Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup26! - Azurite vs. Smithsonite
It's carbonate-vs-carbonate to kick off Mineral Cup 2026 with copper-rich Azurite against zinc-rich Smithsonite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic TimeExplore Fossils
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Getchellite

A valid IMA mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About GetchelliteHide

Formula:
AsSbS3
Colour:
Dark blood red
Lustre:
Resinous
Hardness:
1½ - 2
Specific Gravity:
3.92
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
Named after the type locality, the Getchell Mine, Adam Peak, Potosi District, Humboldt Co., Nevada, USA.
This page provides mineralogical data about Getchellite.


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
1686
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:1686:1

IMA Classification of GetchelliteHide

Classification of GetchelliteHide

2.FA.35

2 : SULFIDES and SULFOSALTS (sulfides, selenides, tellurides; arsenides, antimonides, bismuthides; sulfarsenites, sulfantimonites, sulfbismuthites, etc.)
F : Sulfides of arsenic, alkalies; sulfides with halide, oxide, hydroxide, H2O
A : With As, (Sb), S
2.11.1.2

2 : SULFIDES
11 : AmBnXp, with (m+n):p = 2:3
3.7.11

3 : Sulphides, Selenides, Tellurides, Arsenides and Bismuthides (except the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and Au, which are included in Section 1)
7 : Sulphides etc. of V, As, Sb and Bi

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

SymbolSourceReference for Standard
GetIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43

Physical Properties of GetchelliteHide

Resinous
Transparency:
Transparent
Comment:
pearly to vitreous on cleavage surface.
Colour:
Dark blood red
Comment:
Tarnishes to green to purple iridescence
Streak:
Orange-red
Hardness:
1½ - 2 on Mohs scale
Tenacity:
Flexible
Cleavage:
Perfect
Perfect on {001}
Fracture:
Splintery
Density:
3.92 g/cm3 (Measured)    3.98 g/cm3 (Calculated)
Comment:
Calculated on synthetic material

Optical Data of GetchelliteHide

Type:
Biaxial (+)
RI values:
nα = 2.72
2V:
Measured: 46°
Surface Relief:
Unknown
Anisotropism:
Weak
Dispersion:
r > v strong
Reflectivity:
WavelengthR1 (%)R2 (%)
400nm34.8%37.9%
440nm33.6%36.9%
480nm31.8%34.8%
520nm29.5%31.9%
560nm27.0%29.4%
600nm25.7%28.0%
640nm24.9%27.0%
680nm24.2%26.5%
700nm23.8%26.1%


Graph shows reflectance levels at different wavelengths (in nm). Peak reflectance is 37.9%.
R1 shown in black, R2 shown in red

Chemistry of GetchelliteHide

Mindat Formula:
AsSbS3
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Sb41.574 %
S32.845 %
As25.581 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.
Sb
S
As

Crystallography of GetchelliteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Class (H-M):
2/m - Prismatic
Space Group:
P21/b
Setting:
P21/a
Cell Parameters:
a = 11.8568 Å, b = 9.0152 Å, c = 10.1938 Å
β = 116.45°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.315 : 1 : 1.131
Unit Cell V:
975.57 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
8
Morphology:
Massive, subhedral crystals to 2 cm.

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0003539GetchelliteKyono A, Kimata M (2004) Structural reinvestigation of getchellite As0.98Sb1.02S3.00 American Mineralogist 89 696-70020040293
0009491GetchelliteGuillermo T R, Wuensch B J (1973) The crystal structure of getchellite, AsSbS3 Acta Crystallographica B29 2536-254119730293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Loading XRD data...
Data Set:
Data courtesy of RRUFF project at University of Arizona, used with permission.
Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
3.66 Å(100)
2.915 Å(100)
2.880 Å(100)
4.96 Å(80)
4.46 Å(80)
2.815 Å(80)
4.08 Å(60)

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
High-? alteration and/or metamorphism
33 : Minerals deposited by hydrothermal metal-rich fluids (see also [#12])

Type Occurrence of GetchelliteHide

General Appearance of Type Material:
Transparent, dark red, sectile crystals
Place of Conservation of Type Material:
National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian), Washington, D.C., USA, 118159, 118160.
Geological Setting of Type Material:
Epithermal gold deposit
Associated Minerals at Type Locality:

Synonyms of GetchelliteHide

Other Language Names for GetchelliteHide

German:Getchellit
Simplified Chinese:硫砷锑矿
Spanish:Getchellita
Traditional Chinese:硫砷銻礦

Common AssociatesHide

Associations Based on Photo Data:
95 photos of Getchellite associated with OrpimentAs2S3
28 photos of Getchellite associated with RealgarAs4S4
25 photos of Getchellite associated with StibniteSb2S3
8 photos of Getchellite associated with LaffittiteAgHgAsS3
8 photos of Getchellite associated with CalciteCaCO3
6 photos of Getchellite associated with ScoroditeFe3+AsO4 · 2H2O
6 photos of Getchellite associated with PharmacoliteCa(HAsO4) · 2H2O
6 photos of Getchellite associated with FluoriteCaF2
6 photos of Getchellite associated with Wakabayashilite[(As,Sb)6S9][As4S5]
3 photos of Getchellite associated with QuartzSiO2

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

2.FA.BonazziiteAs4S4Mon. 2/m : B2/b
2.FA.AnorpimentAs2S3Tric. 1 : P1
2.FA.ParadimorphiteAs4S3Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
2.FA.05DuranusiteAs4SOrth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pmna
2.FA.10DimorphiteAs4S3Orth. mmm(2/m2/m2/m) : Pnma
2.FA.15bPararealgarAs4S4Mon. 2/m : P21/b
2.FA.15aRealgarAs4S4Mon. 2/m
2.FA.15d'UM1970-18-S:As'As4S4Mon. 2/m : B2/b
2.FA.20AlacrániteAs8S9Mon. 2/m : P2/b
2.FA.25UzoniteAs4S5Mon. 2/m : P21/m
2.FA.30LaphamiteAs2Se3Mon. 2/m
2.FA.30OrpimentAs2S3Mon. 2/m
2.FA.40Wakabayashilite[(As,Sb)6S9][As4S5]Orth. mm2 : Pna21
2.FA.40KalgoorlieiteAs2Te3Mon. 2/m : B2/m

Other InformationHide

Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for GetchelliteHide

References for GetchelliteHide

Localities for GetchelliteHide

Showing 27 localities.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Canada
 
  • Ontario
    • Lanark County
      • Lavant Township
Sabina (2007)
China
 
  • Guizhou
    • Qianxinan
Shifeng Dai et al. (2006)
France
 
  • Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
    • Hautes-Alpes
      • Gap
        • La Chapelle-en-Valgaudemar
Bourgoin et al. (2011)
Iran
 
  • East Azerbaijan Province
    • Heris County
Haas (n.d.)
  • West Azerbaijan Province
    • Takab County
Daliran (2008)
Asadi +8 other references
Italy
 
  • Piedmont
    • Metropolitan City of Turin
      • Oulx
        • Signols
- (n.d.) +1 other reference
Japan
 
  • Hokkaidō Prefecture
    • Shiribeshi Subprefecture
      • Abuta District
        • Takarada
Kato (1970) +2 other references
Kyrgyzstan
 
  • Batken Region
    • Kadamjay District
      • Aydarken
Kolesar et al. (1993)
Kolesar et al. (1993)
  • Osh Region
Pakistan
 
  • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province
Ikram Mineralogy (Wholly owned & manage by Ikram Nature Exploration )
      • Lower Chitral District
Ikram Mineralogy (Wholly owned & manage by Ikram Nature Exploration )
Poland
 
  • Lower Silesian Voivodeship
    • Karkonosze County
      • Szklarska Poręba
Kozłowski et al. (2024)
Kozłowski et al. (2024)
Russia
 
  • Sakha
    • Ust-Yansky District
Anthony et al. (1990)
  • Sverdlovsk Oblast
    • Serovsky District
      • Turya river
        • Tur'insk
Kasatkin et al. (2021) +1 other reference
Spain
 
  • Castile and Leon
    • León
      • Riaño
        • Escaro
Gutiérrez Villarias (nordeste de Leon)
USA
 
  • Nevada
    • Eureka County
      • Lynn Mining District
Rota (1989)
- (2005)
    • Humboldt County
Castor et al. (2004)
      • Osgood Mountains
        • Potosi Mining District
          • Adam Peak
Weissberg (1965) +2 other references
- (2005)
- (2005)
Barrick Gold Corporation
- (2005)
    • Nye County
      • Toquima Range
Castor et al. (2004)
 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
Content on this site may not be used to train, fine-tune, or otherwise develop artificial intelligence or machine learning models without prior written permission - see our Terms & Conditions.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2026 07:44:09 Page updated: August 29, 2026 14:19:24
Go to top of page