Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Weeksite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page kindly sponsored by Mary Dowse
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About WeeksiteHide

08270910017271927757278.jpg
Alice M. D. Weeks
Formula:
K2(UO2)2(Si5O13) · 4H2O
Colour:
Yellow
Lustre:
Waxy, Silky
Hardness:
1 - 2
Specific Gravity:
4.1
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named in 1960 by W. F. Osterbridge, Mortimer Hay Staatz, Robert Meyrowitz, and A. M. Plummer in honour of Alice Mary Dowse Weeks (26 August 1909, Sherborn, Massachusetts, USA - 27 August 1988, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA), mineralogist for the United States Geological Survey and later professor of mineralogy, Temple University (Philadelphia, USA).
The crystal structure of the mineral is based on a microporous uranyl silicate framework wherein the channels contain (disordered) alkali cation and water sites. Thou the degree of hydration may vary depending on the external conditions, e.g. relative humidity even at room temperature, the silicate framework remains stable upon thermal treatment and ion exchange processes. The exchange capacity is to a certain extent similar to that of zeolites, yet the processes are selective. For instance, Rb+ can be easily substituted by K+ and Cs+, yet no substitution was observed under the same conditions by Na+ or Ag+ even though both K- and Na-based synthetic weeksite analogs have been reported.

Structurally related to barronite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
4255
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:4255:6

Similar NamesHide

WicksiteA valid IMA mineral speciesNaCa2(Fe2+,Mn2+)4MgFe3+(PO4)6 · 2H2O

IMA Classification of WeeksiteHide

Classification of WeeksiteHide

9.AK.30

9 : SILICATES (Germanates)
A : Nesosilicates
K : Uranyl neso- and polysilicates
53.3.2.1

53 : NESOSILICATES Insular SiO4 Groups and Other Anions or Complex Cations
3 : Insular SiO4 Groups and Other Anions of Complex Cations with (UO2)
14.16.5

14 : Silicates not Containing Aluminum
16 : Silicates of U

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
WksIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Pronunciation of WeeksiteHide

Pronunciation:
PlayRecorded byCountry
Jolyon RalphUnited Kingdom

Physical Properties of WeeksiteHide

Waxy, Silky
Transparency:
Transparent, Translucent
Colour:
Yellow
Hardness:
1 - 2 on Mohs scale
Cleavage:
Distinct/Good
Two good prismatic cleavages noted.
Density:
4.1 g/cm3 (Measured)    3.710 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of WeeksiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.596 nβ = 1.603 nγ = 1.606
2V:
Measured: 60° , Calculated: 66°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.010
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Moderate (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
r < v weak
Pleochroism:
Strong
Comments:
X = colorless, Y = pale yellow-green, Z = yellow-green.

Chemistry of WeeksiteHide

Mindat Formula:
K2(UO2)2(Si5O13) · 4H2O
Element Weights:
Element% weight
U45.831 %
O32.346 %
Si13.519 %
K7.528 %
H0.776 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
U
O
Si
K
H
Common Impurities:
Al,Fe,Ca,Ba,Na,C

Crystallography of WeeksiteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
B2/m
Setting:
C2/m
Cell Parameters:
a = 14.2183(8) Å, b = 14.1794(6) Å, c = 9.6229(6) Å
β = 111.445(7)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.003 : 1 : 0.679
Unit Cell V:
1,805.73 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
1
Twinning:
By two-fold rotation around [401].

The correct model (reticular twin, diffraction type II; Petříček et al. 2016) involves a two-fold axis operation (or mirror, as an alternative co-set) in (101), which leads to an orthorhombic lattice of four-times larger volume of the unit-cell.

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0018760WeeksiteFejfarova K, Plasil J, Yang H, Cejka J, Dusek M, Downs R T, Barkley M C, Skoda R (2012) Revision of the crystal structure and chemical formula of weeksite, K2(UO2)2(Si5O13)*4H2O American Mineralogist 97 750-7542012Anderson mine, Arizona, USA0293
0000839WeeksiteStohl F V, Smith D K (1981) The crystal chemistry of the uranyl silicate minerals American Mineralogist 66 610-6251981Anderson mine, Yavapai County, Arizona, USA0293
0005712WeeksiteJackson J M, Burns P C (2001) A re-evaluation of the structure of weeksite, a uranyl silicate framework mineral The Canadian Mineralogist 39 187-19520010293
0018510WeeksiteBaturin S V (1985) Crystal-structure of weeksite Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 282 1132-113619850293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event<2.4
47a : [Near-surface hydration of prior minerals]
47f : [Uranyl (U⁶⁺) minerals]
Geological Setting:
it is formed as a product of the relatively mild hydrothermal transformation of the parental rocks.

Type Occurrence of WeeksiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Yellow radiating fibrous clusters
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian), Washington, D.C., USA, 128713, 115886, 121949.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
In opal veinlets and as replacements of pebbles in tuffaceous conglomerate.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Other Language Names for WeeksiteHide

Dutch:Weeksiet
German:Weeksit
Russian:Уиксит
Spanish:Weeksita

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
18 photos of Weeksite associated with CarnotiteK2(UO2)2(VO4)2 · 3H2O
12 photos of Weeksite associated with 'Chalcedony'SiO2
11 photos of Weeksite associated with AutuniteCa(UO2)2(PO4)2 · 10-12H2O
10 photos of Weeksite associated with QuartzSiO2
8 photos of Weeksite associated with OpalSiO2 · nH2O
6 photos of Weeksite associated with CalciteCaCO3
6 photos of Weeksite associated with GoethiteFe3+O(OH)
6 photos of Weeksite associated with BecquereliteCa(UO2)6O4(OH)6 · 8H2O
6 photos of Weeksite associated with NatrozippeiteNa5(UO2)8(SO4)4O5(OH)3 · 12H2O
4 photos of Weeksite associated with BluelizarditeNa7(UO2)(SO4)4Cl(H2O)2

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

9.AK.'Orlite'Pb3(UO2)3(Si2O7)2 · 6H2O
9.AK.05Soddyite(UO2)2SiO4 · 2H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Fddd
9.AK.10SklodowskiteMg(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 6H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
9.AK.10CuprosklodowskiteCu(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 6H2OTric. 1 : P1
9.AK.10OursiniteCo(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 6H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cmca
9.AK.15ParauranophaneCa(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 5H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
9.AK.15UranophaneCa(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2 · 5H2OMon. 2 : P21
9.AK.15NatroboltwooditeNa(UO2)(SiO3OH) · H2OOrth. 222 : P212121
9.AK.15KasolitePb(UO2)(SiO4) · H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
9.AK.15Boltwoodite(K,Na)(UO2)(SiO3OH) · 1.5H2OMon. 2 : P21
9.AK.20Swamboite-(Nd)Nd0.333[(UO2)(SiO3OH)](H2O)~2.5Mon. 2/m : P21/b
9.AK.25HaiweeiteCa(UO2)2[Si5O12(OH)2] · 6H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pbcn
9.AK.25MetahaiweeiteCa(UO2)2Si6O15 · nH2OMon. 2/m : P2/b
9.AK.30CoutinhoiteThxBa(1-2x)(UO2)2Si5O13 · (H2O)1+y (0 < x < 0.5 and 0 < y < (2+x))Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m)
9.AK.30Barronite(◻0.5Ba0.5)(UO2)2Si5O12(OH) · 2H2OMon. 2/m : B2/m
9.AK.35MagnioursiliteMg4(UO2)4(Si2O5)5(OH)6 · 20H2O
9.AK.35CalcioursiliteCa4(UO2)4(Si2O5)5(OH)6 · 15H2OOrth.
9.AK.40UranosiliteUO3 · 7SiO2Orth.

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 45.8306% 11,457,650 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 7.5281% 2,334 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
Contains uranium. Always wash hands after handling. Do not lick or ingest. Store in an uninhabited area

Internet Links for WeeksiteHide

References for WeeksiteHide

Reference List:

Localities for WeeksiteHide

Showing 54 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Algeria
 
  • Tamanrasset Province (Tamanghasset Province)
    • Abalessa District
      • Timgaouine
MEKTI et al. (2025)
Australia
 
  • South Australia
    • Pastoral Unincorporated Area
      • Arkaroola (Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary; Arkaroola Station)
        • Mount Painter area
Brugger et al. (2003) +1 other reference
Austria
 
  • Carinthia
    • Villach-Land District
      • Fresach
        • Laas
Brandstätter et al. (1987) +1 other reference
Brazil
 
  • Bahia
Pires et al. (2014)
  • Minas Gerais
    • Conselheiro Pena
      • Barra do Cuieté
Bruno Gioia specimen +1 other reference
  • São Paulo
    • São Paulo
Revista Brasileira de Geociências 24 (1) +1 other reference
Fosfatos e Silicatos Secundários de ...
Chile
 
  • Atacama
    • Copiapó Province
      • Copiapó
        • Quebrada San Miguel
          • Los Azules mine
According to Dr. Tony Kampf
China
 
  • Qinghai
    • Haixi Mongol and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture
      • Mangnai City (Mangya Co.)
        • Lenghu Co.
Abudukeyumu et al. (2022)
Czech Republic
 
  • Karlovy Vary Region
    • Cheb District
      • Mariánské Lázně
Pauliš P. et al. (Kutna Hora, issue 1)
    • Karlovy Vary District
Hloušek et al. (2002)
  • Plzeň Region
    • Klatovy District
Pauliš P. et al. (Kutna Hora, issue 1)
Egypt
 
  • South Sinai Governorate
52 (2) +1 other reference
France
 
  • Nouvelle-Aquitaine
    • Deux-Sèvres
      • Bressuire
        • Saint-Amand-sur-Sèvre
Favreau (n.d.)
Germany
 
  • Baden-Württemberg
    • Freiburg Region
      • Waldshut
        • St Blasien
          • Menzenschwand
Walenta (1989) +1 other reference
  • Bavaria
    • Lower Franconia
      • Aschaffenburg District
        • Haibach
          • Dörrmorsbach
Lorenz (1998) +1 other reference
  • Saxony
    • Vogtlandkreis
      • Bergen
Witzke (2018)
Japan
 
  • Tottori Prefecture
K. Watanabe (1976)
Mexico
 
  • Chihuahua
    • Aldama Municipality
      • Peña Blanca District
        • Sierra Peña Blanca
Panczner (1987)
Panczner (1987)
Panczner (1987) +4 other references
Panczner (1987)
Panczner (1987)
Namibia
 
  • Erongo Region
    • Arandis Constituency
      • Goanikontes
von Bezing (2007)
Peru
 
  • Puno
    • Carabaya Province
O'Connor et al. (2018)
Geological Association of Canada (2014) +1 other reference
Romania
 
  • Suceava County
Hîrtopanu P. et al. (2004)
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Yavapai County
      • Date Creek Basin
Anthony et al. (1995)
      • Weaver Mountains
        • Weaver Mining District (Virginia Mining District; Mocking Bird Mining District)
Anthony et al. (1995)
    • Yuma County
      • Muggins Mountains
        • Muggins Mining District
          • Muggins Mountains uranium prospects
Honea (1959) +2 other references
  • California
    • Inyo County
Outerbridge et al. (1960) +2 other references
    • Plumas County
American Mineralogist (1970)
  • Nevada
    • Humboldt County
      • Bottle Creek Mining District
Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology ... +1 other reference
NBMG files No. 50600003 +1 other reference
Castor et al. (2004)
      • Virgin Valley Mining District
- (2005)
    • Mineral County
      • Marietta Mining District
Castor et al. (2004)
    • Washoe County
      • Pyramid Mining District
Castor et al. (2004)
  • New Mexico
    • Cibola County
Northrop et al. (1996)
Outerbridge et al. (1960)
Northrop et al. (1996)
  • Pennsylvania
    • Northampton County
      • Easton
        • Chestnut Hill
          • C.K. Williams Quarry complex
AmMin.45:39 +2 other references
  • Texas
    • Live Oak County
- (2005)
Smith (1991)
    • Presidio County
Am.Min.: 45: 39-52
  • Utah
    • Grand County
      • Thompsons Mining District
        • Mollie Hogans
King (n.d.)
    • Juab County
      • Thomas Range
Bullock (1981)
SLIDES OF THE FLUORSPAR
Bullock (1981)
Outerbridge et al. (1960) +1 other reference
Bullock (1981)
    • San Juan County
      • Red Canyon Mining District
Collection of Alex Earl
  • Wyoming
    • Niobrara County
      • Lusk
Outerbridge et al. (1960)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 21:35:47 Page updated: August 21, 2026 20:12:28
Go to top of page