Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Chlorophaeite

A mixture of two or more distinct mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
A Mixture Of:
This material is of uncertain status. It was considered "possibly a chlorite" by Hey (1955) and Clark, 1993 - "Hey's Mineral Index". It is not considered a valid species by the IMA-CNMNC and is poorly defined.

However a study by Srodo et al (2019) indicated it to vary optically from isotropic to birefringent and to have XRD patterns consistent with a mixture of "Fe-montmorillonite and Fe-saponite, identical with griffithite and oxysmectites, probably preceded by a finer-grained ferrosaponite at the isotropic stage." Their XRD patterns indicate a mixture of dioctahedral and trioctahedral smectites, and the compositions (~(Ca0 · 1,Mg0 · 4,Al0 · 3,Fe1 · 1)Si3 · 8Al0 · 2O11)indicate essentially a hydrous iron silicate, with subordinate Mg, Al and Ca. The composition, optics and XRD patterns are very similar to hisingerite.

Originally described from Isle of Rhum, North West Highlands (Inverness-shire), Scotland, UK. This type material needs to be retested before its identity can be confirmed.


Hide all sections | Show all sections

Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
951
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:951:1

Similar NamesHide

IMA Classification of ChlorophaeiteHide

Questionable

Classification of ChlorophaeiteHide

9..

9 : SILICATES (Germanates)
:
:

Other Language Names for ChlorophaeiteHide

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

9..'Ursilite'(Mg/Ca)4(UO2)4(Si2O5)5.5(OH)5 · 13H2OOrth.
9..'Oxy-uvite'
9..'Franklinphilite'Tric.
9..'Afanasyevaite'
9..'Tetranatrolite'
9..'Halloysite-7A'Mon. m : Bb
9..'Sodicpedrizite'Mon. 2/m : B2/m
9..'Sodic-ferropedrizite'
9..'Oxy-rossmanite'
9..'Hiortdahlite I'Tric. 1 : P1

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for ChlorophaeiteHide

References for ChlorophaeiteHide

Localities for ChlorophaeiteHide

Showing 10 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Canada
 
  • British Columbia
    • New Westminster Mining Division
      • Harrison Lake
Reamsbottom (1971)
India
 
  • Maharashtra
    • Amravati Division
      • Buldhana District
Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40 et al. (2005)
Poland
 
  • Lower Silesian Voivodeship
    • Kłodzko County
      • Gmina Nowa Ruda
        • Czerwieńczyce
Lis et al. (1986)
Sweden
 
  • Skåne County
    • Hässleholm
GFF
    • Höör
UK
 
  • England
    • Cumbria
      • Eden
        • Matterdale
          • Little Mell Fell
Young (1987)
  • Scotland
    • Argyll and Bute
      • Isle of Mull
Cann (1965) +1 other reference
    • Highland
      • Caol and Mallaig
USA
 
  • Massachusetts
Emerson (1917)
      • Deerfield
Emerson (1882) +1 other reference
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 19:30:27 Page updated: August 12, 2026 16:38:51
Go to top of page