Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Kamitugaite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About KamitugaiteHide

01872220017271924264132.jpg
Kamituga
Formula:
PbAl[(UO2)5(PO4)2.38(AsO4)0.62O2(OH)2] · 11.5H2O
Formula inferred from the crystal structure refinement (Plášil 2017).
Colour:
Yellow
Lustre:
Vitreous
Hardness:
3
Specific Gravity:
4.03
Crystal System:
Triclinic
Name:
Named in 1984 by M. Deliens and P. Piret for Kamituga, the mining center of Kivu, near the type locality.
This page provides mineralogical data about Kamitugaite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
2148
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:2148:3

IMA Classification of KamitugaiteHide

Classification of KamitugaiteHide

8.ED.15

8 : PHOSPHATES, ARSENATES, VANADATES
E : Uranyl phosphates and arsenates
D : Unclassified
42.13.11.1

42 : HYDRATED PHOSPHATES, ETC.CONTAINING HYDROXYL OR HALOGEN
13 : Miscellaneous
19.10.3

19 : Phosphates
10 : Phosphates of Pb, Th, V and Bi

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
KtgIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of KamitugaiteHide

Vitreous
Transparency:
Transparent
Colour:
Yellow
Streak:
White
Hardness:
Hardness Data:
Estimated
Density:
4.03 g/cm3 (Measured)    4.47 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of KamitugaiteHide

Type:
Biaxial (-)
RI values:
nα = 1.709 nβ = 1.735 nγ = 1.744
2V:
Measured: 60° , Calculated: 60°
Max. Birefringence:
δ = 0.035
Based on recorded range of RI values above.

Interference Colours:
The colours simulate birefringence patterns seen in thin section under crossed polars. They do not take into account mineral colouration or opacity.

Michel-Levy Bar The default colours simulate the birefringence range for a 30 µm thin-section thickness. Adjust the slider to simulate a different thickness.

Grain Simulation You can rotate the grain simulation to show how this range might look as you rotated a sample under crossed polars. Each grain retains its interference colour (retardation) while its brightness falls to black at extinction and reaches a maximum between extinction positions.

Surface Relief:
Very High (positive)
Relative to Canada balsam mounting medium (n ≈ 1.537).

This shows the grain boundary and Becke line effect under plane-polarised light, based on the contrast between this mineral's average refractive index and the mounting medium. It does not take into account mineral colouration.
In focus
Interference Figure:
This shows the idealized biaxial acute bisectrix (Bxa) interference figure - the conoscopic view for a grain cut perpendicular to the acute bisectrix, using this mineral's 2V. The two small white dots mark the melatopes - the points where the two optic axes emerge - and are shown only when they fall within the field of view. The coloured bands are isochromatics, and the dark bands are isogyres.

Rotate the stage: at 0°/90° the isogyres form a cross through the melatopes; at 45° they pull apart into curved hyperbolas. That splitting on rotation - absent in a uniaxial figure - is the standard diagnostic test for telling biaxial minerals from uniaxial ones. If 2V is large, the melatopes may fall outside the field of view, as they often do at the microscope too.
Dispersion:
r > v weak
Pleochroism:
Visible
Comments:
X = colorless, Y = yellow
Comments:
X ≃ b∗; Y ∧ a = 1◦–2◦; Z ⊥ a and b∗.

Chemistry of KamitugaiteHide

Mindat Formula:
PbAl[(UO2)5(PO4)2.38(AsO4)0.62O2(OH)2] · 11.5H2O

Formula inferred from the crystal structure refinement (Plášil 2017).
Element Weights:
Element% weight
U54.854 %
O27.653 %
Pb9.550 %
P3.398 %
As2.141 %
Al1.244 %
H1.161 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
U
O
Pb
P
As
Al
H

Crystallography of KamitugaiteHide

Crystal System:
Triclinic
Class (H-M):
1 - Pinacoidal
Space Group:
P1
Setting:
P1
Cell Parameters:
a = 9.0296(8) Å, b = 10.9557(8) Å, c = 15.8249(15) Å
α = 89.585(7)°, β = 85.349(8)°, γ = 84.251(7)°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 0.824 : 1 : 1.444
Unit Cell V:
1,552.48 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
7.95 Å(100)
3.972 Å(80)
3.271 Å(40)
3.175 Å(40)
15.92 Å(30)
3.493 Å(30)
4.307 Å(25)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Type Occurrence of KamitugaiteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Thin plates with a maximum length of 0.5 mm.
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
Royal Museum of Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium, RMG13985, RMG13986
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Quartz-albite-muscovite pegmatite.
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of KamitugaiteHide

Other Language Names for KamitugaiteHide

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
1 photo of Kamitugaite associated with MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)2

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

8.ED.05MoreauiteAl3(UO2)(PO4)3(OH)2 · 13H2OMon. 2/m : P21/b
8.ED.10ŠreinitePb(BiO)3(UO2)4(PO4)2(OH)7 · 4H2OIso. m3m(4/m32/m) : Im3m
8.ED.10MetalodèviteZn(UO2)2(AsO4)2 · 10H2OTet. 4/m : P42/m
8.ED.10AsselbornitePb(BiO)3(UO2)4(AsO4)2(OH)7 · 4H2OIso.
8.ED.20NielsbohriteK(UO2)3(AsO4)(OH)4 · H2OOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Cccm

RadioactivityHide

Radioactivity:
Element % Content Activity (Bq/kg) Radiation Type
Uranium (U) 54.8537% 13,713,425 α, β, γ
Thorium (Th) 0.0000% 0 α, β, γ
Potassium (K) 0.0000% 0 β, γ

For comparison:

  • Banana: ~15 Bq per fruit
  • Granite: 1,000–3,000 Bq/kg
  • EU exemption limit: 10,000 Bq/kg

Note: Risk is shown relative to daily recommended maximum exposure to non-background radiation of 1000 µSv/year. Note that natural background radiation averages around 2400 µSv/year so in reality these risks are probably extremely overstated! With infrequent handling and safe storage natural radioactive minerals do not usually pose much risk.

Interactive Simulator:

Note: The mass selector refers to the mass of radioactive mineral present, not the full specimen, also be aware that the matrix may also be radioactive, possibly more radioactive than this mineral!

Activity:

DistanceDose rateRisk
1 cm
10 cm
1 m

The external dose rate (D) from a radioactive mineral is estimated by summing the gamma radiation contributions from its Uranium, Thorium, and Potassium content, disregarding daughter-product which may have a significant effect in some cases (eg 'pitchblende'). This involves multiplying the activity (A, in Bq) of each element by its specific gamma ray constant (Γ), which accounts for its unique gamma emissions. The total unshielded dose at 1 cm is then scaled by the square of the distance (r, in cm) and multiplied by a shielding factor (μshield). This calculation provides a 'worst-case' or 'maximum risk' estimate because it assumes the sample is a point source and entirely neglects any self-shielding where radiation is absorbed within the mineral itself, meaning actual doses will typically be lower. The resulting dose rate (D) is expressed in microsieverts per hour (μSv/h).

D = ((AU × ΓU) + (ATh × ΓTh) + (AK × ΓK)) / r2 × μshield

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for KamitugaiteHide

References for KamitugaiteHide

Localities for KamitugaiteHide

Showing 2 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
DR Congo (TL)
 
  • South Kivu
    • Mwenga Territory
Deliens et al. (1984)
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • Maricopa County
      • Osborn Mining District
        • Tonopah
          • Tiger Wash
pers. comm. Josef Vajdak to C. Lemanski (2002) +1 other reference
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 03:19:04 Page updated: August 21, 2026 20:39:48
Go to top of page