Phengite
A variety of Muscovite
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
About Phengite
Formula:
KAl1.5(Mg,Fe)0.5(Al0.5Si3.5O10)(OH)2
Name:
Originally named in 1841 by Johann Friedrich August Breithaupt as a group of micas showing biaxial characteristics, and applied as a genus name to all of the known biaxial mica minerals then defined. The origin of the name in German is from "feurig" suggesting glowing or fiery, presumably due to the mineral's luster and that property was translated to the Greek φλογερός, also meaning fiery. In 1853, Franz von Kobell discarded phengite as a genus name, partly because binomial nomenclature of minerals had been discarded, and he resurrected the name phengite and defined it as a muscovite with high silica contents, as a way of discussing mica formulas with varying fixed molecular forms. However, James D. Dana criticized the use of phengite in 1854 and von Kobell apparently abandoned the name. Alexander N. Winchell (1925) resurrected phengite in the same manner used by von Kobell in order to assign fixed molecular mixing to account for excess Si substitution in muscovite. Guidotti (1984) and others called slightly hypersilicic muscovite "phengitic muscovite" or simply phengite when Si was greater than 3.5 pfu. In 1998, phengite was defined as a high silica variety of muscovite on the chemical join between muscovite, celadonite, and aluminoceladonite, depending on the composition of the octahedral substitutions, but phengite ceased to be considered an end-member composition.
Phengite is an aluminous true mica (“white mica”) which contains a relatively high amount of tetrahedrally co-ordinated Si (3.1-3.5 apfu). As the Si amount increases, some divalent octahedrally co-ordinated cations (mostly ferrous Fe and Mg) are necessary for charge balance. This forms part of a solid solution towards the celadonite subgroup rather than trioctahedral micas like biotites.
Rieder et al. (1998) described phengites as: "Potassic dioctahedral micas between, or close to, the joins muscovite-aluminoceladonite and muscovite-celadonite."
Also defined as: “white micas with fairly large amounts of Mg and Fe (whatever its oxidation state) and other scarce heavy cations such as Ti, Cr, etc. in the octahedral M site, the name thus meaning any mica with variable amounts of octahedral Al substituted mostly by Mg and Fe, irrespective of whether it is tetrasilicic or not, but implicitly assuming charge balance." (Cibin et al., 2008).
Bailey (1984) gives the ideal formula of phengite as KAl1.5(Mg,Fe)0.5Si3.5Al0.5O10(OH)2.
Tappert et al. (2013) defined phengite more carefully as the compositional space between muscovite, aluminoceladonite and ferroaluminoceladonite, with Si between 3.1 and 3.5.
Schmidt et al. (2001) showed that the phengite unit-cell parameters have a distinct dependence on the celadonite content (cf. also Kisch et al., 2006).
Guidotti (1984) reviewed the conditions under which Ti4+ might substitute for octahedral Al.
Rieder et al. (1998) described phengites as: "Potassic dioctahedral micas between, or close to, the joins muscovite-aluminoceladonite and muscovite-celadonite."
Also defined as: “white micas with fairly large amounts of Mg and Fe (whatever its oxidation state) and other scarce heavy cations such as Ti, Cr, etc. in the octahedral M site, the name thus meaning any mica with variable amounts of octahedral Al substituted mostly by Mg and Fe, irrespective of whether it is tetrasilicic or not, but implicitly assuming charge balance." (Cibin et al., 2008).
Bailey (1984) gives the ideal formula of phengite as KAl1.5(Mg,Fe)0.5Si3.5Al0.5O10(OH)2.
Tappert et al. (2013) defined phengite more carefully as the compositional space between muscovite, aluminoceladonite and ferroaluminoceladonite, with Si between 3.1 and 3.5.
Schmidt et al. (2001) showed that the phengite unit-cell parameters have a distinct dependence on the celadonite content (cf. also Kisch et al., 2006).
Guidotti (1984) reviewed the conditions under which Ti4+ might substitute for octahedral Al.
Unique Identifiers
Mindat ID:
3189 (as Phengite)
2815 (as Muscovite)
2815 (as Muscovite)
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:3189:5 (as Phengite)
mindat:1:1:2815:4 (as Muscovite)
mindat:1:1:2815:4 (as Muscovite)
Similar Names
IMA Classification of Phengite
Discredited
Chemistry of Phengite
Mindat Formula:
KAl1.5(Mg,Fe)0.5(Al0.5Si3.5O10)(OH)2
Element Weights:
Age distribution
Recorded ages:
Miocene : 16 ± 0.2 Ma to 14.2 ± 0.6 Ma - based on 14 recorded ages.
Sample ages:
Sample references:
| ID | Locality | Reference | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jas Roux, La Chapelle-en-Valgaudemar, Gap, Hautes-Alpes, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France | ||
| 2 | " " | ||
| 3 | " " |
Chemical Analysis
Oxide wt%:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 52.82 % | 49.07 % | 49.40 % | 49.32 % | 50.89 % | 51.03 % | 48.93 % | 51.86 % | 51.72 % | 51.69 % | 51.25 % |
| P2O5 | 0.00 % | ||||||||||
| TiO2 | 0.29 % | 0.32 % | 0.45 % | 0.19 % | 0.36 % | 0.32 % | 0.39 % | 0.38 % | 0.02 % | 0.16 % | 0.32 % |
| Al2O3 | 23.34 % | 32.04 % | 31.66 % | 29.03 % | 27.40 % | 26.63 % | 28.05 % | 24.85 % | 27.14 % | 23.52 % | 23.94 % |
| FeO | 0.12 % | 1.18 % | 1.65 % | 2.20 % | 1.06 % | 1.36 % | 2.25 % | 1.73 % | 3.27 % | 1.96 % | 3.06 % |
| MnO | 0.04 % | 0.06 % | 0.10 % | 0.09 % | 0.05 % | 0.04 % | 0.04 % | 0.00 % | |||
| MgO | 5.93 % | 2.39 % | 2.39 % | 3.08 % | 3.89 % | 4.18 % | 3.36 % | 4.68 % | 3.34 % | 4.89 % | 4.40 % |
| CaO | 0.00 % | 0.02 % | 0.05 % | 0.14 % | 0.10 % | 0.06 % | 0.07 % | 0.31 % | 0.00 % | ||
| Na2O | 0.16 % | 1.52 % | 0.91 % | 0.84 % | 0.66 % | 0.68 % | 0.25 % | 0.04 % | 0.12 % | 0.36 % | |
| K2O | 11.07 % | 9.30 % | 10.9 % | 11.07 % | 10.09 % | 10.61 % | 10.30 % | 10.86 % | 8.95 % | 10.79 % | 10.66 % |
| Cr2O3 | 0.24 % | 0.16 % | 0.15 % | 0.12 % | 0.07 % | 0.04 % | 0.32 % | ||||
| Total: | 93.77 % | 95.84 % | 97.41 % | 94.89 % | 94.97 % | 95.15 % | 94.26 % | 94.85 % | 94.9 % | 93.21 % | 94.31 % |
Empirical formulas:
| Sample ID | Empirical Formula |
|---|---|
| 4 | K0.95Al1.50(Mg0.31 Fe2+0.12 Al0.11)Σ0.5(Al0.68Ti0.01Si3.31)Σ4.00O10OH2 |
| 5 | (K0.86Na0.11 )Σ0.97(Al 1.46 Cr 0.01 Ca0.01Mg0.39Fe0.06 Ti0.02)Σ1.95(Al0.61Si3.39O10)OH2 |
| 6 | K0.91Na0.09(Mg0.42 Fe0.08 Ca0.01Mn0.01Al1.51)Σ1.93(Al0.59Si3.41)Σ4.00O10OH2 |
| 7 | K0.89Na0.09(Mg0.34 Fe0.13 Mn0.01 Ti0.02Al1.51)Σ2.11(Al0.69Si3.31)Σ4.00O10OH2 |
| 8 | K0.93Na0.03(Mg0.47 Fe0.10 Ca0.01Ti0.02Al1.44)Σ2.04(Al0.52Si3.48)Σ4.00O10OH2 |
| 9 | K0.76Na0.01(Mg0.33 Fe0.18 Ca0.02 Al1.54)Σ2.07(Al0.58Si3.42)Σ4.00O10OH2 |
Sample references:
| ID | Locality | Reference | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Case Parigi, Martiniana Po, Cuneo Province, Piedmont, Italy | Sample from fine grained matrix of coesite-phenige-pyrope schist Mineral analyses were performed by means of the Cameca electron microprobe (CAMEBAX) , using a wavelength-dispersive technique with PAP correction acceleration voltage 15 kV, beam current 15 nA, measuring time 20 s). | |
| 2 | Gablor Hill eclogites, Kulp district, Diyarbakir Province, Turkey | colorless mica-flake in kyanite-eclogite. EMPA analysis | |
| 3 | " " | colorless mica-flake in kyanite-eclogite. EMPA analysis | |
| 4 | Charakoma eclogite, Soufli, Evros, Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, Greece | EMPA analysis of a primary phengite in an kyanite-eclogite. | |
| 5 | Eissee eclogite, Timmelbach valley, Prägraten am Großvenediger, Lienz District, Tyrol, Austria | EMPA analysis of a phengite inclusion in garnet from a kyanite-eclogite | |
| 6 | Steinsteg eclogite, Frosnitz valley, Matrei in Osttirol, Lienz District, Tyrol, Austria | EMPA anallysis of phengite from a kyanite-eclogite | |
| 7 | " " | EMPA analysis of a matrix phengite in a post eclogite-facies mica schists. | |
| 8 | " " | EMPA analysis of a phengite inclusion in amphibole from a post eclogite-facies mica schists. | |
| 9 | Obidim eclogite, Bansko Municipality, Blagoevgrad Province, Bulgaria | EMPA analysis ( State Geological Institute of Dionyz Stur in Bratislava).of a phengite inclusion in garnet from a kyanite-eclogite | |
| 10 | Eclogite outcrops, Shang Sumdo région, Leh District, Ladakh, India | EMPA analysis of phengite from eclogite matrix. | |
| 11 | Weiß‑Spitze eclogites, Virgen valley, Lienz District, Tyrol, Austria | Phengite from a banded eclogite. EMPA analysis |
Geological Environment
Paragenetic Mode(s):
| Paragenetic Mode | Earliest Age (Ga) |
|---|---|
| Stage 3b: Earth’s earliest hydrosphere | >4.45 |
| 16 : Low-? aqueous alteration of Hadean subaerial lithologies (see also #23) | |
| Near-surface Processes | |
| 22 : Hydration and low-? subsurface aqueous alteration (see also #23) | |
| Stage 7: Great Oxidation Event | <2.4 |
| 47a : [Near-surface hydration of prior minerals] |
Other Language Names for Phengite
Varieties of Phengite
| Mariposite | A greenish Cr-bearing "phengite", sericite or muscovite, probably equivalent to fuchsite. Originally described from Mariposa Co., California, USA. Also used to describe a rock rich in this mineral. |
Common Associates
Associations Based on Photo Data:
| 6 photos of Phengite associated with Glaucophane | ◻Na2(Mg3Al2)Si8O22(OH)2 |
| 5 photos of Phengite associated with Rutile | TiO2 |
| 4 photos of Phengite associated with Calcite | CaCO3 |
| 3 photos of Phengite associated with Quartz | SiO2 |
| 2 photos of Phengite associated with Cryptomelane | K(Mn4+7Mn3+)O16 |
| 1 photo of Phengite associated with Garnet Group | X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
| 1 photo of Phengite associated with Magnesiostaurolite | Mg(Mg,Li)3(Al,Mg)18Si8O44(OH)4 |
| 1 photo of Phengite associated with 'Almandine-Pyrope Series' | |
| 1 photo of Phengite associated with Kyanite | Al2(SiO4)O |
| 1 photo of Phengite associated with Graphite | C |
Radioactivity
Other Information
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Phengite in petrology
An essential component of rock names highlighted in red, an accessory component in rock names highlighted in green.
Internet Links for Phengite
mindat.org URL:
https://www.mindat.org/min-3189.html
Please feel free to link to this page.
Please feel free to link to this page.
Search Engines:
Mineral Dealers:
References for Phengite
Reference List:
Tschermak, G. (1879) Die Glimmergruppe (II. Theil). Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 3 (1). 122-167 doi:10.1524/zkri.1879.3.1.122
Crowley, M. S., Roy, Rustum (1964) Crystalline solubility in the muscovite and phlogopite groups. American Mineralogist, 49 (3-4) 348-362
Black, Philippa M. (1975) Mineralogy of New Caledonian metamorphic rocks. IV. Sheet silicates from the Ouégoa district. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 49 (4). p.269-284. doi:10.1007/bf00376180
Guidotti, Charles V. (1984) Micas in metamorphic rocks. Reviews in Mineralogy, 13. 357-468 doi:10.1515/9781501508820-014
Massonne, Hans -Joachim, Schreyer, Werner (1987) Phengite geobarometry based on the limiting assemblage with K-feldspar, phlogopite, and quartz. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 96 (2) 212-224 doi:10.1007/bf00375235
Rieder, M., Cavazzini, G., D’Yakonov, Y.S., Frank-Kamenetskii, V.A., Gottardt, G., Guggenheim, S., Koval, P.V., Muller, G., Neiva, A.M.R., Radoslovich, E.W., Robert, J.L., Sassi, F.P., Takeda, H., Weiss, Z., Wones, D.R. (1998) Nomenclature of the micas. The Canadian Mineralogist, 36 (3) 905-912
Guidotti, C. V., Sassi, F. P., Comodi, P., Zanazzi, P. F., Blencoe, J. G. (2000) The contrasting responses of muscovite and paragonite to increasing pressure: petrological implications. The Canadian Mineralogist, 38 (3). 707-712 doi:10.2113/gscanmin.38.3.707
Schmidt, Max W., Dugnani, Mattia, Artioli, Gilberto (2001) Synthesis and characterization of white micas in the join muscovite–aluminoceladonite. American Mineralogist, 86 (4) 555-565 doi:10.2138/am-2001-0418
Coggon, R., Holland, T. J. B. (2002) Mixing properties of phengitic micas and revised garnet-phengite thermobarometers. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 20 (7) 683-696 doi:10.1046/j.1525-1314.2002.00395.x
Mookherjee, M., Redfern, S. A. T. (2002) A high-temperature Fourier transform infrared study of the interlayer and Si–O-stretching region in phengite-2M1. Clay Minerals, 37 (2) 323-336 doi:10.1180/0009855023720036
Kisch, Hanan J., Sassi, Raffaele, Sassi, Francesco P. (2006) The b0 lattice parameter and chemistry of phengites from HP/LT metapelites. European Journal of Mineralogy, 18 (2) 207-222 doi:10.1127/0935-1221/2006/0018-0207
Cibin, G., Cinque, G., Marcelli, A., Mottana, A., Sassi, R. (2008) The octahedral sheet of metamorphic 2M1-phengites: A combined EMPA and AXANES study. American Mineralogist, 93 (2) 414-425 doi:10.2138/am.2008.2548
Localities for Phengite
Showing 721 localities.
Locality List
- This locality has map coordinates listed.
- This locality has estimated coordinates.
ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence.
? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.



symbol to view information about a locality.
The
Goiás, Brazil