Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 hours ago by Romaine in topic This Month in GLAM: October 2026

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · 2026
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidateSONS %StatusEnding (UTC)Time leftDups?Report
Lynch44 151 0 0 100 Open 22:46, 13 November 2026 22 hours no report


WikiCanberra July 2026

[edit]

We hope to see you at the next WikiCanberra meetup on 18 July!

The Signpost: 13 October 2026

[edit]
  • Obituary: Doug Weller
    Twenty-year editor, long-term admin, dearly missed.
  • On the bright side: Good people
    Nice comments and real-life rescuers.

New cross-language page link: 216th Army Air Forces Base Unit (2026-10-14)

[edit]

A page you are tracking, 216th Army Air Forces Base Unit, gained new cross-language links via Wikidata (Q16057452):


You are receiving this message because you created this article and have notifications for created articles enabled. To stop, remove the NervousBot template or add {{User:NervousBot/subscriber|created=no}}.

NervousBot (talk) 06:35, 14 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Laura Davoli

[edit]

On 15 October 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Laura Davoli, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Australian Laura Davoli was one of two UT Arlington players at the 2026 Wheelchair Basketball World Championships? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laura Davoli. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Laura Davoli), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Launchballer 00:02, 15 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
The logo for the Wikimedia Café

Hello! There will be two Wikimedia Café discussion opportunities in October. In a change from the usual Café practice, this month's sessions will have different topics. Anyone who meets the Café attendance criteria is welcome to attend either or both sessions.

Session A will happen on Saturday, 24 October 2026 at 15:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to the Americas, Africa, and Europe. This session will feature Wikimedia Foundation lawyer Phil Bradley-Schmieg. We will discuss legal issues on Wikimedia Commons, including complexities of international law. (I am hoping that in a future month, a similar Café session will be offered at a time friendly to Asia and the Pacific.)

Session B will happen on Sunday, 25 October 2026 at 03:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to Asia and the Pacific, we will discuss proposed changes to how Wikimedia Foundation Board candidates are selected. The latest proposals are much different from the earlier July 2026 proposals. The due date for feedback on current proposals is 27 October, and Wikimedians are welcome to participate on the proposal talk page regardless of Café attendance.

Please see the Café page for more information, including how to register!

To subscribe or unsubscribe for Café notices on your talk page please go here.

cropped image of colored pencils

༄ᨒ𖠰 Pine (✉) 06:08, 18 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Bugle: Issue 246, October 2026

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:16, 18 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:36, 19 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

My revisions

[edit]

Hi you seem to be changing additions I have mad havong read Jim Baggotts book. My additions are in good faith although they may be mistaken. Please inform me where and why I'm am wrong Thanks george MLP Updater (talk) 22:08, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

The atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima on 6 August 1945. So Hahn was informed on the night of 7 August, after the BBC broadcast, not two months before. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:22, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
I think the Bomb was dropped just after midnight on the 6th UK Summer time so they were told later on the sixth. MLP Updater (talk) 10:18, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Since you have the book and I don't: does it have footnotes? If so, where is it taking this from? The bit about Hahn being told before supper comes from Groves but he goes on to claim that Hahn felt suicidal, which has been debunked. If you want to work on the Operation Epsilon article (and I encourage you to do so), you'll need to get hold of a copy of Hitler's Uranium Club: The Secret Recordings at Farm Hall. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:24, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes there are footnotes and references but not for that statement. The book was published 15 years ago an mentions Hahn's state of mind.
I have less life expectancy than the books and projects I am already involved with but thank you for the heads up. MLP Updater (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

ACR statistics

[edit]

Hi, I hope that things are going well. I'm writing an op-ed for the next edition of the Bugle with some suggestions for revitalising the ACR process. I'd like to illustrate how things have slowed down with statistics, but it looks like there isn't a log of nominations over time I can use to develop this. I can pull something together using previous editions of the Bugle (e.g. comparing 2025 to 2019), but are you aware of any statistics here that already exist? Regards, Nick-D (talk) 08:46, 24 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

No, I don't think we keep them. I was thinking you might look at the A-class showcase but note that articles are removed when promoted to FA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:06, 24 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I might add that kind of tracking to my list of suggestions! Nick-D (talk) 10:28, 24 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:54, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Anne Beaumanoir (Q30451735), a page you created:

NervousBot (talk) 10:48, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you created or are tracking these pages with the NervousBot template. To stop notifications for an article, remove it from the template; to stop notifications about pages you created, add {{User:NervousBot/subscriber|created=no}} to the template.
[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
2026
1 — 30 September
Volume 4 — Issue 9
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News
Article of the month

Sakigake (さきがけ; lit. 'pioneer', 'pathfinder'), known before launch as MS-T5, was Japan's first interplanetary spacecraft and the first deep space probe to be launched by any country other than the US or the Soviet Union. It aimed to demonstrate the performance of the new launch vehicle, test its ability to escape from Earth gravity, and observe the interplanetary medium and magnetic field. Sakigake also served as a reference probe for Halley's Comet. Early measurements would be used to improve the mission of the Suisei probe launched several months later.

Sakigake was developed by the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science for the National Space Development Agency (both of which are now part of the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA). It became a part of the Halley Armada together with Suisei, the Soviet Vega probes, the ESA Giotto and the NASA International Cometary Explorer, to explore Halley's Comet during its 1986 sojourn through the inner Solar System.

Image of the month
Hubble Extreme Deep Field

The Hubble eXtreme Deep Field (HXDF), released on September 25, 2012, is an image of a portion of space in the center of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field image. Representing a total of two million seconds (about 23 days) of exposure time collected over 10 years, the image covers an area of 2.3 arcminutes by 2 arcminutes, or about 80% of the area of the HUDF. This represents about one thirty-two millionth of the sky.

Long-time readers will recognize this image from the July 2021 issue of The Downlink. The explanatory text is excerpted from the original article.

Members

New Members: none

Number of active members: 206. Total number of members: 466.

September Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list here.


  1. China Pallas-1 — no payload (1 Sep. at 02:00) (success)
  2. United States SpaceX Starship — 26 Starlink (28 Sep. at 12:48) (success)
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from 30 September 2026.

Monthly Changes

Since August 2026, there is one more Mid-importance, nine more Low-importance, eight more NA-importance, and 78 more Unknown-importance articles, for a total of 96 new articles. There are also two more GA-class, four more B-class, 14 more C-class, 34 more Start-class, and 18 more Stub classes articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:22, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2026 WikiCup has come to an end. Our top scorers, based on the tournament point rankings (which can be seen here), are:

  1. Generalissima (submissions) with 1077 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
  2. Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1046 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
  3. MCE89 (submissions) with 762 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
  4. A.Cython (submissions) with 606' tournament points
  5. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 537 tournament points
  6. Reconrabbit (submissions) with 349 tournament points
  7. Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 297 tournament points
  8. Palestine Arconning (submissions) with 183 tournament points

Our three high scorers in the final round, who each got over 1,000 points, happen to all be among the top 8 as well:

  1. Generalissima (submissions) with 2846 round points from 40 good articles, 4 pieces of featured content (including 2 featured articles), 11 DYK articles, and various reviews.
  2. Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 2603 round points from 43 good articles, 5 pieces of featured content (1 featured article and 4 featuyred lists), and various reviews.
  3. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 1141 round points from 20 good articles, a good topic, a featured list, and 30 good article reviews.

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 29 featured articles, 8 featured lists, 1 featured picture, 150 good articles, 43 good topic articles, 189 article reviews, 28 did you know articles, and 4 in the news articles. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

The top eight scorers will receive awards shortly. The following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. These prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field over the course of the competition.

  • Generalissima (submissions) wins the following prizes:
    • The featured article prize, for 12 featured articles.
    • The featured picture prize, for submitting the only featured picture for the second year in a row.
    • The good article prize, for 82 good articles.
  • Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) wins the following prizes:
    • The featured list prize, for 21 featured lists.
    • The featured content reviewer prize, for 72 featured article reviews.
  • Vestrian24Bio (submissions) wins the following prizes:
    • The featured topic prize, for 8 pages in featured topics.
    • The good topic prize, for 26 pages in good topics.
    • The good article reviewer prize, for 84 good article reviews.
  • Sweden BabbaQ (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 9 ITN pages.
  • Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 47 DYK pages.

A special mention also goes to these users who scored the highest in a particular category in a single round:

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate. We are also looking for an experienced editor to help write the bimonthly newsletter. If you would like to help write next year's newsletters, please contact Epicgenius at his talk page.

The WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2027 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 1 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 November newsletter (update)

[edit]

In our November 2026 newsletter, there was a mistake in calculating the final tournament point rankings (which have been updated here). We regret the error.

  1. Generalissima (submissions) with 1461 tournament points, will receive the 1st place award.
  2. Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1302 tournament points, will receive the 2nd place award.
  3. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 793 tournament points, will receive the 3rd place award.
  4. MCE89 (submissions) with 762 tournament points
  5. A.Cython (submissions) with 606 tournament points
  6. Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 425 tournament points
  7. Reconrabbit (submissions) with 349 tournament points
  8. Palestine Arconning (submissions) with 183 tournament points

On behalf of the judges, Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email):

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 1 November 2026

[edit]
  • By the numbers: Wikipedian Nobel Prize 2026
    Which language versions of Wikipedia had biographies of laureates before Nobel announcements?
  • On the bright side: Gone fishing
    Touring Thailand, exploring iridescence, and translating prairie dog.

Tech News: 2026-45

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:20, 3 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bot issue

[edit]

Hi there, There seems to be an issue with MilHistBot. Apparently it has been changing page assessments that had been done by human users. The problem was raised here. It probably needs to be adjusted. Cheers, Psychloppos (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Your bot seems to be malfunctioning again. I guess it should be fixed. Thanks, Psychloppos (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
In general, it produces page assessments that contradict those of human users. Its mode of operation should probably be rethought. Thanks in advance, Psychloppos (talk) 14:09, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hmm. The Bot has to perform the MilHist assessment. If it doesn't match the existing assessment, it will cause the article to be marked for reassessment. That should be fine. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:31, 7 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Maybe it would be better to disable to bot's ability to revert human users ? Thanks. Psychloppos (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi, here is another example of the bot's problems: here, it assessed a page that had already been assessed, presumably by a human other. It shouldn't normally do that. Psychloppos (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
The page had not been assessed, which is why the Bot assessed it. I have a new version to address your concern but have not put it online yet. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:07, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
On the contrary, it had been assessed as Start (presumably by a human) and the bot reassessed it as C, effectively superseding a human user. This probably needs to be fixed. Thanks, Psychloppos (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
And it will be once I put the new version online. The human did not perform the MilHist assessment, leaving that to the Bot. @MSGJ: Is there a category for when the shell differs from the MilHist assessment? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:24, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
The new version is now online. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:36, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
There is no category to track differences. Projects which have opted out (like Milhist) or expected to maintain their own assessments. It's only when the project class is missing that it will default to the PIQA class — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:35, 11 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
The project class will always be missing, as MilHist has adopted PIQA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 17:56, 11 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

FACbot issue

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye, sorry to bug you - it looks like there may be an issue with FACbot's new task. It doesn't seem to be notifying people that their articles have been scheduled for TFA, or updating future main date when an article is scheduled. I see that it notified Harizotoh9 that Archie MacLaren had been scheduled, but Harizotoh9 isn't the FA nom, they're the TFAR nom. No one else seems to have been notified about any of the articles on the December TFA schedule, and the only other article that's had its maindate updated is Chilean cruiser Esmeralda. I'm not sure if this is intended behavior because of the trial period (if so, sorry to bother you). ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have not put the new job into production yet; I have a minor issue regarding the processing of tables, but it will catch up when I run it. This must have occurred on a test run. I thought we had agreed that the TFAR nominator was the person to notify; they are here whereas the FAC nominator from ten years ago may no longer be around. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:55, 5 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ah, no problem, didn't realize it was just a test run. I can do manual notifications in the mean time.
It looks like the discussion at the bot request wasn't fully clarified, which is my bad. Wehwalt said it should be the FAC nom, which was my understanding as well. The majority of TFAs don't have a formal TFAR, so if we only advised the TFAR nom, 80-90% of TFAs would go up without any notification at all. That being said, if it's possible, I don't see a reason not to notify both the FAC and TFAR nom when there is a TFAR from someone other than the FAC nominator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:04, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
I will do another run - it will help if you don't update manually so I have something to process. I created a notification template, so if you want to change the message, you can do it; it will not require changing the bot. I can notify both the FAC nominator and the FAC nominator. It is a small change. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:16, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a million! Tech editors like yourself keep this place running and I cannot overstate how much I appreciate you taking the time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
They all seem to be done already, so we will have to wait until the January nominations go up. I could do a special run sending notifications to the user talk pages. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:30, 9 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, what all seems to be done already? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:12, 9 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
I have processed all the December nominations. All the FAC and TFA nominators should have been informed, and the maindates have all been updated. There was an issue with articles that had already appeared on the main page, so I had to add some extra instructions to cater for this. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:24, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Gotcha. Thanks again :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:50, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
@TFA coordinators: The new bot run is still in trial, so it won't run automatically. If you put up a new lot of nominations, ping me and I will initiate a semi-automated run. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:28, 10 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Hawkeye. I plan to schedule January around November 25, after I return from holiday. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Discovery of nuclear fission (Q1344449), a page you created:

Nello Carrara (Q1975490), a page you created:

High Explosive Research (Q28733116), a page you created:

NervousBot (talk) 07:12, 6 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you created or are tracking these pages with the NervousBot template. To stop notifications for an article, remove it from the template; to stop notifications about pages you created, add {{User:NervousBot/subscriber|created=no}} to the template.
[edit]

British hydrogen bomb programme (Q30143325), a page you created:

British contribution to the Manhattan Project (Q18712664), a page you created:

NervousBot (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you created or are tracking these pages with the NervousBot template. To stop notifications for an article, remove it from the template; to stop notifications about pages you created, add {{User:NervousBot/subscriber|created=no}} to the template.

Tech News: 2026-46

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 10:32, 9 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Tamper (nuclear weapon) (Q108293603), a page you created:

NervousBot (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

You are receiving this message because you created or are tracking these pages with the NervousBot template. To stop notifications for an article, remove it from the template; to stop notifications about pages you created, add {{User:NervousBot/subscriber|created=no}} to the template.

November 2026 Wikimedia Café: the Newcomer homepage & Home experience

[edit]
The logo for the Wikimedia Café

The Wikimedia Foundation's Contributor teams are migrating the Newcomer homepage to a new experience called Home. This page will evolve with users, introducing them to new personalized opportunities based on their interests, and helping them develop into experienced contributors.

In November 21–22 sessions of the Wikimedia Café, Kirsten Stoller (senior product manager, Growth) and Sam Walton (senior product manager, Moderator Tools) will share an overview of this feature, plans for its future, and demos of interactive prototypes which we can explore together.

A quote which I hope will inspire your attendance or at least good wishes, from Grace Hopper: "The most important thing I've accomplished, other than building the compiler, is training young people. They come to me, you know, and say, 'Do you think we can do this?' I say, 'Try it.' And I back 'em up. They need that. I keep track of them as they get older and I stir 'em up at intervals so they don't forget to take chances."

This month's schedule:

  • Session A: 21 November at 16:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to the Americas, Africa, and Europe
  • Session B: 22 November at 04:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to Asia and the Pacific

Please see the Café page for more information, including how to register!

Attendees of the Café are encouraged to bring a favorite beverage. (In the eternal words of Captain Picard, "Tea, Earl Grey, hot.")

To subscribe or unsubscribe for Café notices on your talk page please go here.

cropped image of colored pencils

༄ᨒ𖠰 Pine (✉) 23:43, 11 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: October 2026

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.