Unnamed (Pt-Pd(Au) Alloy)
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
Pt0.84Pd0.16
Co-described and closely associated with UM1995-46-E:AuPdPt.
As rims of the above species or intergrowths with platinum, in large reniform masses (globular to flame-like textures).
Electron microprobe data, wt.%: Pt 87.20, Pd 9.33, Au 1.85, total 98.38; corresponds to Pt0.82Pd0.16Au0.02.
As rims of the above species or intergrowths with platinum, in large reniform masses (globular to flame-like textures).
Electron microprobe data, wt.%: Pt 87.20, Pd 9.33, Au 1.85, total 98.38; corresponds to Pt0.82Pd0.16Au0.02.
Unique Identifiers
Mindat ID:
53642
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:53642:2
Chemistry of Unnamed (Pt-Pd(Au) Alloy)
Mindat Formula:
Pt0.84Pd0.16
Elements listed:
Other Information
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Internet Links for Unnamed (Pt-Pd(Au) Alloy)
mindat.org URL:
https://www.mindat.org/min-53642.html
Please feel free to link to this page.
Please feel free to link to this page.
Search Engines:
Mineral Dealers:
References for Unnamed (Pt-Pd(Au) Alloy)
Localities for Unnamed (Pt-Pd(Au) Alloy)
ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence.
? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality.
Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
South Africa | |
| McDonald et al. (1995) +1 other reference |
