Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Wellsite

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About WellsiteHide

04514540017271927643258.jpg
Horace Lemuel Wells
Formula:
(K,Ba,Ca,K2)Al2Si6O16 · 6H2O
Colour:
Colorless, white
Lustre:
Sub-Vitreous
Hardness:
4 - 4½
Specific Gravity:
2.25
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Wellsite is a barian Phillipsite-Ca. Originally described from from Buck Creek Mine (Cullakenee Mine), Buck Creek, Clay Co., North Carolina, USA by Joseph Hyde Pratt and Henry W. Foote in 1897 in honor of Horace L. Wells [October 5, 1855 New Britain, Connecticut, USA - December 19, 1924 New Haven, Connecticut, USA]. Wells was an important mineral chemist and educator. He named the new species beryllonite, but is especially noted for his research on the chemistry of cesium and rubidium using lepidolite from Mount Mica, Paris, Maine and pollucite from Mount Rubellite, Hebron, Maine, USA. Wells also researched granite pegmatites, phosphate minerals, nitrates, thallium, selenium, tellurium, halogens, and cyanides. He also authored books on chemical calculations and analytical techniques.
Old name for Ba-bearing to -rich phillipsite. Fairly common in various rocks. The Ba-dominant endmember is harmotome.

Usually occurs as small, white to colorless square twinned prisms.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
4265 (as Wellsite)
3192 (as Phillipsite Subgroup)
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:4265:5 (as Wellsite)
mindat:1:1:3192:5 (as Phillipsite Subgroup)

Similar NamesHide

WallisiteA valid IMA mineral species(Cu,Ag)TlPbAs2S5

IMA Classification of WellsiteHide

Discredited

Classification of WellsiteHide

16.12.13

16 : Silicates Containing Aluminum and other Metals
12 : Aluminosilicates of Sr, Ba and Zn

Pronunciation of WellsiteHide

Pronunciation:
PlayRecorded byCountry
Jolyon RalphUnited Kingdom

Physical Properties of WellsiteHide

Sub-Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent, Translucent
Colour:
Colorless, white
Hardness:
4 - 4½ on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Distinct/Good
Distinct on the {010}, indistinct on the {001}
Density:
2.25 g/cm3 (Measured)    

Optical Data of WellsiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 1.4985 nβ = 1.5005 nγ = 1.5035
2V:
Measured: 45°
Birefringence:
0.0050
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.005
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars.

Surface Relief:
Moderate
Dispersion:
none

Chemistry of WellsiteHide

Mindat Formula:
(K,Ba,Ca,K2)Al2Si6O16 · 6H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
O56.259 %
Si26.934 %
Al8.625 %
K6.249 %
H1.933 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Common Impurities:
Mg,Sr,Na

Crystallography of WellsiteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
P21/m
Setting:
P21/m
Cell Parameters:
a = 9.91 Å, b = 14.24 Å, c = 8.7 Å
β = 124.65°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.696 : 1 : 0.611
Unit Cell V:
1,009.98 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
2
Morphology:
Rod-like crystals with square cross-section

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
8.1 Å(30)
7.2 Å(30)
6.4 Å(30)
5.0 Å(20)
4.07 Å(80b)
3.153 Å(100b)
2.903 Å(20)
2.688 Å(80b)
2.501 Å(30)
2.342 Å(30b)
2.217 Å(10)
2.131 Å(30)
2.040) Å(30)
1.939 Å(30)
1.802 Å(10)
1.762 Å(20)
1.699 Å(50)
1.667 Å(10)
1.635 Å(10)
1.585 Å(10)
1.528 Å(30)
1.474 Å(20)
1.420 Å(10b)
1.365 Å(50)
1.321 Å(20)
1.263 Å(20b)
1.209 Å(10b)
1.168 Å(20b)
Comments:
ICDD 12-541 (Vezna, Czech Republic)

First Recorded Occurrence of WellsiteHide

Other Language Names for WellsiteHide

German:Wellsit
Spanish:Wellsita

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
5 photos of Wellsite associated with AnalcimeNa(AlSi2O6) · H2O
3 photos of Wellsite associated with Heulandite Subgroup(Na/Ca/K)5-6[Al8-9 Si27-28 O72] · nH2O
2 photos of Wellsite associated with 'Phacolite'
1 photo of Wellsite associated with CalciteCaCO3

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 6.2492% 1,937 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for WellsiteHide

References for WellsiteHide

Localities for WellsiteHide

Showing 22 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Austria
 
  • Burgenland
    • Güssing District
      • Tobaj
- (n.d.) +1 other reference
  • Carinthia
    • Wolfsberg District
      • Sankt Paul im Lavanttal
        • Kollnitz
Niedermayr et al. (1995)
  • Lower Austria
    • Melk District
      • Persenbeug-Gottsdorf
Exel (1993)
  • Styria
    • Südoststeiermark District
      • Bad Gleichenberg
        • Wilhelmsdorf
Postl et al. (1996)
Czech Republic
 
  • Ústí nad Labem Region
    • Litoměřice District
M.Radoň-Významné mineralogické lokality Českého středohoří (čas.Minerál 2/2009)
  • Vysočina Region
    • Žďár nad Sázavou District
      • Věžná
Černý et al. (1979) +1 other reference
Černý (1963) +1 other reference
France
 
  • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
    • Ardèche
      • Largentière
Robert (1988)
      • Privas
Robert (1988)
Germany
 
  • Hesse
    • Darmstadt
      • Wetteraukreis
        • Ortenberg
Italy
 
  • Veneto
    • Verona Province
      • Roncà
Galli (1972) +2 other references
Capolupi (1995)
UK
 
  • Northern Ireland
    • County Antrim
Adair (1986) +1 other reference
Ukraine
 
World of Stones v.9
    • Simferopol area
      • Petropavlovka Village area
A. Tischenko. Minerals of the Crimea - ...
      • Ukrainka Village area (Kurtsy)
Dvoichenko (1914) +1 other reference
USA
 
  • California
    • Trinity County
      • Mad River Rock
Tony Kampf (PXRD analysis) +3 other references
  • Colorado
    • Mineral County
      • Wolf Creek Pass
Rocks & Minerals 79:5 pp316-324
Wayne C. Shanks et al. (2012)
  • North Carolina
    • Clay County
      • Buck Creek
Pratt et al. (Clay County,North Carolina,American Journal Of Science,Series 4,Vol 3.June 1897,P.443-448)
  • Oregon
    • Clackamas County
Miklancic collection #1742/77
    • Marion County
      • Santiam Mining District (Elkhorn Mining District)
        • Breitenbush-Austin Hot Springs area
Bargar et al. (1997)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 19:35:38 Page updated: July 28, 2026 23:49:09
Go to top of page