Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

UM2000-60-Si:Fe

Valid as an unnamed mineral
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
Fe3Si7
The phase "UM" name concerns material described from the Luobusa ophiolite, as subrounded grains, up to 0.5 mm, that may possess fritted margins.

The Fe3Si7 phase (probably the same) was much earlier described by Essene & Fisher (1986) as lath-like species intergrown with FeSi (naquite?), FeTiSi2 (possibly zangboite), and Unnamed (Ti Phosphide) within a metallic globule in glass of Winans Lake fulgurite.

Possibly the Si analogue of 'Unnamed (Fe phosphide-silicide I)'. One of a number of natural Fe-Si phases known; compare 'Unnamed (Fe silicide I)' and 'Unnamed (Fe silicide II)'.

Electron microprobe data (wt%):

Si 55.26
Fe 44.74

When normalized to 100 wt% it corresponds to Fe2.89Si7.11.


Hide all sections | Show all sections

Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
47572
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:47572:3

Similar NamesHide

UM1971-02-AsO:FeFe-As-O
UM1979-03-AsO:FeFeAsO4 ?
UM1979-04-AsO:FeFeAsO4 ?
UM1988-20-SO:FeHFe2.67(SO4)2.14H2O
UM1991-20-Si:FeValid as an unnamed mineralFe5Si2
UM1995-34-SO:FeFeS2O3
UM1997-14-AsO:FeHValid as an unnamed mineralFe-As-O-H
UM1997-15-AsO:FeHValid as an unnamed mineralFe-As-O-H
UM1997-43-S:FeValid as an unnamed mineralFeS3
UM2007-30-S:FeValid as an unnamed mineralFe3S2

IMA Classification of UM2000-60-Si:FeHide

IMA status notes:
Unnamed (probably valid)

Chemistry of UM2000-60-Si:FeHide

Mindat Formula:
Fe3Si7
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Si53.991 %
Fe46.009 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for UM2000-60-Si:FeHide

References for UM2000-60-Si:FeHide

Localities for UM2000-60-Si:FeHide

Showing 2 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
China
 
  • Tibet
    • Shannan Prefecture (Lhokha Prefecture; Lhoka Prefecture)
      • Qusum Co. (Qusong Co.)
Bai et al. (2000) +1 other reference
USA
 
  • Michigan
    • Livingston County
Essene et al. (1986)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 07:59:30 Page updated: May 29, 2026 07:52:04
Go to top of page