the states. Abcmaxx (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply
The Midterms were posted because the overall result is clear. Counts may still be going on, but that isn't going to change the actual result of who won etc. With the Israeli elections, that is something that will be no doubt be renominated when the actual result is clear as well. We can wait to see who actually won, and if it needs to be renominated, it needs to be renominated.PliskorCor (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply
That can take months (Netherlands), years (Belgium) or even several further elections (Bulgaria) to resolve. This won't change either, National Party won the most seats that will not change, neither did the result change in Israel. Abcmaxx (talk) 08:26, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
National may have won the most seats, but that does not mean they take government. Just like how in Israel, Likud won the most seats, but at this point is also unlikely to take government. I just feel waiting until we actually know the result is a better option. I am comfortable with posting as is, and did state that I would support it if the consensus was there otherwise. But I don't see it as in any way similar to America, where the actual overall result was known, even if seats are still to be called.PliskorCor (talk) 13:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
The result doesn't change though, National will still have the most seats, whether in government or in opposition. The result is clear. What you are mentioning is government formation which is a different matter, but National will be the first to try as the biggest party as a result of the election. Abcmaxx (talk) 22:36, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Hello Nixinova, as you may know (as a fellow kiwi), most general elections see two seats go to the left when the final results come in. As the current coalition is ahead by just one seat, I suspect that the finals will this time not create the clarity that it usually does. That said, it's a bit more unpredictable this time due to the unprecedented size of the overhang. For example, if Te Tai Tokerau flips to the Greens, it would in fact reduce the overhang on the left. Hence, come 27 November, we might be none the wiser and it'll be all up to the Opportunity Party to pick the winner. Hence, we should post now as we know that National has the most seats, and the rest is unknown and may remain unknown until next year. Schwede66 23:45, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
  • I've suggested Alt1 and Alt2 as the "but fails to win a majority" of the original blurb is the most common outcome where a voting system is used that is based on proportional representation. Hence, it doesn't make sense to me to include that part. Personally, I favour Alt2. Schwede66 23:38, 10 November 2026 (UTC)reply
    Alt2 seems to be the best answer tbh. Makes it clear there's no end result, while stating what we do know.PliskorCor (talk) 03:39, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support posting now instead of later, per Schwede. The blurb wording needs tweaking though. "The New Zealand election fails to place either the left or right bloc conclusively into power" or something.  Nixinova  T ⁄ C  02:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

(Posted) Kraków mass shooting

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2026 Kraków shooting (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Six people are killed and 15 injured in a mass shooting in the Main Square of Kraków, Poland. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Six people are killed and 15 injured in a mass shooting in the Main Square of Kraków, Poland. Three more bodies are found in the perpetrator's home in Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski.
Alternative blurb 2: ​ A mass shooting in the Main Square (pictured) of Kraków, Poland, leaves six people dead and sixteen others injured.
Alternative blurb 3: ​ 10 people are killed (including the perpetrator) and 16 injured in a mass shooting in Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski and the Main Square of Kraków, Poland.
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Breaking news, all we know there are two assailants, one a Polish 25 24 year old national and another is on the run. Abcmaxx (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply

It is confirmed the perpetrator is aged 24. Can say the article is now in a much more stable state, as vandalism has stopped after its protection. Fortek67 (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support especially given the recent news of the shooter having killed his family as well, and unprecedented case in Poland. FryUaj (talk) 00:11, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Not a common occurrence in Poland to my knowledge. Article seems quality enough for me, though I don't mind Waiting if others think it could use improvement. ClarkBurbank 01:14, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Comment - the death toll has to 9. Militant.Insurgency (talk) 02:42, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Depends how you want to count it. Six in the actual shooting, another three in the suspect's home. Fortek67 (talk) 02:46, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Yeah, but it is nine overall. Militant.Insurgency (talk) 02:53, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
What is the most common interpretation among reliable sources? That is how our content should be framed. Left guide (talk) 02:54, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
It's nine, I just figured the ITN could've been slightly reworded Fortek67 (talk) 02:56, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Heavy support. 9 fatalities total, over a dozen injuries and Poland's deadliest, and only, public mass shooting in over 100 years. The attack has receieved international coverage. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 04:46, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
@Admins willing to post ITN: @Tone and Left guide: was redirected back from WP:ERRORS; a lot more information has come to light since the initial posting and the Ostrowiec murders are very pertinent to the events so I believe the blurb should be updated, especially as there have been further deaths from injuries since. Abcmaxx (talk) 17:53, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply
We need a viable blurb that we can discuss. Alt3 isn't it as per MOS:NUMNOTES. Schwede66 21:56, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply
I see nothing wrong with the current blurb. If the number of people killed / injured by the shooter in the square need to be updated, that is a straightforward change. But I do not see the need to add the 3 others killed. Natg 19 (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply

November 6

[edit]

Paul Mackensie sentenced to 200 years for 190 child deaths

[edit]
Articles: Good News International Ministries (talk · history · tag) and Shakahola Forest incident (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Good News International Ministries Kenyan sect leader Paul Mackensie is sentenced to 200 years in prison for causing the deaths of at least 190 children during the Shakahola Forest incident. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Nominator's comments: The sentencing brings the legal process to a close. The scale makes this one of the worst mass murder incidents of all time. The cult article needs a lot of updates though, Paul Mackensie himself redirects to the cult organisation page. The incident page is in good shape though. Abcmaxx (talk) 11:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support notability, unsure quality. I don't have the time to read through both articles to make sure they're up to scratch but the event seems notable enough for a blurb. ClarkBurbank 01:15, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support. I was just working on the Shakahola Forest incident page last night. Over 1,000 fatalities possible, making it one of if not the deadliest mass suicides in history, and now the leader has finally been sentenced to hundreds of years in prison. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 04:48, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Both articles still have orange banners. Left guide (talk) 04:31, 9 November 2026 (UTC)reply
I had considered posting but the organization page is still orange-tagged, and the incident page is flagged as "violation possible" on three sources from the copyvio tool. From a cursory check, not all of the identical material is quotes, so further review or explanation would be helpful. Left guide (talk) 04:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC)reply
@Left guide: Both articles have been much improved now. Abcmaxx (talk) 18:10, 12 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Sebastián Lelio

[edit]
Article: Sebastián Lelio (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s):
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: Oscar winning director, screenwriter, editor, and producer. While nominating this, I altered or removed 3 statements that needed sourcing, in order to prepare this article for ITN. Beta Beta Beta - talk 21:46, 6 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support once Filmography section gets some sourcing. Rest of article seems quality enough. ClarkBurbank 01:17, 8 November 2026 (UTC)reply

RD: Jay Rockefeller

[edit]
Article: Jay Rockefeller (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT, Reuters, WaPo
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNQUALITY.

Nominator's comments: American politician, who served as governor (1977–1985) and U.S. senator (1985–2015) for West Virginia, dies at age 89. Davey2116 (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2026 (UTC)reply

Support Article quality looks fine to post. Don't see any source issues. CastleFort1 (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support Article in good shape, doesn't appear to be any major issues with it. TheFellaVB (talk) 01:05, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Support, article looks good enough. Beta Beta Beta - talk 01:10, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply
Oppose I've orange-tagged the article. Many lines and paras are unsourced, as well as two sections. _-_Alsor (talk) 23:41, 7 November 2026 (UTC)reply

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents: