Talk:Euthanasia

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Euthanasia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Medicine High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death: Suicide High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Euthanasia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Philosophy: Ethics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

A summary of this article appears in death.

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 60 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 3.

Rename article to “Human Euthanasia”

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article should be renamed to “Human Euthanasia” to distinguish it from other forms of euthanasia; also to keep in style with Animal euthanasia. KraljLavova97 (talk) 03:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Debate section

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How is “not all deaths are painful” an argument against euthanasia? In fact, I think that it’s an argument in favor of euthanasia when deaths not causing pain is less harmful than deaths causing pain? WikiGrower1 (talk) 23:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Definition Section

Latest comment: 1 month ago6 comments2 people in discussion

The "definition" section appears to be a borderline debate/ethics section. Skyeteam (talk) 16:41, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The definition comes from ethics, so maybe that is the source of your concern? - Bilby (talk) 13:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but that should be in the ethics section, and the definition section should just have the most recent definition and it's reasoning/authors. Skyeteam (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

As far as I know, there is no single most recent definition in the literature. - Bilby (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Interesting....I guess we can't merely go with the most prominant definition either. Skyeteam (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is a Collins Dictionary definition of it. That might work for a plain definition in addition to the ethics part of the definition section.

-Skyeteam (talk) 14:17, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Honors Topics in Lit Digital Humanities

Latest comment: 30 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation–supported course assignment, between 1 September 2026 and 11 December 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ammu.p08 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ammu.p08 (talk) 18:28, 13 October 2026 (UTC)Reply